VQ35 swap after new HGs

Subscribe
Feb 22, 2007 | 12:05 PM
  #1  
Ok, last dyno was http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=494574. (220whp-223wtq). It was rich, had an exhaust leak at rear header. Things different with my setup from that last dyno are...

- Fixed Exhaust Leak
- Added CAI
- Added Straight Pipe
- SAFC Tuned (last time I didnt really do much tuning)
- Fuelab FPR (ebay POS unit rusted and seized at 70psi FTL, so I hammered it to peices after replacing it lol)
- PF TB with StephenMax's Adapter
- NEW Cooper NGK Spark plugs (last dyno I just cleaned up the plugs that were in and reused them)

Note- Sorry, no Run Files

This is the printout with all 4 runs on it...

Note- The 1st run did not have the sniffer hooked up, thats the blue line at 18:1.


This is the print out comparing Run01 against Run04...


For those that will ask me, even though its on the link on the top , my mods are...
- CAI
- PF TB
- Stock 3.0 Headers+ WSP Ypipe+ WSP Straight Pipe
- MotoStorm UDP
- Fuelab FPR
- Z33 HGs
- No P/S belt (forgot to mention this on the previous thread, but it was also like this on the previous dyno, so no change)
- SAFC1-Tuned for 13.0:1 and slightly richer towards redline
- VI powerflap is running full open

My Final 2 cents...
Sure peak #s are slightly less than before, but that means nothing. A 3WHP difference can be caused by anything. Area under the curve>*. These power curves are alot more healthy-looking IMO compared to before.

Also, I used to have to empty my oil catch can pretty much every gas tank fill. Now, I finished the HG replacement just before X-Mas. Its been exactly 2 months since I finished and the catch can has not been drained ONCE. There is exactly I'd say less than 1/8 of the capacity of oil in the can for the last 2 months.

This baby is being held back so much its insane. I might just have to go all out NA (with bolt ons, no internal work other than more cam retard on intake cams with custom-speced adapters, and ARP Rod Bolts) and see how much juice I can squeeze out on stock cams and 3.0 ECU. Things such as WSP catback (still rocking the stock stuff with the nasty crimped b-pipe), SSIM, the new re-designed OBX headers, and of course, E-Manage Ultimate for ubber timing advance and extended rev limiter.

: werd
Reply
Feb 22, 2007 | 12:14 PM
  #2  
haaaawtness!!! NA FTW!
Reply
Feb 22, 2007 | 04:44 PM
  #3  
cute, now lets see how u do at the track morow.
Reply
Feb 22, 2007 | 05:08 PM
  #4  
how do you like the swap?
Reply
Feb 22, 2007 | 05:39 PM
  #5  
So your theory is a better head gasket will limit the amount of oil going into the IM? Those are some good numbers. You should try going leaner. I have mine tuned very close to 13.5. Its safe for short bursts.

I also recommend a budget B-pipe. I just got one. Its high quality at a cheap price. About $240.00 American.
Reply
Feb 22, 2007 | 06:50 PM
  #6  
Quote: haaaawtness!!! NA FTW!
oooOOooOO what it do, sanyo! and nice new power curve edz
Reply
Feb 22, 2007 | 08:12 PM
  #7  
Quote: So your theory is a better head gasket will limit the amount of oil going into the IM? Those are some good numbers. You should try going leaner. I have mine tuned very close to 13.5. Its safe for short bursts.

I also recommend a budget B-pipe. I just got one. Its high quality at a cheap price. About $240.00 American.
Well Im not saying that the HGs ARE the cause of the execive blow-by on 3.5s. All Im saying is that it was ALMOST eliminated after I replaced mine. I was experiencing massive air buildup in the cooling system, insane blow by, and 3 of my spark plugs (#3 #5 and #6 cylinders) had coolant on them. I put in the Z33 head gaskets (which are triple layer, rather than double as those of the FWD 3.5s) and all the previous problems went away.

I agree with you on the 13.5:1 a/f ratio being safe. I had it like this on the 3.0 over a year with no problems. But Im choocing to keep it on the safe side for now.

Aluminuzed B-Pipe from WSP is mandrel bent and with resonator its $170+shipping :-D.

Thanx guys.
Reply
Feb 22, 2007 | 08:32 PM
  #8  
do you feel that your power loss is a result of slightly lower compression from thicker gaskets?
Reply
Feb 22, 2007 | 08:42 PM
  #9  
This guy is the sh*t!!! LOL
Reply
Feb 22, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #10  
Quote: do you feel that your power loss is a result of slightly lower compression from thicker gaskets?
a 3whp loss can be due to the correction factor on the dynojet's computer. Besides come on 3whp isnt noticeable, lol. I cant notice a change on the butt dyno until about 10whp. Also, even though the current gaskets have an extra layer, they are designed to compress to the same width as that of the double layer. Remember the Z engines (not including the rev up motors) have the same exact compression as the FWD engines. So there's no concern on that
Reply
Feb 23, 2007 | 12:36 AM
  #11  
Quote: a 3whp loss can be due to the correction factor on the dynojet's computer. Besides come on 3whp isnt noticeable, lol. I cant notice a change on the butt dyno until about 10whp. Also, even though the current gaskets have an extra layer, they are designed to compress to the same width as that of the double layer. Remember the Z engines (not including the rev up motors) have the same exact compression as the FWD engines. So there's no concern on that
yeah, i wasnt saying it mattered, just wondering if you had a thoery on it.
Reply
Feb 23, 2007 | 05:15 AM
  #12  
Now lets see if I can make it to the track tonight...my damn EU is fin up for some reason, windows wont recognize it.
Reply
Feb 23, 2007 | 11:57 AM
  #13  
Quote: Now lets see if I can make it to the track tonight...my damn EU is fin up for some reason, windows wont recognize it.
I thought you sold your car?
Reply
Feb 23, 2007 | 12:25 PM
  #14  
nope.. and i would check the connection to the PC in zee back
Reply
Feb 23, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #15  
Please get all of this on video i would to see this stuff
Reply
Feb 23, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #16  
Quote: ... the new re-designed OBX headers, and of course, E-Manage Ultimate...
Great numbers! Did you feel a big impact from the SAFC?

About the new OBX headers, how was the design altered?
Reply
Feb 23, 2007 | 08:56 PM
  #17  
Quote: nope.. and i would check the connection to the PC in zee back

I did, I almost think upgrading to SP2 on XP screwed the drivers up somehow. My tuning was WAY off, I ran a horrible time.
Reply
Feb 23, 2007 | 09:20 PM
  #18  
i heard wat al did
Reply
Feb 24, 2007 | 07:00 AM
  #19  
Quote: i heard wat al did

Yeah, he was right in front of me on the track, his time was nasty.
Reply
Subscribe