VQ35 - Which year was best?
#1
VQ35 - Which year was best?
I have not kept up with the year-to-year development of the 3.5L engine. I am planning a VQ35 swap later this year, but rather than logically assume that "the later the model year, the better," I wanted to ask if that assumption has proven to be true.
If the 2004 engines are as good as the 2006 ones, then that is good news since the earlier the model year, the less they will cost. However, if you feel that it is really worth it to buy a 2006, or a 2005, over a 2004 engine, then I'd like to know.
Thanks,
Dr RJP
If the 2004 engines are as good as the 2006 ones, then that is good news since the earlier the model year, the less they will cost. However, if you feel that it is really worth it to buy a 2006, or a 2005, over a 2004 engine, then I'd like to know.
Thanks,
Dr RJP
#4
Well thats all in the intake and stuff and exhaust isnt it? Like an 02 altima vq35, well its the same all around lol but say the 02 engine you put it in with an aftermarket exhaust and the intake from a maxima or something, should be around 265 instead of 240 right?
#5
Originally Posted by carsarecool
Well thats all in the intake and stuff and exhaust isnt it? Like an 02 altima vq35, well its the same all around lol but say the 02 engine you put it in with an aftermarket exhaust and the intake from a maxima or something, should be around 265 instead of 240 right?
#8
Originally Posted by po8pimp
out of curiousity what are you planning on putting this engine in.....
Originally Posted by mynameispee
why not a vq35 from a 350z or g35?
#9
Originally Posted by rsly33
In his I30 for 3.5 swap. 3.5 and 3.0 are basically the same and everything will bolt up fine
Its all the same VQ
Its all the same VQ
Kamski
#14
Originally Posted by madmik
I think you may need the matching ECU and wiring of the VQ engine you buy (VDC, Auto vs MT, etc). Low mileage 04 engine probably the cheapest solution.
However, if I were to buy both the VQ35 and its matching transmission, seems like I should use whatever comes with the VQ35.
Thoughts?
#15
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
Someone suggested removing the wiring, sensors, and ECU from the VQ30 and trasferring them to the VQ35.
However, if I were to buy both the VQ35 and its matching transmission, seems like I should use whatever comes with the VQ35.
Thoughts?
However, if I were to buy both the VQ35 and its matching transmission, seems like I should use whatever comes with the VQ35.
Thoughts?
#16
you can't use the entire vq35 from the G35 or the 350z
the motor mounts are located in different locations, and the RWD block does not have the holes to bolt on the FWD mounts
you can still use the 350z IM on a fwd vq35 like nismo3112 or Vsamoylov did (but you need to hack the hood or the IM for proper fitment)
use the 350/g35 rev-up cams, aftermarket headers, and polyurethane mounts (put the power better to the ground, rocket start, no wheelhop) and tune it with a wideband. should be what you are looking for.
if you do use the vq35 ECU, you must then deal with the entire 3.5L wiring harness, and the BS NVIS system along with the chipped key that all 99+ maximas have. and you will have full use of the VTC and 3.5l equipment etc, no need to drill cams, get spacers and you use all 3.5L sensors and maf. this setup "should" have better ecu tunability from TS
(this is like vsamoylov's setup with a vq35 ECU)
or go the route more travelled and get cams drilled, spacers vq30 timing chain sprockets, and reuse the vq30 harness and all vq30 sensors and ECU. you will have less tunability (only 95-96 ecus can be re-mapped by TS)
get good wideband tuning and you'll be making good power.
(this is like what nismo3112 did with 350z im and vq30 ECU)
either way you go a vq35 will make good power if swapped and tuned right.
the motor mounts are located in different locations, and the RWD block does not have the holes to bolt on the FWD mounts
you can still use the 350z IM on a fwd vq35 like nismo3112 or Vsamoylov did (but you need to hack the hood or the IM for proper fitment)
use the 350/g35 rev-up cams, aftermarket headers, and polyurethane mounts (put the power better to the ground, rocket start, no wheelhop) and tune it with a wideband. should be what you are looking for.
if you do use the vq35 ECU, you must then deal with the entire 3.5L wiring harness, and the BS NVIS system along with the chipped key that all 99+ maximas have. and you will have full use of the VTC and 3.5l equipment etc, no need to drill cams, get spacers and you use all 3.5L sensors and maf. this setup "should" have better ecu tunability from TS
(this is like vsamoylov's setup with a vq35 ECU)
or go the route more travelled and get cams drilled, spacers vq30 timing chain sprockets, and reuse the vq30 harness and all vq30 sensors and ECU. you will have less tunability (only 95-96 ecus can be re-mapped by TS)
get good wideband tuning and you'll be making good power.
(this is like what nismo3112 did with 350z im and vq30 ECU)
either way you go a vq35 will make good power if swapped and tuned right.
#17
Originally Posted by nismology
It's not that simple. Read the sticky.
OK, I read every post on that thread, and came away more persuaded NOT to do the swap than the opposite.
That is, unless I can find someone within a 250 radius of my location who can do the whole thing for me like Tilley.
Seems like SC'ing the engine is an easier route to more HP than this.
#19
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
OK, I read every post on that thread, and came away more persuaded NOT to do the swap than the opposite.
That is, unless I can find someone within a 250 radius of my location who can do the whole thing for me like Tilley.
Seems like SC'ing the engine is an easier route to more HP than this.
That is, unless I can find someone within a 250 radius of my location who can do the whole thing for me like Tilley.
Seems like SC'ing the engine is an easier route to more HP than this.
#21
i don't know if you noticed it but there are quite a few vq35 maximas around the .org
you could always ask around for local help from somebody who already did the swap or is getting ready for one. this swap isn't all that crazy, you just need have self-confidence and the "cohones" to rip into the motor. and most importantly a place to do the swap and the time/parts/money necessary
if i had the place, and parts, i'd already have one in my 99. so instead i built up my vq30
you could always ask around for local help from somebody who already did the swap or is getting ready for one. this swap isn't all that crazy, you just need have self-confidence and the "cohones" to rip into the motor. and most importantly a place to do the swap and the time/parts/money necessary
if i had the place, and parts, i'd already have one in my 99. so instead i built up my vq30
#22
Originally Posted by nismology
I could do the swap for you buttt yea, im in south fla. Do like i did and keep reading it info over and over again til it makes sense. Feel free to ask questions via PM if you want.
Thanks for the info!
My sister lives in Miami, so I'm used to doing the drive from Jacksonville. It takes about 6 1/2 hours to get to Kendall where she lives.
I could drive on down to your shop to have you do it, if you really would be willing to do the swap. Do to a previous car accident, I really cannot do any physical labor beyond using a socket wrench or screwdriver, so I am literally at the mercy of mechanics. Fortunately, I found a good one here in Jax.
I'll PM you with what I have in mind, and you can give me an idea of how much it might cost.
It was the fact that so many have done the swap is what got me interested in the first place.
#23
well me personally it was hell doing it.but it was worth it. being the first in MY state to do so.<this kept me motivated.but basically if anyone tells its not gonna be as reliable is lying(considering the swap was done right).jus my worthless 2cents
#25
in all the post ive read, i still havent been able to figure out if i need to rewire the harness or change out any plugs or anything of that sort yet. im a honda guy and i know if i stuff a h22(prelude motor) into an accord or a civic, i need to alter the wiring harness and some plugs. provided that i go with a vq35 and use my 3.0 harness and ecu, will i need to do anything to the harness? or will the harness just plug in directly as is to the 3.5?
#27
OK I am going to throw this thread onto a tangent ... forgive me.
Just from reading a lot of swap threads, I have never heard of people throwing the 6th gen MAXIMA engines (VQ35) into the 4th gen because it has different harnesses, sensors, intake manifolds, ... I can go forever. The 5th gen engine electronics, I am guessing, has more compatibility and more closely resembles the VQ30. The 3.5 FAQ explains which cars you can pull the engines out of, but unfortunately doesn't specify which years. If I had to choose, I would take from the 02-03 Maxima or the Altima (Not the 04+ Maximas). Note that I am not the engine expert by any means and this knowledge comes from me reciting information that I have not recently researched, but I am pretty sure it is correct.
Moral of the story ... don't swap to the 04+ Maxima engines.
Now to jack the thread ... Does anyone ever get scared of the oil consumption problems that the 5.5 gen owners report. The horror stories right now have me convinced to do the DEK swap instead. If someone can prove they fixed it or that it is overrated then I will go back to wanting a 3.5 swap.
Just from reading a lot of swap threads, I have never heard of people throwing the 6th gen MAXIMA engines (VQ35) into the 4th gen because it has different harnesses, sensors, intake manifolds, ... I can go forever. The 5th gen engine electronics, I am guessing, has more compatibility and more closely resembles the VQ30. The 3.5 FAQ explains which cars you can pull the engines out of, but unfortunately doesn't specify which years. If I had to choose, I would take from the 02-03 Maxima or the Altima (Not the 04+ Maximas). Note that I am not the engine expert by any means and this knowledge comes from me reciting information that I have not recently researched, but I am pretty sure it is correct.
Moral of the story ... don't swap to the 04+ Maxima engines.
Now to jack the thread ... Does anyone ever get scared of the oil consumption problems that the 5.5 gen owners report. The horror stories right now have me convinced to do the DEK swap instead. If someone can prove they fixed it or that it is overrated then I will go back to wanting a 3.5 swap.
#29
Since this is a 3.5 swap thread, I am guessing that you are a 4th gen.
3.5 Swap FAQ
If you scroll down on this sticky then you will get to read a HORROR story about using the 5th gen ECU. I really do not recommend it. You do not need to run the same year ECU, but you REALLY should consider the consequences of not using your current 4th gen ECU.
If you are worried about tuning/loss of HP due to poor maps, then you should invest in EManage-Ultimate. It has to be the easiest AND cheapest route to recover from the bad 4th gen ECU.
3.5 Swap FAQ
If you scroll down on this sticky then you will get to read a HORROR story about using the 5th gen ECU. I really do not recommend it. You do not need to run the same year ECU, but you REALLY should consider the consequences of not using your current 4th gen ECU.
If you are worried about tuning/loss of HP due to poor maps, then you should invest in EManage-Ultimate. It has to be the easiest AND cheapest route to recover from the bad 4th gen ECU.
#30
DIYMAXKID is correct. 04+ has external EGR versus the exhaust CAMS doing it internally for the 02-03 Maxima engines. Unfortunately there isn't a lot of information out there about people swapping 6th gen engines in.
#31
What about the high output 3.0L?
I was wondering if anyone with a 4th Gen swapped their stock 190HP motor with the 222HP motor?
Is it even worth considering, given the similarities between the two?
Or, is the gain in HP not worth the effort?
What about SC'ing my present 3.0L instead of a 3.5L swap?
What are the advantages/disadvantages of the SC route versus the 3.5L swap? (Is there a stick on this subject?)
Is it even worth considering, given the similarities between the two?
Or, is the gain in HP not worth the effort?
What about SC'ing my present 3.0L instead of a 3.5L swap?
What are the advantages/disadvantages of the SC route versus the 3.5L swap? (Is there a stick on this subject?)
#32
Originally Posted by scrhale
If you are worried about tuning/loss of HP due to poor maps, then you should invest in EManage-Ultimate. It has to be the easiest AND cheapest route to recover from the bad 4th gen ECU.
#33
I think scrhale is talking about the 5th gen ecu running more timing advance vs the 4th gen ECU (from 96sleeper's Adv. Timing threads)
I do agree on the EU comment, it is a nice way to control engine fuel management, but it's not for everybody, only the people who can be able to tune with it. i.e. it's not a plug and play and set to automatic deal. there is a certain knowledge involved in tuning the EU.
I think running 4th gen ecu with a EU is adequate for a VQ35 in a 4th gen.
I do agree on the EU comment, it is a nice way to control engine fuel management, but it's not for everybody, only the people who can be able to tune with it. i.e. it's not a plug and play and set to automatic deal. there is a certain knowledge involved in tuning the EU.
I think running 4th gen ecu with a EU is adequate for a VQ35 in a 4th gen.
#34
Originally Posted by vipervadim
I think scrhale is talking about the 5th gen ecu running more timing advance vs the 4th gen ECU (from 96sleeper's Adv. Timing threads)
[/QUOTE]
I do agree on the EU comment, it is a nice way to control engine fuel management, but it's not for everybody, only the people who can be able to tune with it. i.e. it's not a plug and play and set to automatic deal. there is a certain knowledge involved in tuning the EU.
I think running 4th gen ecu with a EU is adequate for a VQ35 in a 4th gen.
#35
It was this thread: http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=468488
I totally agree with you on the 4th gen ECU. It doesn't have a "bad map"
It does have less timing advance in the midrange. (it's designed for a stock USIM maxima to be good with MPG)
however if we can get timing like on that 350Z AND tune that A/F I think the midrange-topend would benefit more, esp. to all those running headers and VI, and of course all the 4th gen VQ35s
I totally agree with you on the 4th gen ECU. It doesn't have a "bad map"
It does have less timing advance in the midrange. (it's designed for a stock USIM maxima to be good with MPG)
however if we can get timing like on that 350Z AND tune that A/F I think the midrange-topend would benefit more, esp. to all those running headers and VI, and of course all the 4th gen VQ35s
#36
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,204
Originally Posted by vipervadim
I totally agree with you on the 4th gen ECU. It doesn't have a "bad map"
It does have less timing advance in the midrange. (it's designed for a stock USIM maxima to be good with MPG)
It does have less timing advance in the midrange. (it's designed for a stock USIM maxima to be good with MPG)
You really need to work your timing to follow the VE of your engine. The huge dip in the stock 4g timing in the midrange corresponds to a rapid increase in VE for the VQ30.
From what I have seen, VE is relatively low in the lower to midrange rpms on the stock VQ35. This allows you to run more timing than the 4g without problems.
You have to be be careful in the higher rpms though if you have cams and a modified IM. You will not be able to run as much advance as someone with stock components.
#37
eng92 thanks for shining some light on this,
do you know how the 00vi behaves?
how can you measure the VE?
(with my 00vi and port-matched PF tb, and minor p&p)
would the amount of air entering the IM or the speed of air entering matter in VE?
what about headers, (less restrictive pathway) would it affect VE of the engine? or is it only IM, heads, cams valve lift and duration?
This is an interesting subject I haven't seen much discussion on
I'm TOTALLY SORRY for hijacking this thread
do you know how the 00vi behaves?
how can you measure the VE?
(with my 00vi and port-matched PF tb, and minor p&p)
would the amount of air entering the IM or the speed of air entering matter in VE?
what about headers, (less restrictive pathway) would it affect VE of the engine? or is it only IM, heads, cams valve lift and duration?
This is an interesting subject I haven't seen much discussion on
I'm TOTALLY SORRY for hijacking this thread
#38
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,204
Originally Posted by vipervadim
eng92 thanks for shining some light on this,
do you know how the 00vi behaves?
how can you measure the VE?
(with my 00vi and port-matched PF tb, and minor p&p)
would the amount of air entering the IM or the speed of air entering matter in VE?
what about headers, (less restrictive pathway) would it affect VE of the engine? or is it only IM, heads, cams valve lift and duration?
This is an interesting subject I haven't seen much discussion on
I'm TOTALLY SORRY for hijacking this thread
do you know how the 00vi behaves?
how can you measure the VE?
(with my 00vi and port-matched PF tb, and minor p&p)
would the amount of air entering the IM or the speed of air entering matter in VE?
what about headers, (less restrictive pathway) would it affect VE of the engine? or is it only IM, heads, cams valve lift and duration?
This is an interesting subject I haven't seen much discussion on
I'm TOTALLY SORRY for hijacking this thread
VE = actual inlet volume air flow / (volume air flow based on 100% cylinder filling)
To measure VE with high accuracy, you really need an engine sitting on a testbench drawing its air through an accurately calibrated flow meter.
You can get a rough estimate of VE using an OBD-II scanner and a spreadsheet. You have to convert the mass air flow data to volume air flow using your inlet air density (from temp, RH and in-Hg). The 100% cylinder filling value is just (displacement x rpm/2)
Of course all your units must match to make it non-dimensional.
#39
Originally Posted by dr-rjp
I was wondering if anyone with a 4th Gen swapped their stock 190HP motor with the 222HP motor?
Is it even worth considering, given the similarities between the two?
Or, is the gain in HP not worth the effort?
What about SC'ing my present 3.0L instead of a 3.5L swap?
What are the advantages/disadvantages of the SC route versus the 3.5L swap? (Is there a stick on this subject?)
Is it even worth considering, given the similarities between the two?
Or, is the gain in HP not worth the effort?
What about SC'ing my present 3.0L instead of a 3.5L swap?
What are the advantages/disadvantages of the SC route versus the 3.5L swap? (Is there a stick on this subject?)
It is DEFINITELY worth considering. First of all, the DEK is a bullet-proof engine and can take a lot of abuse. To bring my question into yours (as stated in my previous post), does anyone ever consider the oil consumption problems that the VQ35DE has? I have read horror stories and want to know if this represents a significant portion of 3.5's or just a select few AND if there is any solution to the problem.
It is commonly agreed that Supercharging your current engine is more of a hassle, more expensive, and less reliable. It is your money and your decision. Some people perfer Forced induction versus all motor.
#40
Another question. It is confirmed that the 02-03 Maximas have the exhaust CAMS handling the EGR. I did a quick search on EGR and unforunately can't find the thread, but I remember reading that if you didn't have VTC (5th gen ECU) then the EGR may not function 100% and therefore you would fail. Can someone confirm this?