Horsepower gains from aftermarket torque convertors
#1
This site http://www.converter.cc/dyno_shop.htm has alot a valuable info on aftermarket TC's. It would seem that a well matched TC would give a very nice increase in power. Now if only there was a way to get a 4.0 or 4.11 final gear for the automagic's.
#2
Originally posted by Nismo87SE
This site http://www.converter.cc/dyno_shop.htm has alot a valuable info on aftermarket TC's. It would seem that a well matched TC would give a very nice increase in power. Now if only there was a way to get a 4.0 or 4.11 final gear for the automagic's.
This site http://www.converter.cc/dyno_shop.htm has alot a valuable info on aftermarket TC's. It would seem that a well matched TC would give a very nice increase in power. Now if only there was a way to get a 4.0 or 4.11 final gear for the automagic's.
#5
#6
I do to and . . .
Originally posted by axion
Doesn't Don from Texas have a tq. converter?
Doesn't Don from Texas have a tq. converter?
#7
You actually lose a little hp and tq with a high stall converter, but you gain a ton of torque multiplication. The reason you lose power is because of the larger amounts of converter slippage. You'd be best served getting a high quality converter because they lose a minimal amount of power compared to the cheaper units.
Dave
Dave
#8
I also have a Protorque TC
Originally posted by DMan_2KMax
I haven't had a 5-speed jump me from the start yet!! Prior to the T.C.er the 5-speeds would usually get a jump on me until I reeled them in but now I can get an awesome start. One of the best mods I've done so far next to the S.C.er.
I haven't had a 5-speed jump me from the start yet!! Prior to the T.C.er the 5-speeds would usually get a jump on me until I reeled them in but now I can get an awesome start. One of the best mods I've done so far next to the S.C.er.
#11
Originally posted by mtrai760
#12
I think the best Maxima setup would be an auto with a good stall, beefed up internals, and SC. You'd have V8 power, a brutal launch, less drivetrain stress, and smooth cruising. With the SC and stall converter, the difference between the 5 speed and auto would be zilch except maybe over 120mph.
Dave
Dave
#14
Originally posted by Dave B
I think the best Maxima setup would be an auto with a good stall, beefed up internals, and SC. You'd have V8 power, a brutal launch, less drivetrain stress, and smooth cruising. With the SC and stall converter, the difference between the 5 speed and auto would be zilch except maybe over 120mph.
Dave
I think the best Maxima setup would be an auto with a good stall, beefed up internals, and SC. You'd have V8 power, a brutal launch, less drivetrain stress, and smooth cruising. With the SC and stall converter, the difference between the 5 speed and auto would be zilch except maybe over 120mph.
Dave
Beefed up internals? Dave, please give me some examples. Thanks. 300ZXTT injectors? Colder spark plugs? Right? What else?
#16
www.mobiletek.net , Don's site. Look for HSTC.
#17
Re: I also have a Protorque TC
Originally posted by CalsonicSE
I lessened my 0-60 time by over half a second (G-Tech verified) with the hi-stall TC...BTW, I am N/A...I'm satsified with it...DMan, I bet traction is hard to get with your S/C and the TC...how do you launch? and what tires do you have? It's hard enough trying to launch N/A.
I lessened my 0-60 time by over half a second (G-Tech verified) with the hi-stall TC...BTW, I am N/A...I'm satsified with it...DMan, I bet traction is hard to get with your S/C and the TC...how do you launch? and what tires do you have? It's hard enough trying to launch N/A.
#18
I AGREE WITH YOU 100%!!
Originally posted by Dave B
I think the best Maxima setup would be an auto with a good stall, beefed up internals, and SC. You'd have V8 power, a brutal launch, less drivetrain stress, and smooth cruising. With the SC and stall converter, the difference between the 5 speed and auto would be zilch except maybe over 120mph.
Dave
I think the best Maxima setup would be an auto with a good stall, beefed up internals, and SC. You'd have V8 power, a brutal launch, less drivetrain stress, and smooth cruising. With the SC and stall converter, the difference between the 5 speed and auto would be zilch except maybe over 120mph.
Dave
#19
Originally posted by Cumalot
Beefed up internals? Dave, please give me some examples. Thanks. 300ZXTT injectors? Colder spark plugs? Right? What else?
Beefed up internals? Dave, please give me some examples. Thanks. 300ZXTT injectors? Colder spark plugs? Right? What else?
By a beefed up tranny, I mean heavier duty clutches, bands, upgraded valve body, stronger converter, and a tranny cooler. Nothing dramatic, but it would require a rebuild. The killer of auto trannys is heat and a higher stall converter produces a ton of heat. The quicker shifts of the valve body and the cooling of the tranny cooler will keep the tranny happy.
Autos are great because they don't shock the drivetrain on launch like a 5 speed does. With the auto, you can take out the slack in the drivetrain just before launch. When you've got a good bit of torque (215-230fwtq SC auto), good hp (~250fwhp), high torque multiplication of a higher stall converter, and a relatively light sedan, the car is going to move very quickly, especially up top. The auto does cost more money to upgrade, but I believe it will last much longer behind boost. This seems to be the case for almost all boosted cars.
Dave
#20
The general "gearhead" rule of thumb for choosing the stall speed of a converter is to get it to stall 500rpms below peak torque. With most VQs, that means about 3300-3500 rpms. However, driving around town with a 3300 stall would be VERY sluggish on part throttle acceleration. For a street driven NA VQ, I'd say 2800 would be the tops and if you're going to get a SC then get a 2600 stall. Stall is based on torque. Since the SC makes more torque and at a slightly lower rpm, you'll want to adjust stall speed accordingly. I believe the try stall speed of the stock converter is 2250rpms.
Dave
Dave
#21
So what TC would be right for me.I have a VE and plan on going with all the bolt ons I can and eventually a 80 shot of NOS.I am planning on getting a TC for my next mod so I am glad this subject was brought up since my VE is different from the VQ.I know nothing about TC's and that is being honest.All I know is the VE auto is a killer up top and lacks on the low end.What stall TC would be good for me I dont want to lose top end.
#22
Based on my own limited testing, the basic Protorque TC is all that a bolt on or S/C maxima needs. Now that I think back on it, the car did feel slightly "looser or sluggish" compared to stock under 1600rpm. However with 50% throttle I could get a 2000-2100rpm launch, flash stalling at 1500rpm gave me a 3000rpm launch. If there was a way to get shorter gearing the TC/VB combo would kick some serious ***. According to protorque the stall speed increases about 400-800rpm depending on the engine's torque characterists (sp?). I'm guessing that my 87 maxima only had like 160-170fwtq tops after I did the headwork+cams.
Originally posted by Dave B
The general "gearhead" rule of thumb for choosing the stall speed of a converter is to get it to stall 500rpms below peak torque. With most VQs, that means about 3300-3500 rpms. However, driving around town with a 3300 stall would be VERY sluggish on part throttle acceleration. For a street driven NA VQ, I'd say 2800 would be the tops and if you're going to get a SC then get a 2600 stall. Stall is based on torque. Since the SC makes more torque and at a slightly lower rpm, you'll want to adjust stall speed accordingly. I believe the try stall speed of the stock converter is 2250rpms.
Dave
The general "gearhead" rule of thumb for choosing the stall speed of a converter is to get it to stall 500rpms below peak torque. With most VQs, that means about 3300-3500 rpms. However, driving around town with a 3300 stall would be VERY sluggish on part throttle acceleration. For a street driven NA VQ, I'd say 2800 would be the tops and if you're going to get a SC then get a 2600 stall. Stall is based on torque. Since the SC makes more torque and at a slightly lower rpm, you'll want to adjust stall speed accordingly. I believe the try stall speed of the stock converter is 2250rpms.
Dave
#23
Originally posted by Dave B
The general "gearhead" rule of thumb for choosing the stall speed of a converter is to get it to stall 500rpms below peak torque. With most VQs, that means about 3300-3500 rpms. However, driving around town with a 3300 stall would be VERY sluggish on part throttle acceleration. For a street driven NA VQ, I'd say 2800 would be the tops and if you're going to get a SC then get a 2600 stall. Stall is based on torque. Since the SC makes more torque and at a slightly lower rpm, you'll want to adjust stall speed accordingly. I believe the try stall speed of the stock converter is 2250rpms.
Dave
The general "gearhead" rule of thumb for choosing the stall speed of a converter is to get it to stall 500rpms below peak torque. With most VQs, that means about 3300-3500 rpms. However, driving around town with a 3300 stall would be VERY sluggish on part throttle acceleration. For a street driven NA VQ, I'd say 2800 would be the tops and if you're going to get a SC then get a 2600 stall. Stall is based on torque. Since the SC makes more torque and at a slightly lower rpm, you'll want to adjust stall speed accordingly. I believe the try stall speed of the stock converter is 2250rpms.
Dave
#24
Originally posted by CalsonicSE
Stall speed on my NA car is around 2700 more or less. Everyday driving hasn't been affected much if at all...gas mileage has also stayed the same so that's good =). DaveB - why would you want a 2600 stall for a SC? I think you'd be able to launch with more power with a higher stall. Anyway, for everyone's FYI, you can't put in a TC that says 3000 rpm stall and expect to get 3000 stall...again, it depends on your torque. Good example - I know DMan and I have the same model Protorque TC...his stall is around 3000 and mine is around 2700.
Stall speed on my NA car is around 2700 more or less. Everyday driving hasn't been affected much if at all...gas mileage has also stayed the same so that's good =). DaveB - why would you want a 2600 stall for a SC? I think you'd be able to launch with more power with a higher stall. Anyway, for everyone's FYI, you can't put in a TC that says 3000 rpm stall and expect to get 3000 stall...again, it depends on your torque. Good example - I know DMan and I have the same model Protorque TC...his stall is around 3000 and mine is around 2700.
Dave
#25
Originally posted by Dave B
Actually, I was talking about the tranny. Sorry, I should have been more clear. The VQ itself is plenty strong for standard pulley boost. If anything, upgrading your fuel pump seems to be the only wise and useful mod for the SC. New injectors, I've been told, and worthless and the stock VQ units are safe to over 320hp.
By a beefed up tranny, I mean heavier duty clutches, bands, upgraded valve body, stronger converter, and a tranny cooler. Nothing dramatic, but it would require a rebuild. The killer of auto trannys is heat and a higher stall converter produces a ton of heat. The quicker shifts of the valve body and the cooling of the tranny cooler will keep the tranny happy.
Autos are great because they don't shock the drivetrain on launch like a 5 speed does. With the auto, you can take out the slack in the drivetrain just before launch. When you've got a good bit of torque (215-230fwtq SC auto), good hp (~250fwhp), high torque multiplication of a higher stall converter, and a relatively light sedan, the car is going to move very quickly, especially up top. The auto does cost more money to upgrade, but I believe it will last much longer behind boost. This seems to be the case for almost all boosted cars.
Dave
Actually, I was talking about the tranny. Sorry, I should have been more clear. The VQ itself is plenty strong for standard pulley boost. If anything, upgrading your fuel pump seems to be the only wise and useful mod for the SC. New injectors, I've been told, and worthless and the stock VQ units are safe to over 320hp.
By a beefed up tranny, I mean heavier duty clutches, bands, upgraded valve body, stronger converter, and a tranny cooler. Nothing dramatic, but it would require a rebuild. The killer of auto trannys is heat and a higher stall converter produces a ton of heat. The quicker shifts of the valve body and the cooling of the tranny cooler will keep the tranny happy.
Autos are great because they don't shock the drivetrain on launch like a 5 speed does. With the auto, you can take out the slack in the drivetrain just before launch. When you've got a good bit of torque (215-230fwtq SC auto), good hp (~250fwhp), high torque multiplication of a higher stall converter, and a relatively light sedan, the car is going to move very quickly, especially up top. The auto does cost more money to upgrade, but I believe it will last much longer behind boost. This seems to be the case for almost all boosted cars.
Dave
#26
Im slow at this but wtf does flash torqueing mean? I usually just power brake but what is this method. Thanks.
BTW, what would you suggest on a NOSed auto putting down about 200fwhp & about 215lbs? What stall if any? I already ahve vb mod & tranny cooler.
BTW, what would you suggest on a NOSed auto putting down about 200fwhp & about 215lbs? What stall if any? I already ahve vb mod & tranny cooler.
#27
Flash stalling is using the brakes, hitting the accelerator for a split second to start spooling the engine, then letting go of the brake. Same effect as brake torquing without the excess heat. Ih, and you are not slow.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post