General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

how fast is a 3000GT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 06:27 PM
  #1  
Cumalot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,113
From: Louisiana
My friend just got a used '93 Mitsubishi 3000GT, I think it's the SL model, not the VR4 one. To me, I think he should got the VR4 model. Yes, it's more expensive, but why go half way? Anyway, it's a manual. Friend said it's a 6spd. I thought only the VR4 had 6spd., the none VR4 only came in 5spd.? He paid about $10k for the car with about 55k mileage. The interior looks like crap, he definitely nees to redo the whole interior. Bottom line is, can I take him? I know it's not the VR4 model, but it does have over 200hp and it's a manual transmission. My mods are listed in my signature. I will race him whenever we get the chance. I believe there's a chance he can take me. I don't know, but whatever the outcome will be, I think it should be close. He claimed that he took out a newer Mustang GT. I'm a bit skeptical on that claim. This is sad, now two of my friends have a sportier car than me. My other friend has a 5spd. Prelude., haven't race him yet. And I'm stuck with my old automagic. With my mods, would I be able to take my friend's 3000GT SL? Since he just got the car, of course, it's stock. Isn't there a turbo kit that he could get for this car? Man, I need my VB and supercharger!
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 06:36 PM
  #2  
Sprint's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,943
SL's run mid 15's
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 06:40 PM
  #3  
Cumalot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,113
From: Louisiana
Originally posted by SprintMax
SL's run mid 15's

Hm...that should a good match for me. Pretty even. Now if only I had a 5spd., I would kill him.
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 06:42 PM
  #4  
Sprint's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,943
no.. not funny
Originally posted by Cumalot



Hm...that should a good match for me. Pretty even. Now if only I had a 5spd., I would kill him.
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 07:25 PM
  #5  
Cumalot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,113
From: Louisiana
Nevermind then. No sense of humor, I see. Oh wait, I have an automatic, I'm not worthy.


Anyone else want to comment on this. I would appreciate it.
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 08:24 PM
  #6  
Egression's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 85
actually i think the SL's are about dead even with a 4th gen max. the SL's are crap, they are only 5 spd, so you can bust your friend. he got ripped off for how much he paid, and what else..... oh yeah race him, you have a good chance. his cars a POS
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 08:56 PM
  #7  
costcowholesale's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,001
go show him what nissan automatics are capable of
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 09:08 PM
  #8  
Cumalot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,113
From: Louisiana
Originally posted by Egression
actually i think the SL's are about dead even with a 4th gen max. the SL's are crap, they are only 5 spd, so you can bust your friend. he got ripped off for how much he paid, and what else..... oh yeah race him, you have a good chance. his cars a POS

That's what I thought. He doesn't seem to be really good at judging cars. First when he bought an Integra, he got the LS model and not the GSR. Now he got a SL and not a VR4. Frankly, I think it's a waste of money. I think if I had a 5spd., I could take him without much trouble. With my automatic, I think we're even. So, it should be a good race. I'll keep you guys posted.
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 09:19 PM
  #9  
Egression's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 85
3000GT Base, 3000GT SL, Stealth R/T, Stealth ES:
* 3.0 Liter V-6, 222 hp/205 ft-lbs torque
* DOHC 24-valve engine
* 5-speed manual transmission
* 16 inch 225/55R16/V-rated wheels
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 10:04 PM
  #10  
_DRU_'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,503
Originally posted by Egression
3000GT Base, 3000GT SL, Stealth R/T, Stealth ES:
* 3.0 Liter V-6, 222 hp/205 ft-lbs torque
* DOHC 24-valve engine
* 5-speed manual transmission
* 16 inch 225/55R16/V-rated wheels
is that the new one or the old ones? i remember that the 3000GT V6's went from a weak 180HP? up to the 222HP, but i dunno if the newer ones or the older ones were wekaer, i think the older ones...
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 10:12 PM
  #11  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
i've raced 3 modded 3000GT SLs, and testdriven one. i ran all 3 of them significantly in my 5 speed 4th gen. and yes, its a 5 speed, not 6.
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 10:38 PM
  #12  
MaximaMan's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,012
Raced one

They put out more power than the max...but the weight it what gets them. They weigh so much...that unless its the VR-4 model u should win...

I raced one the other night, SL like the one your friend has...it was pretty close, i had 2 other people in the car..
The points where i gained the most length was the shifting..so i thnik the one i raced was an auto vs. my 5spd

my 2 cents.
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 10:41 PM
  #13  
costcowholesale's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,001
Re: Raced one

Originally posted by MaximaMan
They put out more power than the max...but the weight it what gets them. They weigh so much...that unless its the VR-4 model u should win...

I raced one the other night, SL like the one your friend has...it was pretty close, i had 2 other people in the car..
The points where i gained the most length was the shifting..so i thnik the one i raced was an auto vs. my 5spd

my 2 cents.
if thats true then hes gonna lose, u got an 5spd he has an auto
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 10:46 PM
  #14  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,844
From: North Aurora, IL
The base model 3000GT is only 160hp....not 222.....now the SL and Dodge Stealth ES are both 222...and they are basically the same car....when I was stock...I took my friends Stealth ES 5-speed by about a car and a half....now...I've got him by about 3-4 carlengths....you should be able to take him.
Old Jun 26, 2001 | 11:07 PM
  #15  
SWEETSOUND2001's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,860
can someone post the specs for the vr4?
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 12:25 AM
  #16  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Bri, where'd you get that info about the 160 hp base model? i know alot of times people just "know" the stuff... i do it all the time, numbers stick with me when i learn them. i'm not doubting, i just never knew that there was a model lower than the SL in the 3000GT....i thought there was only SL and VR4.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 12:26 AM
  #17  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
The '93 VR4 has 300 HP/ 307 ft-lb of torque, weighed 3803 (yes, thats correct) pounds, and rode on 245/45-17 tires. The SL 5 speed of that year weighed 3373 pounds and made 222 HP and 217 ft-lb.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 12:27 AM
  #18  
SWEETSOUND2001's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,860
Originally posted by medicsonic
The '93 VR4 has 300 HP/ 307 ft-lb of torque, weighed 3803 (yes, thats correct) pounds, and rode on 245/45-17 tires. The SL 5 speed of that year weighed 3373 pounds and made 222 HP and 217 ft-lb.
Whats the 1/4 mile and 0-60 times for vr4?
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 12:39 AM
  #19  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
5.4 and 13.5@101.6
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 12:41 AM
  #20  
SWEETSOUND2001's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,860
Originally posted by medicsonic
5.4 and 13.5@101.6
That doesn't make any sense..
A 3600 pound cadillac sevilles sts has 300 hp and 295 torque
but yet it runs a mids 15's 1/4 mile.
What makes the heavier vr4 so much better? AWD?
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 12:44 AM
  #21  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
Silly boy, 4WD, an active exhaust and twin turbos. And some MASSIVE rubber.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 01:54 AM
  #22  
OgreDave's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,067
Yah.. i dunno how you guys can say VR4's are slow TT/AWD ? My friend's modded VR4 (94 i think?) is doing high 12's .. sorry, I don't think my car can even touch him.

A NA Auto 4th gen vs a 5spd VR4 ? If your friend can drive, and his turbo's arent dead (my friends stock turbos were) .. he should be able to beat you everytime.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 01:59 AM
  #23  
Jeff91SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 445
From: Omaha, NE
Originally posted by medicsonic
The '93 VR4 has 300 HP/ 307 ft-lb of torque, weighed 3803 (yes, thats correct) pounds, and rode on 245/45-17 tires. The SL 5 speed of that year weighed 3373 pounds and made 222 HP and 217 ft-lb.
Hes right. Right from Carpoint.com. Same numbers.

A '91 SL will run 8.5/16.4. Dont know auto/stick.
A same Gen VR4 ('91-'93) will run low 14s.

I think 16.4 was an auto. I think your friend will take you.
Sorry.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 02:17 AM
  #24  
fastmax92's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 337
i know how he has a six speed.... you add reverse and walah you got six gears....hahahhaha =)
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 04:23 AM
  #25  
Cumalot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,113
From: Louisiana
Originally posted by OgreDave
Yah.. i dunno how you guys can say VR4's are slow TT/AWD ? My friend's modded VR4 (94 i think?) is doing high 12's .. sorry, I don't think my car can even touch him.

A NA Auto 4th gen vs a 5spd VR4 ? If your friend can drive, and his turbo's arent dead (my friends stock turbos were) .. he should be able to beat you everytime.


Um...Dave, did you read carefully? My friend doesn't have a VR4. It's a SL. Don't you think I know that a VR4 can take me all the time. Even your supercharger won't help.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 04:28 AM
  #26  
Cumalot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,113
From: Louisiana
Originally posted by Jeff91SE


Hes right. Right from Carpoint.com. Same numbers.

A '91 SL will run 8.5/16.4. Dont know auto/stick.
A same Gen VR4 ('91-'93) will run low 14s.

I think 16.4 was an auto. I think your friend will take you.
Sorry.

Speak for yourself. If a SL runs 16s with an auto, a 5spd. should run mid to high 15s. So, I have more than a good chance to take him. Btw, I run low to mid 15s.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 06:30 AM
  #27  
Jose's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 271
Listen I raced 2 of them so far and I beaten them both->

I have auto like you and the SL didn't give me much of a problem. The key to winning the race is the start I was able to get the jump on both of them. With a intake and a ypipe you should beat him.
Later:Jose


Originally posted by Cumalot



Speak for yourself. If a SL runs 16s with an auto, a 5spd. should run mid to high 15s. So, I have more than a good chance to take him. Btw, I run low to mid 15s.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 06:41 AM
  #28  
_DRU_'s Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,503
Originally posted by Nealoc187
Bri, where'd you get that info about the 160 hp base model? i know alot of times people just "know" the stuff... i do it all the time, numbers stick with me when i learn them. i'm not doubting, i just never knew that there was a model lower than the SL in the 3000GT....i thought there was only SL and VR4.
the 160HP is a weak sohc v6
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 07:14 AM
  #29  
Egression's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 85
in 93 they have no 160 hp 3000gt buddy. check again.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 07:23 AM
  #30  
Cumalot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,113
From: Louisiana
My friend told me the '93 SL has around 200hp. Is that correct? Oh, I guess I forgot to mention the funniest part. Further proof it's not a VR4, my friend bought a few "VR4" stickers to put on his car. I think he also bought a "turbocharged" sticker as well. Is there any physical way to tell a SL and a VR4 apart? Stickers can be misleading, like my friend here.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 07:25 AM
  #31  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
In '97 there was a 161 HP V6, there was never a I$ in the 3000GT, those were in the Eclipse.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 07:38 AM
  #32  
OgreDave's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,067
Originally posted by Cumalot

Um...Dave, did you read carefully? My friend doesn't have a VR4. It's a SL. Don't you think I know that a VR4 can take me all the time. Even your supercharger won't help.
Ah, my bad. I havent slept in a while.. lets just say the suns out..

And i know the SC wont help. Thats why im goin for a ride in HIS CAR @ Buttonwillow sometime. WHEE..
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 08:09 AM
  #33  
Egression's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 85
all VR4's came equipped standard with HUGE chrome 18's (VERY WIDE!!!) i forget if there are any other things. oh yeah, you should deff. hear a "wwwwwhhhhhhhhiiiiiizzzzzz" while driving by. ah yeah love that turbo whistle! your friend is starting to **** me off, i hate when people do ish like that. I had a friend that had a millenia and he bougt the "s" to put on it
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 08:13 AM
  #34  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
Originally posted by Egression
all VR4's came equipped standard with HUGE chrome 18's (VERY WIDE!!!) i forget if there are any other things. oh yeah, you should deff. hear a "wwwwwhhhhhhhhiiiiiizzzzzz" while driving by. ah yeah love that turbo whistle! your friend is starting to **** me off, i hate when people do ish like that. I had a friend that had a millenia and he bougt the "s" to put on it

245/45-18s in the '95+ years, they were 245/45-17s in the '91 to '94 years.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 09:28 AM
  #35  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,549
The 3000GTs have used 3 styles of V6s over the years. There's the 300/320hp twin turbo, 222hp DOHC, and the 160hp SOHC. The VR4s are good for lower 14s to mid 13s depending on year. The DOHC V6 was good for mid 15s with the 5 speed and the SOHC V6 was good for lower 16s.

Many of you must realize that the VR4 is not a quick car unless it's launched at 5000rpms. Moving 3800+lbs off the line with 320 turbo hp is not an easy feat. I've witnessed a newer VR4 running mid 15s@90mph with a 3000 launch. The guy then stepped up the launch to 5500 and the VR4 was running low 14s@96. That's pretty significant and shows how launch dependant these cars are. I believe it was MT that compared 0-60s of the VR4 being launched at 5000rpms vs 2000rpms. With a 2000rpm launch it was running 0-60 in 7 second range. With the 5000rpms launch it was in the mid 5s.

I don't see why a SC Max couldn't take a early 90s VR4 in the 1/4. From a roll, a well driven 5 speed 4th/5th gen with the typical mods should come pretty close to hanging with a early 90s VR4. I use to race VR4s all the time in my 94 Z28 auto. Off the line they'd get me, but after 60mph I'd walk them pretty hard. AWD is no good after 30mph.


Dave
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 10:03 AM
  #36  
Sprint's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 26,943
Dave has an Supercharged Auto.. he is not keeping up with a vr4
Originally posted by Dave B
The 3000GTs have used 3 styles of V6s over the years. There's the 300/320hp twin turbo, 222hp DOHC, and the 160hp SOHC. The VR4s are good for lower 14s to mid 13s depending on year. The DOHC V6 was good for mid 15s with the 5 speed and the SOHC V6 was good for lower 16s.

Many of you must realize that the VR4 is not a quick car unless it's launched at 5000rpms. Moving 3800+lbs off the line with 320 turbo hp is not an easy feat. I've witnessed a newer VR4 running mid 15s@90mph with a 3000 launch. The guy then stepped up the launch to 5500 and the VR4 was running low 14s@96. That's pretty significant and shows how launch dependant these cars are. I believe it was MT that compared 0-60s of the VR4 being launched at 5000rpms vs 2000rpms. With a 2000rpm launch it was running 0-60 in 7 second range. With the 5000rpms launch it was in the mid 5s.

I don't see why a SC Max couldn't take a early 90s VR4 in the 1/4. From a roll, a well driven 5 speed 4th/5th gen with the typical mods should come pretty close to hanging with a early 90s VR4. I use to race VR4s all the time in my 94 Z28 auto. Off the line they'd get me, but after 60mph I'd walk them pretty hard. AWD is no good after 30mph.


Dave
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 10:55 AM
  #37  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
the VR4 just has a "more agressive" stance than the SL and base model. it also has larger stock wheels, and they key thing is dual exhaust... the SL and base dont have dual exhaust. thats how you can tell them apart. oh yeah and the VR4 is the one that smokes you off the line, thats an indication as well.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 02:25 PM
  #38  
Cumalot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,113
From: Louisiana
Next time, I'll take some pics of his car. Then, I could show you guys. Hm...this is weird. If a real VR4 has heavy chrome wheels and dual exhaust(two on each side?), then my friend has it! I remember he said the speedometer goes up to 180. Maybe it is a VR4? Or could the last owner be a poser and slap some VR4 cosmetic mods on? This is confusing, I'll call him over to get some pics.
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 03:25 PM
  #39  
BriGuyMax's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,844
From: North Aurora, IL
Originally posted by Nealoc187
Bri, where'd you get that info about the 160 hp base model? i know alot of times people just "know" the stuff... i do it all the time, numbers stick with me when i learn them. i'm not doubting, i just never knew that there was a model lower than the SL in the 3000GT....i thought there was only SL and VR4.
I don't know where I got it....I've known it for a while.....just look at the back of the car...if it just says 3000GT...then it's a base model...if it says 3000GT SL than it's the 222hp DOHC motor...and if it says 3000GT VR-4 then it's the 300-320 hp one...
Old Jun 27, 2001 | 03:28 PM
  #40  
Yellowbrother's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,249
Originally posted by Cumalot
My friend told me the '93 SL has around 200hp. Is that correct? Oh, I guess I forgot to mention the funniest part. Further proof it's not a VR4, my friend bought a few "VR4" stickers to put on his car. I think he also bought a "turbocharged" sticker as well. Is there any physical way to tell a SL and a VR4 apart? Stickers can be misleading, like my friend here.
i believe on that year model the vr4 rear spoiler is different the other trim level...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
lrb6805
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
17
Sep 30, 2015 08:12 AM
msellas
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Sep 23, 2015 09:16 PM
220k+ A32
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Sep 23, 2015 03:38 PM
pears
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
15
Sep 18, 2015 05:25 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:47 PM.