Skimax, the answer to your question...
10-18-2000, 02:17 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,989
just to answer a question, not to start any trouble 
Let me refresh your memory, this is how it went:
1) Cheston said the chip showed a midrange 30FWHP on UPRD's in-house Clayton dyno, and the chart was provived. No problem with that.
2) I, along with others, politely asked for independent dyno jet chart.
3) Cheston claimed: the major difference btwn the clayton and the dynojet is that the clayton offers more of a "REAL WORLD" senario. whatever the gain showed on the Clayton will show on the dynojet too.
4) I challenged him to a bet to see if it will show 30 on dynojet.
Note, at this point, if there is a misunderstanding, he should speak out. for example he could have said that it will show 30 on an independent Clayton but not a dynojet. However he didn't, he countined on how he stands by his claim of the 30 on a dynojet as well. You can see his post *yesterday*, he still claimed so.
Thus, I didn't push him into saying anything.
Originally posted by skimax
well woodear, don't really remember cheston saying a garuantee 30hp other than you "pushing" him towards something like that.
well woodear, don't really remember cheston saying a garuantee 30hp other than you "pushing" him towards something like that.
1) Cheston said the chip showed a midrange 30FWHP on UPRD's in-house Clayton dyno, and the chart was provived. No problem with that.
2) I, along with others, politely asked for independent dyno jet chart.
3) Cheston claimed: the major difference btwn the clayton and the dynojet is that the clayton offers more of a "REAL WORLD" senario. whatever the gain showed on the Clayton will show on the dynojet too.
4) I challenged him to a bet to see if it will show 30 on dynojet.
Note, at this point, if there is a misunderstanding, he should speak out. for example he could have said that it will show 30 on an independent Clayton but not a dynojet. However he didn't, he countined on how he stands by his claim of the 30 on a dynojet as well. You can see his post *yesterday*, he still claimed so.
Thus, I didn't push him into saying anything.
10-18-2000, 02:36 PM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 470
sorry jambo, last one man!!!! =0)
Originally posted by WoodEar
just to answer a question, not to start any trouble
Let me refresh your memory, this is how it went:
1) Cheston said the chip showed a midrange 30FWHP on UPRD's in-house Clayton dyno, and the chart was provived. No problem with that.
2) I, along with others, politely asked for independent dyno jet chart.
3) Cheston claimed: the major difference btwn the clayton and the dynojet is that the clayton offers more of a "REAL WORLD" senario. whatever the gain showed on the Clayton will show on the dynojet too.
4) I challenged him to a bet to see if it will show 30 on dynojet.
Note, at this point, if there is a misunderstanding, he should speak out. for example he could have said that it will show 30 on an independent Clayton but not a dynojet. However he didn't, he countined on how he stands by his claim of the 30 on a dynojet as well. You can see his post *yesterday*, he still claimed so.
Thus, I didn't push him into saying anything.
just to answer a question, not to start any trouble
Originally posted by skimax
well woodear, don't really remember cheston saying a garuantee 30hp other than you "pushing" him towards something like that.
well woodear, don't really remember cheston saying a garuantee 30hp other than you "pushing" him towards something like that.
1) Cheston said the chip showed a midrange 30FWHP on UPRD's in-house Clayton dyno, and the chart was provived. No problem with that.
2) I, along with others, politely asked for independent dyno jet chart.
3) Cheston claimed: the major difference btwn the clayton and the dynojet is that the clayton offers more of a "REAL WORLD" senario. whatever the gain showed on the Clayton will show on the dynojet too.
4) I challenged him to a bet to see if it will show 30 on dynojet.
Note, at this point, if there is a misunderstanding, he should speak out. for example he could have said that it will show 30 on an independent Clayton but not a dynojet. However he didn't, he countined on how he stands by his claim of the 30 on a dynojet as well. You can see his post *yesterday*, he still claimed so.
Thus, I didn't push him into saying anything.
logically it make sense, why shouldn't the dynojet show such gains. i'm not sure but i think he's looking at it that way. seriously man you shouldn't have done the proposal thing in the first place and have tried to understand where he was coming from. just setting up a group deal gets hectic, but you've made it worse. he has his fault to, but it was out of anger/anxiety (which is normal IMO). pretty sure you knew he was edgy, but you had to go off and trigger more. i know with your personality you couldn't have let that go by (who can right?) but from here just dormant this whole thing please. just let time work and see what happens, plus you won't be needing one so why waste time on this news man (its coo you're helping). sorry jambo, last one i promise!!!
10-18-2000, 02:39 PM
#3
Donating Maxima.org Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,530
Glad's that's over.
Consider it locked.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jerrod99_se-l
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
3
09-25-2015 03:02 AM
Keyno McMike
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
1
09-21-2015 07:18 AM