Lost to an Auto V6 Stang...
#1
Lost to an Auto V6 Stang...
Haha just kidding!!!
Now I see why you people call them "dogs". I pulled up to the light and a red Auto Mustang V6 with a young driver (just as myself) pulled up next to me. We both shot and had very decent launches, and I had 2 carlengths on him by 40MpH, at which point I switched into his lane. By the time I was at 80MpH he must have been 10+ carlengths behind me. All I could here was my intake screaming, none of the V-8 Rustang growl I'm used to. What an easy kill. I thought those things ran 8 flat 0-60MpH? Sure didn't seem like it though...
-Cyrus
Now I see why you people call them "dogs". I pulled up to the light and a red Auto Mustang V6 with a young driver (just as myself) pulled up next to me. We both shot and had very decent launches, and I had 2 carlengths on him by 40MpH, at which point I switched into his lane. By the time I was at 80MpH he must have been 10+ carlengths behind me. All I could here was my intake screaming, none of the V-8 Rustang growl I'm used to. What an easy kill. I thought those things ran 8 flat 0-60MpH? Sure didn't seem like it though...
-Cyrus
#3
Re: Lost to an Auto V6 Stang...
Originally posted by Vyrus
Haha just kidding!!!
Now I see why you people call them "dogs". I pulled up to the light and a red Auto Mustang V6 with a young driver (just as myself) pulled up next to me. We both shot and had very decent launches, and I had 2 carlengths on him by 40MpH, at which point I switched into his lane. By the time I was at 80MpH he must have been 10+ carlengths behind me. All I could here was my intake screaming, none of the V-8 Rustang growl I'm used to. What an easy kill. I thought those things ran 8 flat 0-60MpH? Sure didn't seem like it though...
-Cyrus
Haha just kidding!!!
Now I see why you people call them "dogs". I pulled up to the light and a red Auto Mustang V6 with a young driver (just as myself) pulled up next to me. We both shot and had very decent launches, and I had 2 carlengths on him by 40MpH, at which point I switched into his lane. By the time I was at 80MpH he must have been 10+ carlengths behind me. All I could here was my intake screaming, none of the V-8 Rustang growl I'm used to. What an easy kill. I thought those things ran 8 flat 0-60MpH? Sure didn't seem like it though...
-Cyrus
#5
I know V6 stangs are pretty slow, but then again my stock auto Max isn't any speed demon either, but what do they run the 1/4 mile in comparison to a stock auto maxima? I drove my Grandma's V6 (2001) stang, and I thought my Maxima was faster just going on feel of the car but I just wanted to know if times are pretty similar. I noticed the stang redlined between 5000 and 5500 rpms and didn't have half as much tire squeal as my Maxima when flooring it from a stop.
#6
Originally posted by ReichMax97
I know V6 stangs are pretty slow, but then again my stock auto Max isn't any speed demon either, but what do they run the 1/4 mile in comparison to a stock auto maxima? I drove my Grandma's V6 (2001) stang, and I thought my Maxima was faster just going on feel of the car but I just wanted to know if times are pretty similar. I noticed the stang redlined between 5000 and 5500 rpms and didn't have half as much tire squeal as my Maxima when flooring it from a stop.
I know V6 stangs are pretty slow, but then again my stock auto Max isn't any speed demon either, but what do they run the 1/4 mile in comparison to a stock auto maxima? I drove my Grandma's V6 (2001) stang, and I thought my Maxima was faster just going on feel of the car but I just wanted to know if times are pretty similar. I noticed the stang redlined between 5000 and 5500 rpms and didn't have half as much tire squeal as my Maxima when flooring it from a stop.
Engine: 3.8-liter V6
Horsepower: 190 @ 5250
Torque: 220 @ 2750
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 8.7 sec. 1/4-mile in 17.1 sec.
Top Speed: 109 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 133 ft.
Road Holding: 0.80 g.
Fuel Economy: 20 (City) / 29 (Highway)
__________________________________________
Mustang : 3.8-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 3.8-liter V6
Horsepower: 190 @ 5250
Torque: 220 @ 2750
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 7.7 sec. 1/4-mile in 16.3 sec.
Top Speed: 112 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 130 ft.
Road Holding: 0.80 g.
Fuel Economy: 20 (City) / 31 (Highway)
__________________________________________
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 4-speed automatic
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 7.2 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.4 sec.
Top Speed: 130 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 133 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 26 (Highway)
_________________________________________
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 6.8 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.1 sec.
Top Speed: 137 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 127 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 27 (Highway)
http://carpoint.msn.com/Vip/Heraud/F...tang/2002S.asp
#9
Originally posted by 1FSTMAX
Mustang : 3.8-liter, 4-speed automatic
Engine: 3.8-liter V6
Horsepower: 190 @ 5250
Torque: 220 @ 2750
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 8.7 sec. 1/4-mile in 17.1 sec.
Top Speed: 109 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 133 ft.
Road Holding: 0.80 g.
Fuel Economy: 20 (City) / 29 (Highway)
__________________________________________
Mustang : 3.8-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 3.8-liter V6
Horsepower: 190 @ 5250
Torque: 220 @ 2750
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 7.7 sec. 1/4-mile in 16.3 sec.
Top Speed: 112 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 130 ft.
Road Holding: 0.80 g.
Fuel Economy: 20 (City) / 31 (Highway)
__________________________________________
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 4-speed automatic
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 7.2 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.4 sec.
Top Speed: 130 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 133 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 26 (Highway)
_________________________________________
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 6.8 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.1 sec.
Top Speed: 137 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 127 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 27 (Highway)
http://carpoint.msn.com/Vip/Heraud/F...tang/2002S.asp
Mustang : 3.8-liter, 4-speed automatic
Engine: 3.8-liter V6
Horsepower: 190 @ 5250
Torque: 220 @ 2750
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 8.7 sec. 1/4-mile in 17.1 sec.
Top Speed: 109 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 133 ft.
Road Holding: 0.80 g.
Fuel Economy: 20 (City) / 29 (Highway)
__________________________________________
Mustang : 3.8-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 3.8-liter V6
Horsepower: 190 @ 5250
Torque: 220 @ 2750
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 7.7 sec. 1/4-mile in 16.3 sec.
Top Speed: 112 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 130 ft.
Road Holding: 0.80 g.
Fuel Economy: 20 (City) / 31 (Highway)
__________________________________________
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 4-speed automatic
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 7.2 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.4 sec.
Top Speed: 130 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 133 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 26 (Highway)
_________________________________________
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 6.8 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.1 sec.
Top Speed: 137 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 127 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 27 (Highway)
http://carpoint.msn.com/Vip/Heraud/F...tang/2002S.asp
#10
99+ stangs aren't slow
The 99+ V6 stangs are just about as fast as 4th gens are. THere have even been bone stock 14 second V6 cars.
http://www.corral.net/forums/search....der=descending
http://www.corral.net/forums/search....der=descending
#11
Originally posted by 1FSTMAX
Mustang : 3.8-liter, 4-speed automatic
Engine: 3.8-liter V6
Horsepower: 190 @ 5250
Torque: 220 @ 2750
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 8.7 sec. 1/4-mile in 17.1 sec.
Top Speed: 109 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 133 ft.
Road Holding: 0.80 g.
Fuel Economy: 20 (City) / 29 (Highway)
__________________________________________
Mustang : 3.8-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 3.8-liter V6
Horsepower: 190 @ 5250
Torque: 220 @ 2750
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 7.7 sec. 1/4-mile in 16.3 sec.
Top Speed: 112 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 130 ft.
Road Holding: 0.80 g.
Fuel Economy: 20 (City) / 31 (Highway)
__________________________________________
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 4-speed automatic
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 7.2 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.4 sec.
Top Speed: 130 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 133 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 26 (Highway)
_________________________________________
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 6.8 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.1 sec.
Top Speed: 137 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 127 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 27 (Highway)
http://carpoint.msn.com/Vip/Heraud/F...tang/2002S.asp
Mustang : 3.8-liter, 4-speed automatic
Engine: 3.8-liter V6
Horsepower: 190 @ 5250
Torque: 220 @ 2750
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 8.7 sec. 1/4-mile in 17.1 sec.
Top Speed: 109 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 133 ft.
Road Holding: 0.80 g.
Fuel Economy: 20 (City) / 29 (Highway)
__________________________________________
Mustang : 3.8-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 3.8-liter V6
Horsepower: 190 @ 5250
Torque: 220 @ 2750
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 7.7 sec. 1/4-mile in 16.3 sec.
Top Speed: 112 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 130 ft.
Road Holding: 0.80 g.
Fuel Economy: 20 (City) / 31 (Highway)
__________________________________________
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 4-speed automatic
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 7.2 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.4 sec.
Top Speed: 130 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 133 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 26 (Highway)
_________________________________________
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 6.8 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.1 sec.
Top Speed: 137 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 127 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 27 (Highway)
http://carpoint.msn.com/Vip/Heraud/F...tang/2002S.asp
#12
Re: 99+ stangs aren't slow
Originally posted by Nismo87SE
The 99+ V6 stangs are just about as fast as 4th gens are. THere have even been bone stock 14 second V6 cars.
http://www.corral.net/forums/search....der=descending
The 99+ V6 stangs are just about as fast as 4th gens are. THere have even been bone stock 14 second V6 cars.
http://www.corral.net/forums/search....der=descending
#13
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Near Archer High School, Ga
Posts: 6,451
_________________________________________
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 6.8 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.1 sec.
Top Speed: 137 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 127 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 27 (Highway)
The V8 mustangs run 14.4 stock 5 speed, my friend bought one and took it to the track all he ran was mid to high 14's the whole time.
Mustang : 4.6-liter, 5-speed manual
Engine: 4.6-liter V8
Horsepower: 260 @ 5250
Torque: 302 @ 4000
Acceleration: 0-60 mph in 6.8 sec. 1/4-mile in 15.1 sec.
Top Speed: 137 mph
Braking: 60-0 mph in 127 ft.
Road Holding: 0.85 g.
Fuel Economy: 17 (City) / 27 (Highway)
The V8 mustangs run 14.4 stock 5 speed, my friend bought one and took it to the track all he ran was mid to high 14's the whole time.
#14
Re: Re: 99+ stangs aren't slow
Originally posted by 1BADMAX
Where on there does it prove that the 99 and up V6's are as fast as 4th gen Maxima's. I saw one car that ran 14.9 after they had damn near removed everything out of the car. So no your wrong, a V6 Mustang is not as fast a Maxima. If they compare to any Maxima it would probably be the 3rd Gen. GXE w/160hp. But against a 190hp to the new 2k2 255hp forget about it. Race one and you'll find out i'm right.
Where on there does it prove that the 99 and up V6's are as fast as 4th gen Maxima's. I saw one car that ran 14.9 after they had damn near removed everything out of the car. So no your wrong, a V6 Mustang is not as fast a Maxima. If they compare to any Maxima it would probably be the 3rd Gen. GXE w/160hp. But against a 190hp to the new 2k2 255hp forget about it. Race one and you'll find out i'm right.
#16
Originally posted by lcf
what do you guys think about this matchup?
2000 se auto
vs
2001 mustang gt (v8) auto
will i have my *** handed to me?
what do you guys think about this matchup?
2000 se auto
vs
2001 mustang gt (v8) auto
will i have my *** handed to me?
#20
Re: Re: Re: 99+ stangs aren't slow
Originally posted by skeelo34
Its not fair to compare a v6 mustang that came out in 99 to a 2k2 maxima. A stock 99 & up v6 mustang is a good race for a 4th gen maxima. Im not talking about a max with full mods, and the mustang with nothing, i mean both stock. An auto 4th gen probably will lose, while stick win. A 2k2 max is a good race for a gt stang 99 up.
Its not fair to compare a v6 mustang that came out in 99 to a 2k2 maxima. A stock 99 & up v6 mustang is a good race for a 4th gen maxima. Im not talking about a max with full mods, and the mustang with nothing, i mean both stock. An auto 4th gen probably will lose, while stick win. A 2k2 max is a good race for a gt stang 99 up.
#21
Re: Re: Re: Re: 99+ stangs aren't slow
Originally posted by 1BADMAX
BS, there's no way a 4th Gen Maxima is going to lose to a auto V6 Mustang. Losing to a manual is likely, but not the auto. I think most of you that say that a V6 Mustang could beat a Maxima have never drove one to begin with. I'm not saying that a Maxima would kill it, but I wouldn't expect the race to be very close. Just my 2 cents though.
BS, there's no way a 4th Gen Maxima is going to lose to a auto V6 Mustang. Losing to a manual is likely, but not the auto. I think most of you that say that a V6 Mustang could beat a Maxima have never drove one to begin with. I'm not saying that a Maxima would kill it, but I wouldn't expect the race to be very close. Just my 2 cents though.
#22
Originally posted by ReichMax97
I know V6 stangs are pretty slow, but then again my stock auto Max isn't any speed demon either, but what do they run the 1/4 mile in comparison to a stock auto maxima? I drove my Grandma's V6 (2001) stang, and I thought my Maxima was faster just going on feel of the car but I just wanted to know if times are pretty similar. I noticed the stang redlined between 5000 and 5500 rpms and didn't have half as much tire squeal as my Maxima when flooring it from a stop.
I know V6 stangs are pretty slow, but then again my stock auto Max isn't any speed demon either, but what do they run the 1/4 mile in comparison to a stock auto maxima? I drove my Grandma's V6 (2001) stang, and I thought my Maxima was faster just going on feel of the car but I just wanted to know if times are pretty similar. I noticed the stang redlined between 5000 and 5500 rpms and didn't have half as much tire squeal as my Maxima when flooring it from a stop.
You drive a family sedan, yet your GRANDMOTHER drives a mustang!?!
#24
Originally posted by mattattax
stock manual '99+ GTs have run in the high 13s and autos have been in low to mid 14s
stock manual '99+ GTs have run in the high 13s and autos have been in low to mid 14s
Anyways I've been to that site and posted several times.
99-2001 V6 5spd stangs do 0-60 in about 7, autos in about 8.
The new GT 5spd stang will do 0-60 in about 5.6, 1/4th in mid-high 13's - low 14's, autos 0-60 in low 6's, 1/4th in mid-high 14's.
My friend has a 2000 V6 Stang 5spd with headers, cai, downpipe, dual pipes, superchip, gears, Short shifter, ect. ...anyways, his car has lots of torque and could take out most stock maxima 5spds easily, and could hang with lightly modded 95 5spd maxima's all day long, especially the 2k's.
#25
Originally posted by ericdwong
You drive a family sedan, yet your GRANDMOTHER drives a mustang!?!
You drive a family sedan, yet your GRANDMOTHER drives a mustang!?!
#26
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Yea...your Matsima on stangnet right?
Anyways I've been to that site and posted several times.
99-2001 V6 5spd stangs do 0-60 in about 7, autos in about 8.
The new GT 5spd stang will do 0-60 in about 5.6, 1/4th in mid-high 13's - low 14's, autos 0-60 in low 6's, 1/4th in mid-high 14's.
My friend has a 2000 V6 Stang 5spd with headers, cai, downpipe, dual pipes, superchip, gears, Short shifter, ect. ...anyways, his car has lots of torque and could take out most stock maxima 5spds easily, and could hang with lightly modded 95 5spd maxima's all day long, especially the 2k's.
Yea...your Matsima on stangnet right?
Anyways I've been to that site and posted several times.
99-2001 V6 5spd stangs do 0-60 in about 7, autos in about 8.
The new GT 5spd stang will do 0-60 in about 5.6, 1/4th in mid-high 13's - low 14's, autos 0-60 in low 6's, 1/4th in mid-high 14's.
My friend has a 2000 V6 Stang 5spd with headers, cai, downpipe, dual pipes, superchip, gears, Short shifter, ect. ...anyways, his car has lots of torque and could take out most stock maxima 5spds easily, and could hang with lightly modded 95 5spd maxima's all day long, especially the 2k's.
#27
Originally posted by ericdwong
You drive a family sedan, yet your GRANDMOTHER drives a mustang!?!
You drive a family sedan, yet your GRANDMOTHER drives a mustang!?!
#28
the 99+ 190 HP Mustang V6's are certainly more respectable than the older and ridiculously pathetic 150 HP ones (150 HP from a 3.8L V6? WTF was Ford thinking? ), but if my Accord V6 could beat one from about 60 up to about 110 (came from about 2 cars back to a half car ahead) then what does that tell you...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AaronL
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
15
08-08-2020 10:31 AM
Maximeltman
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
09-28-2015 07:19 PM