6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008) Discussion of the 6th generation Maxima. Come see what others are saying.

07 VS previous years?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 08:48 AM
  #1  
imported_White_lightning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 25
07 VS previous years?

so im looking to pick up an 07 and am trying to find general performance facts. how do they compare to previous years? 0-60? 0-100? on the freeway etc?
thanks in advance.
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 09:23 AM
  #2  
koyoki's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 108
Originally Posted by White_lightning
so im looking to pick up an 07 and am trying to find general performance facts. how do they compare to previous years? 0-60? 0-100? on the freeway etc?
thanks in advance.


The best would be to do a research on the internet before you get flame.
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 09:24 AM
  #3  
jcalabria's Avatar
NINE-time Maxima Owner
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 680
From: Charlotte
Very unscientific, but my personal comparitive benchmark results (speed attained - standing start to fixed marker along road)...
  • '07 Max 3.5 CVT - 65mph
  • '03 Max 3.5 Auto - 64mph
  • '00 Max 3.0 Auto - 59mph
  • '96 Max 3.0 Auto - 58mph
  • '95 Max 3.0 Auto - 60mph
  • '01 S60 T5 Auto - 62mph
The CVT feels slower than the '03 (same engine), but in reality appears to be at least equal. Offhand, I do not know the weight differential between the 5Gs & 6Gs. All are/were bone-stock. Never ran my little benchmark on a 6G Auto or 6-speed.
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 09:27 AM
  #4  
jcalabria's Avatar
NINE-time Maxima Owner
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 680
From: Charlotte
Originally Posted by koyoki
The best would be to do a research on the internet before you get flame.
Not sure that there are any published tests from reliable sources on the '07. Been lookin' and haven't found any.
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 10:05 AM
  #5  
2LEET4U's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,640
From: Phoenix, AZ
also, i think the 2006 and up lose horsepower... maybe im wrong but that is what i show when a google the new maximas. i see 250 and 255 horse...

and also, i hate the new grills, too small for any bling bling...
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 10:31 AM
  #6  
imported_White_lightning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 25
Originally Posted by koyoki
The best would be to do a research on the internet before you get flame.
they can flame away.. i havent found any decent 07 performance reviews
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 10:46 AM
  #7  
qbturbo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 342
Hey Jcalabria, how did you have any problems with your 03 Se Titanium Edition?
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #8  
streetzlegend's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,097
Dosnt the 07 have the new generation VQ35 as well, like the G35's. wit 290something hp.
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 11:09 AM
  #9  
imported_White_lightning's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 25
itsa rated at 255, because of a change in the SAE standard ( down from 265).
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 12:21 PM
  #10  
jcalabria's Avatar
NINE-time Maxima Owner
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 680
From: Charlotte
Originally Posted by qbturbo
Hey Jcalabria, how did you have any problems with your 03 Se Titanium Edition?
Only with the Bose HU... that's it.

They've been a pretty reliable bunch:
  • '07 SE Dark Slate CVT (Nothing Yet... currently 2100 miles)
  • '96 SE Pearl White Auto (Bose HU @ 102k, Ignition switch at 148k miles - currently 150k miles)
  • '03 SE Polished Titanium Auto (Bose HU twice - lease ended @ 55k miles)
  • '00 SE Gray Lustre Auto (Zero problems - leased ended @ 42k miles)
  • '95 SE Super Black Auto (Starter @ 90k miles, Bose HU @ 110k - sold @ 158k miles)
  • '87 SE Super Black 5sp (Zero problems - sold @ 60k miles)
Similar experience with Toyota.
Mitsubishi & Chrysler = not quite as good.
Ford & GM = miserable, disgusting, horrible (anything else bad you can think of)
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 12:24 PM
  #11  
MaximaRacer_95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 358
From: Houston TX
i think the 2006 and up lose horsepower
I got 2006, still has same 265 HP.
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #12  
jcalabria's Avatar
NINE-time Maxima Owner
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 680
From: Charlotte
Originally Posted by 2LEET4U
also, i think the 2006 and up lose horsepower... maybe im wrong but that is what i show when a google the new maximas. i see 250 and 255 horse...
Sorry to take this out on you, but this is getting very old...

The '07 lost 10 horses ON PAPER ONLY. The engine is identical and has the exact same output as previous years. The measurement standard has changed... if measured to the new standard the prior engines would also be rated 10 lower.

Also, the "new" VQ is not in the '07 Max.
Old Aug 2, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #13  
lightonthehill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,143
From: a meadow south of Atlanta
I shouldn't be crying about this, but there STILL seems to be rampant confusion with a few folks about the horsepower of the '07 Maxima.

As many here (and on countless other threads on the ORG) have tried very hard to explain, THE '07 MAXIMA HAS AS MUCH HORSEPOWER AS ANY PRODUCTION MAXIMA EVER BUILT. There was NO DROP WHATSOEVER in power from the '06 to the '07 Maxima.

Why the confusion? Because, beginning with '07 models, the government agency responsible for such things CHANGED THE WAY THEY CALCULATE HORSEPOWER.

If the '07 was rated under the '06 rules, it would have 265 HP. If the '04 thru '06 were rated under the '07 rules, they would have 255 HP. Let those of us still in doubt (or, in some cases, totally uninformed) PLEASE grasp the FACT the '07 has the same engine with the SAME power as the '04 thru '06. No bump. No drop. EXACTLY the SAME.

Time to stop crying and step down from my soggy soapbox. I shouldn't be wailing about this misunderstanding which has now continued for almost five months. Crying only reflects badly on me.

--------------

Now, back to the thread-starting question.

I have seen no OFFICIAL testing of the '07 Maxima's accelleration, but unofficial test drives as reported on the ORG and elsewhere seem to indicate approximately the same performance between the '07 and earlier 6th gen Maximas. Because of the change to a CVT tranny, as well as the 100 pound increase in weight with the '07, I would not rely totally on official performance stats for the '04 thru '06 Maximas as being the same as for the '07, but they should be very close.

Now where is a Kleenex when I need one?
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 06:00 AM
  #14  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
There are other forums on maxima.org ya know..

http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=467145

Since this has been confusing to a lot of people, and Nissan/Infiniti still has a mix of rating systems in use, here is some real quick basic information.

SAE J1349 JUN 1995 = OLD
SAE J1349 AUG 2004 = NEW
SAE J2723 = certified = "voluntary" and based on top of J1349


http://www.sae.org/certifiedpower/details.htm

About SAE J1349 Certified Power

Power and torque certification provide a means for a manufacturer to assure a customer that the engine they purchase delivers the advertised performance. This SAE Standard has been written to provide manufacturers with a method of certifying the power of engines to SAE J1349 or SAE J1995. Document SAE J2723 specifies the procedure to be used for a manufacturer to certify the net power and torque rating of a production engine according to SAE J1349 or the gross engine power of a production engine according to SAE J1995. Manufacturers who advertise their engine power and torque ratings as Certified to SAE J1349 or SAE J1995 shall follow this procedure. Certification of engine power and torque to SAE J1349 or SAE J1995 is voluntary, however, this power certification process is mandatory for those advertising power ratings as "Certified to SAE J1349".

SAE Engine Rating Standard Prevents Numbers Fudging (an article on how GM will use SAE J1349 Certified Power, AEI May 2005, Vol 113 No.5, p 59 )

General Motors has become the first manufacturer to certify an engine's power and torque ratings using a newly adopted SAE standard (J2723), James Queen, GM Vice President, Global Engineering, announced during his keynote address at the SAE World Congress and Exhibition in April 2005. The world's largest automaker plans to certify all of its engines to the voluntary standard, and is encouraging its competitors to do the same. The LS7 engine for the 2006 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 was certified under the new standard this month. The 7.0-L V8 unit produces 505 hp (377 kW) at 6300 rpm and 470 lboft (637 Nom) at 4800 rpm. "The new voluntary SAE power and torque certification procedure ensures fair, accurate ratings for horsepower and torque as it uses third-party certification," said Queen. "SAE technical standards level the playing field, and this certification procedure is just the latest example of the value SAE has offered over the past century." To tout power and torque ratings as "SAE-certified," engine manufacturers must have an SAE qualified witness watch over the entire testing procedure to ensure that it is conducted in conformity to SAE standard J1349. Third-party witnessing is the main provision of J2723. An existing SAE standard, J1349, spells out how the actual testing is to be done. J1349 was updated last year to eliminate some ambiguities that allowed engine makers to cite power and torque ratings higher than the engine's actual capabilities. Engine makers are free to cite power and torque figures drived from testing conducted outside the scope of the SAE standards, but they may not claim the figures are SAE-certifed. "We feel that both the consumer and industry are well served by having accurate, consistent ratings from all manufacturers," said David Lancaster, a Technical Fellow in GM Powertrain and Chairman of the SAE Engine Power Test Code Committee that updated J1349 and wrote J2723. Data from a wide array of parameters (e.g., air:fuel ratio) will be collected during testing conducted to the SAE standards. SAE will create a database and offer it to industry in different packages and at different price points.

By Patrick Ponticel


So far ONLY GM is making it a point to officially "CERTIFY" their engine's power ratings across the board. DCX has done so but only on the 8.3L Viper engine. You can see the documentation below. And the whole "certification" process is entirely optional to begin with. Using the "NEW" standard (J1349 AUG 2004) is mandatory, however on all new or updated powertrains. Nissan and other manufacturers have gotten away with using older ratings since if you do not change the engines you are not required to restate the numbers. You MUST use the new standard on any new or updated powertrains though.

http://www.sae.org/servlets/epcdAppl...PAGE=epcdIntro



PLEASE DO NOT SAY that SAE J1349 AUG 2004 is "OLD". That is wrong period. It is in fact the NEW standard. J2723 simply tells a manufacturer how they go about officially "certifying" an engine.
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 06:15 AM
  #15  
chernmax's Avatar
Nations 1st 6th Gen Turbo
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10,197
From: Displaced New Yorker in Southern, MD
Originally Posted by jcalabria
Sorry to take this out on you, but this is getting very old...

The '07 lost 10 horses ON PAPER ONLY. The engine is identical and has the exact same output as previous years. The measurement standard has changed... if measured to the new standard the prior engines would also be rated 10 lower.

Also, the "new" VQ is not in the '07 Max.
Sorry, I disagree, the car manufactures compiled a list several months back showing what the HP output was for all 06 cars under the new standards, most where lowered but surprisingly the Nissan Maxima remained at 265hp. IMO, the 07 may have been electronically detuned via the ECU because of the CVT.
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 06:51 AM
  #16  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
FWIW...

06 older = June 1995 SAE J1349
07+ = August 2004 SAE J1349
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 10:05 AM
  #17  
Nissan 6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,590
From: Bartlett, IL
Look into the thread in the weekend battles forum titled........



I raced my brothers 06 with my 07.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
9aj9
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
5
Apr 5, 2020 12:11 AM
97_GXE
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
5
Sep 15, 2015 06:47 AM
hntwhttail
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
0
Sep 12, 2015 03:43 PM
ag90fox
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
6
Sep 9, 2015 12:22 PM
FanaticMadMax
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
1
Sep 4, 2015 02:45 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:36 PM.