Why hasnt Nissan revised HP numbers?

Subscribe
Apr 13, 2006 | 07:49 AM
  #1  
Both Honda and Toyota have brought down the power ratings
of their engines, why hasnt Nissan?! They still claim
265 hp for the Maxima. Is it because they're not required
to, or because their numbers were realistic to begin with
(yeah right)?
Reply
Apr 13, 2006 | 08:22 AM
  #2  
call the 800 # they provide under the hp rating to find out?
Reply
Apr 13, 2006 | 08:31 AM
  #3  
for 2007 they have revised them.
Reply
Apr 13, 2006 | 08:34 AM
  #4  
Do you have the HP and torque for the 07 Maxima? Thanks.
Reply
Apr 13, 2006 | 08:49 AM
  #5  
Quote: for 2007 they have revised them.
looks like they havent, they using the SAE, standard from 04, dont know if thats the new one, but thats what they are using
Reply
Apr 13, 2006 | 11:10 AM
  #6  
Quote: Do you have the HP and torque for the 07 Maxima? Thanks.
OMFG!!! Look around.

Do you need someone to feed you too?
Reply
Apr 13, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #7  
Why would they need to revise numbers if they were already following the standard?
Reply
Apr 13, 2006 | 11:50 AM
  #8  
its probably 255 or 265hp for 07 maxima
Reply
Apr 13, 2006 | 11:57 AM
  #9  
Hmmmm. Could it be that Nissan wants more sales and the non-adjusted figures look better? Why give up their unfair advantage? Its all about profit.
Reply
Apr 13, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #10  
Yes for some they need to be hand fed!!!!
Quote: OMFG!!! Look around.

Do you need someone to feed you too?

They are following SAE J1349 standard (net hp), which was revised in 2004 to take out some ambiguities and areas for misrepresentation of actual hp numbers. IMHO a better one might have been SAE J2723 at least that way they could have received certified torque results also, but I’m no expert.
Quote: Why would they need to revise numbers if they were already following the standard?
And here is the hand feeding part enjoy:
http://www.nissannews.com/nissan/200...ma/specs.shtml
or read all the ’07 stuff:
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=466806
Quote: its probably 255 or 265hp for 07 maxima

Now maybe Nissan chose to use this standard since they are only offering CVT and have big changes in mind for '08 (I know I’m looking ahead). I'm not one bit surprised by the hp number of 255, but take 252 ft-lb with a grain-o-salt since it does not carry SAE standard approval.
Reply
Apr 23, 2006 | 07:27 PM
  #11  
So what is the TRUE HP on an '05 Max??
Reply
Apr 23, 2006 | 07:35 PM
  #12  
Quote: And here is the hand feeding part enjoy:
http://www.nissannews.com/nissan/200...ma/specs.shtml
or read all the ’07 stuff:
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=466806
Oh well. Too bad they got away with bloating the figures on the 2002-2003 Maximas.
Reply
Apr 23, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #13  
Quote: So what is the TRUE HP on an '05 Max??
It's probably 255 under the new standard. I doubt there are any real engine changes.
Reply
Apr 24, 2006 | 05:47 AM
  #14  
The engine is a "carryover" according to 2007 press releases I have read.
Reply
Apr 24, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #15  
Quote: Yes for some they need to be hand fed!!!!

And here is the hand feeding part enjoy:
http://www.nissannews.com/nissan/200...ma/specs.shtml
or read all the ’07 stuff:
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=466806....
Yum, love the hand feed. Thanks for the info.

Mustang5L5 - True HP at the wheels for a stock 6th gen seems to be around 200hp.
Reply
Apr 25, 2006 | 05:15 AM
  #16  
The engine may not be exactly same. If the fact sheet is correct, our engine gets its peak hp at 5,800 rpm. According to http://www.nissannews.com/nissan/200...ma/specs.shtml, the 2007 gets its peak hp at 6,000 rpm. Something's different.
Reply
Apr 25, 2006 | 06:49 PM
  #17  
Quote: The engine is a "carryover" according to 2007 press releases I have read.
Isn't the VQ engine the same in alot of Nissan/Infiniti cars?

Z, V-6 Alti, G35 (both), FX35, Murano, Pathfinder, M35...That's all I know of.

Change the cams, air flow, injectors and ECU tunning and you get all different kinds of numbers. My theory is if the Z can have 300HP, then so can my Max...That's what I'm moddin for
Reply
Subscribe