please help me find the rod weight
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,323
From: amsterdam ,new york
please help me find the rod weight
i cannot find the vq 35 rod weight anywhere ,and ive never been known for being a good net searcher .
but iam up to something and i really need the weight of the vq35de rod
and if noone knows then maybe i can buy or borrow a rod off one of my fellow orgians. because i happen to have a scale that measures in grams that will be here in a day or two. and with that i can find the weight .
thanks
but iam up to something and i really need the weight of the vq35de rod
and if noone knows then maybe i can buy or borrow a rod off one of my fellow orgians. because i happen to have a scale that measures in grams that will be here in a day or two. and with that i can find the weight .
thanks
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,323
From: amsterdam ,new york
ok i just weighed the dek rod with bearing shims and rod bolts and nuts 582 grams. i didnt know the 3.0 and 3.5 weights were so close.
nissan says the 3.5 rod bolts are much lighter than the 3.0 bolt and nut design i just weighed the dek 3.0 rod bolt and nut at 30 grams (24G for the bolt and 6 G for the nut)
what iam getting at is the carrillo A beam rods are in the 490 G range with ARP rod bolts .
iam wondering what a 600 gram reduction would do for the power curve? and high rev worrys would be a thing of the past. as far as rod concerns go.
nissan says the 3.5 rod bolts are much lighter than the 3.0 bolt and nut design i just weighed the dek 3.0 rod bolt and nut at 30 grams (24G for the bolt and 6 G for the nut)
what iam getting at is the carrillo A beam rods are in the 490 G range with ARP rod bolts .
iam wondering what a 600 gram reduction would do for the power curve? and high rev worrys would be a thing of the past. as far as rod concerns go.
Originally Posted by krismax
what iam getting at is the carrillo A beam rods are in the 490 G range with ARP rod bolts .
iam wondering what a 600 gram reduction would do for the power curve?
Either way, you'd be hard pressed to feel the difference between one rod and the next for all practical purposes. It might help response slightly in the lower gears, but i doubt it'd show up on a dyno or at the track.
and high rev worrys would be a thing of the past. as far as rod concerns go.
Originally Posted by nismology
600 gram? Where's this number coming from?
Either way, you'd be hard pressed to feel the difference between one rod and the next for all practical purposes. It might help response slightly in the lower gears, but i doubt it'd show up on a dyno or at the track.
That's a fairly large chunk of reciprocating weight in the engine. that's worse than rotating weight.. you don't just have to spin it up once like the flywheel. you have to change the direction of these things moving many (up to 250) times per second. If removing 1lb from the flywheel is noticeable, which it is, this will be much more so.
You'd be hard-pressed NOT to see a difference in swapping rods.
The theory is sound, there's no denying that. UDP's make a difference in theory too. But i'm afraid that's all it is.
On the other hand, i didn't discredit lighter rods completely either.
I'd love to be directed to a link or magazine article where there was a HP increase recorded or 1/4 mile times dropped with lighter rods alone.
On the other hand, i didn't discredit lighter rods completely either.
Originally Posted by nismology
It might help response slightly in the lower gears, but i doubt it'd show up on a dyno or at the track.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
6spd4dsc
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
4
Mar 4, 2016 05:19 PM
pears
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
15
Sep 18, 2015 05:25 AM
ef9
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
0
Sep 10, 2015 10:35 PM
MikesChevelle
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
0
Sep 7, 2015 09:11 AM




