All Motor All Motor Advanced Performance. Talk about Engine Swaps, Internal Engine work. Not your basic Y pipe and Intake Information.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2k max w/ full bolt ons Q

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 01:31 PM
  #1  
OOmaxSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,908
From: Amherst, MA
2k max w/ full bolt ons Q

Knowing that there is no ECU upgrade for the 2k-2k1 max, I would like to know which program would best suit a fully bolt-on 2k max?

SAFC, VAFC, Emanage, etc.

I know this isn't comparing apples and apples. I would probably end up altering the A/F ratio, but who knows yet. Also, I understand that Emanage will "hopefully" be able to extend our rev limiters, do you guys see this happening, because this would be important in my decision. If not, would I just be better off going with the VAFC? Thanks!
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 06:20 AM
  #2  
MDeezy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 33,701
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by OOmaxSE
..I would probably end up altering the A/F ratio, but who knows yet.
If you might not end up altering the A/F why even purchase these products?
Also I havent heard of a max sucessfully raising the rev limiter with the E-manage ultimate
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 12:38 PM
  #3  
sloppymax's Avatar
IMBOUTTOBUSTSOMEGHOSTS
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,695
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by OOmaxSE
Knowing that there is no ECU upgrade for the 2k-2k1 max, I would like to know which program would best suit a fully bolt-on 2k max?

SAFC, VAFC, Emanage, etc.

I know this isn't comparing apples and apples. I would probably end up altering the A/F ratio, but who knows yet. Also, I understand that Emanage will "hopefully" be able to extend our rev limiters, do you guys see this happening, because this would be important in my decision. If not, would I just be better off going with the VAFC? Thanks!
i would advise a dyno before even considering a purchase. my max had perfect a/f with my cattman y pipe but headers made sure that didnt last. every car is different but 3 pulls w/ a/f would help lead you.
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 01:31 PM
  #4  
SPiG's Avatar
SomePsychoGuy
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
From: Baton Rouge, LA
Also I havent heard of a max sucessfully raising the rev limiter with the E-manage ultimate
IceY2k1 did here: http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=448742
It has not been perfected though.

Emanage Ultimate is obviously the most capable in tuning, but it is also the most expensive and complex. There are several threads in the SC/TC and NA forums about both.

If you want something simpler and cheaper get a VAFC over an SAFC since it can control your VIAS or any other RPM based function and it has more cells for tuning. It is also not much more IIRC.
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #5  
Puppetmaster's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,551
From: Fairfax, VA
Originally Posted by sloppymax
i would advise a dyno before even considering a purchase. my max had perfect a/f with my cattman y pipe but headers made sure that didnt last. every car is different but 3 pulls w/ a/f would help lead you.
don't blow the money on a piggyback before seeing if you even need to adjust the AF mix.
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 09:45 AM
  #6  
ColdSHO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,551
i was lookng at the emange, for both the af adjustmaent as well as the rev limiter adjustment, my tunign shop was confident that my car wouldnt be much of a problem to do what i want. are other people having problems with it?
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 12:13 PM
  #7  
OOmaxSE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,908
From: Amherst, MA
Thanks guys for the responses. I will run a few dyno's before doing any AF altering.

What's the deal with Emanage and our raised rev limiters... are they just being slow and lazy?
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 03:19 PM
  #8  
Weimar Ben's Avatar
Helicopters! Money!!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,816
From: Interior Alaska
The real power comes in advancing the timing, not so much the A/F ratio.
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 04:23 PM
  #9  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,431
From: Los Angeles, CA
if they ever get that adapter or figure out the emanage ultimate on how to advance timing....it would be great!

actually, does anyone know if you swap in the vq35 shortblock and put our heads on it, would you be able to use the vq35 crank position sensor? therefore the emanage ultimate would work fine...since 350z's are advancing timing and extending rev limiters just fine I believe...
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 04:34 PM
  #10  
Weimar Ben's Avatar
Helicopters! Money!!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,816
From: Interior Alaska
nope, won't work. The vq35 CPS needs the vq35 flywheel.
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 05:31 PM
  #11  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,431
From: Los Angeles, CA
right...so the only way to use the vq35 shortblock and vq30 heads with the vq35 cps is to use the vq35 flywheel...but then that would necessitate the need for the 6spd right?
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 05:39 PM
  #12  
Weimar Ben's Avatar
Helicopters! Money!!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,816
From: Interior Alaska
yep, you'd have to use the 6spd, 5.5gen ECU, and E-GAS as well. You don't want to use a vq30 heads on a vq35 because the vq35 heads flow better.
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 04:33 AM
  #13  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,431
From: Los Angeles, CA
yeah I know that they flow way better, but I kinda like the higher compression you would get with the VQ30 heads...plus if I had them port and polished...and the fact that knowing I am not utilizing the VTC's with using the VQ35 heads, would bug me terribly unless I did swap over the entire harness which would be a huge hastle and cost...the idea that there is untapped power would bother me till I got it to work...
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 05:02 AM
  #14  
Weimar Ben's Avatar
Helicopters! Money!!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,816
From: Interior Alaska
The vq35 heads have biggers valves. With a vq30 heads that are ported and polished and using the 00vi, you might be able to get close or match the peak power of the vq35 heads with the vq35 IM. But the vq35 heads have a lot more low and mid range torque. This is dyno proven. Who cares if you can get a higher CR with the vq30 heads if the vq35 heads make more power and TQ?

In addition, the vq35 heads have bigger valves so you'll always have more potential with the vq35 heads. The vq35 heads have better cooling so you can advance the timing much more than you could with the vq30 heads.

IMAO, if you want the crown for the most powerful all motor maxima, you would:

-use Mallfinder heads
-use the 00VI
-use the 5.5gen TS ECU
-tweak the A/F ratio and advance the living $hit out of the timing
-put in the ARP rod bolts
-use cattman headers and catback exhaust. Maybe upgrade to 2.75" exhaust.

The 6th gen 6spd would help it to be faster since it has a more aggressive final drive gear.
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #15  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,431
From: Los Angeles, CA
but if you use the 5.5gen TS ecu....you would have to swap the entire wiring harness over....I would consider a vq35 out of the pathfinder so I could use the 00VI...

maybe smt6 or smt7 I could advance the crap out of the timing or when they or if they ever get the emanage working...that way I could skip the TS ecu and save more money...cams, valve springs and a increased rev limit (once again if they get the emanage working)...would breath pretty good up top I would think....I didn't know that people are still getting with I/H/E/AFR tuned are still getting 230WHP/230WTQ with our 4 or 5th gen ecus....no VTC's...which is impressive...so I would think advance the timing a ton and maybe the rest of the mods...ie. flywheel, udp, and cams would net me the rest....
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 01:19 PM
  #16  
Weimar Ben's Avatar
Helicopters! Money!!!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,816
From: Interior Alaska
Originally Posted by michaelnyden
but if you use the 5.5gen TS ecu....you would have to swap the entire wiring harness over....
Yep.

Originally Posted by michaelnyden
....I would consider a vq35 out of the pathfinder so I could use the 00VI...
....
Can't do that, it's RWD. You'd need a FWD block or you won't be able to mount the engine.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lowpost99
1st & 2nd Generation Maxima (1981-1984 and 1985-1988)
9
Oct 26, 2025 06:53 PM
matts95max
General Maxima Discussion
15
Apr 23, 2025 10:44 AM
dcam0326
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Sep 18, 2015 04:52 PM
ag90fox
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
6
Sep 9, 2015 12:22 PM
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Sep 4, 2015 06:04 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:28 PM.