2002 baseline dyno

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

06-28-2011, 05:55 PM

cil1jtr02max

Member

Thread Starter

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 198

2002 baseline dyno

6spd - Currently has a Cattman Cat Back. Otherwise stock. I've had the car it's whole life and figured I'd get a baseline.
I'm a little bit disappointed in the numbers.
I know I need a tuneup. The car misses slightly when accelerating hard.

plans for the near future:
Spark plugs
Cattman headers, Y-pipe, and Fastcat
NWP spacers
Intake

Last edited by cil1jtr02max; 06-28-2011 at 06:33 PM. Reason: transmission type added

06-28-2011, 06:26 PM

Rhyno02

Senior Member

iTrader: (12)

Join Date: Aug 2008

Location: Long Island, NY

Posts: 0

AT or Manual?

06-28-2011, 06:33 PM

cil1jtr02max

Member

Thread Starter

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 198

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhyno02

AT or Manual?

knew i forgot something - 6spd

06-28-2011, 06:45 PM

Rhyno02

Senior Member

iTrader: (12)

Join Date: Aug 2008

Location: Long Island, NY

Posts: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by cil1jtr02max

knew i forgot something - 6spd

What gear did you dyno in? I know with AT's, 3rd is optimal but, as for 6spd I dunno...I am sure a search could answer that or someone will chime in soon enough.

06-28-2011, 07:01 PM

FlawleZ

Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jun 2008

Location: San Antonio

Posts: 280

Are those temperatures correct, 40F?

06-28-2011, 08:08 PM

Rods03Max619

Senior Member

iTrader: (5)

Join Date: Oct 2009

Location: Diego,California

Posts: 8,949

How many miles on the car, and are you on the New Header list he only needs 3 more people...and they say 6mt suppose to be around 205-215whp stock....

06-29-2011, 09:01 AM

jkpgt96

Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Ballwin, MO

Posts: 585

I have never seen anything higher than my 214whp stock in a 5.5 gen...

Nice torque number, that seems about on par, but yes the whp looks low. Get a tune-up and get back for a better baseline..

06-29-2011, 09:16 AM

cil1jtr02max

Member

Thread Starter

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 198

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhyno02

What gear did you dyno in? I know with AT's, 3rd is optimal but, as for 6spd I dunno...I am sure a search could answer that or someone will chime in soon enough.

I didn't think to ask. Will do for sure when i take it back.

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlawleZ

Are those temperatures correct, 40F?

It's 86.40F

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkpgt96

I have never seen anything higher than my 214whp stock in a 5.5 gen...

Nice torque number, that seems about on par, but yes the whp looks low. Get a tune-up and get back for a better baseline..

Yeah, i had hoped to break 200 being stock.

Car has 115k and my "near future" mod list is what I have sitting in my apartment, just need the time and place to install.

06-29-2011, 10:55 AM

jkpgt96

Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Ballwin, MO

Posts: 585

It depends on the dyno honestly..but even still you should be able to break 200whp without issue..typically 200-210whp is normal for stock.

06-29-2011, 12:01 PM

#10

HotshotVQ35

Senior Member

iTrader: (5)

Join Date: Nov 2005

Location: LI, NY

Posts: 930

i did 218whp/228tq with just an intake..

06-29-2011, 12:40 PM

#11

036mtmax

Senior Member

iTrader: (11)

Join Date: Oct 2010

Location: Mass

Posts: 783

06-29-2011, 12:42 PM

#12

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Join Date: Dec 2000

Location: Santa Fe, NM

Posts: 34,588

SAE #'s?

Runfiles? Seems a bit low for HP, torque seems good.

The curve is typical, so I wouldn't worry much. Nice to have a baseline.

06-29-2011, 01:37 PM

#13

jkpgt96

Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Ballwin, MO

Posts: 585

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotshotVQ35

i did 218whp/228tq with just an intake..

.

Those are healthy numbers from what I have seen..especially the wtq.

06-29-2011, 01:51 PM

#14

HotshotVQ35

Senior Member

iTrader: (5)

Join Date: Nov 2005

Location: LI, NY

Posts: 930

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkpgt96

.

Those are healthy numbers from what I have seen..especially the wtq.

i thought so too, but i owned the car since new and always took care of it. i want to get it back on a dynojet, as i did 243 on a DD with just I/H/E

06-29-2011, 01:59 PM

#15

jkpgt96

Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Ballwin, MO

Posts: 585

Yeah..I dunno that mine will ever get mods, lol. I have great numbers to base off of, but no desire..

06-29-2011, 04:10 PM

#16

FlawleZ

Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jun 2008

Location: San Antonio

Posts: 280

Mine made 200hp 210tq bone stock auto 102F day.

06-29-2011, 04:47 PM

#17

taz394

Senior Member

iTrader: (2)

Join Date: Jan 2010

Location: Houston,TX

Posts: 638

Hp is def off ... Get a tune up and go back for a rerun

06-29-2011, 05:30 PM

#18

NmexMAX

dot dot dot ...

iTrader: (22)

Join Date: Dec 2000

Location: Santa Fe, NM

Posts: 34,588

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlawleZ

Mine made 200hp 210tq bone stock auto 102F day.

Was that corrected or uncorrected?

06-29-2011, 08:54 PM

#19

FlawleZ

Member

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jun 2008

Location: San Antonio

Posts: 280

Quote:

Originally Posted by NmexMAX

Was that corrected or uncorrected?

SAE corrected if I do believe. I'll have dig around for the dyno sheet again to be certain.

06-30-2011, 09:23 AM

#20

jkpgt96

Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Ballwin, MO

Posts: 585

Pretty good numbers for an auto.

06-30-2011, 09:32 AM

#21

cil1jtr02max

Member

Thread Starter

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 198

I'm not worried too much, just figured i'd share?
how much power loss can old plugs result in? If i use 205hp-214hp, that's about 7%-10.5% loss.
When i take it apart to do the plugs, I plan to do the spacers too, so I won't know the actual answer to that, but if i have unexpected gains from my new mods, then i'll be able to make an educated guess.

I didn't get the run files - my mistake. I was in a bit of a hurry and it was early in the morning, so I wasn't thinking all that clearly.