Look-At-My-Max Dyno chart... NUMBERS ARE IN
06-09-2007, 10:05 AM
#1
Look-At-My-Max Dyno chart... NUMBERS ARE IN
i wanted more!!! but my first run i got 179 whp because i was running too rich. And yes I did take a picture of it... scanners not working.
Performance Mods are
Injen CAI
Custom Headers
Greddy sp2 exhaust
Unorthodox Pulley
Aarons Intake manifold Phenolic Spacers
1/2 SSIM (just took butterfly out)
SAFC 2 Tuned by T&R Racing
Performance Mods are
Injen CAI
Custom Headers
Greddy sp2 exhaust
Unorthodox Pulley
Aarons Intake manifold Phenolic Spacers
1/2 SSIM (just took butterfly out)
SAFC 2 Tuned by T&R Racing
06-09-2007, 11:57 AM
#5
Originally Posted by Glude
So how u like the cheapo headers? Was it hard to get a shop to weld in the EGR?
and its 261.22 whp. 179 was my first run because it was running too rich.
06-09-2007, 03:46 PM
#10
Originally Posted by Glude
Removal of the butterfly valve only.
yeah thanks glude for clearing that up. I dont have time to completely port the inside of my intake manifold. Thats my next mod. Ill probably get it done this friday.
Originally Posted by nismology
Got any run files?
06-09-2007, 03:55 PM
#11
Originally Posted by Look-at-my-MAX
lol nah i had everything done 1 shot. took over 8hrs... but got it back in a day.
and its 261.22 whp. 179 was my first run because it was running too rich.
and its 261.22 whp. 179 was my first run because it was running too rich.
06-09-2007, 04:56 PM
#12
Originally Posted by pmohr
How rich were you running? Must be like 10:1 to drop down to the power level of a modded A32..heh.
but im not sure im trying to get the run files but my tuner is are the track.... im hoping to see 290 in a month. Will complete the SSIM, polish and all. Im going to be in cali next month so ill drop my ecu off of technosquare and get it reflashed.
06-09-2007, 09:00 PM
#13
Originally Posted by Look-at-my-MAX
im hoping to see 290 in a month. Will complete the SSIM, polish and all. Im going to be in cali next month so ill drop my ecu off of technosquare and get it reflashed.
hsnap you did...
06-12-2007, 05:50 AM
#22
Originally Posted by Fastmax05
hve u ran at a qtr mile track ???? if not please do
06-12-2007, 07:57 AM
#23
Originally Posted by Look-at-my-MAX
well im porting/polishing my intake manifold friday. changing to copper ngk plugs (thx tavarish) and im looking into NX stage 1 kit.
06-14-2007, 06:35 AM
#24
Originally Posted by Look-at-my-MAX
well im porting/polishing my intake manifold friday. changing to copper ngk plugs (thx tavarish) and im looking into NX stage 1 kit.
Also, I would recommend that you match the runners on the UIM to the spacers. That way, everything will be spacer matched perfectly and you will have a perfect transition from the UIM to LIM!! Right now, you have the smaller runners on the UIM, then they suddenly open to a larger runner, which causes turbulence.
The spacers help out alot with the airflow since you removed the oversized OEM intake gasket along with it being properly port matched to the LIM runners.
Also, one more thing to consider is matching the two runners on the elbow itself to the spacer. This should yield the best results without going too extreme and needing a flowbench to determine how much to port.
So, no actual porting of the spacers should be needed on the VQ35DE unless you drastically enlarge the ports or have a custom IM design.
06-15-2007, 11:48 AM
#27
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by Look-at-my-MAX
hope none of those guys see that comment but im not sure im trying to get the run files but my tuner is are the track....
im hoping to see 290 in a month. Will complete the SSIM, polish and all. Im going to be in cali next month so ill drop my ecu off of technosquare and get it reflashed.
but im not sure im trying to get the run files but my tuner is are the track.... im hoping to see 290 in a month. Will complete the SSIM, polish and all. Im going to be in cali next month so ill drop my ecu off of technosquare and get it reflashed.
Since you're already running S-AFCII and are already piggybacking the a/f ratios, having the full blown TS ECU reflash for a/f would be redundant yes?
http://www.technosquareinc.com/limited.htm
06-15-2007, 12:02 PM
#28
Originally Posted by cjbaldw
L-spec TS ECU reflash I'm assuming?
Since you're already running S-AFCII and are already piggybacking the a/f ratios, having the full blown TS ECU reflash for a/f would be redundant yes?
http://www.technosquareinc.com/limited.htm
Since you're already running S-AFCII and are already piggybacking the a/f ratios, having the full blown TS ECU reflash for a/f would be redundant yes?
http://www.technosquareinc.com/limited.htm
o crap!!! i didnt even notice that... thanks man!! i wasnt going to do the flash because its going to be 500 and my car is already tuned but i wouldnt mind having the limiter removed...
06-16-2007, 07:00 AM
#29
aka The Doom Ship
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,788
This is exactly what I want! Good find, I didn't notice that option.
Originally Posted by cjbaldw
L-spec TS ECU reflash I'm assuming?
Since you're already running S-AFCII and are already piggybacking the a/f ratios, having the full blown TS ECU reflash for a/f would be redundant yes?
http://www.technosquareinc.com/limited.htm
Since you're already running S-AFCII and are already piggybacking the a/f ratios, having the full blown TS ECU reflash for a/f would be redundant yes?
http://www.technosquareinc.com/limited.htm
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jmlee44
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
8
10-02-2022 02:13 PM