Dyno Discussion and Slips Discussion and a moderated "Dyno Slips" sub-forum to allow for posting of dyno slips.

4.5 Gen auto dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 02:32 PM
  #1  
whlimi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 527
From: Scarborough, Ontario
4.5 Gen auto dyno



I was expecting some better numbers. The AFR was between 11.8 to 12.2 across the range although I had it street tuned to 12.9-13.1 doing second gear pulls. The one thing I noticed when I got home was that it wasnt dynoed to the 7200rpm rev cut. Mods are in sig.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 02:37 PM
  #2  
MorpheusZero's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,064
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Um, yeah... you should be putting out significantly better numbers than that. You didn't do any tuning on the dyno?

You're using the 3.0 manifolds, right?
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 02:42 PM
  #3  
whlimi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 527
From: Scarborough, Ontario
Yes, 3.0 exhaust manifolds.
There was no time to do any tuning today. They just had enough time to do a couple of pulls and see where things were at. Hopefully over the course of the next few weeks I can figure out what's going on.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #4  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
shee in an auto... man u ever ran the car???
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #5  
t6378tp's Avatar
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,785
From: Philly
yeah I would think you'd put down more

just take it to the track and run it that will tell you if the dyno #'s are bs or not
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #6  
whlimi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 527
From: Scarborough, Ontario
I'm actually thinking about taking it somewhere else to have it dynoed again. Even though its an auto, I still think I should have seen some better numbers. I dont think the AFR being in the 11.8 and low 12s would make that big of an impact.

I think the track closest to me is closed for the season. Or so I was told by one of the operators so that will have to wait till next season.

Last edited by whlimi; Oct 15, 2008 at 06:28 PM.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #7  
MaximaSpd85's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,630
From: Kissimmee, FL
so you had it street tuned before the dyno? and ur afrs were around 13? but on the dyno they read 11.8 and 12s?

is that a normal thing and is it better to tune on the street or on the dyno? just curious...
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 07:26 PM
  #8  
whlimi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 527
From: Scarborough, Ontario
It was street tuned in 2nd gear and the AFR was close to 13 flat. When I dynoed it today, 3rd gear, the AFR was down in the 11s and low 12s. We used my wideband so that there would be some sort of consistency. I data logged the runs with the EU and everything else seemed fine.
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 08:31 PM
  #9  
t6378tp's Avatar
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,785
From: Philly
just wondering, what are your a/f now that your back home is it back to 13flat or in the 11s and 12s still
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 09:58 PM
  #10  
95BLKMAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,317
From: Miami, FL
the widebands were not calibrated. Either yours or the dyno's. I would recalibrate your WB and do a run just to make sure it wasnt yours. If that's the case then use another dyno.

Another things, when you tune in one gear (2nd in your case) you most tune in a way that for 3rd gear (your real dyno gear) its going to LEAN by about .3-.4 because of the added airflow with the longer gears. In your case, on the dyno, this did the exact opposite, pointing the finger towards the dyno's WB.

Either case, on a dyno, WB readout has no effect on how the power to the ground is calculated. I would go to another dyno just to verify this against this dyno. If the new dyno is within close approximation to this one, then there's something going on with your engine. Also, was the TC locked for these pulls?
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 04:58 AM
  #11  
whlimi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 527
From: Scarborough, Ontario
Originally Posted by 95BLKMAX
the widebands were not calibrated. Either yours or the dyno's. I would recalibrate your WB and do a run just to make sure it wasnt yours. If that's the case then use another dyno.

Another things, when you tune in one gear (2nd in your case) you most tune in a way that for 3rd gear (your real dyno gear) its going to LEAN by about .3-.4 because of the added airflow with the longer gears. In your case, on the dyno, this did the exact opposite, pointing the finger towards the dyno's WB.

Either case, on a dyno, WB readout has no effect on how the power to the ground is calculated. I would go to another dyno just to verify this against this dyno. If the new dyno is within close approximation to this one, then there's something going on with your engine. Also, was the TC locked for these pulls?

We never used the dyno's WB. My WB was used. Also the car was dynoed in D with OD off. I was under the assumption that the TC doesnt lock up with OD off.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 04:59 AM
  #12  
whlimi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 527
From: Scarborough, Ontario
Originally Posted by t6378tp
just wondering, what are your a/f now that your back home is it back to 13flat or in the 11s and 12s still
I havent had a chance to check the AFR. I have to wait until this weekend when there's no traffic.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 11:46 AM
  #13  
whlimi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 527
From: Scarborough, Ontario
I rechecked the AFR today doing some 2nd gear pulls, and they're where I had them. 13 flat. The curve is nice and straight from 3500rpm right to 7200 with the exception of the spot where the stock fuel cut is where it momentarily dips into low 12s.

I have a dyno appointment at a different location booked for next week but in the mean time I would like to get some suggestions as to where I should look in the event that the second dyno confirms the low numbers. Where would you guys look for problems in the motor?

The setup:
02 vq35de
Nismo knock off cams
converted TB
SSIM with port matched LIM
4th gen IACV
oil catch can between pcv and UIM
breather on front valve cover

I installed the NWP spacers myself and now I'm second guessing if I put too much RTV on the spacers and maybe they're blocking the air path. Could something like that cause such significant losses?

Last edited by whlimi; Oct 16, 2008 at 11:55 AM.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 02:26 PM
  #14  
vqaltima's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 38
What type of dyno did you use? This could be why the #'s are low.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 03:04 PM
  #15  
streetzlegend's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,097
Originally Posted by whlimi
We never used the dyno's WB. My WB was used. Also the car was dynoed in D with OD off. I was under the assumption that the TC doesnt lock up with OD off.
the TC does lock up with OD off. always dyno like that with OD off. i have verified this myself with my manual lock up switch, dynoed with TC unlocked, put down like 240whp, dynoed with TC in stock setting with OD off, dynoed 312whp. so yea it does lock up.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 05:07 PM
  #16  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
oh snap all this time i thought it was a VQ30 with VQ35 cams... oops my bad, yeah something's off
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 05:40 PM
  #17  
whlimi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 527
From: Scarborough, Ontario
Ok guys, when I was looking at the EU data log stuff, I noticed that I did a 50-100mph pull in 7.88 seconds in 2nd gear on the street. I compared this to several other 2nd gear pulls that I had saved and that number is consistent. Does that seem decently quick or is that average?

Also, I noticed that in the higher rpm, ignition timing is between 36-39 degrees. I was told it should be in the mid to low 30s.
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 09:42 PM
  #18  
95BLKMAX's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,317
From: Miami, FL
general consensus is that any ign timing advance after 35* is a waste and will not yield any more power. Some have said that the threshold is even lower than that.
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 01:46 AM
  #19  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
I suppose you have not yet read my 2nd vs 3rd theory ... have you?
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 02:09 AM
  #20  
whlimi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 527
From: Scarborough, Ontario
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
I suppose you have not yet read my 2nd vs 3rd theory ... have you?
I havent. Can you point me in the right direction please.



Nevermind. Found it.

Last edited by whlimi; Oct 17, 2008 at 02:30 AM.
Old Oct 17, 2008 | 02:30 AM
  #21  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM



Read my thread(s) & ask me if you have any ?'s (technical or not, ANYTHING) ...k?

I look forward to hearing from you....

-Nmex.
Old Oct 19, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #22  
DandyMax's Avatar
3.5 in the works
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,477
From: Ontario, Canada
Give me a call Will when you get a chance, we can discuss... there is some misinformation in this thread.

Did you do a map trace to see which cells your dyno run tracked through on the I/J map? Are they the same as where it tracks through the 2nd gear pull (shouldn't be much different but I'm not sure how you changed the map doing your last tuning runs). Running high 11 AFR will lose some power but you should still have more than what you got with those mods. The ignition timing, where are you reading the 36-39 degrees... at what rpm? Also, is that an averaged number on the EU or a peak number you're seeing? 36 degrees up past 7000 rpm is no concern, but did you play with timing on the dyno at all to see where the optimal setting is? The numbers in that initial map were based on a different car (although still a 4th gen), so you may need to tweak a degree or two.

Are you sure you aren't having a KS problem again to cause a power loss? Also, check compression or better yet do a leakdown test.

Last edited by DandyMax; Oct 19, 2008 at 04:51 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MAXSE5SPD
General Maxima Discussion
33
Sep 17, 2022 04:00 AM
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
9
Sep 9, 2015 10:37 AM
robtroxel
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
1
Sep 8, 2015 08:15 PM
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Sep 4, 2015 06:04 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:55 AM.