Forced Induction Sell your turbos, supercharger, nitrous, and related items here

GI: 4th Gen turbo headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 10:53 PM
  #41  
93altima's Avatar
Turbo 4th Gen
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,041
From: Philla
so it would be 950 for feed and down pipe?
Old Oct 13, 2009 | 07:27 AM
  #42  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
The price is for the headers and crossover plus the engine mounts. Not doing down pipe since fitment would become an issuse depending on your turbo size and housing.

Ferhan
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 04:37 PM
  #43  
aic96max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,369
From: Miami , FL
does battery need to be relocated on this setup? is stainless an option?
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 05:26 PM
  #44  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
Battery does need to be relocated. Yes but the cost of parts would increase.

I was able to get some more pictures of the new engine in the car with the headers on. I will have pictures of the the crossover and down pipe on by monday.








Ferhan
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 05:27 PM
  #45  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
Here is the last one of the entire engine bay.



Ferhan
Old Oct 16, 2009 | 11:52 PM
  #46  
aic96max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,369
From: Miami , FL
dam, i hate the battery in the trunk deal, becomes a mission at the track. out of curiosity, how much for the front modded motormount? i can find you a replacement stock front mount if you need it to cut it up.i dont have a welder so i cant really make it right now. let me know, thanks
Old Oct 18, 2009 | 09:09 PM
  #47  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
I can check on the price for the mount even though I would prefer for sale this as a package. This way the guy doing the work is getting more business.

I should have pictures of the system completed this week. Waiting on a few more fuel line fittings to come it.

Ferhan
Old Oct 19, 2009 | 02:32 PM
  #48  
maxgtr2000's Avatar
KH3 by popular demand
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,102
From: Detroit, MI
The welder can still make good money on the mounts only because it would allow more people to run front feed style piping.
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 08:50 PM
  #49  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
I will asking in to selling the mounts once I have a chance to sit down and talk it over with him.

Here are pcitures of the system completed.







More in the next post.

Ferhan
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 08:53 PM
  #50  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
These are of the intercooler, intake manifold and the engine mounts. You can see the difference between the ones I ordered compared to using the hockey puck. It is much bigger and stiff.






Should have it ready to fire up Friday or this weekend, then off to tuning.

Ferhan
Old Oct 20, 2009 | 09:37 PM
  #51  
digitalbow's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 128
I'm feelin' this setup - a truly unique build. Until I saw the latest pictures, I was going to ask how you intended to route in fresh air, as the compressor side is facing rearward, but I see you have that worked out now. That intake manifold will shine up nicely when complete.

Out of curiosity, I have a few questions;
Is there still clearance for a radiator and/or condenser?
Can you discuss any considerations made about having the turbine side significantly closer to the left exhaust bank as opposed to being centered between the left and right headers (for more synchronized exhaust flow through the turbine, like a reverse-Y might provide)?
Is the turbo's weight being supported only by the manifold and DP?
Though I realize this is probably the most ideal spot to get cooler air through the compressor, have you thought about water ingestion by having the cone so low?
Specs of the build, please
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 10:31 AM
  #52  
aic96max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,369
From: Miami , FL
i have had the air intake there before, theres a plastic fender cover that works like a shield, i lived in FL and it rains alot, should be good unless its totally under water.

hows does that mount feel? a apposed to a solid mount? is filled with rubber inside or what? waiting on the mount deal.
Old Oct 21, 2009 | 10:55 AM
  #53  
XeroX's Avatar
Hella internets
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,808
From: Sacramento, CA
Subscribing to this, so far i like the setup. Curious to know what some of your answers are in regards to digitalbow's questions...
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 09:51 AM
  #54  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
To answer your questions.

There is room for the radiator and condensor. The only thing that we will modify is the fan shroud by the dump pipe. Itcomes very close or touches. Will be either cutt out a part of the shroud or make a new shroud. The fan is not affected.

The turbo was place there to allow for the cold air setup with minimal restrictions. The one bank is longer but the velocity of the air will be about the same at the merge. The merge a the turbo it also position in a way to enter the turbo at the same angle for both pipes. There should be no issues with the gases slowing the turbo down from defecting each other.

At the moment the urbo is only being supported by the piping but I may be adding a bracket off the frame rail for support.

On my previous car tha was supercharged, I used a 10" cone in the fender with no water being sucked in. On this car I have an 8" cone that will have a shield right in front of it. So no water will ever it the cone, it will deflect of the shield and hit the fender guard.

Hope that covers it.

Ferhan

Last edited by furbiss112; Oct 22, 2009 at 09:55 AM.
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 10:25 AM
  #55  
digitalbow's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 128
^ I got it. Are you on ChicagoNissanClub
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 10:40 AM
  #56  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
I am but I have not really posted this there yet.

Ferhan
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #57  
XeroX's Avatar
Hella internets
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,808
From: Sacramento, CA
I am one of 3 (now that kevlo joined the RMT club) that has a functional Rear mounted turbo setup. And our filters are exposed under the car right behind the muffler. I can speek from experience that i have been driving around for over 2 winters like this, and a little water doesnt hurt anything anyways. just dont start driving thru any rivers and u should be kewl lol...

The price is somewhat right, and im reallly digging this setup. Quite possible might make the move away from RMT for this.. MAYBE

Are you concerned at all with the hot pipe from the front bank being too close to that coolant line tho? That looks a lil iffy even with the exaust wrapped...
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #58  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
The exhaust in coated in high temp paint then wraped and finally painted over again. Should not have much of a heat issue.

The radiator hosed will be switched over to hard lines usings only rubber connectors at the engine and radiator.

Ferhan
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 11:53 AM
  #59  
XeroX's Avatar
Hella internets
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,808
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by furbiss112
The exhaust in coated in high temp paint then wraped and finally painted over again. Should not have much of a heat issue.

The radiator hosed will be switched over to hard lines usings only rubber connectors at the engine and radiator.

Ferhan
You paint the piping...i get that, and then the wrap goes on, but you paint over that also? Im confused lol

I didnt think of using braided coolant lines, this makes more sense now how close does it actually get tho?
Old Oct 22, 2009 | 08:23 PM
  #60  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
Its a bit overkill to keep the heat were it belongs. It helps with the look on the headers too.

I will be running steel or aluminium tubing like the supra guys run instead of rubber hoses. The coolant pipe going to the radiator in 1.5 to 2 inches from the front bank.

Ferhan
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 01:54 AM
  #61  
aic96max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,369
From: Miami , FL
any word on the mount?
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #62  
93altima's Avatar
Turbo 4th Gen
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,041
From: Philla
what about the upper rad hose?
Old Oct 23, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #63  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
For those interested in the front mount. Price would be $100 and I think he will need the orginal one.

Using hard pipe for the upper radiator hose.

Ferhan
Old Nov 1, 2009 | 08:16 PM
  #64  
aic96max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,369
From: Miami , FL
can you confirm, would be priced right without needing mines, as shipping would be involved
Old Nov 2, 2009 | 08:41 AM
  #65  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
Not sure what you are asking. Please rephrase your question. Thanks. I should be starting the car this week since I had to get some other things done last week.

Ferhan
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 05:44 PM
  #66  
mywhitewolf's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 143
Originally Posted by XeroX
I am one of 3 (now that kevlo joined the RMT club) that has a functional Rear mounted turbo setup.
So i guess mine isn't "functional" then..

Refer to maximasdownunder

only difference is i've moved my cone filter (which is filthy btw) to the other side of the car, its right behind the wheel so gets splashed with water all the time and i don't have any problems with water ingestion.
Old Nov 11, 2009 | 11:58 PM
  #67  
Drnismo's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
From: houston
what size exactly is that intercooler? will u have modify the bumper a bit like cut into it?
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 03:56 PM
  #68  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
The intercooler is a 24x12x3.5. From inlet to outlet is 34. The bumper is shaved to fit about it and it sits a bit lower then the bumper itself.

Ferhan
Old Nov 14, 2009 | 04:36 PM
  #69  
PharoNDmist's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 504
From: Uniondale NY
Are you heading to get some dyno time soon?
Old Nov 17, 2009 | 01:12 AM
  #70  
Drnismo's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 8
From: houston
hows the project coming along? new pics?
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 07:33 AM
  #71  
sennister's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 68
From: Jackson, AL
What type on fuel fails are you running and how difficult was it the relocate the throttlebody to the opposite side of the engine. Also is that a modified VQ30DET manifold or a custom job. Almost forgot this setup will work on a 3.5 correct?

Last edited by sennister; Nov 18, 2009 at 09:33 AM.
Old Nov 18, 2009 | 09:01 PM
  #72  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
The dyno will not be done until the engine is broken in. Looking at mid December.

The setup is completed but there are some changes that I will be making after the engine is broken in. I will have pictures after that. Right now working on last of the stand alone wiring and getting running. Should be done with that tomorrow.

The rails are stock but they are modified. We used the stock lower intake manifold form the VQ30DET and made our own upper for it. The throttle body to the other side was not that hard either. If the physical size of the engines are the same then yes.

Ferhan
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 07:56 AM
  #73  
sennister's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 68
From: Jackson, AL
Will that manifold be offered with the kit along with instructions for relocating the throttlebody? I am very interested in this setup and will most likely purchase one of the kits when they are ready.

Last edited by sennister; Nov 19, 2009 at 08:00 AM.
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 02:03 PM
  #74  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
The problem with the manifold is getting a hold of a J-spec lower. If you can get your hands on one then it can be made. I have the flange for making the upper. It is easy to set the throttle to the other side. All you do is extend the two connecters on the tps with it.

Also, I am not running the EGR and the coolant lines to the throttle. I will have my Master Tech figure out a way to get the engine lights off to still pass emissions.

Ferhan
Old Nov 19, 2009 | 08:58 PM
  #75  
sennister's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 68
From: Jackson, AL
Definitely put me down for one of these kits. I live in Alabama so there are no emission inspections
Old Dec 4, 2009 | 06:56 PM
  #76  
bryan163's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 369
From: clinton, connecticut
Originally Posted by furbiss112
The problem with the manifold is getting a hold of a J-spec lower. If you can get your hands on one then it can be made. I have the flange for making the upper. It is easy to set the throttle to the other side. All you do is extend the two connecters on the tps with it.

Also, I am not running the EGR and the coolant lines to the throttle. I will have my Master Tech figure out a way to get the engine lights off to still pass emissions.

Ferhan
You probably won't have any drivability issues by deleting the EGR and TB coolant lines, But you will need to hook the IACV back up to keep the car from stalling while its warming up. You could always re-plumb the EGR tube to your new intake to keep the CEL away if you have to.
I've been working on building some turbo and intake manifolds also. Routing the feed pipes DET style seemed impossible on my ABS equipped 4th gen. So I did a forward Y-pipe style. I'm also working on an open plenum style upper intake. I'm fortunate to have access to a CNC and aluminum welding equipment. I'm wondering how well your intake clears the hood where it crosses over the timing cover because I wanted to go that way, but I though it would be to close.
Anyway, this has made for a great thread. Congrats and keep the info and pictures coming.

Last edited by bryan163; Dec 4, 2009 at 06:59 PM.
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 04:15 PM
  #77  
XeroX's Avatar
Hella internets
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,808
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by mywhitewolf
So i guess mine isn't "functional" then..

Refer to maximasdownunder

only difference is i've moved my cone filter (which is filthy btw) to the other side of the car, its right behind the wheel so gets splashed with water all the time and i don't have any problems with water ingestion.
Ooh! sweet deal man...i havent heard of anyone other than kevlo, streetz , and one other guy on here...blackbirdvq i think?

Well now i gota add you to the list haha...You guys need to come out of the woodwork!
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 09:43 PM
  #78  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
Sorry guys but no really prigress right now. I am busy with school and have not reworked the IACV into the intake yet. School ends soon so should be fully running shortly.

Ferhan
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 05:11 AM
  #79  
t6378tp's Avatar
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,785
From: Philly
Originally Posted by furbiss112
Sorry guys but no really prigress right now. I am busy with school and have not reworked the IACV into the intake yet. School ends soon so should be fully running shortly.

Ferhan
so just run the car without it for now
Old Dec 22, 2009 | 09:43 PM
  #80  
furbiss112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 891
From: Vernon Hills, IL/ Alexandria, VA
I am also working on geting the auto transmission to run correctly with the stand alone. The transmission also needs to get a signal from the IAVC. This trans is starting to annoy me a bit. I have ordered a new custom radiator to go with this setup. Should be in before the end of the week.

Ferhan



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:55 PM.