General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

messed with a cocky S2000 owner today....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 05:57 PM
  #41  
MaximaPower's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,503
Originally posted by Sin


All they need to do now is drop in the new 3.5L V6 in there. That, I would buy.
can that thing actually house a 3.5L?? i dont think so.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 05:58 PM
  #42  
Sin's Avatar
Sin
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,007
Originally posted by MaximaPower

can that thing actually house a 3.5L?? i dont think so.
It wouldn't be that hard. The hard part would be the shift in weight.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 06:42 PM
  #43  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
I've ridden in a prepped S2K around a road course... that was a fun time lemme tell ya.

If done right, they can move pretty well in the 1/4. I've seen 14.1s stock myself, and heard of high 13s and one claimed 13.66 from a well respected member of another board. That's the same guy who pulled 14.1 out of a stock CL-S.

Dave maybe you are thinking of the acceleration test they did when shifting at redline vs 5000 rpm? I remember it's 0-60 was 5.x at redline and something like 11.9 when shifting at 5000.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 07:03 PM
  #44  
Sin's Avatar
Sin
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,007
Originally posted by Nealoc187
I've ridden in a prepped S2K around a road course... that was a fun time lemme tell ya.

If done right, they can move pretty well in the 1/4. I've seen 14.1s stock myself, and heard of high 13s and one claimed 13.66 from a well respected member of another board. That's the same guy who pulled 14.1 out of a stock CL-S.

Dave maybe you are thinking of the acceleration test they did when shifting at redline vs 5000 rpm? I remember it's 0-60 was 5.x at redline and something like 11.9 when shifting at 5000.
The only way an S2000 can do a run of those numbers is if it launches in the VTEC range, and uses 5hitloads of clutch slip. How do I know? Because I know two guys that race S2000's in SCCA. Let's just say if you want to duplicate runs like that, be prepared to make clutch jobs as regular as oil jobs.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 09:01 PM
  #45  
nj97maxima's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6
i owns an 02 s2k, and so far i have not lose any road race with any maxima driver here in north jersey...
don't get me worng..i sitll love my auto maxima....its just a family car.......or so call daily beater.......and thats also why i parted out all the parts and kits......but, we can still be friend rite...
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 09:42 PM
  #46  
Virus's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,602
Originally posted by MaximaPower

can that thing actually house a 3.5L?? i dont think so.
If you take the stock airbox out there is a TON of room up in the front for alot more engine. I thought the Max got rid of alot of room but the s2k easily releases 2 to 3 times as much room as the Max does with the stock intake removed. As I said before, if I was going to buy a convertable, it would definately be the s2k, performance or not. I love the way the dash is laid out.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 09:46 PM
  #47  
sil SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,162
From: Matawan, NJ
everytime i get a little intimidated, i destroy a modded honda and feel better. but then i think theyre gutless, and i am matched. today i was matched by a would be ricer crx ON THE HIGHWAY. straight from 60 to 100. tell me that wasnt engine work.
forkin hondas
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 09:48 PM
  #48  
CKNY's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,203
Originally posted by Sin


Very true. It's a gorgeous looking car, and handles superbly. But in terms of performance it lacks greatly. It gets smoked in SCCA every season. All they need to do now is drop in the new 3.5L V6 in there. That, I would buy.
a v6 in there would absolutely ruin what the car is. if you're looking 3 or 3.5 liters of torque go purchase a z4 or audi tt.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 09:52 PM
  #49  
DA-MAX's Avatar
Eat, sleep, and sh*t 2JZ
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,978
HeLL YEAH!!! I was at a car show back in October and man with the stock airbox removed they have room to fit a damn 454 in there! I was surprised, their air box is ****ing HUGE!!! 1/3 the size of the engine bay



Originally posted by Virus
If you take the stock airbox out there is a TON of room up in the front for alot more engine. I thought the Max got rid of alot of room but the s2k easily releases 2 to 3 times as much room as the Max does with the stock intake removed. As I said before, if I was going to buy a convertable, it would definately be the s2k, performance or not. I love the way the dash is laid out.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 10:07 PM
  #50  
Soon2BMaxed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,308
Originally posted by CKNY


a v6 in there would absolutely ruin what the car is. if you're looking 3 or 3.5 liters of torque go purchase a z4 or audi tt.
wouldn't it ruin the weight distribution anyways? i bet it'd make it handle worse.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 10:37 PM
  #51  
honda troll's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5
Just adding my .02 as I troll on through.

I own a completely stock S2000. First off, I'm the biggest race ***** you'll ever meet. I street race almost every weekend in the summer, as well as go to the track and run my S2k often. The worst I've ever gotten in my S2k was a 14.6.

I also ran a 14.6 in my S2k WITHOUT doing a clutch dump... in other words, just a roll out and floor it. No clutch dump, no clutch slipping, nothing.

It isn't hard to drive the S2k at all. I was hitting low low 14's my first time out, and was breaking consistent 13's my second time at the track. Also, I launch between 4500-6500rpm. I've NEVER launched over 6500rpm. It's not hard to drive an S2k. Rev to 5500... dump the clutch. Redline, shift, redline shift. Other than the rev to 5500 part, it's driven the same as any other car.

If you see someone running crappy times at the track, it's not so much the launch, but the fact that they are probably granny shifting, as well as short shifting each gear.

As for wear and tear.... I have done a countless number of clutch dumps, time after time at the track, and street racing a LOT, and my S2k has 24,000 miles on it. I recently got a new clutch (under a TSB from honda... no, nothing was wrong with my clutch). when they took the old clutch out, the mechanics checked the clutch and flywheel. I also had them check my differential/drivetrain for anything wrong.

My clutch had barely a mark on it. My differential showed no wear at all, and looked brand new. transmission and drivetrain were fine. The S2k can take plenty of clutch dumps. Honda's not stupid... they built the car to take the clutch dumps and launching.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 10:44 PM
  #52  
Sprint's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,943
no need for that name.. one of our moderators has a S2000

Originally posted by honda troll
Just adding my .02 as I troll on through.

I own a completely stock S2000. First off, I'm the biggest race ***** you'll ever meet. I street race almost every weekend in the summer, as well as go to the track and run my S2k often. The worst I've ever gotten in my S2k was a 14.6.

I also ran a 14.6 in my S2k WITHOUT doing a clutch dump... in other words, just a roll out and floor it. No clutch dump, no clutch slipping, nothing.

It isn't hard to drive the S2k at all. I was hitting low low 14's my first time out, and was breaking consistent 13's my second time at the track. Also, I launch between 4500-6500rpm. I've NEVER launched over 6500rpm. It's not hard to drive an S2k. Rev to 5500... dump the clutch. Redline, shift, redline shift. Other than the rev to 5500 part, it's driven the same as any other car.

If you see someone running crappy times at the track, it's not so much the launch, but the fact that they are probably granny shifting, as well as short shifting each gear.

As for wear and tear.... I have done a countless number of clutch dumps, time after time at the track, and street racing a LOT, and my S2k has 24,000 miles on it. I recently got a new clutch (under a TSB from honda... no, nothing was wrong with my clutch). when they took the old clutch out, the mechanics checked the clutch and flywheel. I also had them check my differential/drivetrain for anything wrong.

My clutch had barely a mark on it. My differential showed no wear at all, and looked brand new. transmission and drivetrain were fine. The S2k can take plenty of clutch dumps. Honda's not stupid... they built the car to take the clutch dumps and launching.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 11:39 PM
  #53  
meccanoble's Avatar
Sports Button FTW
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,291
From: NJ
Originally posted by hlh0501


hehe yeah, i love pulling up next to a ws6 or SS or something... they think im a joke and wont even waste their time on me.. i punch it and pull away so fast and they think again.. then they procede to try and race, only to be let down in their cars..

can't beat that feeling
turbo kit installed -- roughly $5,000

new clutch -- $300

watching a SS driver
go as you make
him look like a corolla -- priceless
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 04:50 AM
  #54  
shaolin's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13
Originally posted by honda troll
Just adding my .02 as I troll on through.

I own a completely stock S2000. First off, I'm the biggest race ***** you'll ever meet. I street race almost every weekend in the summer, as well as go to the track and run my S2k often. The worst I've ever gotten in my S2k was a 14.6.

I also ran a 14.6 in my S2k WITHOUT doing a clutch dump... in other words, just a roll out and floor it. No clutch dump, no clutch slipping, nothing.

It isn't hard to drive the S2k at all. I was hitting low low 14's my first time out, and was breaking consistent 13's my second time at the track. Also, I launch between 4500-6500rpm. I've NEVER launched over 6500rpm. It's not hard to drive an S2k. Rev to 5500... dump the clutch. Redline, shift, redline shift. Other than the rev to 5500 part, it's driven the same as any other car.

If you see someone running crappy times at the track, it's not so much the launch, but the fact that they are probably granny shifting, as well as short shifting each gear.

As for wear and tear.... I have done a countless number of clutch dumps, time after time at the track, and street racing a LOT, and my S2k has 24,000 miles on it. I recently got a new clutch (under a TSB from honda... no, nothing was wrong with my clutch). when they took the old clutch out, the mechanics checked the clutch and flywheel. I also had them check my differential/drivetrain for anything wrong.

My clutch had barely a mark on it. My differential showed no wear at all, and looked brand new. transmission and drivetrain were fine. The S2k can take plenty of clutch dumps. Honda's not stupid... they built the car to take the clutch dumps and launching.
What kind of 60 ft times are you getting? I am particulary curious of what kind of trap speeds you are able to obtain. Got any slips?
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 06:29 AM
  #55  
honda troll's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5
My 60' on my 14.0 flat times were 2.24 or so. Not the best, and I've certainly done better.

I have my most recent slips scanned, but they don't always link correctly from the S2000 site. I'll try, but I'll also type what I had.

EDIT: image didn't work

First slip I'm on the left.

R/T .947
60' 2.240
330 6.095
1/8 .000
mph n/a
1000 11.844
1/4 14.085 @ 101.84mph

2nd slip I'm on the right.

R/T .942
60' 2.240
330 6.063
1/8 9.161
mph 79.44
1000 .000
1/4 14.065 @ 100.15mph

My traps are usually 100+mph
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 08:36 AM
  #56  
Z06-KILLR's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5
lol....really?

Originally posted by Dave B


It wasn't that jerky with the yellow S2000 that couldn't break 15.3s@92mph at KCIR was it? I tell ya what, most guys are easy kills in those things because no one knows how to drive it.


Dave
Hey Dave....have you ever ran a "well driven" S2000? I am just curious about the outcome. I am out of Topeka, KS and would love a friendly match against a Maxima...my S is pretty much stock...

By the way, S cars are for the autox and for the track, not really for the strip. Also, the 15.3 dude, should have been shot on the spot...
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 08:40 AM
  #57  
Z06-KILLR's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5
you are funny

Originally posted by Soon2BMaxed
show me a s2000 running 13.8 in the 1/4 with an AUTOMATIC and MINOR mods. yeah th s2000 wasn't made for the drag strip.....was the maxima?
yeah, really, have you EVER seen an automatic S2000??? :-)

Hey!!! I have a 13.7 STOCK s2000! It is NOT an automatic though
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 08:44 AM
  #58  
Z06-KILLR's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5
...scca?

Originally posted by Sin


Very true. It's a gorgeous looking car, and handles superbly. But in terms of performance it lacks greatly. It gets smoked in SCCA every season. All they need to do now is drop in the new 3.5L V6 in there. That, I would buy.
er...are you even a member? Look at the BS class on scca autox and you will find that on the Nationals 95% of the first 15 top spots were taken by S2000s......I did not see any Maximas there btw :-)
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 08:55 AM
  #59  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
You guys really like to repeat information huh?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
Jan 4, 2024 07:01 PM
doctorpullit
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
21
Oct 28, 2019 10:58 PM
D Mason
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
1
Jun 21, 2016 04:43 AM
bernyp
New Member Introductions
1
Oct 2, 2015 10:10 AM
homewrecker
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
2
Sep 24, 2015 07:01 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:45 PM.