General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

cvt sucks

Old Mar 30, 2008 | 04:40 AM
  #1  
gixxer1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 46
From: stoughton mass.
cvt sucks

i work on these cars for a living and i have to say that the cvt sucks.nissan cut the ***** off there cars with the cvt. and the longevity is questionable. i really miss the 5spd auto. look at toyota and honda. no cvt in the accord or camry!!
and just so you guys know anytime i hear someone changes fluid in say a murano the dam thing needs a tranny!!! for instance nissan has a service bulliten on the murano for a shifting code. we had three come into my shop by 3 different techs. the message states reprogram tcm, and replace valve body. means drain fluid to remove pan (to gain access to valve body). all 3 had service message done and all 3 needed new trannys. a cvt is almost 4000 dollars!!!plus labor.
what i'm saying is the new cvts don't like the fluid changed, if you flush your tranny in at say 150k miles there is a risk of needing a tranny. the vehicle will not move..just thought you guys should be aware of future costly problems of the cvt.i could be wrong but this is my experiance with the cvt and its what i've heard at other local nissan dealers.
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 06:40 AM
  #2  
wyche89's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,898
From: Philadelphia, PA
hmm.. thanx for the info, as the new maxima has a CVT and i was thinking about getting it later down th road... anybody else have anything to add about this issue?
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 07:29 AM
  #3  
irish44j's Avatar
retired moderator
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 27,285
From: Burke, VA
CVT is computer-controlled.

Nissan computers are not the most reliable out there.

Figure it out.
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 08:47 AM
  #4  
RacerX1320's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 584
Ive always said that about the cvt, id be interested to see how they run at 150k+ i guess we will have to wait an see. Although my GF's honda accord has a 5spd auto in it which i must admit it a damn good tranny. The best ive seen in years, for economy anyway.
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 09:07 AM
  #5  
Bakermax's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 99
From: Chicago Burbs
I was just kind of disapointed with the whole concept of a CVT. Why would you try to complicate and fix something that aint broken. My 98 GLE has 200K and still shifts like it's brand new, all I do is change the fluid and filter once a year or so. It's not complicated. I knew when I first saw that CVT commercial, that there would be problems with that tranny. Nissan has gotten away from what made me love Nissan.
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 10:05 AM
  #6  
4MySwee's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,499
From: Greer, SC
I'm a little dissappointed that the CVT is all that is offered. I know that topic has been beat to death, so no need in opening that can of worms.....

I liked the 5spd-auto and the 6spd manual. I may be buying 4th, 5th and 6th gens from now on.
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #7  
STARR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,465
From: NY
I think some people seem to be over reacting, modern car with all the new technology are year ahead of the old school/back yard mechanics, engines are no longer heavy duty, you can't beat on them and neglect to change the oil and the same with new transmissions, they need the fluid changed but if you wait 3 times longer then your suppose to no wonder the things fail.

I don't really believe the whole CVT suck just because, Toyota Prius have been around for over 10 years and they have always had CVT and their are hybrids going over 200k.

I've read it many times that newer cars require more frequent maintenance and because newer cars cost more owners neglect and put it off and then it's to late
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 02:12 PM
  #8  
MrDicks95SE's Avatar
Offset Is Everything.
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,417
From: SoCal
Nissan just needs to figure out the problems and bugs in this system, thats all. Very innovative if you really think about it.
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:06 PM
  #9  
Whitebread's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 503
From: Central NJ
Innovative yes, but not as much fun as a stick!
Old Mar 30, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #10  
STARR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,465
From: NY
Originally Posted by gixxer1
i work on these cars for a living and i have to say that the cvt sucks.nissan cut the ***** off there cars with the cvt. and the longevity is questionable. i really miss the 5spd auto. look at toyota and honda. no cvt in the accord or camry!!
and just so you guys know anytime i hear someone changes fluid in say a murano the dam thing needs a tranny!!! for instance nissan has a service bulliten on the murano for a shifting code. we had three come into my shop by 3 different techs. the message states reprogram tcm, and replace valve body. means drain fluid to remove pan (to gain access to valve body). all 3 had service message done and all 3 needed new trannys. a cvt is almost 4000 dollars!!!plus labor.
what i'm saying is the new cvts don't like the fluid changed, if you flush your tranny in at say 150k miles there is a risk of needing a tranny. the vehicle will not move..just thought you guys should be aware of future costly problems of the cvt.i could be wrong but this is my experiance with the cvt and its what i've heard at other local nissan dealers.
would be interesting to know what mileage intervals the owners changed the fluid at, BMW transmission with lifetime fluid fail at about 120k with no fluid changes.

Since your a tech, what does Nissan say about it's own vehicles with failing CVT after a Nissan dealer changes the fluid.

I know techs generally see the best and worst of a make and generally techs don't drive what they work on
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 08:41 AM
  #11  
joebangaa's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,586
From: the OC & Silicon Valley
Funny because TWO Nissan Master Techs I know have nothing but good things to say about the CVT...
Old Apr 6, 2008 | 03:21 PM
  #12  
NismoMax80's Avatar
SuPeRmOd
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,378
Originally Posted by Mr****s95SE
Nissan just needs to figure out the problems and bugs in this system, thats all. Very innovative if you really think about it.
actually CVT is old technology. just hasn't been used in production cars in a long time.
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 04:33 PM
  #13  
joebangaa's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,586
From: the OC & Silicon Valley
Originally Posted by 2000KeyedMaxima
.
I hope you're happy now that you're past 15 posts now
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #14  
fat_kid's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,522
From: MO
1. Newbie should get a temp ban

2.
Originally Posted by gixxer1
look at toyota and honda. no cvt in the accord or camry!!

I thought CVT=VTEC=VVT-i or at least it's a similar idea
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 05:46 PM
  #15  
MrDicks95SE's Avatar
Offset Is Everything.
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,417
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by NismoMax80
actually CVT is old technology. just hasn't been used in production cars in a long time.
very true.
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:12 PM
  #16  
vernk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,323
From: Albuquerque, NM
Originally Posted by fat_kid


I thought CVT=VTEC=VVT-i or at least it's a similar idea
CVT= continuously variable transmission

not valve train stuff
Old Apr 7, 2008 | 06:16 PM
  #17  
fat_kid's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,522
From: MO
Originally Posted by vernk
CVT= continuously variable transmission

not valve train stuff


my bad. i was thinking continuously valve timing or something to that sort
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #18  
STARR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,465
From: NY
Unsure about the accord but every Toyota/Lexus Hybrid vehicle has a CVT
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 09:04 PM
  #19  
kzoosho's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,029
From: Grand rapids Mi
CVT has been in snowmobiles for years mopeds all kinds of stuff. But for a car i hate it. I drove a car with cvt and its just not the same. For an econobox(prius) something with no power i can see it lasting along time. But a car that makes more than 10ft/lbs of torque i cant see it lasting.
Old Apr 8, 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #20  
viperbite's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
Originally Posted by irish44j
CVT is computer-controlled.

Nissan computers are not the most reliable out there.

Figure it out.

:P this is why you should go megasquirt

or aem


oh and that cvt stuff

theres only one good cvt.

and thats a simple cvt.

and no one can perfect it yet :P

its two ***** that rotate to increase / decrease gear ratio

check it out

Old Apr 9, 2008 | 07:48 AM
  #21  
joebangaa's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,586
From: the OC & Silicon Valley
Originally Posted by kzoosho
CVT has been in snowmobiles for years mopeds all kinds of stuff. But for a car i hate it. I drove a car with cvt and its just not the same. For an econobox(prius) something with no power i can see it lasting along time. But a car that makes more than 10ft/lbs of torque i cant see it lasting.
CVTs are used in buses and "heavy equipment" for construction. I think they can handle the torque.

According to the internetz, Nissan's been using CVTs in production vehicles for 16 years now.

And not having to change the fluid so often sounds pretty nice.
Old Apr 9, 2008 | 11:57 PM
  #22  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by irish44j
CVT is computer-controlled.

Nissan computers are not the most reliable out there.

Figure it out.
I'll bet to differ! Nissan Computers in the previous Maximas from gen1 -5 were outstanding unless the end user screwed it up! I use to own a Mitsubishi and I know they've got the most fragile ECU of all the Japanese automakers! I've got a 86.5 Hardbody with the original ECU with 321,000 miles and counting! I'm in Houston and one of the ecu repair shops hip me to the truth! Good luck trying to find a Nissan ecu you'll have to find a wreck duplicate with the same options! I've got 2 Maximas, 1 hardbody, and owned another 00' that we kept 3 yrs B4 upgrading to a 03' and they've alway been really good reliable cars!
Old Apr 10, 2008 | 11:20 AM
  #23  
hot_wax_tree's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,044
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by viperbite
:P this is why you should go megasquirt

or aem


oh and that cvt stuff

theres only one good cvt.

and thats a simple cvt.

and no one can perfect it yet :P

its two ***** that rotate to increase / decrease gear ratio

check it out

that looks like something Plato designed.
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 03:18 AM
  #24  
4MySwee's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,499
From: Greer, SC
Originally Posted by STARR
I think some people seem to be over reacting, modern car with all the new technology are year ahead of the old school/back yard mechanics, engines are no longer heavy duty, you can't beat on them and neglect to change the oil and the same with new transmissions, they need the fluid changed but if you wait 3 times longer then your suppose to no wonder the things fail.

I don't really believe the whole CVT suck just because, Toyota Prius have been around for over 10 years and they have always had CVT and their are hybrids going over 200k.

I've read it many times that newer cars require more frequent maintenance and because newer cars cost more owners neglect and put it off and then it's to late
It seems to me that the thinking is a little off. Older cars could be neglected to some degree.
Buuht,
You now see oil changes at 5,000, spark plus and tranny flushes at 100,000 miles. I see that technology has allowed us to go longer in between maintaining our cars. I agree that you shouldn't push your car past those numbers, and when you do the maintainence, you should do it the right when WHEN IT'S DUE. Abuse anything and it isn't bound to last too long.
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 09:29 AM
  #25  
joebangaa's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,586
From: the OC & Silicon Valley
Originally Posted by hot_wax_tree
that looks like something Plato designed.
I think it's Leonardo da Vinci but I could be wrong
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 09:33 AM
  #26  
fat_kid's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,522
From: MO
plato was a philosopher not an engineer...
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 09:36 AM
  #27  
Progress's Avatar
It's business time.
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,294
From: Buffalo, NY
Why anyone would buy a Maxima without three pedals is beyond on me.
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #28  
fat_kid's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,522
From: MO
Originally Posted by Progress
Why anyone would buy a Maxima without three pedals is beyond on me.
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 10:41 AM
  #29  
northface202's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
Any 6 gen maxima owners have issues with their CVT?
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 05:37 PM
  #30  
MrDicks95SE's Avatar
Offset Is Everything.
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 9,417
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by hot_wax_tree
that looks like something Plato designed.
wtf. are you serious. hahah. thats totally Da Vinci -esque.
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 05:44 PM
  #31  
MorpheusZero's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,064
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Originally Posted by Progress
Why anyone would buy a Maxima without three pedals is beyond on me.
FTMFW

Main redeeming quality of the Maxima was that it's the only family sedan with a V6 and stick available simultaneously
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 06:47 PM
  #32  
skuccio's max's Avatar
Beast Mode!!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 513
From: In a '99 SE-L, w/no sunroof
Originally Posted by MorpheusZero
FTMFW

Main redeeming quality of the Maxima was that it's the only family sedan with a V6 and stick available simultaneously
MAIN redeeming quality.

ESPECIALLY when we got the rear suspension off a carriage. Even shopping carts have IRS
Old Apr 11, 2008 | 09:33 PM
  #33  
dineth00i30's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 700
From: Staten Island,NY
yeah im not feeling the cvt neither but you gotto think. do you really think a major automaker would put a transmission on almost all of their popular vehicles that they know will go bad and hurt sales and loose their loyal customers? intelligent autos are the new thing(gt-r,evo x) so i think nissan should put something like a gr-r ir sinething that kinda use the same technology.
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 06:32 AM
  #34  
Zack342's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
Originally Posted by gixxer1
i work on these cars for a living and i have to say that the cvt sucks.nissan cut the ***** off there cars with the cvt. and the longevity is questionable. i really miss the 5spd auto. look at toyota and honda. no cvt in the accord or camry!!
and just so you guys know anytime i hear someone changes fluid in say a murano the dam thing needs a tranny!!! for instance nissan has a service bulliten on the murano for a shifting code. we had three come into my shop by 3 different techs. the message states reprogram tcm, and replace valve body. means drain fluid to remove pan (to gain access to valve body). all 3 had service message done and all 3 needed new trannys. a cvt is almost 4000 dollars!!!plus labor.
what i'm saying is the new cvts don't like the fluid changed, if you flush your tranny in at say 150k miles there is a risk of needing a tranny. the vehicle will not move..just thought you guys should be aware of future costly problems of the cvt.i could be wrong but this is my experiance with the cvt and its what i've heard at other local nissan dealers.
What nissan dealer do you work for? I did the CVT fuild on my Moms murano at 30k per the book. The fuild is expensive ($18.00 a qt) as you know but other than that it seems seems fine.
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 08:06 AM
  #35  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by dineth00i30
intelligent autos are the new thing(gt-r,evo x).
Intelligent autos?
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 09:54 AM
  #36  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
64 bit?
Old Apr 12, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #37  
ThurzNite's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,469
Originally Posted by Mr****s95SE
wtf. are you serious. hahah. thats totally Da Vinci -esque.
<-- As evident by my avatar, His famous Vitruvian Man.

Dr J
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 09:27 AM
  #38  
sr123's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5
Originally Posted by gixxer1
i work on these cars for a living and i have to say that the cvt sucks.nissan cut the ***** off there cars with the cvt. and the longevity is questionable. i really miss the 5spd auto. look at toyota and honda. no cvt in the accord or camry!!
and just so you guys know anytime i hear someone changes fluid in say a murano the dam thing needs a tranny!!! for instance nissan has a service bulliten on the murano for a shifting code. we had three come into my shop by 3 different techs. the message states reprogram tcm, and replace valve body. means drain fluid to remove pan (to gain access to valve body). all 3 had service message done and all 3 needed new trannys. a cvt is almost 4000 dollars!!!plus labor.
what i'm saying is the new cvts don't like the fluid changed, if you flush your tranny in at say 150k miles there is a risk of needing a tranny. the vehicle will not move..just thought you guys should be aware of future costly problems of the cvt.i could be wrong but this is my experiance with the cvt and its what i've heard at other local nissan dealers.
you say people are changing the oil at 150k and having problems,could you tell me what k these people are supposed to be changing the cvt oil and if they did it at the proper k would they have the same problem,also could you tell me if a back yarder can change his own oil in the cvt.thanks sr123
Old Sep 16, 2008 | 07:19 PM
  #39  
STARR's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,465
From: NY
Originally Posted by sr123
you say people are changing the oil at 150k and having problems,could you tell me what k these people are supposed to be changing the cvt oil and if they did it at the proper k would they have the same problem,also could you tell me if a back yarder can change his own oil in the cvt.thanks sr123
Traditional transmissions with 4, 5 and 6 gears etc... will shut down at 150k with a flush, I would stick to the normal maintenance schedule, CVT are just a new spin on technology with Auto trans

I read several reviews from well know online posters on different forums and all said the same thing, at 1st you don't know the 09 Maxima has a CVT, it has shifts programed into it
Old Sep 18, 2008 | 10:28 PM
  #40  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,016
From: Arlington, TX
Originally Posted by Progress
Why anyone would buy a Maxima without three pedals is beyond on me.
Couldn't find one quickly enough. My old car (Mazda 626) got totaled and once your car is declared a total (at least in Texas) then insurance is no longer obligated to pay for your rental even if they haven't paid your claim. 3 weeks of rental was enough. I am on the lookout for a low mileage 6 speed 5.5 gen.

Unless Nissan puts a proper 6 speed in the 7th gen Maxima, my next car will probably be a 6 speed VQ35 Altima coupe instead.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:44 PM.