Just ordered 8000rpm JWT ECU
Originally Posted by JeffesonM
I have a rare condition called Bell's Palsy where I lose control of the muscles in my face, causing drool to exude from mouth. It just so happened I was leaning over my keyboard at the time of posting.
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,323
From: amsterdam ,new york
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Actually....IIRC...SR20DEN said the VQ35 does even with its longer stroke. Something like 300+hrs during a transmission durability test procedure.
Considering the VQ30 piston speed at 7200rpm(3463fpm) is approximately equal to the the VQ35 at 6550rpm(3498fpm) according to another post, I'd say if the VQ35 can handle 8000rpm for 300+hrs, then the VQ30 can no problem with its much slower piston speed.
Considering the VQ30 piston speed at 7200rpm(3463fpm) is approximately equal to the the VQ35 at 6550rpm(3498fpm) according to another post, I'd say if the VQ35 can handle 8000rpm for 300+hrs, then the VQ30 can no problem with its much slower piston speed.
Originally Posted by Dave B
Are there any production V6s on the market that actually can rev to 8000rpms? I don't even think the NSX revs that high. If Honda doesn't do it, why can we assume our VQ can 
Dave

Dave
Dave, actually you nailed that on the head, the NSX's redline IS 8000rpms... maybe that's why they're so damn expensive.. And my VQ has already gone well beyond 8000rpms... 9,000 or so to be exact... missing 4th and hitting 2nd at the track does wonders... and now my valves tick a little, but she still runs strong!
Originally Posted by MaxedOutR34
Can you just use the VI from the newer maxima's or is it better to use the mevi? Whats the best route and what are you looking at for prices here.
some people seem to think it won't work due to hood clearance issues and how they would get it to activate. I guess we'll just have to wait and see if anyone can get it to fit.
I've never heard of cams breaking from an over-rev. EVER!! As a matter of fact, the only time if heard of cams snapping is improper installation(aftermarket of course). And besides, aren't the JWT cams made using OE blanks?? Same material...
Originally Posted by Dave B
Are there any production V6s on the market that actually can rev to 8000rpms? I don't even think the NSX revs that high. If Honda doesn't do it, why can we assume our VQ can 

Originally Posted by Stephen Max
The only thing I can think of is aren't Honda engines undersquare and the Vq30 is oversquare?
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,323
From: amsterdam ,new york
Originally Posted by UNCDooD
its called a mis-shift. not like he purposely revved the car to 9 grand.
Originally Posted by IwANnAMaX96
What does the fact that he has stock cams have to do with it??
I miss read it seemed to me that he said that his car revs at 9,000 rpm normally. I didn't read it was a miss shift.
Originally Posted by ABK
Isn't it's duration? The valves don't have time to close before ingnition takes place and won't that cause crazy valve knock? I might be wrong but I never heard of anybody increasing their revs alot without changing cams along with valve train?
I miss read it seemed to me that he said that his car revs at 9,000 rpm normally. I didn't read it was a miss shift.
I miss read it seemed to me that he said that his car revs at 9,000 rpm normally. I didn't read it was a miss shift.
That happens when the spring doesn't have enough tension to keep the shim pressed up against the cam lobe.
The reason ppl swap out their cams with upgraded valvetrains is because without the increased breathing capabilities of the upgraded cams, the extra revs would be useless since the engine would be running out of breath.
IIRC...there is a point at which you overcome the valve springs ability to close the valve before the next opening called 'valve float'.
I've heard it before on Hondas.
I've heard it before on Hondas.
Originally Posted by IwANnAMaX96
Why wouldn't the valves have time to close?? The valve timing is the same no matter what the RPM is since it is mechanical and has no variable valve timing. So if the valves are closed in time for ignition at 3000 RPM, they will close in time at 9000 RPM.
The reason ppl swap out their cams with upgraded valvetrains is because without the increased breathing capabilities of the upgraded cams, the extra revs would be useless since the engine would be running out of breath.
The reason ppl swap out their cams with upgraded valvetrains is because without the increased breathing capabilities of the upgraded cams, the extra revs would be useless since the engine would be running out of breath.
This should be very very interesting to see. Awesome that someone is taking the next step in N/A performance.
As for the video of my car, that was stock ECU in that video. There are no videos of my car on the net with 7200rpm limiter. I have some, but none are uploaded.
As for the video of my car, that was stock ECU in that video. There are no videos of my car on the net with 7200rpm limiter. I have some, but none are uploaded.
Well cams determine how long the valve is open, so it too would need to allow enough time for the spring to close the valve at sky high rpm.
I think that's referred too as duration?
I think that's referred too as duration?

Originally Posted by ABK
I said both. But I still think there is something to do with a cam duration. I know that you need stronger valve springs to stop valve float, but I think cams help with that too.
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Well cams determine how long the valve is open, so it too would need to allow enough time for the spring to close the valve at sky high rpm.
I think that's referred too as duration?
I think that's referred too as duration?

And allow enough time?? It's all mechanical, so everything happens in sync with each other. It's not like the cams says "hmm, let me wait for that damn valve to close so i can continue"
Since the cam can't wait, that spring better have the tension to keep up.
Originally Posted by IwANnAMaX96
Isn't duration how long the valve stays open? Either way, you match the valve springs to the cam, not the other way around.
And allow enough time?? It's all mechanical, so everything happens in sync with each other. It's not like the cams says "hmm, let my wait for that damn valve to close so i can continue"
Since the cam can't wait, that spring better have the tension to keep up.
Since the cam can't wait, that spring better have the tension to keep up.
I agree with everything you're saying.
My point is the valve springs have everything to do with valve float, not the cams(in response to ABK)
The valve is to a larger lobe what the piston is to a longer stroke. They have to cover a greater distance in the same amount of time, thus they have to travel faster.*Enter the more resistant valve spring*
Or in the context of stock cams, the spring cannot expand quickly enough at high RPM to allow the shim to follow the lobe...
The valve is to a larger lobe what the piston is to a longer stroke. They have to cover a greater distance in the same amount of time, thus they have to travel faster.*Enter the more resistant valve spring*
Or in the context of stock cams, the spring cannot expand quickly enough at high RPM to allow the shim to follow the lobe...
Ok...I see your point now.
Originally Posted by IwANnAMaX96
I agree with everything you're saying.
My point is the valve springs have everything to do with valve float, not the cams(in response to ABK)
The valve is to a larger lobe what the piston is to a longer stroke. They have to cover a greater distance in the same amount of time, thus they have to travel faster.*Enter the more resistant valve spring*
Or in the context of stock cams, the spring cannot expand quickly enough at high RPM to allow the shim to follow the lobe...
The valve is to a larger lobe what the piston is to a longer stroke. They have to cover a greater distance in the same amount of time, thus they have to travel faster.*Enter the more resistant valve spring*
Or in the context of stock cams, the spring cannot expand quickly enough at high RPM to allow the shim to follow the lobe...
This reminds me of a cartoon I saw a long time ago in a car salesman's office. The cartoon showed a teenager with some hot looking car in the background. The kid says to a shocked looking salesman in a nonchalant way: "Yeah, it drove okay, but the valves float at 9000 rpm."
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
This reminds me of a cartoon I saw a long time ago in a car salesman's office. The cartoon showed a teenager with some hot looking car in the background. The kid says to a shocked looking salesman in a nonchalant way: "Yeah, it drove okay, but the valves float at 9000 rpm."
LOL that reminds me about me testdriving cars from a pc of **** dealerships. All of them had rev limiters and I was bouncing off them like crazy, but the fun part is that they let you take the car by yourself. I always picked the one with the most power from the lot and made sure it was stickshift. It's some great fun!!!
Originally Posted by subs1000w
thats funny i should go test drive an old car without a rev limmiter and come back and tell the salesman that
I wonder if the "You break it, you buy it" saying applies. 
S
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
Jan 4, 2024 07:01 PM
bigfrank
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:51 PM
BLACKKILA.GTR
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
1
Sep 29, 2015 11:23 AM





