2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Has anyone raced one of these? My neighbor friend saw my new car and challenged me to a race against his Impala. Just curious how anyone has done in the past with one of these. If it ever stops raining here in Chicago I will take him up on the challenge.
Frank
Frank
#2
Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by greyse6spd
Has anyone raced one of these? My neighbor friend saw my new car and challenged me to a race against his Impala. Just curious how anyone has done in the past with one of these. If it ever stops raining here in Chicago I will take him up on the challenge.
Frank
Has anyone raced one of these? My neighbor friend saw my new car and challenged me to a race against his Impala. Just curious how anyone has done in the past with one of these. If it ever stops raining here in Chicago I will take him up on the challenge.
Frank
#3
Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by Tanmann9
Well, specs on the 94 Impala SS are 260HP/330TQ at 4218 lbs. So he'd beat you off the line with all that torque, but you'd catch up to him and pass him after maybe 60-70mph. Impala SS is a 4-speed auto vs your 6-speed manual, so it might be closer at the start. Of course, he might have mods...
Well, specs on the 94 Impala SS are 260HP/330TQ at 4218 lbs. So he'd beat you off the line with all that torque, but you'd catch up to him and pass him after maybe 60-70mph. Impala SS is a 4-speed auto vs your 6-speed manual, so it might be closer at the start. Of course, he might have mods...
BTW...Where are you located in Chicago?
#4
Stock for stock it'll be very close, but Impalas are very easy to mod, and most of them are completely invisible from the outside. It's cheap and easy to make those cars run 13s... if it's stock it'll be a good race though.
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by MAX2000JP
A Impala SS is gonna get smoke by carlengths. They arent that fast, but can easily be modded. Even so they will have a hard time beating a 2k2 6 speed with bolt ons.
BTW...Where are you located in Chicago?
A Impala SS is gonna get smoke by carlengths. They arent that fast, but can easily be modded. Even so they will have a hard time beating a 2k2 6 speed with bolt ons.
BTW...Where are you located in Chicago?
I live in Skokie and work in Bensenville. I have had my car for two weeks and it is bone stock.
Frank
#6
Originally posted by Weasel
Stock for stock it'll be very close, but Impalas are very easy to mod, and most of them are completely invisible from the outside. It's cheap and easy to make those cars run 13s... if it's stock it'll be a good race though.
Stock for stock it'll be very close, but Impalas are very easy to mod, and most of them are completely invisible from the outside. It's cheap and easy to make those cars run 13s... if it's stock it'll be a good race though.
#7
Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by Tanmann9
Well, specs on the 94 Impala SS are 260HP/330TQ at 4218 lbs. So he'd beat you off the line with all that torque, but you'd catch up to him and pass him after maybe 60-70mph. Impala SS is a 4-speed auto vs your 6-speed manual, so it might be closer at the start. Of course, he might have mods...
Well, specs on the 94 Impala SS are 260HP/330TQ at 4218 lbs. So he'd beat you off the line with all that torque, but you'd catch up to him and pass him after maybe 60-70mph. Impala SS is a 4-speed auto vs your 6-speed manual, so it might be closer at the start. Of course, he might have mods...
What are you smoken weasel?
#8
Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
i'm still a '94-'96 Impala SS enthusiast and was really considering getting one...and still am after i get richer. hehe. stock it runs 15.4. and yea, it's super easy to modify so just a little tweakin' & mods can make it run side by side w/ the maxima.
#9
I raced one at the track once. Not sure about mods but he ran a 14.8 to my 15 somthing. I'd say if he were stock you'd beat him. And yes, they are easy to mod but still heavy.
I've always been a fan of the Impalla SS. In fact, I brought a new SS home, a '96 DGM, but my wife didn't think it was a good time to be buying. I still regret that decision.
I've always been a fan of the Impalla SS. In fact, I brought a new SS home, a '96 DGM, but my wife didn't think it was a good time to be buying. I still regret that decision.
#10
Smoke what
If you get a good launch you should win in a quarter mile. But take it from someone who has raced a modded Impala SS numerous times(my buddies) they are seriously fast. If your neighbors is modded he will probably beat you, and possibly by 3 to 4 car lengths. Good luck. "Learn the launch Luke, learn the launch."
#11
Re: Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by emax95
A impala will not even jump a 6spd max off the line, they weigh 1000 lb's more and have a slush box. Theres no comparison.
What are you smoken weasel?
A impala will not even jump a 6spd max off the line, they weigh 1000 lb's more and have a slush box. Theres no comparison.
What are you smoken weasel?
Are you guys serious?!!? A 2002 6-speed Max will SMOKE any non-Corvette/Camaro SS,Z28 Chevrolet
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
a few years back i had a 93 sho taurus with 5spd, dynomax and ypipe exhaust, udp and ram air . he would take me out of the hole and i would pass him middle of second gear. he had intake ,headers , and cat back exhaust. i ran 14.8-.9 , he ran 15.00 all night long. he never beat my time once. we ran about 5 runs all together.
#13
Re: Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by emax95
A impala will not even jump a 6spd max off the line, they weigh 1000 lb's more and have a slush box. Theres no comparison.
What are you smoken weasel?
A impala will not even jump a 6spd max off the line, they weigh 1000 lb's more and have a slush box. Theres no comparison.
What are you smoken weasel?
Are you guys serious?!!? A 2002 6-speed Max will SMOKE any non-Corvette/Camaro SS,Z28 Chevrolet
#14
Re: Re: Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by KP117
This has got to be the thread's smartest post.
Are you guys serious?!!? A 2002 6-speed Max will SMOKE any non-Corvette/Camaro SS,Z28 Chevrolet
This has got to be the thread's smartest post.
Are you guys serious?!!? A 2002 6-speed Max will SMOKE any non-Corvette/Camaro SS,Z28 Chevrolet
#15
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by Blackgums100
That's actually pretty funny. I guess you haven't run some the of the Rednecks down here in VA that have serious hotrods. That is the beauty of the Chevy 350, it is so easy to spend three grand and drop in a 400+ hp & torque crate engine. These aren't Maxima engines were you throw on an intake and a y-pipe and beat some 18 year old in his exhaust tipped Honda Civic and write about it.
That's actually pretty funny. I guess you haven't run some the of the Rednecks down here in VA that have serious hotrods. That is the beauty of the Chevy 350, it is so easy to spend three grand and drop in a 400+ hp & torque crate engine. These aren't Maxima engines were you throw on an intake and a y-pipe and beat some 18 year old in his exhaust tipped Honda Civic and write about it.
#16
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by Blackgums100
That's actually pretty funny. I guess you haven't run some the of the Rednecks down here in VA that have serious hotrods. That is the beauty of the Chevy 350, it is so easy to spend three grand and drop in a 400+ hp & torque crate engine. These aren't Maxima engines were you throw on an intake and a y-pipe and beat some 18 year old in his exhaust tipped Honda Civic and write about it.
That's actually pretty funny. I guess you haven't run some the of the Rednecks down here in VA that have serious hotrods. That is the beauty of the Chevy 350, it is so easy to spend three grand and drop in a 400+ hp & torque crate engine. These aren't Maxima engines were you throw on an intake and a y-pipe and beat some 18 year old in his exhaust tipped Honda Civic and write about it.
#17
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by emax95
A tweaked 454 big block is the only way to go! My friend droped one of them into his 1970 chevelle SS and man does that thing freaken fly! Were going to race soon, I wonder how many car lenghts he will take me by?
A tweaked 454 big block is the only way to go! My friend droped one of them into his 1970 chevelle SS and man does that thing freaken fly! Were going to race soon, I wonder how many car lenghts he will take me by?
#18
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by MAX2000JP
What kinda mods does he have?? Those were heavy engines and traction is always a problem with the tq those things make. You might be able to take him.
What kinda mods does he have?? Those were heavy engines and traction is always a problem with the tq those things make. You might be able to take him.
#19
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by emax95
The engine is completly built up with high end parts and it's board out. It has 3.0 flowmasters, MSD ignition, dual 3 inch flowmaster exhaust. I know the engine alone had over $6K worth of work done to it. He has it running 10:1:3(I think thas what he said) compression. I have been in his car a few times and traction is a big issue but man when that thing starts to go it really goes!! It's so much quicker then my car it's not even funny. I might get a little jump on him off the line but he will just blow by me once he gets going. He plans on getting a wheely bar becuase his front tires lift off the ground a bit He's also planning on having his rear end moddified to fit huge slicks. Ohh yes and he wants to get a blower too with a touch of NOS, LOL!
The engine is completly built up with high end parts and it's board out. It has 3.0 flowmasters, MSD ignition, dual 3 inch flowmaster exhaust. I know the engine alone had over $6K worth of work done to it. He has it running 10:1:3(I think thas what he said) compression. I have been in his car a few times and traction is a big issue but man when that thing starts to go it really goes!! It's so much quicker then my car it's not even funny. I might get a little jump on him off the line but he will just blow by me once he gets going. He plans on getting a wheely bar becuase his front tires lift off the ground a bit He's also planning on having his rear end moddified to fit huge slicks. Ohh yes and he wants to get a blower too with a touch of NOS, LOL!
My friend is big into muscle cars. He has a 95 Mustang GT with a 392 and 6 speed manual. He raced my brother in his 99 Auto with I/E/Y-Pipe in 6th gear on the highway and pulled a car or two on him. He also has a Factory Five Racing Cobra, with a carbon fiber body. It has a heavily modded 5.0 engine in it pumping out something like 500 hp. The thing is amazing, I believe it ran mid 11s.
#20
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 2002 6spd SE vs. 1994 Impala SS
Originally posted by MAX2000JP
Has he taken his car to the track? I would assume he is into the 12's??
My friend is big into muscle cars. He has a 95 Mustang GT with a 392 and 6 speed manual. He raced my brother in his 99 Auto with I/E/Y-Pipe in 6th gear on the highway and pulled a car or two on him. He also has a Factory Five Racing Cobra, with a carbon fiber body. It has a heavily modded 5.0 engine in it pumping out something like 500 hp. The thing is amazing, I believe it ran mid 11s.
Has he taken his car to the track? I would assume he is into the 12's??
My friend is big into muscle cars. He has a 95 Mustang GT with a 392 and 6 speed manual. He raced my brother in his 99 Auto with I/E/Y-Pipe in 6th gear on the highway and pulled a car or two on him. He also has a Factory Five Racing Cobra, with a carbon fiber body. It has a heavily modded 5.0 engine in it pumping out something like 500 hp. The thing is amazing, I believe it ran mid 11s.
He has not gone to track with it yet because he just put teh engine in and the tracks just opened up. He wants to do a little more work to it before he trailers it up to the strip(about 100 miles away).
Funny you mentioned a friend of your has a 95 Mustand GT. A friend of mine has a 95 GT also, he just blew his modiffied 5.0 from racing me to much . I can't recall exactly what he said but IIRC he is currently installing a 342 stroker motor, he said something about it being out of the Cobra or something, I could have my #'s messed up though. He say's it should put down about 370 RWHP. These damn modded musle cars make me feel like a wimp! I would need a 100-200 shot just to hang on a roll :laugh
#21
Maxima vs. Impala SS
A 2K2 Max will severely rip an Impala SS on a roll because an LT-1 is going to peter out at higher RPMs. The Max will make its HP in the mid to upper reaches where the SS will make its horsepower on the low to mid end.
#22
Re: Maxima vs. Impala SS
Originally posted by PrinzII
A 2K2 Max will severely rip an Impala SS on a roll because an LT-1 is going to peter out at higher RPMs. The Max will make its HP in the mid to upper reaches where the SS will make its horsepower on the low to mid end.
A 2K2 Max will severely rip an Impala SS on a roll because an LT-1 is going to peter out at higher RPMs. The Max will make its HP in the mid to upper reaches where the SS will make its horsepower on the low to mid end.
#23
Re: Re: Maxima vs. Impala SS
lets hear it for the LT1!! there's a Impala SS out there, i think in the kentucky area or something, that broke late 11!! it prolly had every single mod there is. including nos, too. a maxima's vq will have a pretty hard time reaching those times.
but, i'm still a maxima fan no matter what.
but, i'm still a maxima fan no matter what.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
06-06-2017 03:01 PM
Unclejunebug
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
04-02-2016 06:42 AM
MaxLvr21
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
10-17-2015 01:11 PM