General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

Car & Driver finally tests the 2002-03 Maxima 6-SPD!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 06:20 PM
  #1  
4DRSpeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Project Ruby......
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,282
From: Maryville, TN
Car & Driver finally tests the 2002-03 Maxima 6-SPD!

I got the new Car & Driver issue today (October 2002) it has the new Accord on the cover. On page 148 there is a Short Take on the Maxima SE. When I started to read it, I knew this wasn't going to be a good article.

The very first paragraph says: "If you've ever found yourself speculating on famous names that have faded into obscurity-like, "Whatever happended to Bill Haley?"-you have a basic understanding of our feelings when we've strapped on recent editions of the Nissan Maxima: Whatever happended to the real Maxima?"

While they did bash the Maxima a little bit, because it has turned into more of a BMW then staying true to what it was orginally a "4 Door Sports Car". They still rung out some impressive times. 0-60 in 6.0 -- 15.7 to 100 -- and 14.7 @ 97 MPH through the 1/4 Mile.

Too bad the Maxima is going to be even larger, they should do a redesign of the Maxima but keep it the same size and bring back the independent rear suspension. Only 0.82G on the skidpad

What's sad is that the last time the Maxima placed first in a comparo was in August 1992.

It's a pretty interseting article. This issue also has every car and truck for 2003. They mention a sentence about how this is the last year for this body style. And that 2004 will have a new design, and that's about it for the Max.
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 06:24 PM
  #2  
JUDE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,120
From: Miami, FL
Dang, it gets to 97mph in 14.7 seconds, but takes a full second to reach 100 at 15.7 ??
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 06:27 PM
  #3  
MAXRAY's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 338
what are the times for auto 2k2?
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 09:17 PM
  #4  
dmontzsta's Avatar
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,598
From: SoCal
They have a point and obviously Nissan does too, when they dumped the 4DSC stickers from the Maxima after the 3rd gen. WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE EVERYONE... it is just too hard to beleive that an older car is...well nevermind...I will end it here.
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 09:27 PM
  #5  
Vyrus's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,442
Originally posted by dmontzmax
They have a point and obviously Nissan does too, when they dumped the 4DSC stickers from the Maxima after the 3rd gen. WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE EVERYONE... it is just too hard to beleive that an older car is...well nevermind...I will end it here.
Cyrus: "Mom, I have a 4th Gen. My friend Nghia's Maxima - the newer rounder one - that's a 5th Gen. And you see that elder one over there, can you tell me what that is?"
Mom: "The Best Gen. Why did they ever change it." That's 1 for you 3rd Gens.
-Cyrus
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 10:07 PM
  #6  
dmontzsta's Avatar
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,598
From: SoCal
hehe You know you love it!!
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 10:14 PM
  #7  
Maximan190's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,996
From: long island, NY
Re: Car & Driver finally tests the 2002-03 Maxima 6-SPD!

Originally posted by 4DRSpeed

What's sad is that the last time the Maxima placed first in a comparo was in August 1992.
gee, wonder why


see Bill's quote in my sig
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 10:36 PM
  #8  
dmontzsta's Avatar
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,598
From: SoCal
That quote is beautiful.
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 11:11 PM
  #9  
02MaximizedVQ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 630
Re: Car & Driver finally tests the 2002-03 Maxima 6-SPD!

Originally posted by 4DRSpeed


While they did bash the Maxima a little bit, because it has turned into more of a BMW then staying true to what it was orginally a "4 Door Sports Car". They still rung out some impressive times. 0-60 in 6.0 -- 15.7 to 100 -- and 14.7 @ 97 MPH through the 1/4 Mile.

Anyone who says a BWM isn't a 4 door sports car has never driven one of 98-03 models. That is very poor journalism coming from an automotive magazine. And a 4 door sedan with 255 horsepower and a 6spd transmission isn't sporty? Sometimes I get the feeling that there are certain journalists who have been so spoiled by testing Mercedes and Corvettes that they forget about the price conscious segment of the market that is what the Maxima competes in.

Jesse
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 11:15 PM
  #10  
dmontzsta's Avatar
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,598
From: SoCal
255hp with a 6 speed is powerful. But it still does not make it sporty. For example...a dragster is powerful, but does not go hitting the corners hard...dont get me wrong the 2k2 is just about right there as one of the sportiest Maxs made.
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 11:20 PM
  #11  
02MaximizedVQ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 630
Originally posted by dmontzmax
255hp with a 6 speed is powerful. But it still does not make it sporty. For example...a dragster is powerful, but does not go hitting the corners hard...dont get me wrong the 2k2 is just about right there as one of the sportiest Maxs made.
.

And the Lexus IS300 is quick around the turns but is slow in the straights. There is no sedan under 30k dollars that will do both well. And I believe there are quite a few IS300's over the $30k mark.
Whenever you put a price restriction on a vehicle there will ALWAYS be "shortcomings" or more specifically....b*tching.

Jesse
Old Aug 22, 2002 | 11:21 PM
  #12  
dmontzsta's Avatar
Ford Only.
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,598
From: SoCal
yup, the 2k2 is beyond excellent in its price category. I really dont know what they were thinking. I would take a 2k2 over a IS300 anyday.
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 01:31 AM
  #13  
meccanoble's Avatar
Sports Button FTW
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,291
From: NJ
Originally posted by MAXRAY
what are the times for auto 2k2?
on edmunds.com, it says the 2k2 max runs 0-60 in 6.3 seconds....

.3 seconds faster than the acura TL-S running at 6.6
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 02:58 AM
  #14  
Frank Fontaine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,879
Re: Car & Driver finally tests the 2002-03 Maxima 6-SPD!

Originally posted by 4DRSpeed
I got the new Car & Driver issue today (October 2002) it has the new Accord on the cover. On page 148 there is a Short Take on the Maxima SE. When I started to read it, I knew this wasn't going to be a good article.

The very first paragraph says: "If you've ever found yourself speculating on famous names that have faded into obscurity-like, "Whatever happended to Bill Haley?"-you have a basic understanding of our feelings when we've strapped on recent editions of the Nissan Maxima: Whatever happended to the real Maxima?"

While they did bash the Maxima a little bit, because it has turned into more of a BMW then staying true to what it was orginally a "4 Door Sports Car". They still rung out some impressive times. 0-60 in 6.0 -- 15.7 to 100 -- and 14.7 @ 97 MPH through the 1/4 Mile.

Too bad the Maxima is going to be even larger, they should do a redesign of the Maxima but keep it the same size and bring back the independent rear suspension. Only 0.82G on the skidpad

What's sad is that the last time the Maxima placed first in a comparo was in August 1992.

It's a pretty interseting article. This issue also has every car and truck for 2003. They mention a sentence about how this is the last year for this body style. And that 2004 will have a new design, and that's about it for the Max.
Wow, imagine after all that a 1996 M3 will beat it's pants off by .3 0-60? 6 senconds, I thought it could do better than that. Then again, for 21 grand maybe 6.0 and 97 mph is best bang for buck.
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 03:33 AM
  #15  
Mishmosh's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,653
Originally posted by 02MaximizedVQ
And the Lexus IS300 is quick around the turns but is slow in the straights. There is no sedan under 30k dollars that will do both well.
The G35 starts at $28k, handles well and is very quick! I think if they redid the tail, it would be killer...
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 05:37 AM
  #16  
4DRSpeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Project Ruby......
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,282
From: Maryville, TN
Originally posted by dmontzmax
yup, the 2k2 is beyond excellent in its price category. I really dont know what they were thinking. I would take a 2k2 over a IS300 anyday.
I forgot to mention that Car & Driver did mention how the Maxima has great bang for the buck. That's one thing they gave it a plus.

I'll probably get flamed for this, but here goes. I made the comment about how the Maxima became more of a BMW. I'm not saying BMW isn't a 4 door sports car, I think they are really awesome cars. I was just saying that the Maxima has become more luxurious like a BMW, than staying true what it was set out to be. Infiniti has the I30/I35 that's the car(s) that should be competing with BMW. The Maxima should have stayed sporty like the 3rd Gen, IMHO. While the Max is still sporty, it's just not what it use to be.
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 08:16 AM
  #17  
MONTE 01&97 SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,750
From: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Nice trap speed but the 1/4 mile time seems a bit slow, some stock autos are running 14.7's.
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 09:50 AM
  #18  
slick's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 773
does C&D break in the car before testing it? doesn't the max perform better after breaking in first?
anyways, those times are respectable, but i guess i will have to get the mag and read it myself to see what they say. btw, what cars did they compare it to?
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 09:51 AM
  #19  
motectransam's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 112
Well, the mainstream press may have something to nitpick on, but I truly think the mainstream appeal of the Maxima is really taking off. Times have never been hotter for to get a Maxima. I remember my 1995 Trans Am with just Borla exhaust trapping 100.3 mph. Now we have an affordable 4-door trapping 97 mph?!?!? Sheez.
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 10:25 AM
  #20  
Greg's2kGLE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,373
Re: Car & Driver finally tests the 2002-03 Maxima 6-SPD!

Originally posted by 4DRSpeed
0-60 in 6.0 -- 15.7 to 100 -- and 14.7 @ 97 MPH through the 1/4 Mile.
Alright, let me see if I understand what you wrote. They did the 1/4 in 15.7@100mph and 14.7@97 mph? Something doesn't seem right.
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 12:16 PM
  #21  
Pervis Anathema's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,761
Re: Re: Car & Driver finally tests the 2002-03 Maxima 6-SPD!

Originally posted by Greg's2kGLE


Alright, let me see if I understand what you wrote. They did the 1/4 in 15.7@100mph and 14.7@97 mph? Something doesn't seem right.
15.7 to 100 mph. (vs. ~25 for my VG )
Old Aug 23, 2002 | 01:46 PM
  #22  
Greg's2kGLE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,373
Re: Re: Re: Car & Driver finally tests the 2002-03 Maxima 6-SPD!

Originally posted by Pervis Anathema


15.7 to 100 mph. (vs. ~25 for my VG )
I didn't read it correctly. I got it now.
Old Aug 24, 2002 | 07:25 AM
  #23  
4DRSpeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Project Ruby......
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,282
From: Maryville, TN
Re: Re: Re: Re: Car & Driver finally tests the 2002-03 Maxima 6-SPD!

Originally posted by Greg's2kGLE


I didn't read it correctly. I got it now.
Don't worry your not the only one that didn't read it correctly. When I was reading the article, I was like WTF? Car & Driver doesn't know how to drive a stick. But then I realized they worded it all funny.

They mentioned how sedans are becoming even faster each year. They used examples like the WRX, the TL Type-S, and few others. I don't have the article in front of me at the moment.
Old Aug 25, 2002 | 12:35 PM
  #24  
Loe max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,269
From: sarasota FL
Re: Car & Driver finally tests the 2002-03 Maxima 6-SPD!

Originally posted by 4DRSpeed
What's sad is that the last time the Maxima placed first in a comparo was in August 1992.

May 2000 Road and Track "America's Movers"

5th place- Toyota Camry V6 XLE
4th place- Ford Taurus SE
3rd place- Pontiac Grand Prix GT
2nd place- Honda Accord EX V6
1st place- Nissan Maxima SE

"...the Maxima was everyone's choice for gobbling up stretches of twisting caynon road, with the least understeer and best grip, promoting high driver confidence."

Old Aug 25, 2002 | 01:19 PM
  #25  
tbirdrob's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 269
Originally posted by meccanoble


on edmunds.com, it says the 2k2 max runs 0-60 in 6.3 seconds....

.3 seconds faster than the acura TL-S running at 6.6

I'm pretty sure the Edmunds article was an estimate.
Old Aug 25, 2002 | 05:01 PM
  #26  
speedtrip's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 500
From: Boise, ID
Originally posted by JUDE
Dang, it gets to 97mph in 14.7 seconds, but takes a full second to reach 100 at 15.7 ??
Trap speed is the average speed of a vehicle over the last 60' of the dragstrip. It's not the speed of the vehicle as it crosses the finish line. A simple example is a car entering the traps at 90 mph and crosses the finish line at 95 mph would have a trap speed of 92.5 mph.

As to the 14.7 et for the 6-spd I wouldn't read to much into it. I'm happy to see a sub 15 second et in a printed publication. You don't know the weather conditions, how much gas was in the tank, where they using premium gas.....the list goes on.
Old Aug 25, 2002 | 06:41 PM
  #27  
nforg's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 289
I agree with what you said 4DRSpeed, however, nissan was not profitable from 93-99..... Granted a new president was named in 2000 (finally) and business operations, etc. changed; but money is the name of the game, and if a 4dr luxury car makes money and a 4dr sports car doesn't.... well which one would you make?
Old Aug 25, 2002 | 06:49 PM
  #28  
$tillen$ux's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 111
this thread reminds me of having read somewhere about C&D taking $$ from car companies for biased articles. Somehow, i never completely trusted car mags since then (yes,regrettably including such less financially endowed/prestigious mags like "Wards auto world". All-in-all, although its difficult to do, I try as hard as i can to ignore for the most part, those mags that potentially have interests other than giving the sole subjective opinion of the editors themselves.
geez, in these days, even the olympics arent so sacred anymore.
Old Aug 25, 2002 | 07:37 PM
  #29  
Jaws's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 787
Originally posted by $tillen$ux
this thread reminds me of having read somewhere about C&D taking $$ from car companies for biased articles. Somehow, i never completely trusted car mags since then (yes,regrettably including such less financially endowed/prestigious mags like "Wards auto world". All-in-all, although its difficult to do, I try as hard as i can to ignore for the most part, those mags that potentially have interests other than giving the sole subjective opinion of the editors themselves.
geez, in these days, even the olympics arent so sacred anymore.
I believe it was Motor Trend that took money for awarding a car with 'car of the year' honors. C&D is the best North American car mag (R&T a close second)---IMHO.
Old Aug 25, 2002 | 07:47 PM
  #30  
PeterUbers's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 243
I don't mean to interject something totally OT, but I thought this might be worth mentioning (and before I offend someone, I should mention that I'm a huge maxima fan, and would love to own a 6-spd).

W/ that said, a recent issue of C&D nearly put the CL-S 6-spd FWD coupe OVER the 330Ci .. a car they've revelled over for YEARS... The CL-S lost by a point, after having read that article, I've been a little more trusting of C&D reporting. However, Acura may also have invested a good amount of money into that article to produce such great journalism (on behalf of Acura).
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 04:18 AM
  #31  
$tillen$ux's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 111
oops, i probably was talking about MT! too bad, its a shame that ruined my faith in auto-mags in general. Guess im going to have to test drive more often from now on!
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 04:34 AM
  #32  
Frank Fontaine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,879
Originally posted by PeterUbers
I don't mean to interject something totally OT, but I thought this might be worth mentioning (and before I offend someone, I should mention that I'm a huge maxima fan, and would love to own a 6-spd).

W/ that said, a recent issue of C&D nearly put the CL-S 6-spd FWD coupe OVER the 330Ci .. a car they've revelled over for YEARS... The CL-S lost by a point, after having read that article, I've been a little more trusting of C&D reporting. However, Acura may also have invested a good amount of money into that article to produce such great journalism (on behalf of Acura).
imho attention to details does matter. It doesn't matter if the 2k2 Max has a trap speed of 108 mph and does 0-60 in 4.5 sec, it still looks as it does, very unmodern and skinny. Stuff like the fact that the rear windows don't go all the way down, why do they miss details like that? the 2k2 Camry has rear windows that go all the way down. Take a look at the CL/TL, the rear windshield. It's mounted the old way, 1998 technology. Doesn't matter to most, matters to car enthusiasts. Like dating a girl who is not good-looking but has a good job. Some say I don't care about looks and they go for it, others do care and look at the "total package." Looks will always matter in my mind even if they're only skin deep.
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 05:05 AM
  #33  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Blah Blah Blah


Originally posted by Frank Fontaine


imho attention to details does matter. It doesn't matter if the 2k2 Max has a trap speed of 108 mph and does 0-60 in 4.5 sec, it still looks as it does, very unmodern and skinny. Stuff like the fact that the rear windows don't go all the way down, why do they miss details like that? the 2k2 Camry has rear windows that go all the way down. Take a look at the CL/TL, the rear windshield. It's mounted the old way, 1998 technology. Doesn't matter to most, matters to car enthusiasts. Like dating a girl who is not good-looking but has a good job. Some say I don't care about looks and they go for it, others do care and look at the "total package." Looks will always matter in my mind even if they're only skin deep.
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 05:07 AM
  #34  
Larry's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 369
imho attention to details does matter. It doesn't matter if the 2k2 Max has a trap speed of 108 mph and does 0-60 in 4.5 sec, it still looks as it does, very unmodern and skinny. Stuff like the fact that the rear windows don't go all the way down, why do they miss details like that? the 2k2 Camry has rear windows that go all the way down. Take a look at the CL/TL, the rear windshield. It's mounted the old way, 1998 technology. Doesn't matter to most, matters to car enthusiasts. Like dating a girl who is not good-looking but has a good job. Some say I don't care about looks and they go for it, others do care and look at the "total package." Looks will always matter in my mind even if they're only skin deep
I just bought a 2002 Camry and I am very disappointed. All four wheels were out of alignment and the dealer would not align it. I took it in two times and all I got was that it was within specs. The camber on all four wheels was -1.0/-1.3 degrees. I could visually see all four wheels/tires leaning. I even checked several other cars on their lot with my level and they were all that way. I finally bought some eccentric strut bolts and paid to have it aligned. Maybe the rear windows go down all the way but I would be more concerned about all four tire wearing out prematurely.
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 05:54 AM
  #35  
4DRSpeed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Project Ruby......
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,282
From: Maryville, TN
Originally posted by nforg
I agree with what you said 4DRSpeed, however, nissan was not profitable from 93-99..... Granted a new president was named in 2000 (finally) and business operations, etc. changed; but money is the name of the game, and if a 4dr luxury car makes money and a 4dr sports car doesn't.... well which one would you make?
I totally understand. I just wish at the end of 2003 model year, that Nissan will bring out a sporty Maxima, stiffer springs, and maybe a slight boost in HP. From the looks of the 2004 model, the Maxima will never really have a sporty edge again.

Will see.
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 06:06 AM
  #36  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine


imho attention to details does matter. It doesn't matter if the 2k2 Max has a trap speed of 108 mph and does 0-60 in 4.5 sec, it still looks as it does, very unmodern and skinny. Stuff like the fact that the rear windows don't go all the way down, why do they miss details like that? the 2k2 Camry has rear windows that go all the way down. Take a look at the CL/TL, the rear windshield. It's mounted the old way, 1998 technology. Doesn't matter to most, matters to car enthusiasts. Like dating a girl who is not good-looking but has a good job. Some say I don't care about looks and they go for it, others do care and look at the "total package." Looks will always matter in my mind even if they're only skin deep.
If you actually own a Maxima I suggest you get rid of it. Go buy a Camry or Accord so you cna complain to those people on their message boards. If you own a Maxima it deserves better.
Old Aug 26, 2002 | 08:48 AM
  #37  
Jaws's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 787
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine


imho attention to details does matter. It doesn't matter if the 2k2 Max has a trap speed of 108 mph and does 0-60 in 4.5 sec, it still looks as it does, very unmodern and skinny. Stuff like the fact that the rear windows don't go all the way down, why do they miss details like that? the 2k2 Camry has rear windows that go all the way down. Take a look at the CL/TL, the rear windshield. It's mounted the old way, 1998 technology. Doesn't matter to most, matters to car enthusiasts. Like dating a girl who is not good-looking but has a good job. Some say I don't care about looks and they go for it, others do care and look at the "total package." Looks will always matter in my mind even if they're only skin deep.
What is does 'skinny' mean? In the Camry they left out the most important 'details', such as a real engine, manual gearbox and soul.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fastcarny
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
May 18, 2020 10:40 AM
Lakersallday24
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
10
Jun 16, 2019 01:35 AM
Blaxima
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
37
Aug 31, 2015 01:02 PM
acw
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
10
Aug 13, 2015 12:50 AM
erniel
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
1
Aug 8, 2015 09:32 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:20 PM.