Hmm ... disappointing dyno numbers on Chestons Supercharged max ...
10-09-2001, 08:49 PM
#1
Hmm ... disappointing dyno numbers on Chestons Supercharged max ...
10-09-2001, 09:03 PM
#2
Re: Hmm ... disappointing dyno numbers on Chestons Supercharged max ...
Originally posted by ohboiya
http://www.maximadriver.com/
Have n e of you other guys dynoed your SC?
http://www.maximadriver.com/
Have n e of you other guys dynoed your SC?
10-09-2001, 09:07 PM
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 773
Re: Re: Hmm ... disappointing dyno numbers on Chestons Supercharged max ...
Originally posted by emax95
I don't think those #'s are bad, maybe not awesome, but not bad. He gained 70 FWHP with the SC, I would not complane.
I don't think those #'s are bad, maybe not awesome, but not bad. He gained 70 FWHP with the SC, I would not complane.
dont worry about it, it happens all the time
anyways, those numbers seem decent, is his car an auto on manual?
10-09-2001, 09:10 PM
#6
Re: Re: Hmm ... disappointing dyno numbers on Chestons Supercharged max ...
you sure about that? Jane's AUTO dynoed 3 hp less on stock boost 
Originally posted by emax95
I don't think those #'s are bad, maybe not awesome, but not bad. He gained 70 FWHP with the SC, I would not complane.
I don't think those #'s are bad, maybe not awesome, but not bad. He gained 70 FWHP with the SC, I would not complane.
10-09-2001, 09:12 PM
#7
Originally posted by emax95
Actualy more like 75 more FWHP because he had to take out his ecu. His last reported dyno was in 3rd gear, if these #'s were in 4th gear you would have to tack on another 5-10 FWHP gain.
Actualy more like 75 more FWHP because he had to take out his ecu. His last reported dyno was in 3rd gear, if these #'s were in 4th gear you would have to tack on another 5-10 FWHP gain.
10-09-2001, 09:12 PM
#8
Re: Re: Re: Hmm ... disappointing dyno numbers on Chestons Supercharged max ...
Originally posted by slick
you spelt complain wrong dont worry about it, it happens all the time
you spelt complain wrong
dont worry about it, it happens all the time
10-09-2001, 10:36 PM
#9
it was a 4th gear pull, on stock 15s. and about 85°F at the time of the pull.
well. back to the drawing board. change oil. change fuel filter. change intake, and remod ECU. tweak the exhaust, and then we'll see..
--cheston
well. back to the drawing board. change oil. change fuel filter. change intake, and remod ECU. tweak the exhaust, and then we'll see..
--cheston
10-09-2001, 10:50 PM
#10
Originally posted by sx7r
friend at dyno shop tells me numbers would be lower in 4th than 3rd.
friend at dyno shop tells me numbers would be lower in 4th than 3rd.
Sprint, thats ironic. Look at crabs I30, that guy has 2 of every mod known to man and then some but yet he only put down 212FWHP{I think}. I guess the more mods you have the less power you get, to a point
.
10-10-2001, 12:03 AM
#11
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 43
Re: Re: Hmm ... disappointing dyno numbers on Chestons Supercharged max ...
Originally posted by emax95
I don't think those #'s are bad, maybe not awesome, but not bad. He gained 70 FWHP with the SC, I would not complane.
I don't think those #'s are bad, maybe not awesome, but not bad. He gained 70 FWHP with the SC, I would not complane.
10-10-2001, 05:53 AM
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 308
Re: Re: Re: Hmm ... disappointing dyno numbers on Chestons Supercharged max ...
Originally posted by UndercoverMax
I would not complain either! Will you people out there learn the correct tenses of the words you use?
I would not complain either! Will you people out there learn the correct tenses of the words you use?
10-10-2001, 05:59 AM
#13
i think he was at 230.. but he was still at stock boost
Originally posted by emax95
I know that, thats why I said tack on another 5-10 HP. Read it again, you will understand.
Sprint, thats ironic. Look at crabs I30, that guy has 2 of every mod known to man and then some but yet he only put down 212FWHP{I think}. I guess the more mods you have the less power you get, to a point .
I know that, thats why I said tack on another 5-10 HP. Read it again, you will understand.
Sprint, thats ironic. Look at crabs I30, that guy has 2 of every mod known to man and then some but yet he only put down 212FWHP{I think}. I guess the more mods you have the less power you get, to a point
.
10-10-2001, 08:50 AM
#14
Re: Hmm ... disappointing dyno numbers on Chestons Supercharged max ...
My 99SE 5Sp with 3.33" pulley was able to pull 277.7HP and 260.1 torque in 4th gear for my best run. My other run was 276.0/251.7. The better of the two run came after cooling the engine down for about 15 minutes. The conditions were 84.8 degress and 29.4-0.37in.Hg. I also have budget Y, Greddy catback. This run was with OZ monte carlo 17" rim.
Originally posted by ohboiya
http://www.maximadriver.com/
Have n e of you other guys dynoed your SC?
http://www.maximadriver.com/
Have n e of you other guys dynoed your SC?
10-10-2001, 10:11 AM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,046
WOW...sighmax. Isn't that around 300hp crank? Your car must haul booty!
In chestons page it says "fwhp". I always forget...is that Front wheel hp or fly wheel hp?
If he got nearly 250hp at the wheels and stock autos put out 160?....whats the big deal?
Mike S.
In chestons page it says "fwhp". I always forget...is that Front wheel hp or fly wheel hp?
If he got nearly 250hp at the wheels and stock autos put out 160?....whats the big deal?
Mike S.
10-10-2001, 02:19 PM
#22
that's what i told him he was gonna get. but he kept telling me 255 and i said no. those are still some decent numbers for a 4th gear pull. we need to all dyno in the same gear for the 5-spd's so they can compare their numbers better.
10-10-2001, 02:27 PM
#23
hmmm
I have always dyno'd in 4th, true the 3rd gear will give better #'s but I think that 4th gear is a better 1 to 1 ratio. Can someone give us some insight on what is best to run in either 3rd or 5th? Thanks
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KabirUTA13
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
19
10-17-2015 02:15 AM