General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

Header Dyno insise..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:22 PM
  #1  
emax02's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Whats up guys, I just got back from the dyno and to say the least.. I am very dissapointed. My max HP incresed is a whopping 5.0{176.7} HP and my max TQ increased 2.7{182.1} HP! Whoopdey do..

The biggest difference in HP was at 5650 RPM, I gained 9.1 HP there and 8.5 TQ.

This is not what I hoped for by any stretch of the amagination. The car does hold it's power a bit further now to a about 5800 RPM. I lost about 1 HP and 1 TQ up to 4000 RPM, at that point I slowly gained HP starting at 1 HP and continuing up to almost 10 HP by 5800 RPM.


Now what I am wondering is, is this worse then just a Y-Pipe? Does anyone have a dyno of a Y-Pipe before and after, what are the real gains?

This experience is a big turn off to spending large amounts of money on a car and not gaining hardly anything.. It looks like I am going to have to join the SMC club .

Well share your thoughts. BTW I will get the sheets scand on Sunday.
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:26 PM
  #2  
Lordrandall's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 7,853
From: Burbank, CA
Are these corrected #'s? I know you said it was freakin' hot the other day.... Maybe try again when it's cooler?
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:26 PM
  #3  
Paul6speed's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,915
Do you have Y pipe? I bet a freer flowing exhaust would help the headers along.
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:29 PM
  #4  
Sonic's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,765
From: Westchester County, NY
The Y pipe was part of the header design. Hmm, maybe its more worth it for those that still have the stock Y. Wanna trade?
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:31 PM
  #5  
NickStam's Avatar
...needs to please stop post whoring.
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,727
not good to hear.
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:32 PM
  #6  
95GoldMax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 190
that just outright blows. It sucks you had to be the first one to try it,(spend all this money, long distance calls, etc) but at least you've helped out a lot of members on this forum. I dont see many, if any people getting this. We were all hoping for big gains, but for $600 bucks w/out installation it just aint worth it.
Consider yourself a brave hero. By you doing this, you saved me money.
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:35 PM
  #7  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,146
Either way E, thanks for bucking up and taking the plunge. It costs $$ for the headers + shipping + install + dyno.

Even though you spent alot of $$, you no doubt saved alot of 4-geners money by the information.

Some should set up a fund for this guy for being the test pilot here. $1 or $2 from all the 4-gen guys would at least help this guy some.

This seems to go hand in hand with Don's ported stock exhaust manifold information. Maybe there isn't alot of hp to be made by headers on the VQ? At least not w/ the stock cams anyway.
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:35 PM
  #8  
emax02's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Originally posted by Paul2kGXE
Do you have Y pipe? I bet a freer flowing exhaust would help the headers along.
The headers include a Y-Pipe. My 95 max with 98K miles has a Stillen Intake,PPC headers/Y-Pipe, RT cat, Stillen Cat-Back exaust and a Stillen Flywheel. The car is however in seriuos need of a good tune up.

Randy, the temperature today was 77 degrees and the temperature of my Baseline test last week was 81.8 F. These #'s are SAE corrected. I am not going to dyno the car again until I have my GForce ECU,tunup and UDP. These damn tests are $120 a pop!
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:36 PM
  #9  
Paul6speed's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,915
Oh yeah, I forgot. eek. I think a redyno is a good idea.

Originally posted by medicsonic
The Y pipe was part of the header design. Hmm, maybe its more worth it for those that still have the stock Y. Wanna trade?
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:36 PM
  #10  
max'n out's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,445
that just plane sucks a$$
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:38 PM
  #11  
Paul6speed's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,915
Do you have Paypal? I'll kick in a few bucks for this experiment. I give you a ton of credit for taking a big risk.
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:40 PM
  #12  
emax02's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Originally posted by Jeff92se
Either way E, thanks for bucking up and taking the plunge. It costs $$ for the headers + shipping + install + dyno.

Even though you spent alot of $$, you no doubt saved alot of 4-geners money by the information.

Some should set up a fund for this guy for being the test pilot here. $1 or $2 from all the 4-gen guys would at least help this guy some.

This seems to go hand in hand with Don's ported stock exhaust manifold information. Maybe there isn't alot of hp to be made by headers on the VQ? At least not w/ the stock cams anyway.
Thanks for the very kind gesture Jeff but don't sweet it, I can always make more money.

How much HP is usually gained with a Y-Pipe? I meen real HP #'s from a before and after dyno test? I have never actualy seen one before.

I wonder if I waited another week if the ECU whould adjust more or something? I have had these headers on for 3 day's and 200 miles.
Old 08-10-2001 | 05:44 PM
  #13  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,146
Well from what I see, the Y gains the 4-geners about 10hp and 10-15ftlbs torque more or less. About what you are seeing. I would have to say 200miles is plenty of time for any changes to take effect.


Originally posted by emax95


Thanks for the very kind gesture Jeff but don't sweet it, I can always make more money.

How much HP is usually gained with a Y-Pipe? I meen real HP #'s from a before and after dyno test? I have never actualy seen one before.

I wonder if I waited another week if the ECU whould adjust more or something? I have had these headers on for 3 day's and 200 miles.
Old 08-10-2001 | 07:01 PM
  #14  
My 4DSC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Disappointing...but here's a few POSITIVES:

(1) YOU will most likely continue to be the ONLY one on the .org with headers!! (dont you feel special!)

(2) Y-pipes will NOT become obsolete & will remain a top bang-for-buck mod.

(3) I can still get decent money for my y-pipe if I decide to sell it.

Oh, BTW, I feel your pain bro...
I spent $4000 on a S/C kit that was a P.O.S. and only dropped 1 second off my E.T. (hope Kev has better luck with it than I did)
Old 08-10-2001 | 07:06 PM
  #15  
mdeal's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,930
From: Atlanta, GA
Without reading back through all of the thread(s), would a different y-pipe make a difference as opposed to using theirs? I think it was stated some o2 sensors were positioned differently.
Old 08-10-2001 | 07:25 PM
  #16  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Paul2kGXE
Do you have Y pipe? I bet a freer flowing exhaust would help the headers along.
His orginal dyno was with a ypipe. It increased from that. And personally I think that is excellent results. So basically 18~ hp for a header. Sounds very realistic.
Old 08-10-2001 | 08:04 PM
  #17  
Y2KevSE's Avatar
Rice Boy in Denial =)
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,356
Re: Disappointing...but here's a few POSITIVES:

Originally posted by My 4DSC
Oh, BTW, I feel your pain bro...
I spent $4000 on a S/C kit that was a P.O.S. and only dropped 1 second off my E.T. (hope Kev has better luck with it than I did)
Your fault for running 19's!!!


Sorry to hear about your gains (or no gains). You have my respect for being the first to try this mod.
Old 08-10-2001 | 08:13 PM
  #18  
emax02's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac


His orginal dyno was with a ypipe. It increased from that. And personally I think that is excellent results. So basically 18~ hp for a header. Sounds very realistic.
I wish that was true Russ. I had a stock Y-Pipe on my baseline test.

MY4DSC, I am glad I made you happy! haha. I also bought and sold a SC so I feel your pain.



After looking at my dyno in 4th gear I actually gained 6.4 peak HP{173.1}. Thats a little better.
Old 08-10-2001 | 08:22 PM
  #19  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
emax: First of all, thanks a bunch for going to all the trouble and expending your effort on trying out these headers. You did a great service to all of the people here. It's too bad that you didn't get the results we were all hoping for. But I guess thats the way things go.... Thanks man!
Old 08-10-2001 | 09:13 PM
  #20  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,287
From: FV, NC
When will us 4th Gen owners see the light? I was going to get the headers too.

E-Money, You aught to send that company your dyno test and get them for false advertisment. Just kidding.

I really think you should send them a copy of your results though.

When will we get a break?
Old 08-10-2001 | 10:08 PM
  #21  
emax02's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Originally posted by deezo



When will we get a break?
When the G35 is 3 years old .
I will let PPC know the results.
Old 08-10-2001 | 10:31 PM
  #22  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,287
From: FV, NC
Originally posted by emax95


When the G35 is 3 years old .
I will let PPC know the results.
Cool.
Old 08-10-2001 | 11:55 PM
  #23  
Dave B's Avatar
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,555
This is kind on what I expected all along. It looks as if the Nissan manifolds, while ugly, aren't too restrictive. The gains are right on with the gains from a y-pipe. I have never seen just a Y-pipe add 10hp and 10-15tq like some say. A Y-pipe WITH an intake will post those kind of numbers.

No worries Ethan. When you get more mods, the headers should help slightly more than just the manifolds. Not all car respond great to headers. The LS1 doesn't make, but more than 4 rwhp with shorty aftermarket headers and that's a big 5.7 liter. Sometimes the maker gets it right. Unfortunately you rid of your SC which would have loved those headers.


Dave
Old 08-11-2001 | 12:15 AM
  #24  
Ants97SE's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,121
I'm just waiting for Don to yell out I told you so. In any case, even if it didn't produce anything I'd like to that Ethan for doing research into this and taking a chance on it. Who knows, if you ever decide to buy another supercharger it may come in handy.
Old 08-11-2001 | 12:44 AM
  #25  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oh damn, then those results suck.

Originally posted by emax95


I wish that was true Russ. I had a stock Y-Pipe on my baseline test.

MY4DSC, I am glad I made you happy! haha. I also bought and sold a SC so I feel your pain.



After looking at my dyno in 4th gear I actually gained 6.4 peak HP{173.1}. Thats a little better.
Old 08-11-2001 | 12:46 AM
  #26  
RussMaxManiac
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hmmm, my friend Carlos dynoed 324 before headers and ypipe and then went to 356 with headers and ypipe. I think they worked more than 4 hp

Originally posted by Dave B
This is kind on what I expected all along. It looks as if the Nissan manifolds, while ugly, aren't too restrictive. The gains are right on with the gains from a y-pipe. I have never seen just a Y-pipe add 10hp and 10-15tq like some say. A Y-pipe WITH an intake will post those kind of numbers.

No worries Ethan. When you get more mods, the headers should help slightly more than just the manifolds. Not all car respond great to headers. The LS1 doesn't make, but more than 4 rwhp with shorty aftermarket headers and that's a big 5.7 liter. Sometimes the maker gets it right. Unfortunately you rid of your SC which would have loved those headers.


Dave
Old 08-11-2001 | 11:07 AM
  #27  
Don in Texas's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (-2)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 682
Originally posted by Ants97SE
I'm just waiting for Don to yell out I told you so. In any case, even if it didn't produce anything I'd like to that Ethan for doing research into this and taking a chance on it. Who knows, if you ever decide to buy another supercharger it may come in handy.

Nope, I'm not gonna do it.

The only point I tried to make on the original header deal I tried to put together was that even though I made the OEM manifolds flow 300% better than stock, there was a 1hp gain (barely).

If you look at the design of the header set, its not that much different (flow) than the setup with a y-pipe. It looks like it would be better flowing, but I still stand behind my theory of a S/C'd car benefiting greater (because of the forced induction) than a N/A car, simply because I don't think you can get any more volume thru the engine (heads, intake, etc).

It may still be theory (until September), but I bet you'd see a better gain on a S/C car.

Good job on the progress though, it takes a lot of pain and suffering to find out the right combinations.
Old 08-11-2001 | 12:49 PM
  #28  
Cumalot's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,113
From: Louisiana
Originally posted by Don in Texas



Nope, I'm not gonna do it.

The only point I tried to make on the original header deal I tried to put together was that even though I made the OEM manifolds flow 300% better than stock, there was a 1hp gain (barely).

If you look at the design of the header set, its not that much different (flow) than the setup with a y-pipe. It looks like it would be better flowing, but I still stand behind my theory of a S/C'd car benefiting greater (because of the forced induction) than a N/A car, simply because I don't think you can get any more volume thru the engine (heads, intake, etc).

It may still be theory (until September), but I bet you'd see a better gain on a S/C car.

Good job on the progress though, it takes a lot of pain and suffering to find out the right combinations.

Don, get rid of that sig pic! It's hideous! I'm sure that we all don't want to see Kev's pic up again.
Old 08-11-2001 | 12:52 PM
  #29  
UMD_MaxSE's Avatar
Got Bent?
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,516
Originally posted by Cumalot



Don, get rid of that sig pic! It's hideous! I'm sure that we all don't want to see Kev's pic up again.
doh!
Old 08-11-2001 | 01:38 PM
  #30  
Loren00Miata's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 234
Why should this be a surprise? Don had his stock manifolds ported and they only made 1 hp difference. The stock manifold already flows more than the head does. The head needs to be opened a lot more before headers make a difference.
Old 08-11-2001 | 01:47 PM
  #31  
costcowholesale's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 6,002
Originally posted by Cumalot



Don, get rid of that sig pic! It's hideous! I'm sure that we all don't want to see Kev's pic up again.
isn't that guy an rich actor or somethin from hong kong? no way is kev that rich , he drives a MAXIMA
Old 08-11-2001 | 01:48 PM
  #32  
Y2KevSE's Avatar
Rice Boy in Denial =)
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,356
Originally posted by Cumalot



Don, get rid of that sig pic! It's hideous! I'm sure that we all don't want to see Kev's pic up again.
Do I make you..... horney?
Old 08-11-2001 | 02:06 PM
  #33  
Cumalot's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,113
From: Louisiana
Originally posted by Y2KevSE


Do I make you..... horney?

Ok, where't that puke smile?


Btw, we need more smilies!
Old 08-11-2001 | 04:57 PM
  #34  
Synki's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,631
From: NJ
Re: Disappointing...but here's a few POSITIVES:

Originally posted by My 4DSC

Oh, BTW, I feel your pain bro...
I spent $4000 on a S/C kit that was a P.O.S. and only dropped 1 second off my E.T. (hope Kev has better luck with it than I did)

Im sorry to hear teh #'s Ethan. Well your the only guy i knwo who has headers on a max... well to all max owners your the only one. hehe.

Atom-that was pretty bad that it only took 1 sec off considering a 50 shot took a full sec off. I told you to drop the damn 19 inchers. Doh!
Old 08-11-2001 | 05:43 PM
  #35  
speedy-t's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 217
Thanks, emax95, for doing this for all of us. Your efforts are very appreciated.

I curious about the sound you said the headers made like a motor bike. Do you think you have some kind of exhaust leak from the header flanges? Was there a gasket for the install? This could contribute to the poor results. Just curious of what you think.
Old 08-11-2001 | 07:51 PM
  #36  
y2kse's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,728
From: City of the Fallen Angel, CA
Originally posted by Don in Texas
. . . it takes a lot of pain and suffering to find out the right combinations.
You said a mouthful there, Don. After two intake setups and four exhaust setups, I couldn't agree more. And damn if I'm not back to running some stock components on both my intake and exhaust to get decent performance throughout the rpm range. Guess those Nissan Engineers actually knew what they were doing.
Old 08-12-2001 | 12:51 AM
  #37  
emax02's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Originally posted by speedy-t
Thanks, emax95, for doing this for all of us. Your efforts are very appreciated.

I curious about the sound you said the headers made like a motor bike. Do you think you have some kind of exhaust leak from the header flanges? Was there a gasket for the install? This could contribute to the poor results. Just curious of what you think.
This is actually a good idea and I will investigate it tomarrow. The sound I believe I am hearing is a beez in the can flex section. If there was indeed a exaust leak it whould blend it easaly with this sound. The sound does decrease a bit when the car warms up but the same went for my old Stillen Y-Pipe. New gaskets came with the headers and were installed. I sure hope I have a BIG exaust leak, that whould make my day! Thanks
Old 08-12-2001 | 08:04 AM
  #38  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,287
From: FV, NC
Originally posted by Loren00Miata
Why should this be a surprise? Don had his stock manifolds ported and they only made 1 hp difference. The stock manifold already flows more than the head does. The head needs to be opened a lot more before headers make a difference.
But look at what Don just said about the headers not doing much unless you have an SC.
In his own testing, he removed 1 pound of material from the stock headers and only gained .5 HP when dynoed.

Even Ethan's test shows that you don't get big gains unless you replace the stock headers with these.

Nissan did their homework on the VQ.
Old 08-12-2001 | 10:14 AM
  #39  
Ironlord's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 778
Now, this test was on a 95 who already had intake and exhaust work and a flywheel... So this car is flowing pretty well for a 95, even if it is in bad need of a tuneup (which might affect performance). Now, even with all these mods, he's putting down 173 fwhp. That's about what a 5th gen auto puts down stock, so my question is, would these headers see more gain of a 5th gen? And, are they more beneficial for4 such than just a ypipe? And, if they're not - is this a result of the build and design by the company who makes these headers? are they optimized length and diameter? etc. etc. I think we need more questions than just they suck...

BTW, emax, youn are my hero, you got big brass ones for going all out and getting them and testing them for everyone. Mad props!
Old 08-12-2001 | 12:40 PM
  #40  
emax02's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Originally posted by Ironlord
Now, this test was on a 95 who already had intake and exhaust work and a flywheel... So this car is flowing pretty well for a 95, even if it is in bad need of a tuneup (which might affect performance). Now, even with all these mods, he's putting down 173 fwhp. That's about what a 5th gen auto puts down stock, so my question is, would these headers see more gain of a 5th gen? And, are they more beneficial for4 such than just a ypipe? And, if they're not - is this a result of the build and design by the company who makes these headers? are they optimized length and diameter? etc. etc. I think we need more questions than just they suck...

BTW, emax, youn are my hero, you got big brass ones for going all out and getting them and testing them for everyone. Mad props!

Thanks dude. The PPC headers are 2.5' diam. and have a equal length designe. BTW I don't think a stock auto 5th gen put's down 173 stock, I remember Kev's modded {NA} max only put down 172HP. Either way..


Quick Reply: Header Dyno insise..



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:24 AM.