7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015) Come in and talk about the 7th generation Maxima

Premium Gas and Ester Oil

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2012 | 04:40 PM
  #1  
The Observer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 28
Smile Premium Gas and Ester Oil

After reading the owners manual for my new 2012 as compared to my 09 I see they changed the Premium Gas and Ester Oil from Required to Recomended. They also removed the line that says only use regular in emergency.
Must be a PR thing since it's the same Engine and Computer.
I will still use Premium and the Ester oil.
Don't want to start the age old debate over which to use
I purchased the Maintenance agreement for 5 years which covers the Ester oil

Last edited by The Observer; May 1, 2012 at 05:37 PM.
Old May 1, 2012 | 06:58 PM
  #2  
Papies01's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 228
I put plus in my car and 5w30 and i have worked at nissan dealer that ester stuff is all a money making scheme
Old May 1, 2012 | 08:09 PM
  #3  
Ghozt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,020
From: Maryland
91 octane and better will give you the best performance and mileage. ester oil is IN many full synthetic oils so yea I agree Nissan is just charging you more for what's basically re-branded full synthetic
Old May 1, 2012 | 08:49 PM
  #4  
Car Addict's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,082
From: Los Angeles
explains what ester oil is...
http://www.motoiq.com/magazine_artic...-diamonds.aspx
Old May 1, 2012 | 09:21 PM
  #5  
ttt3's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 33
You are correct in that the language for 87-octane usage is different between 2009 and 2012 owner's manuals. However, I see no difference in language between 2009 and 2012 owner's manuals with regards to oil. Both say "NISSAN recommends Genuine NISSAN Ester Engine Oil available at a NISSAN dealer." but also indicate that all API certified 5W-30 oils are acceptable.

2009 (see page 386 for fuel, see pages 385 and 388 for oil):
http://www.nissanextendedwarranty.co...san-Maxima.pdf

2012 (see page 420 for fuel, see pages 419 and 422 for oil)
http://www.nissanextendedwarranty.co...san-Maxima.pdf

Last edited by ttt3; May 1, 2012 at 09:24 PM.
Old May 3, 2012 | 07:52 AM
  #6  
gizzsdad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 836
From: Central Iowa
As to fuel choice - I usually use premium, but will occasionally use E10 to fill less than half a tank, as it usually 20-30 cents cheaper than premium around here.

The ester oil was developed to address a problem specific to the VQ37HR engines, and Nissan decided to see if they could recommend it in other Nissan engines (I assume to try to recoup costs and make some cash). It is NOT an ester oil. It has a small amount of an ester based additive in it. I have not seen a single GOOD UOA from it, only some OK ones and some bad ones. It is an incredibly overpriced oil that shears badly.

There are many more cost effective and better options available.
Old Aug 5, 2012 | 07:38 PM
  #7  
palmerwmd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 217
I wish I could even <get> non E10 fuel here.
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 08:21 AM
  #8  
jspagna's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 393
From: Connecticut
The 5W-30 is fine for these cars. That's what I was using in the 3.7 in my 2010 Acura TL every 5,000 miles with 23,000 miles with no issues.
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 01:05 PM
  #9  
AlDente67's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 253
From: Jersey
Just had a chat in a parking lot with an owner of a 2010 S model. he says he uses regular 87/89 (I can't recall what it is around here), and an occasional fill up of the mid-grade 91 octane. Since the manual highly recommends premium, I'm not inclined to save on the 30 cents a gallon difference, although I would like to of course.
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 01:10 PM
  #10  
Car Addict's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,082
From: Los Angeles
You might lose a few horsepower but I highly doubt using 89 would cause any long term damage.
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 05:42 PM
  #11  
STARR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,465
From: NY
Originally Posted by jspagna
The 5W-30 is fine for these cars. That's what I was using in the 3.7 in my 2010 Acura TL every 5,000 miles with 23,000 miles with no issues.
Oil problems don't happen because of using varying weights, or change intervals, problems with engines and oil are directly related to owners not changing the oil and add to that hard driving
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 11:14 PM
  #12  
Serpent's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 660
From: SLC, UT
Ready to change oil in my car, not gonna do Ester, going to move to full synthetic from the dino oil that the last owner used. I've been searching the last 20 minutes for what oil to put in, and those threads are just a bunch of long arguments. lol. Impossible to find what you're looking for in there. Somebody please just answer this dreadfully simple question for me:

For my daily driver, fully synthetic 5w30?
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 01:46 AM
  #13  
lightonthehill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,143
From: a meadow south of Atlanta
Originally Posted by AlDente67
Just had a chat in a parking lot with an owner of a 2010 S model. he says he uses regular 87/89 (I can't recall what it is around here), and an occasional fill up of the mid-grade 91 octane. Since the manual highly recommends premium, I'm not inclined to save on the 30 cents a gallon difference, although I would like to of course.
87 octane will never give the best performance for the 7th gen Maxima. A few here on the ORG use regular and say it works with their car, but others here tried regular and found their car would barely run.

I personally would NOT use regular in this car, even if the car seemed to run OK with it. And if there was an emergency, and regular was the only fuel available, I would drive very carefully (NO brisk accelaration, etc) until I could find a higher octane fuel.

BUT -

89 octane is a TOTALLY DIFFERENT situation. I have switched from premium to midgrade (89 octane) after the first 18 months on each Maxima I have owned (every generation but the first). I have never detected any change in performance or MPG when changing.

Those who say they are getting better MPG with 91 or 93 octane instead of 89 are not measuring correctly. MPG should be the same for 89, 91 and 93 octanes. That is because, as long as the engine handles the octane with no problems, octane is not directly related to MPG. The reason 87 might give a slightly lower MPG is because the fuel system on this Maxima will not handle 87 octane with maximum efficiency.

I can easily afford the 30 cents per gallon difference between midgrade and premium in my area ($3.39, $3.69 and $3.99), but automotive writers and engineers I have trusted for years always say that using a higher octane than your car needs is a waste, as neither performance nor fuel efficiency are affected unless we are running WOT time trials, and even there, the elapsed time difference is miniscule and the MPG does not change.
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 05:34 AM
  #14  
PSU09MAXIMA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 963
From: West Chester, PA
I have always run 91, 92, or 93
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 05:46 AM
  #15  
eesjunin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 636
From: MA/NH border
i always alternate...usually 89 89 91/93, 89 89 91/93
As far as oil, have always used Mobil 1 Fully synthetic for 10K oil changes...
you could eat of my Benzo engine at 250K no drips, leaks etc with that routine
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 10:11 AM
  #16  
MaximaGuido09c's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 803
From: Long Island & NyC, NY
I run 93 because I am a big shot...and for Oil..I put in the regular stuff..because in reality that's all the car really needs. The owner manual does say that those oil brands are acceptable. And the mechanics I go to said that there is really no difference unless you have a Sports car or a Muscle car.
Old Aug 9, 2012 | 08:46 AM
  #17  
mls277's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 951
I do 91 octane I did 93 for a year, but I feel its a waste. If I had a brand new corvette or an M3 I'd go 93, for a nice maxima, ill go 91 thats far enough!
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 02:28 AM
  #18  
STARR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,465
From: NY
Originally Posted by mls277
I do 91 octane I did 93 for a year, but I feel its a waste. If I had a brand new corvette or an M3 I'd go 93, for a nice maxima, ill go 91 thats far enough!
Where do you live, Im currently in GA for school but back home in NY/NJ most gas stations carry 87/89/93, and the same grades are here in GA, with normal pricing, randomly I will pull into a gas station that was 91 and 93, which I don't like cause I will just fill up with 93 and realize that 93 is priced way higher cause they slid a 91 octane into the mix I have never really cared enough to check into the difference between 91/93, I just know that some owners complain about Maxima engine pinging running 91
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 06:11 AM
  #19  
BigFletch's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 25
From: Houston, TX
It seems that 89-91 is fine the Maxima. But like any car, 93 will just help keep the engine clean and last longer. If it is a lease, 87 is too high. If anyone plans on driving to 200K then 93 may be a good choice.
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 10:44 AM
  #20  
Car Addict's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,082
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by BigFletch
But like any car, 93 will just help keep the engine clean and last longer. If it is a lease, 87 is too high. If anyone plans on driving to 200K then 93 may be a good choice.
Who the heck told you this?
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 12:40 PM
  #21  
hamzer11's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 353
From: Queens, NY
Originally Posted by The Observer
Don't want to start the age old debate over which to use
Looks like you did just that.
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 01:56 PM
  #22  
STARR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,465
From: NY
Originally Posted by Car Addict
Who the heck told you this?
and this is he reason used cars are so beat
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 07:24 PM
  #23  
Mrbizness1's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 147
From: Mt. Sinai NY
I thought today's modern engine management systems adjust the timing etc: depending on the fuel used.
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 07:34 PM
  #24  
STARR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,465
From: NY
Originally Posted by Mrbizness1
I thought today's modern engine management systems adjust the timing etc: depending on the fuel used.
That is a safety mechanism to protect the engine incase someone accidentally fill it up with regular but people realized if the engine don't ping then it can be run on regular.

Most modern ECU can adjust
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 08:28 PM
  #25  
lightonthehill's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,143
From: a meadow south of Atlanta
Originally Posted by STARR

some owners complain about Maxima engine pinging running 91
Any 7th gen Maxima that pings under any driving situation with 91 octane BADLY needs a tuneup. The fuel system in this car EXPECTS to receive 91 octane. 91 octane is what Nissan intended us to use in this car.

I have moved to 89 octane after the first 18 months in every Maxima generation except the first, and sometimes I drive WOT when passing other traffic going up long grades, and have never heard even the first hint of a ping. And I am **** about any sounds coming from my engine compartment.

Scientists and those involved in automotive research have always told us that moving to an octane higher than the fuel system on a car needs does NOT improve MPG. There was a time I questioned that, but after 64 years of driving, and checking this out with every Maxima gen but the first, I have found the scientists to be correct.

I don't know the exact difference in detergents between the two grades, but, other than that possibility, I would have difficulty believing that 93 octane gives any measurable improvement over 91 octane in the 7th gen Maxima, except making the driver feel good about babying his car. And making the driver feel good is one thing the Maxima has always been about.
Old Aug 10, 2012 | 09:14 PM
  #26  
dr_2010SV's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,326
From: WA
If anybody's Max is pinging using 91 octane I would suggest...
1) Do not fill-up at that station ever again.
(Most tanker drivers are not going to fill a premium tank with regular gas...but stranger things have occurred).

2) Re-visit and verify that the pumps actually have valid certification/inspection labels.

3) If you suspect fraud report it to your (local) weights and measurement department.
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 02:37 PM
  #27  
silberma's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 327
Originally Posted by BigFletch
It seems that 89-91 is fine the Maxima. But like any car, 93 will just help keep the engine clean and last longer. If it is a lease, 87 is too high. If anyone plans on driving to 200K then 93 may be a good choice.
You need to check your fact. All gasolines have detergents to keep the engine clean, higher octane will not keep the engine cleaner. Furthermore, if you use lower octane rating than your engine requires the knock sensors in the engine will retard the ignition time so that the engine is not damaged. This will cause a slight loss of engine perfromance and gas mileage
Old Aug 11, 2012 | 02:53 PM
  #28  
Car Addict's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,082
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by silberma
You need to check your fact. All gasolines have detergents to keep the engine clean, higher octane will not keep the engine cleaner. Furthermore, if you use lower octane rating than your engine requires the knock sensors in the engine will retard the ignition time so that the engine is not damaged. This will cause a slight loss of engine perfromance and gas mileage
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 05:47 AM
  #29  
2young2retire's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 546
From: Hot Springs Village, AR
Interesting read on the premium vs. regular discussion on the Murano forum.

http://www.nissanmurano.org/forums/8...12-murano.html
Old Aug 17, 2012 | 09:17 PM
  #30  
IFuXwiTuZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 502
From: Yonkers, NY
Royal purple 5w30 & 93 gas and your good to go ....i have 135,000 miles =) the car runs great.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
Fbana41
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
3
Aug 29, 2016 12:18 PM
JoshG
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
51
Sep 21, 2015 10:41 PM
jerrod99_se-l
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
4
Sep 16, 2015 02:39 AM
ag90fox
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
6
Sep 9, 2015 12:22 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:50 PM.