Dyno Discussion and Slips Discussion and a moderated "Dyno Slips" sub-forum to allow for posting of dyno slips.

2005 Maxima Intake manifold testing Kinetix vs SSIM DE

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 11:53 AM
  #1  
SurraTT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HR Swap Pioneer
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,642
From: Mebane NC
2005 Maxima Intake manifold testing Kinetix vs SSIM DE

We finally had a chance to properly test 2 intake manifold options for the 2005 Maxima VQ35DE engine.


All testing done on the same car , same day , same dyno, etc.

Car setup:

2005 Maxima
VQ35DE engine
JWT S2 cams
NISformance High Power 3.5" cold air intake
Manzo Headers
Mangafow cat back 2.5"
NISformance UpRev tune
2009 Maxima 75MM throttle body


First 3 runs are with Kinetix manifold (red, blue, green)

Last 3 runs are with DE manifold gutted (SSIM)





The only change is the manifold itself!

The power loss from the kinetix was expected once I done a side by side visual comparison. Its clear none to very little actual engineering in the manifold design.

The SSIM Maxima manifold works great! A fellow NC native "SR20DEN" innovated this SSIM manifold many many years ago. This SSIM manifold is a staple mod for DE style engines. Its pretty crazy how old it is but still seems to be the best option!

This car really could benefit from reving higher also. But it has stock oil pump, stock rod bolts, stock valve springs, stock oil gallery gasket (not sure if leaking).


Dyno testing provided by NISformance.com
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 01:36 PM
  #2  
TSelanne's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 515
Nice work Darren, and great to see this posted on the org.

Is the "SSIM" cut the same way, regardless of who worked on it? For example, is Doug's SSIM going to look the same as your SSIM?
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 02:01 PM
  #3  
SurraTT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HR Swap Pioneer
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,642
From: Mebane NC
Originally Posted by TSelanne
Nice work Darren, and great to see this posted on the org.

Is the "SSIM" cut the same way, regardless of who worked on it? For example, is Doug's SSIM going to look the same as your SSIM?
Thanks!

Yeah we are more active over here now, the info is a lot easier to find vs facebook.

I was looking for some pictures from SR20DEN's original SSIM manifold but cant find them. For the most part id say gutted DE manifolds are roughly the same. Even though have been a few guys making them over the years.
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 02:02 PM
  #4  
SurraTT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HR Swap Pioneer
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,642
From: Mebane NC
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 36 (1 members and 35 guests)


make the org great again!
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 03:57 PM
  #5  
Crusher103's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 54,042
From: Dur-ham NC
300whp out of a DE? Am i reading that correctly?
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 08:28 PM
  #6  
Cant_Get_Ryte's Avatar
Chocolate_Boi_1Der
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,588
From: P.G.'s Finest
Originally Posted by Crusher103
300whp out of a DE? Am i reading that correctly?
A cammed de
Seems about on par with jps.
Good stuff
Old Oct 13, 2017 | 11:03 PM
  #7  
Itz Shak's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 564
From: Prince Georges, MD
Yes, once again good stuff Darren. I love these comparisons
Old Oct 14, 2017 | 05:32 AM
  #8  
SurraTT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HR Swap Pioneer
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,642
From: Mebane NC
Originally Posted by Crusher103
300whp out of a DE? Am i reading that correctly?
Yes we have tuned a couple DE's with cams that have done 300whp.

This one here is doing really good even with 2.5" catback
Old Oct 16, 2017 | 12:23 PM
  #9  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Great work as always Darren!!! Glad to see this post.
Old Oct 16, 2017 | 01:43 PM
  #10  
SurraTT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HR Swap Pioneer
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,642
From: Mebane NC
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Great work as always Darren!!! Glad to see this post.

Thanks!

I figured it would be a good test it first hand, all these years Ive seen kinetix is not that great and just wanted to really see.
Old Oct 16, 2017 | 02:32 PM
  #11  
TSelanne's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 515
Would love to see you test a regular 'ole DE (w stock cams) for comparison. Tuned of course.
Old Oct 19, 2017 | 11:01 AM
  #12  
SurraTT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HR Swap Pioneer
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,642
From: Mebane NC
Originally Posted by TSelanne
Would love to see you test a regular 'ole DE (w stock cams) for comparison. Tuned of course.
We dont see many of them. Most of them burn lots of oil, have low compression, etc.

This one here the engine was replaced and timing was done years ago.
Old Oct 30, 2017 | 07:39 AM
  #13  
schmellyfart's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,816
From: AZ
Nice work. Glad to see more content on the .org.
Old Feb 14, 2018 | 07:00 AM
  #14  
95maxrider's Avatar
Lightly modded
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,741
From: Herndon, VA
I would have liked to see it tested with the NWP BOP. From what I remember, that produced almost the same peak whp as a gutted IM but didn't lose nearly as much torque. But it's good to see new dynos and info on the org!
Old Feb 17, 2018 | 07:48 AM
  #15  
SurraTT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HR Swap Pioneer
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,642
From: Mebane NC
Originally Posted by 95maxrider
I would have liked to see it tested with the NWP BOP. From what I remember, that produced almost the same peak whp as a gutted IM but didn't lose nearly as much torque. But it's good to see new dynos and info on the org!
The SSIM loses low end but gains a lot in the top end.

vias delete / block off plate with a stock manifold loses low end but dont have anywhere near the same top end gains as SSIM.

We run stock manifold with working vias. OR SSIM.
Old Feb 17, 2018 | 08:00 AM
  #16  
95maxrider's Avatar
Lightly modded
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,741
From: Herndon, VA
Originally Posted by SurraTT
The SSIM loses low end but gains a lot in the top end.

vias delete / block off plate with a stock manifold loses low end but dont have anywhere near the same top end gains as SSIM.

We run stock manifold with working vias. OR SSIM.
That seems to conflict with these classic dynos from NissanClub:

Blue=stock
Red=VIAS delete, NWP BOP
Green=SSIM



Looks like the SSIM is the worst combo below 6100, and by a good margin. I don't know about you, but I spend most of my driving below 6100 rpm, so the SSIM isn't even a consideration. I do miss the mid-range torque hit of the stock setup, but the gains above 3800 rpm appear to be enough to tip the scales in favor of VIAS delete and NWP BOP. Do you have dynos showing different results?
Old Feb 17, 2018 | 08:48 AM
  #17  
SurraTT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HR Swap Pioneer
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,642
From: Mebane NC
Thats a good point.

This is not tuned, he just had a apei neo for fuel adjustments.

We try to test on a consistent setup of FULLY tuned including Fuel, Ign timing, and intake cam timing, and extended rev limiter.

I would not suggest a SSIM on a Maxima/Altima without fully tuning it, thats for sure.

Its very complicated to test parts and find out what REALLY makes power. Showing gains on a stock car, or a car thats not fully tuned is kinda pointless IMO. These older ECU's are tuned so bad from the factory we are seeing insane gains just from tuning.



Here is a great example: 02 Maxima, DE engine, 3" intake, gutted cats. stock intake manifold , working vias. so literally intake, and gutted cats are the only mods. Gains simply from tuning IGN timing, intake cam timing, fuel.



Maybe we should start a thread going over everything we have been doing. Since we got our dyno we started all testing from scratch. Started with stock and tested tons and tons of parts.

Originally Posted by 95maxrider
That seems to conflict with these classic dynos from NissanClub:

Blue=stock
Red=VIAS delete, NWP BOP
Green=SSIM



Looks like the SSIM is the worst combo below 6100, and by a good margin. I don't know about you, but I spend most of my driving below 6100 rpm, so the SSIM isn't even a consideration. I do miss the mid-range torque hit of the stock setup, but the gains above 3800 rpm appear to be enough to tip the scales in favor of VIAS delete and NWP BOP. Do you have dynos showing different results?
Old Feb 17, 2018 | 08:49 AM
  #18  
SurraTT's Avatar
Thread Starter
HR Swap Pioneer
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,642
From: Mebane NC
We dont get a lot of DE engines though here that are actually good to test on. Most old DEs are here to be replaced with out FWD HR swap. Our testing is 80% FWD HR and 20% Old DE.
Old Aug 13, 2018 | 11:24 PM
  #19  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
I'm love to see where the limit is on a DE myself....I love my VIAS, but maybe I'll try a NWP BOP...just to see if I gain or lose low end torque...I'm only missing cams, big bore TB, NISformance Intake, and tune...Got everything else...Cattman Headers, Cattman 3" exhaust, 6" SRI, UDP, NWP spacers, etc...My engine burns a little oil but it's the intake valve seals...I'll be heading that way hopely this year or the beginning of 2019...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
one_fast_max
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
12
Oct 28, 2007 06:45 PM
pimpin02max
All Motor
30
Mar 14, 2007 10:02 AM
Fred Allen Burge
All Motor
79
Jan 14, 2007 12:11 PM
eyecon7
All Motor
19
Sep 17, 2006 06:59 PM
belfeez
General Maxima Discussion
6
Nov 27, 2004 03:15 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:33 PM.