General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

2k-2k1 Manifold on a 2k2?? Insights?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2002, 09:41 PM
  #1  
Maxima.org Sponsor and Donating Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
dmbmaxima2k2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,690
2k-2k1 Manifold on a 2k2?? Insights?

me and ethan have been scheming again and we both have thought in the back of our heads what about a 2k intake manifold. they might not look pretty but they don't get hot AND they scream right to redline and i bet they will fit easier then a 350 Z one. so i'm thinking, they switch over based on RPM cus we disconnected Jeff's(RU4REAL) vacuum linme to the butterflies and they still opened and he didn't get a CEL. so if it will fit i'm thinking that we might lose a few FT LBS of TQ which i'm more then happy to give up but gain maybe 10hp maybe a few more. the engine between the 4th gne and the 2k is pretty much the same other then minor exhaust tweaks and hen the intake. any insights from anyone before we proceed.
dmbmaxima2k2 is offline  
Old 10-27-2002, 09:51 PM
  #2  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
We discussed this one several times guys. If you really want to try it out then go ahead but here are things to consider.

You will certainly have to use both the upper and lower parts of the manifold. The injector fitting is different and you will have to find O rings that will seal up the smaller fit Peak & Hold injectors we have. Gaining hp is mere speculation at this point and you could easily lose a few instead of gain. Instead of just going through with the project it may be wiser to have all three manifold assemblies flowed (VQ35, VQ30-K and VQ30 MEVI). That way you can have the facts on paper before you wasted too much time and effort.
At this point I doubt the older manifolds are capable of flowing more than the new one but it would be nice to see someone try this out and put this speculation to bed.
SR20DEN is offline  
Old 10-27-2002, 09:58 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
LaXor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 145
Does't the 2000 and 2001 have "Plastic type intake manifold"? I keep hearing about it not switching over at 4800-5000 because of the poor materials used. Correct me if I'm wrong. Just a thought.
LaXor is offline  
Old 10-27-2002, 10:01 PM
  #4  
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Dave B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,555
I would think the drive-by-wire throttle body would pose the biggest problem.


Dave
Dave B is offline  
Old 10-27-2002, 10:01 PM
  #5  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
emax02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Originally posted by SR20DEN
We discussed this one several times guys. If you really want to try it out then go ahead but here are things to consider.

You will certainly have to use both the upper and lower parts of the manifold. The injector fitting is different and you will have to find O rings that will seal up the smaller fit Peak & Hold injectors we have. Gaining hp is mere speculation at this point and you could easily lose a few instead of gain. Instead of just going through with the project it may be wiser to have all three manifold assemblies flowed (VQ35, VQ30-K and (VQ30 MEVI). That way you can have the facts on paper before you wasted too much time and effort.
At this point I doubt the older manifolds are capable of flowing more than the new one.
I disagree with this. I beleive the 00-01 manifold will flow better up top then our 2002 manifold. Reason is because on the 00-10's they breath very well all the way up to redline. Now if the VQ30DE-K breaths well up to redline I belevie the same would hold true for the VQ35. Of course this is just a logical guess here, the incresed air volume going into the VQ35 may over welm this designe but judging by modidied 00's the manifold breathes well up to 205 WHP.

As for the injectors not fitting properly.. This will only be a problem if the lower manifold does not match up. I will have to get a good look at a 00-01's lower manifold. I think our lower manifold may be the came minus the holes for the injectors. Well see..
emax02 is offline  
Old 10-27-2002, 10:05 PM
  #6  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
Originally posted by Dave B
I would think the drive-by-wire throttle body would pose the biggest problem.


Dave
But wouldn't the car make more power without that brass butterfly thingy blocking the air?
SR20DEN is offline  
Old 10-27-2002, 10:18 PM
  #7  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
Originally posted by emax95




As for the injectors not fitting properly.. This will only be a problem if the lower manifold does not match up.
Wrong. Prior to 2002 Nissan used saturated injectors that were seated intot he lower intake manifold with large rubber seals. The 2002 injectors are peak & hold and have a much smaller footprint. They use much smaller rubber seals to mate to the lower manifold. Look for yourself and see.
SR20DEN is offline  
Old 10-27-2002, 10:38 PM
  #8  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
emax02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Originally posted by SR20DEN


Wrong. Prior to 2002 Nissan used saturated injectors that were seated intot he lower intake manifold with large rubber seals. The 2002 injectors are peak & hold and have a much smaller footprint. They use much smaller rubber seals to mate to the lower manifold. Look for yourself and see.
No i'm not wrong, lol.. I said This will only be a problem if the lower manifold does not match up. Now if the lower manifold mathes up I will not even need to touch the fuel injectors. See what I'm saying here?
emax02 is offline  
Old 10-28-2002, 09:40 AM
  #9  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Re: 2k-2k1 Manifold on a 2k2?? Insights?

Originally posted by dmbmaxima2k2
me and ethan have been scheming again and we both have thought in the back of our heads what about a 2k intake manifold. they might not look pretty but they don't get hot AND they scream right to redline and i bet they will fit easier then a 350 Z one. so i'm thinking, they switch over based on RPM cus we disconnected Jeff's(RU4REAL) vacuum linme to the butterflies and they still opened and he didn't get a CEL. so if it will fit i'm thinking that we might lose a few FT LBS of TQ which i'm more then happy to give up but gain maybe 10hp maybe a few more. the engine between the 4th gne and the 2k is pretty much the same other then minor exhaust tweaks and hen the intake. any insights from anyone before we proceed.
Actually, it works off both a RPM signal sent from the ECU at 5K and TWO vacuum sources. IF you guys disconnected one vacuum source the other must be sufficient to open the valves.

I have the system description next to my desk at home and I can double check TONIGHT. However, I don't think providing a vacuum source is going to be too difficult, but coming up with a vacuum control valve that opens at a certain RPM, may be.

BTW, why did you give up on the 350Z manifold withOUT trying the bottom half?
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 10-28-2002, 11:07 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
SuDZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,530
Does the power curve of the 350Z manifold go up to redline nicely like the 00-01 maxima? I am just curious since it just seems weird they would skip it over for the 2k2. Unless they were trying to "detune" the 2k2 so that the power level would not be even closer to the 350z.

SuDZ
SuDZ is offline  
Old 10-28-2002, 11:21 AM
  #11  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
SkylineGTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 878
I did some cfm calculations, im not an expert or anything, but just thought i could help. The 3L VQ at redline needs 297cfm of air, while the 3.5 @ redline needs 347cfm. The long runners on the VQ30DE-K intake manifold, is roughly the same flow of the VQ30DE manifold on 4th gens, and 4th gens run out of breath around 5500rpms, I assumed running out of breath meant the intake manifold couldnt flow that much more without it being forced in, and it showed that the long runners would flow up to 247cfm while still being efficient. The VQ30DEK manifold, makes power up to 6400rpm, which is about a flow rate of 288cfm. doing some reverse calculations with the 3.5L, the long runners would start to run out of breath around 4700rpms, and IF the short runners ran out of breath at 6400rpm on a VQ30DE-K, then it would also begin to run short on the VQ35 around 5500rpms.

None of this is completely accurate or precise, i just thought id figure out how much air each engine needs, and if the intake manifolds were the factor in how much air the engine could take in, u might not see any gains at all. It just shows that the VQ35 swallows significantly more air than the VQ30.
SkylineGTR is offline  
Old 10-28-2002, 11:25 AM
  #12  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
SkylineGTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 878
I didnt factor in that it could be the cams slowing the flow of air, so again, all my calculations could mean nothing, other than that a bigger engine needs more air.

One more note, the VQ35DE @ 5700rpm, needs as much air as the VQ30DE needs at redline.
SkylineGTR is offline  
Old 10-28-2002, 02:29 PM
  #13  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
Originally posted by emax95

Now if the lower manifold mathes up I will not even need to touch the fuel injectors. See what I'm saying here?
Be serious Ethan. There is no way that thing will line up and fit. If the 350Z top was so much different than ours what makes you think the other one will be any more close?
SR20DEN is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TallTom
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
50
07-08-2022 09:54 AM
aw11power
Supercharged/Turbocharged
161
10-10-2021 04:57 AM
JonBlz
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
2
10-05-2015 06:02 PM
jaydot901
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
9
09-29-2015 01:18 PM
lrb6805
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
0
09-24-2015 05:03 PM



Quick Reply: 2k-2k1 Manifold on a 2k2?? Insights?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:25 AM.