Whats your best reaction time?
11-14-2002, 02:17 PM
#7
.14 running against majesticbluemto on here
i tried to flash stall(first time) the car so i punched it on the first light then the car rolled out becuase i wasn't stepping on the brakes hard enough & got a .14 r/t it was funny
my best non redlight r/t is in my sig
.50
i tried to flash stall(first time) the car so i punched it on the first light then the car rolled out becuase i wasn't stepping on the brakes hard enough & got a .14 r/t it was funny
my best non redlight r/t is in my sig
.50
11-14-2002, 03:15 PM
#15
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
Im lost, how come in NHRA .400 is not considered redlighting?
What am I missing here?
Im lost, how come in NHRA .400 is not considered redlighting?
What am I missing here?
11-14-2002, 04:01 PM
#17
Originally posted by Chris91SE
and .500 is the best you can get w/o redlighting...
...dum dum
and .500 is the best you can get w/o redlighting...
...dum dum
so when people say they ran a .262 without redlighting, add .500 and that is their r/t
11-14-2002, 04:18 PM
#18
Originally posted by hlh0501
some tracks do this differently, my home track in Louisville gives you r/t's of .100 or whatever, anything under .000 is redlight , they figure the .5 in there beforehand if that makes sense - -
so when people say they ran a .262 without redlighting, add .500 and that is their r/t
some tracks do this differently, my home track in Louisville gives you r/t's of .100 or whatever, anything under .000 is redlight , they figure the .5 in there beforehand if that makes sense - -
so when people say they ran a .262 without redlighting, add .500 and that is their r/t
11-14-2002, 05:14 PM
#19
Originally posted by JoesMAX
so if it said that i won, i guess it was really a .762? in that case most of my runs would be in the 1.1's, and i dont think i was that slow.. either way the track i was at sucked, not enough traction
so if it said that i won, i guess it was really a .762? in that case most of my runs would be in the 1.1's, and i dont think i was that slow.. either way the track i was at sucked, not enough traction
11-14-2002, 06:14 PM
#20
Originally posted by Chris91SE
yes 1.1 is pretty slow but .5 second is so damn fast...i usually gun it when the 3rd light lights up b/c of the .5 second diff between that and the green light (which is the .5 reaction)...by the time you see that light and your car starts moving the green is lit. I generally see .500 to .600 times
yes 1.1 is pretty slow but .5 second is so damn fast...i usually gun it when the 3rd light lights up b/c of the .5 second diff between that and the green light (which is the .5 reaction)...by the time you see that light and your car starts moving the green is lit. I generally see .500 to .600 times
11-14-2002, 06:17 PM
#21
Originally posted by Chris91SE
probably because the tree doesn't run down all 3 lights consecutively. In NHRA the 3 light up and then go green so it's probably a .400 second delay in the changing of the lights
probably because the tree doesn't run down all 3 lights consecutively. In NHRA the 3 light up and then go green so it's probably a .400 second delay in the changing of the lights
My best RT is a .507. I've also hit a .508 and that ever so frustrating .499. Yes, that was in a bracket race and I lost because of that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sctludwig
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
8
09-01-2022 01:32 PM
kjlouis
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
12
10-03-2015 05:29 AM
trungg86
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
7
09-04-2015 04:58 AM