General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

2000 VI is now on and running on my 96

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2004 | 05:59 PM
  #41  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
Some have said the firewall wouldn't allow it to fit but here is the truth without all of the words....

Old May 17, 2004 | 06:00 PM
  #42  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
No limiter...





Old May 17, 2004 | 06:01 PM
  #43  
MaxSpeedSE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,516
you can take it up to 8 grand while racing, on a stock ecu cuz of the manifold alone?
Old May 17, 2004 | 06:03 PM
  #44  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by Big D
What did I say? I said unless he wants LSD that came with the 2k1.
Relax man. I wasn't being argumentative, that's why i said "FYI". Not all 2k1's have LSD, only the AE's have it and those are rare enough as it is. I was just saying that the LSD is most likely not the reason he got the tranny because he would have a VERY hard time finding an AE tranny.
Old May 17, 2004 | 06:05 PM
  #45  
Bags's Avatar
VG Ridah's Biatch Hoe
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,472
Congrats!!!

Glad you were able to pull it off...

Are you running the stock valve's and springs
Old May 17, 2004 | 06:08 PM
  #46  
krismax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Father of the 00 VI
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,323
From: amsterdam ,new york
Originally Posted by bags533
Congrats!!!

Glad you were able to pull it off...

Are you running the stock valve's and springs
Yes I'am still using stock valvtrain
Old May 17, 2004 | 06:10 PM
  #47  
nismos14's Avatar
§è~® f®ÈÄk
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,505
From: NJ
MaxSpeedSE he has a JWT ecu with a 8k rpm rev limiter

great work guys! i would love to own that car
Old May 17, 2004 | 06:10 PM
  #48  
maximase86's Avatar
I love lamp.
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,696
From: Seattle, WA
8k rev limiter...wow that's crazy! And to think I thought 7200rpm rev limiter was crazy! Are you planning any valvetrain upgrades?

S
Old May 17, 2004 | 06:24 PM
  #49  
AsthmaMax11's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,796
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Wow!! first of all I would like to say that this is really cool, the .org has been a little boring for a few months now. Things like this are starting to get my interest again.
However, I would REALLY be interested in seeing a video of a run through 1st and 2nd gear to 8k but with the camera focused on the gauges...it would be really cool to see how fast the MPH move after 7k.
Awesome job though man, I mean all the people involved in this are extremely dedicated!!!
Old May 17, 2004 | 06:32 PM
  #50  
Kolyan's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 791
2k-2k1 have 220HP due to that VI so is that what you supposed to get?
and 2k1 AE have 225HP right? where is the extra 5 come from?
Old May 17, 2004 | 06:35 PM
  #51  
Matt93SE's Avatar
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 18,087
From: Houston
Woah.. kicka$$! congrats man!

I'd love to see some dyno numbers now...

I highly doubt you want to pull it all off, but I can refer to you a good fab shop if you'd like to make up the custom pcs in quantity..
Old May 17, 2004 | 06:43 PM
  #52  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
you guys rock!!

Can't WAIT to see some dynos and track times with this BEAST! Finally something interesting to read about here instead of all of this lame ricer crap lately.

Get a dyno done and I'll plot USIM vs MEVI vs 2kVI
Old May 17, 2004 | 07:00 PM
  #53  
Conrad283's Avatar
I need a truck
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 73,115
From: Naples, Fl
Awesome job. I remember you telling me that the FI guys are gonna want your car after you're done with it. I think you're right
Old May 17, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #54  
98SEBlackMax's Avatar
Maxima.org Insomniac
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,857
From: Shrewsbury, MA
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
you guys rock!!

Can't WAIT to see some dynos and track times with this BEAST! Finally something interesting to read about here instead of all of this lame ricer crap lately.

Get a dyno done and I'll plot USIM vs MEVI vs 2kVI
Haha my thoughts exactly, It was getting boring around here in the last few months. I was honored to get to do a project like this and would do it again if the oppurtunity came about.

Oh as far as a dyno comparison goes this manifold isnt your normal 2K VI. For instance Chris got rid of all the swirl valve crap in the lower manifold and bored out the upper plenum to 73 mm, also he used a 70mm Pathfinder TB. So this definitly has more pep than a stock 2K VI. Would be interesting to compare a 2K dyno to his.
Old May 17, 2004 | 07:13 PM
  #55  
Jason R's Avatar
aka UNCDooD
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 10,239
From: Aylett, VA
if this car is going to be at the East Coast meet in Jersey then i am definitely there. awesome work.
Old May 17, 2004 | 07:15 PM
  #56  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Originally Posted by 98SEBlackMax
Haha my thoughts exactly, It was getting boring around here in the last few months. I was honored to get to do a project like this and would do it again if the oppurtunity came about.

Oh as far as a dyno comparison goes this manifold isnt your normal 2K VI. For instance Chris got rid of all the swirl valve crap in the lower manifold and bored out the upper plenum to 73 mm, also he used a 70mm Pathfinder TB. So this definitly has more pep than a stock 2K VI. Would be interesting to compare a 2K dyno to his.
who cares? More power to ya.

I'll be sure to note any mods to the VI in any charts I put up.
Old May 17, 2004 | 07:19 PM
  #57  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
I am glad to see that someone finally went through with this. Congrats!!

Now you really should concern yourself with the stock valvetrain. The VQ35 retainers are the best option because they're lighter than titanium and only about $3 each from the dealer.

I have been waiting for a good opportunity to realease this information and this appears to be it. The VK45 titanium valves are near identical to the VQ30 valves. The only thing that is different is the total length which can be adjusted with new shims.

VQ30DE Steel valve;
Face In: 36.0 - 36.3mm
Face Ex: 31.2 - 31.5mm

Stem In: 5.965 - 5.980mm
Stem Ex: 5.945 - 5.960mm

Length In: 97.32 - 97.82mm
Length Ex: 94.85 - 95.35mm

Valve seat angle 45º15' - 45º45'

VK45 Titanium valve;
Face In: 36.0 - 36.3mm
Face Ex: 31.2 - 31.5mm

Stem In: 5.972 - 5.980mm
Stem Ex: 5.962 - 5.970mm

Length In: 96.57mm
Length Ex: 94.50mm


Valve seat angle 45º15' - 45º45'

The faces and the seat angles are identical. The stems are slightly different only because the expansion rates are slightly different between the metals. They're both classified as 6mm stems.

The only question that remains is the location of the keeper. If it's high enough on the Ti valve then there is no problem. If it's too low then custom retainers will be needed to make them work.
Old May 17, 2004 | 07:44 PM
  #58  
DAVE Sz's Avatar
Hooooooonda.....
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,082
From: Chiiiii
Originally Posted by Kolyan
2k-2k1 have 220HP due to that VI so is that what you supposed to get?
and 2k1 AE have 225HP right? where is the extra 5 come from?
Again, no. The HP gains are from more than just the manifold. Lighter internals are used inside the engines to get gains as well. A better exhaust system and other things. The AE has 227hp.
Old May 17, 2004 | 07:50 PM
  #59  
waveridr85's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,946
wow, surely a great thing to know. a FAQ or a how to is now a must.

And to think, there is a thread 1 up about them arguing if it can be done or not.
Old May 17, 2004 | 08:07 PM
  #60  
DAVE Sz's Avatar
Hooooooonda.....
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,082
From: Chiiiii
If you read that thread you'd have noticed that it was made by the guys who did the swap. They made it to get a good laugh.
Old May 17, 2004 | 08:10 PM
  #61  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by Big D
Again, no. The HP gains are from more than just the manifold. Lighter internals are used inside the engines to get gains as well. A better exhaust system and other things. The AE has 227hp.
Most of the gains came from the manifold. This is a fact.

And please explain how lighter internals adds HP...
Old May 17, 2004 | 08:13 PM
  #62  
1FSTMAX's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,994
Originally Posted by Big D
Again, no. The HP gains are from more than just the manifold. Lighter internals are used inside the engines to get gains as well. A better exhaust system and other things. The AE has 227hp.
What internal parts are those? I was under the impression that the only diffrence between the DE and DE-K, was more agressive cams, true VI, Higher redline, and variable exhaust that gave it more power. Also the AE supposedly gains more power by using a different b pipe.


That engine is screaming, GOOD WORK!!!!I hope your hard works pays off, with awsome number on the dyno. Im sure a bunch of MEVI's are gonna pop up in the 4th gen 4 sale forum..
Old May 17, 2004 | 08:18 PM
  #63  
Wisky97SE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,119
From: Bergen County NJ
Damn man thats awesome. . . I cant wait to see the dyno for this! . . . . Im surprised your valvetrain is taking this abuse without problem!

PS: You should wear your seatbelt.
Old May 17, 2004 | 09:01 PM
  #64  
DAVE Sz's Avatar
Hooooooonda.....
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 8,082
From: Chiiiii
I read that they used lighter moving parts to get more power on top of the manifold and the exhaust. Explain how lighter parts wouldn't make more power. If all the internal moving parts in the engine weigh 1/2 of what the 4th gen parts weighed don't you think that would free up some power?
Old May 17, 2004 | 09:34 PM
  #65  
Iilac's Avatar
Spelled with a I not a L for Iilac. Prounced Ii-eee-ack.
iTrader: (65)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,434
From: Central Valley, California
Congrats on the success. Now if you can dyno, that be awesome.
Old May 17, 2004 | 10:30 PM
  #66  
MaximumMax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 81
Looks like all those who said it couldn't be done ate their words!!
Old May 18, 2004 | 12:42 AM
  #67  
SPiG's Avatar
SomePsychoGuy
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,943
From: Baton Rouge, LA
How much did it cost to do?

How long did it take?

Can you make a write up?
Old May 18, 2004 | 02:20 AM
  #68  
spirilis's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,235
From: New Market, MD
Originally Posted by IwANnAMaX96
Most of the gains came from the manifold. This is a fact.

And please explain how lighter internals adds HP...
i'm pretty sure the lighter valve components are to decrease the probability of valve float at those high RPMs (especially 8K)
Old May 18, 2004 | 02:22 AM
  #69  
Tatanko's Avatar
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,662
From: State College, PA
Originally Posted by Big D
I read that they used lighter moving parts to get more power on top of the manifold and the exhaust. Explain how lighter parts wouldn't make more power. If all the internal moving parts in the engine weigh 1/2 of what the 4th gen parts weighed don't you think that would free up some power?
Are the VQ35 internals also lighter? (granted they aren't really the same, but are they still a more lightweight design)
Old May 18, 2004 | 03:22 AM
  #70  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
Originally Posted by 98SEBlackMax
Ok I PMed Endus about the video and his server is up to the task to provide it.

This video was taken at the meet Sunday, keep in mind we got this whole thing running with the Summit switch a few hours before this was taken. Endus took numerous vids and made this short clip. Enjoy

Right click and Save
In that vid, the guys were checking out my 200amp alternator... And I was probably talking their ears off about it..

To those wanting to do this mod:
Be reading for a lot of modification work. After seeing this thing in action, you would think its a direct bolt on to the intake. It's probably been explained before but you need the intake collector, the fuel rails, and the intake with the injectors from the DE-K block. I thought the guys (Chris and Joe) said they worked about 20 hours straight on this.

It's good to hear that the EGR was a direct fit to the EGR port on the 2K intake collector but the rear collector bolts couldn't be used. The is on there good though and Chris showed us by rocking the whole car by the collector.
Old May 18, 2004 | 03:25 AM
  #71  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
Originally Posted by spirilis
i'm pretty sure the lighter valve components are to decrease the probability of valve float at those high RPMs (especially 8K)
I don't know if it's the weight that reduces the float. I thought it was the spring rate. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Old May 18, 2004 | 03:36 AM
  #72  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Lighter valvetrain components do reduce float. It's essentually the same thing as adding stronger valve springs. A valve spring can close a lighter valve quicker than it can close a heavier one.

I never saw any publication that mentioned the VQ35DE-K having lighter internal componants than the regular VQ30DE. The published differences were the VI composite intake manifold, the cams and the two stage muffler. The cams can be overlooked because the only cam that is different is the exhaust cam and the VQ30DE has the more aggressive of the two (duration wise). The two stage muffler doesn't add any hp on the top end so rule that one out too.
Old May 18, 2004 | 06:43 AM
  #73  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,549
Originally Posted by MaximumMax
Looks like all those who said it couldn't be done ate their words!!
I think a lot of people asked why would you do it, not necessarily it couldn't be done. When I looked into the swap about 2.5 years and had my car side by side with a 2001 SE, there were numerous things I saw that would require a lot of fab work and modification. Also, according to the measurements of the DE-K manifold, I thought hood clearance and firewall clearance would be too tight. I figured the DE-K manifold would sit about 1" from all the lines along the firewall and that the top of the manifold would be a 1/2" from the hood. Seeing that the VQ rocks horribly in it's mounts and lifts upwards, I thought the clearance would be too tight in some situations. Shortly after comparing my DE to the DE-K, a few of us saw some pics of the euro-spec MEVI. After I saw that, I decided it would be far easier to swap like parts on the right motor.

We still don't know exactly what kind of power the DE-K manifold will make over the MEVI. I know that Steve made plot of what the MEVI on a stock DE "should" look like, but no one has ever done a dyno like this so it's a speculative. Russ dynoed his 01 to ~181fwhp and Steve's "stock" MEVI showed ~168fwhp. Personally, I disagree with Steve's plot because my MEVI alone gained me about 8 peak HP and I suffered no losses in power until about 3300rpms. Without a true stock MEVI dyno we-ll never know, but it's my opinion that a stock MEVI will make around 174fwhp, but that's another debate. I'll also note the MEVI actually gained me power below 3000rpms.

At various parts of the RPM band the DE-K surpasses the MEVI by 10-20hp and that is significant however comparing real DE-K numbers to estimated MEVI stock numbers isn't terribly accurate (see argument above). The powercurve shape of the MEVI compared to the DE-K are pretty much mirror images each other with both peaking at ~6100-6200rpms and then the power curve slowly drops off. I don't understand why people say the DE-K has a "longer" powerband because the dynos suggest both the DE-K and MEVI hold on to power bascially the same way and have the same peak rpms. The DE-K manifold, just like the MEVI, will definitely benefit from the JWT ECU. Krismax needs to see about 215fwhp/210fwtq to make this a legitimate bolt-on. 200-205fwhp/198-203fwtq is what MEVI bolt-on 4th gens are seeing.

My argument has been why do so much fab work when you can get a complete bolt-on setup (MEVI) that's easy to install? The power is definitely less, but you get peace of mind with the install. Swapping in the DE-K requires the DE-K fuel rails and injectors, rewiring the injectors, modification of the manifold, and a basic understanding of electronics, soldering, and automotive systems (vacuum, solenoids, emissions). Is all the extra work and potential hidden problems (ex. bad wiring = hellacious trouble shooting) worth the extra power? To most people the answer is no and to a select capable few the answer is yes.

Congrats to Krismax. There's no doubt his DE-K 4th will haul some serious butt assuming his valvetrain can handle the load.


Dave
Old May 18, 2004 | 07:18 AM
  #74  
BSwithTF's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,410
I'm attempting a DE-k with MEVI first and then swap over to the '00 manifold. I'll try to get dyno's from each and see which is better and by how much.

It may be awhile though.

Thank you krismax and all who helped for pioneering this and showing it could be done.
Old May 18, 2004 | 07:28 AM
  #75  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
Very, very awesome. Good work, Krismax. Can't wait to see the dyno.


One question on behalf of the boosted folks, what options are there for larger injectors with this setup?
Old May 18, 2004 | 07:36 AM
  #76  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
No, they're heavier. They used vanadium steel for the rods to reduce the weight, however not to VQ30 levels.

Originally Posted by Tatanko
Are the VQ35 internals also lighter? (granted they aren't really the same, but are they still a more lightweight design)
Old May 18, 2004 | 07:37 AM
  #77  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Any 350z injector.

Originally Posted by Stephen Max
Very, very awesome. Good work, Krismax. Can't wait to see the dyno.


One question on behalf of the boosted folks, what options are there for larger injectors with this setup?
Old May 18, 2004 | 07:47 AM
  #78  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,868
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Any 350z injector.
But aren't those only 290 cc/min? Sorry, I haven't been paying attention to the 5th gen injector discussions over in boosted. <== me



Nevermind, you're probably talking about aftermarket injectors for the 350Z, eh?
Old May 18, 2004 | 07:51 AM
  #79  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
But aren't those only 290 cc/min? Sorry, I haven't been paying attention to the 5th gen injector discussions over in boosted. <== me



Nevermind, you're probably talking about aftermarket injectors for the 350Z, eh?
I haven't seen a flow chart for those injectors but if they are 280-290cc/min that would be at 3.0 bar which is the same as what the VQ30 uses. All of the new returnless Nissan systems are running at 3.5 bar.
Old May 18, 2004 | 07:53 AM
  #80  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Originally Posted by Dave B
The powercurve shape of the MEVI compared to the DE-K are pretty much mirror images each other with both peaking at ~6100-6200rpms and then the power curve slowly drops off. I don't understand why people say the DE-K has a "longer" powerband because the dynos suggest both the DE-K and MEVI hold on to power bascially the same way and have the same peak rpms.
Show me a stock DE+MEVI dyno that holds power from 6000-redline like this DEK:


Show me a ypipe/intake/catback/UDP DE+MEVI dyno that *PULLS* to redline like these THREE DEKs:


One more DEK+StillenIntake+Ypipe *PULLING* past 200whp@6K:


My argument has been why do so much fab work when you can get a complete bolt-on setup (MEVI) that's easy to install? The power is definitely less, but you get peace of mind with the install. Swapping in the DE-K requires the DE-K fuel rails and injectors, rewiring the injectors, modification of the manifold, and a basic understanding of electronics, soldering, and automotive systems (vacuum, solenoids, emissions). Is all the extra work and potential hidden problems (ex. bad wiring = hellacious trouble shooting) worth the extra power? To most people the answer is no and to a select capable few the answer is yes.
This is a PROTOTYPE. Once people start following his lead, easier/better methods will be found. After a while, the custom fab parts will be eliminated and this will end up being LESS money then the MEVI with a FUEL UPGRADE to boot.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:28 PM.