95-99 are better than 2000+
#41
Re: 95-99 are better than 2000+
Originally posted by mblasko85
I have a question? Why did they ever change the body from the 95-99... Those bodies are the best. Even though they dont have 255 HP im sure they could get it to w/ the same 95-99 bodies. Man and the new 2004 pictures that ive seen... if they are real... they are ugly. Thats what i think. What is your all opinions?
I have a question? Why did they ever change the body from the 95-99... Those bodies are the best. Even though they dont have 255 HP im sure they could get it to w/ the same 95-99 bodies. Man and the new 2004 pictures that ive seen... if they are real... they are ugly. Thats what i think. What is your all opinions?
The Maxima is a dated car, 4th gen or 5th gen. It's very amazing how narrow the car is when you park next to just about anybody. The rear decks are very low both on the 4th and 5th, a sign of age--the bodies are screaming for a complete makeover. So is a 4th "better" than a 5th? Not really, it'a a matter of which you happened to get. The 5th is probably the first Maxima anyone ever called ugly though. The other day a brand-new Dodge Stratus parked next to me and I noticed how bizarre the styling of the 4th gen is when compared to something brand-new. That Stratus has some 745-esque lines believe it or not. Look at the door-handles on the Maxima, look at them on the Camry, look at them on the VW, look at them on the BMW. There is one of the 4 makes that doesn't have the same as the other 3. Now which car mfg refuses to keep up with styling factors?
#42
Re: Re: 95-99 are better than 2000+
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
I own a 98 SE 5-spd with every option except the wind deflector, so that's the disclaimer. The 4th gen was smokin' in late '94--it got on the C&D 10 Best list for the '95 model. Back then, 190 hp was very good, and the soft handling, loose steering, and beam axle wasn't that bad at all. Anything around 7.0 0-60 was pretty fast. But those characteristics are still in the car 7 years later, 255 hp or no 255 hp.
The Maxima is a dated car, 4th gen or 5th gen. It's very amazing how narrow the car is when you park next to just about anybody. The rear decks are very low both on the 4th and 5th, a sign of age--the bodies are screaming for a complete makeover. So is a 4th "better" than a 5th? Not really, it'a a matter of which you happened to get. The 5th is probably the first Maxima anyone ever called ugly though. The other day a brand-new Dodge Stratus parked next to me and I noticed how bizarre the styling of the 4th gen is when compared to something brand-new. That Stratus has some 745-esque lines believe it or not. Look at the door-handles on the Maxima, look at them on the Camry, look at them on the VW, look at them on the BMW. There is one of the 4 makes that doesn't have the same as the other 3. Now which car mfg refuses to keep up with styling factors?
I own a 98 SE 5-spd with every option except the wind deflector, so that's the disclaimer. The 4th gen was smokin' in late '94--it got on the C&D 10 Best list for the '95 model. Back then, 190 hp was very good, and the soft handling, loose steering, and beam axle wasn't that bad at all. Anything around 7.0 0-60 was pretty fast. But those characteristics are still in the car 7 years later, 255 hp or no 255 hp.
The Maxima is a dated car, 4th gen or 5th gen. It's very amazing how narrow the car is when you park next to just about anybody. The rear decks are very low both on the 4th and 5th, a sign of age--the bodies are screaming for a complete makeover. So is a 4th "better" than a 5th? Not really, it'a a matter of which you happened to get. The 5th is probably the first Maxima anyone ever called ugly though. The other day a brand-new Dodge Stratus parked next to me and I noticed how bizarre the styling of the 4th gen is when compared to something brand-new. That Stratus has some 745-esque lines believe it or not. Look at the door-handles on the Maxima, look at them on the Camry, look at them on the VW, look at them on the BMW. There is one of the 4 makes that doesn't have the same as the other 3. Now which car mfg refuses to keep up with styling factors?
#44
Originally posted by jim90gxe
So your saying a 10 yr old suspension sucks? Who wudda thunk it!
So your saying a 10 yr old suspension sucks? Who wudda thunk it!
i only said that [it sucks] because everyone praises the 3rd gen suspension so much
#45
Originally posted by TurDz
I always dream of Nissan coming to their senses to reintroduce the 4th Gen Max with updated feature, and subtle changes here and there. That would be pretty cool.
I always dream of Nissan coming to their senses to reintroduce the 4th Gen Max with updated feature, and subtle changes here and there. That would be pretty cool.
#46
ummmmmmm......well then if you replace the 3rd gens OEM suspension NOW and try comparing again, wouldn't that make more sense
Originally posted by Maximan190
yes it is stock, i only said that because everyone praises the 3rd gen suspension so much when its really not that great. Yeah of course back then when these cars were brand new it was, but were here now in 2002 not in 1989-1994.
yes it is stock, i only said that because everyone praises the 3rd gen suspension so much when its really not that great. Yeah of course back then when these cars were brand new it was, but were here now in 2002 not in 1989-1994.
#47
Although i dont know much about the 2004+ maximas,, from what i can see they will kill the Max's image.......It is very said to say but the altima has taken the place of the 4 door sports car. Nissan is making the Max into a ugly luxury car...
Am i right ?
Am i right ?
#48
Originally posted by Rutnick
what do you think the 5th gen is? Look CLOSELY.
what do you think the 5th gen is? Look CLOSELY.
There are really NO exterior similarities. Interior... well they both do have seats and a wheel to navigate with... hmmm.
#49
Originally posted by SLC I30t
DOH your right the nissan emplems are the same, and they are both called maxima's... I can't believe you wrote that.
There are really NO exterior similarities. Interior... well they both do have seats and a wheel to navigate with... hmmm.
DOH your right the nissan emplems are the same, and they are both called maxima's... I can't believe you wrote that.
There are really NO exterior similarities. Interior... well they both do have seats and a wheel to navigate with... hmmm.
#50
Originally posted by Rutnick
look again.
look again.
#51
Originally posted by Bad97MaxSE
Although i dont know much about the 2004+ maximas,, from what i can see they will kill the Max's image.......It is very said to say but the altima has taken the place of the 4 door sports car. Nissan is making the Max into a ugly luxury car...
Am i right ?
Although i dont know much about the 2004+ maximas,, from what i can see they will kill the Max's image.......It is very said to say but the altima has taken the place of the 4 door sports car. Nissan is making the Max into a ugly luxury car...
Am i right ?
#53
Originally posted by SLC I30t
if you are refering to the engine block-yes but the rest of the engine is different, the suspension-yes, the exhaust-no. Maybe you need to take a another look, with out the rose colored glasses
if you are refering to the engine block-yes but the rest of the engine is different, the suspension-yes, the exhaust-no. Maybe you need to take a another look, with out the rose colored glasses
#54
Re: 95-99 are better than 2000+
Originally posted by mblasko85
I have a question? Why did they ever change the body from the 95-99... Those bodies are the best. Even though they dont have 255 HP im sure they could get it to w/ the same 95-99 bodies. Man and the new 2004 pictures that ive seen... if they are real... they are ugly. Thats what i think. What is your all opinions?
I have a question? Why did they ever change the body from the 95-99... Those bodies are the best. Even though they dont have 255 HP im sure they could get it to w/ the same 95-99 bodies. Man and the new 2004 pictures that ive seen... if they are real... they are ugly. Thats what i think. What is your all opinions?
#56
Re: My .02 cents
Originally posted by MAXlove
So far I've owned 2 3rd gen., 1 fourth, and 2 fifth generation and it has done nothing but gotten better each time to me. Even though my 92 SE hold fond memories every time I jump in my 2k2 they are quickly forgotten
So far I've owned 2 3rd gen., 1 fourth, and 2 fifth generation and it has done nothing but gotten better each time to me. Even though my 92 SE hold fond memories every time I jump in my 2k2 they are quickly forgotten
98 se
72 240z
loved em all
#57
Originally posted by Rutnick
maybe YOU need to take another look. From the side, the car isn't much different from the 4th generation. In fact, not a whole heck of a lot has changed from the 4th gen. Yeah, more hp. The latest Maxima does have a larger engine. The rest is just sheetmetal changes. Not much has really changed in the car. It IS an aging chassis. At best, minor sheetmetal changes. You act like the 5th generation car is an entirely different car. From a manufacturing standpoint, it isn't even close.
maybe YOU need to take another look. From the side, the car isn't much different from the 4th generation. In fact, not a whole heck of a lot has changed from the 4th gen. Yeah, more hp. The latest Maxima does have a larger engine. The rest is just sheetmetal changes. Not much has really changed in the car. It IS an aging chassis. At best, minor sheetmetal changes. You act like the 5th generation car is an entirely different car. From a manufacturing standpoint, it isn't even close.
1. there was a 2inch wheel base increase for the 5th generation
2. 2.8 inches longer and .5 inches longer
3. if the car was so similar as you have stated, why don't part numbers line up? have you tried to put a 4th generation fstb on a 5thgen? what about springs or shocks? They are not the same. In my first post rebutting your notions I did say that the car does have the engine block. Thats about the only designation that will cross over from a 4th gen to a 5th gen.
4. The design hasn't changed much? obviously you havent looked at 4th generation 95-99.5 and a 5th generation 2000-2003.
http://www.max-performance.net/image...ews%20maxi.jpg
http://www.max-performance.net/image...sons%20Max.JPG
Here is my last question for you mr wizard... if our cars are unibody constructed...how do you have an aging chassis when the chassis has to be recreated for a new body... think about that.
#58
I beleive what he means is this:
The 5th Gen was not an all new car, Nissan would like for everyone to think so however. Same platform as gen 4, with a stretched wheelbase, new interior, new sheetmetal, tweaked engine. Basically, I see gen 5 as a reworked gen 4. Gen 5 was Nissan's quick answer to a larger roomier interior.
Now onto MY opinions. Gen 3 is best on the looks dept. Gen 4 feels best as for quality and size (and worst looking rear end). Gen 5 feels too big for my tastes, but I am one of the few that LOVE the rear end styling, but hate the HUGE cow-catcher fordish oval grille up front. Gen 5 has some cheaper interior pieces and paint vs gen 4 as well. I am very curious to the final design of gen 6. But gen 3's looks will remain in my heart forever.
Also,You can see where Nissan cut some costs on gen 5 vs gen 4. Very obvious.
With all this said and with the 3.5 attached to a 6 speed manual, I would not kick a 2002 SE max out of my driveway at all.
Note: I own a gen 4 and my best pal owns a gen 5, and I also sold Nissans during the run of gen 2, 3 and 4 maximas. I am very familiar with All but gen 1 maximas. I feel my opinions are well weighted.
Now onto MY opinions. Gen 3 is best on the looks dept. Gen 4 feels best as for quality and size (and worst looking rear end). Gen 5 feels too big for my tastes, but I am one of the few that LOVE the rear end styling, but hate the HUGE cow-catcher fordish oval grille up front. Gen 5 has some cheaper interior pieces and paint vs gen 4 as well. I am very curious to the final design of gen 6. But gen 3's looks will remain in my heart forever.
Also,You can see where Nissan cut some costs on gen 5 vs gen 4. Very obvious.
With all this said and with the 3.5 attached to a 6 speed manual, I would not kick a 2002 SE max out of my driveway at all.
Note: I own a gen 4 and my best pal owns a gen 5, and I also sold Nissans during the run of gen 2, 3 and 4 maximas. I am very familiar with All but gen 1 maximas. I feel my opinions are well weighted.
Originally posted by SLC I30t
For someone who doesn't know me you are making assumptions you cannot make.
1. there was a 2inch wheel base increase for the 5th generation
2. 2.8 inches longer and .5 inches longer
3. if the car was so similar as you have stated, why don't part numbers line up? have you tried to put a 4th generation fstb on a 5thgen? what about springs or shocks? They are not the same. In my first post rebutting your notions I did say that the car does have the engine block. Thats about the only designation that will cross over from a 4th gen to a 5th gen.
4. The design hasn't changed much? obviously you havent looked at 4th generation 95-99.5 and a 5th generation 2000-2003.
http://www.max-performance.net/image...ews%20maxi.jpg
http://www.max-performance.net/image...sons%20Max.JPG
Here is my last question for you mr wizard... if our cars are unibody constructed...how do you have an aging chassis when the chassis has to be recreated for a new body... think about that.
For someone who doesn't know me you are making assumptions you cannot make.
1. there was a 2inch wheel base increase for the 5th generation
2. 2.8 inches longer and .5 inches longer
3. if the car was so similar as you have stated, why don't part numbers line up? have you tried to put a 4th generation fstb on a 5thgen? what about springs or shocks? They are not the same. In my first post rebutting your notions I did say that the car does have the engine block. Thats about the only designation that will cross over from a 4th gen to a 5th gen.
4. The design hasn't changed much? obviously you havent looked at 4th generation 95-99.5 and a 5th generation 2000-2003.
http://www.max-performance.net/image...ews%20maxi.jpg
http://www.max-performance.net/image...sons%20Max.JPG
Here is my last question for you mr wizard... if our cars are unibody constructed...how do you have an aging chassis when the chassis has to be recreated for a new body... think about that.
#59
Re: I beleive what he means is this:
Originally posted by JettmiesterMax
The 5th Gen was not an all new car, Nissan would like for everyone to think so however. Same platform as gen 4, with a stretched wheelbase, new interior, new sheetmetal, tweaked engine. Basically, I see gen 5 as a reworked gen 4. Gen 5 was Nissan's quick answer to a larger roomier interior.
The 5th Gen was not an all new car, Nissan would like for everyone to think so however. Same platform as gen 4, with a stretched wheelbase, new interior, new sheetmetal, tweaked engine. Basically, I see gen 5 as a reworked gen 4. Gen 5 was Nissan's quick answer to a larger roomier interior.
Now onto MY opinions. Gen 3 is best on the looks dept. Gen 4 feels best as for quality and size (and worst looking rear end). Gen 5 feels too big for my tastes, but I am one of the few that LOVE the rear end styling, but hate the HUGE cow-catcher fordish oval grille up front. Gen 5 has some cheaper interior pieces and paint vs gen 4 as well. I am very curious to the final design of gen 6. But gen 3's looks will remain in my heart forever.
Also,You can see where Nissan cut some costs on gen 5 vs gen 4. Very obvious.
With all this said and with the 3.5 attached to a 6 speed manual, I would not kick a 2002 SE max out of my driveway at all.
Note: I own a gen 4 and my best pal owns a gen 5, and I also sold Nissans during the run of gen 2, 3 and 4 maximas. I am very familiar with All but gen 1 maximas. I feel my opinions are well weighted.
Also,You can see where Nissan cut some costs on gen 5 vs gen 4. Very obvious.
With all this said and with the 3.5 attached to a 6 speed manual, I would not kick a 2002 SE max out of my driveway at all.
Note: I own a gen 4 and my best pal owns a gen 5, and I also sold Nissans during the run of gen 2, 3 and 4 maximas. I am very familiar with All but gen 1 maximas. I feel my opinions are well weighted.
#60
Re: I beleive what he means is this:
Well, a new design is some like the G20 -> G35, or the old Altima and the new one, or even 3rd Gen -> 4th Gen Maximas. I think when someone says "new design," he is referring to a whole new body, inside and out. I agree that the 5th Gen is just a modified version of the 4th Gen. Even if parts are directly interchangable, it is only because of the slight modifications in the 5th Gen's subtle suspension/engine and styling that make it different.
I'm not sure what you're referring to...could you tell me where they cut costs?
Originally posted by JettmiesterMax
Also,You can see where Nissan cut some costs on gen 5 vs gen 4. Very obvious.
Also,You can see where Nissan cut some costs on gen 5 vs gen 4. Very obvious.
#61
Re: Re: I beleive what he means is this:
Originally posted by TurDz
Well, a new design is some like the G20 -> G35, or the old Altima and the new one, or even 3rd Gen -> 4th Gen Maximas. I think when someone says "new design," he is referring to a whole new body, inside and out. I agree that the 5th Gen is just a modified version of the 4th Gen. Even if parts are directly interchangable, it is only because of the slight modifications in the 5th Gen's subtle suspension/engine and styling that make it different.
I'm not sure what you're referring to...could you tell me where they cut costs?
Well, a new design is some like the G20 -> G35, or the old Altima and the new one, or even 3rd Gen -> 4th Gen Maximas. I think when someone says "new design," he is referring to a whole new body, inside and out. I agree that the 5th Gen is just a modified version of the 4th Gen. Even if parts are directly interchangable, it is only because of the slight modifications in the 5th Gen's subtle suspension/engine and styling that make it different.
I'm not sure what you're referring to...could you tell me where they cut costs?
#62
Originally posted by carnal_c30
I like the styling of the exterior and interior of the 4th gens.. but the 5th gens have many things that are better than us... when the 5th gens first came out... i was really disappointed but the look has grown on me and the features+quality on the 5th gens is better
and in the looks department, after seeing Hoons car, Kevs car, and mingo's car in person, I really like the 5th gens!
2k2s however... haha... they look odd it will take time getting used to them especially with their hamburger sized hamburger emblem and the wierd tails
I like the styling of the exterior and interior of the 4th gens.. but the 5th gens have many things that are better than us... when the 5th gens first came out... i was really disappointed but the look has grown on me and the features+quality on the 5th gens is better
and in the looks department, after seeing Hoons car, Kevs car, and mingo's car in person, I really like the 5th gens!
2k2s however... haha... they look odd it will take time getting used to them especially with their hamburger sized hamburger emblem and the wierd tails
#63
I owned both cars!!!
I owned a 1995 SE before my 2000 SE. Both cars are nice, the 4th gen was a great car and the 2000 is a great car. The main differences I see in the two are, the body styles are very different. The 5th gen is more sleekly styled, I also say the 5th gen feels more "solid" in relation to the 4th gen. The 4th gen did seem a bit quicker off the line through 1-2, but the 5th pulls better from 40mph on. Both of my cars have automatic trannys . All is all I like my 5th gen better.
Main differences I see are:
Styling(exterior and interior)
VAIS(additional 32hp mainly)
Larger wheels
So to answer the question:
The two cars are different, 5th gen is more refined in my opinion, is it faster, about the same!
Main differences I see are:
Styling(exterior and interior)
VAIS(additional 32hp mainly)
Larger wheels
So to answer the question:
The two cars are different, 5th gen is more refined in my opinion, is it faster, about the same!
#64
Originally posted by Rutnick
maybe YOU need to take another look. From the side, the car isn't much different from the 4th generation. In fact, not a whole heck of a lot has changed from the 4th gen. Yeah, more hp. The latest Maxima does have a larger engine. The rest is just sheetmetal changes. Not much has really changed in the car. It IS an aging chassis. At best, minor sheetmetal changes. You act like the 5th generation car is an entirely different car. From a manufacturing standpoint, it isn't even close.
maybe YOU need to take another look. From the side, the car isn't much different from the 4th generation. In fact, not a whole heck of a lot has changed from the 4th gen. Yeah, more hp. The latest Maxima does have a larger engine. The rest is just sheetmetal changes. Not much has really changed in the car. It IS an aging chassis. At best, minor sheetmetal changes. You act like the 5th generation car is an entirely different car. From a manufacturing standpoint, it isn't even close.
#66
Re: Re: I beleive what he means is this:
SAME PLATFORM. It is minor change from the 4th generation platform. I parked my 4th generation right next to a 5th generation. Guess what? From the side, they look considerably alike.
The camry went through a similar changes over the years. From like 1992 until 2000, the Camry used the SAME platform. The 2001 Camry is the first "all new" Camry in 8 years. Look at the 1992 and the 1999 Camry and you go hmm...I can see the same platform. 2k1 you go...ahh a whole new platform. You want a Toyota Avalon? Guess what? It shares the SAME platform as the Camry.
The same can be said about the Cavalier. Guess what? It has used the same platform for what? 12 years? A 1990 Cavalier shares nearly the same platform as a 2k2.
The 5th generation maxima isn't "all new". Sure, the platform has been stretched slightly and is slightly wider but overall the car is the same. Interior changes are easy and don't cost much since the platform hasn't changed much. Yes, it has a new engine but the 2000 maxima engine wasn't a major feat. Minor tweaks from a manufacturing standpoint.
I am not ******* the 5th generation maxima. It shares more from a manufacturing standpoint with the 4th generation than you seem to realize.
With all this said, the next generation maxima is going to share the same platform as the altima.
The camry went through a similar changes over the years. From like 1992 until 2000, the Camry used the SAME platform. The 2001 Camry is the first "all new" Camry in 8 years. Look at the 1992 and the 1999 Camry and you go hmm...I can see the same platform. 2k1 you go...ahh a whole new platform. You want a Toyota Avalon? Guess what? It shares the SAME platform as the Camry.
The same can be said about the Cavalier. Guess what? It has used the same platform for what? 12 years? A 1990 Cavalier shares nearly the same platform as a 2k2.
The 5th generation maxima isn't "all new". Sure, the platform has been stretched slightly and is slightly wider but overall the car is the same. Interior changes are easy and don't cost much since the platform hasn't changed much. Yes, it has a new engine but the 2000 maxima engine wasn't a major feat. Minor tweaks from a manufacturing standpoint.
I am not ******* the 5th generation maxima. It shares more from a manufacturing standpoint with the 4th generation than you seem to realize.
With all this said, the next generation maxima is going to share the same platform as the altima.
#67
Re: Re: Re: I beleive what he means is this:
Originally posted by Rutnick
SAME PLATFORM. It is minor change from the 4th generation platform. I parked my 4th generation right next to a 5th generation. Guess what? From the side, they look considerably alike.
SAME PLATFORM. It is minor change from the 4th generation platform. I parked my 4th generation right next to a 5th generation. Guess what? From the side, they look considerably alike.
The camry went through a similar changes over the years. From like 1992 until 2000, the Camry used the SAME platform. The 2001 Camry is the first "all new" Camry in 8 years. Look at the 1992 and the 1999 Camry and you go hmm...I can see the same platform. 2k1 you go...ahh a whole new platform. You want a Toyota Avalon? Guess what? It shares the SAME platform as the Camry.
The same can be said about the Cavalier. Guess what? It has used the same platform for what? 12 years? A 1990 Cavalier shares nearly the same platform as a 2k2.
The same can be said about the Cavalier. Guess what? It has used the same platform for what? 12 years? A 1990 Cavalier shares nearly the same platform as a 2k2.
The 5th generation maxima isn't "all new". Sure, the platform has been stretched slightly and is slightly wider but overall the car is the same. Interior changes are easy and don't cost much since the platform hasn't changed much. Yes, it has a new engine but the 2000 maxima engine wasn't a major feat. Minor tweaks from a manufacturing standpoint.
I am not ******* the 5th generation maxima. It shares more from a manufacturing standpoint with the 4th generation than you seem to realize.
With all this said, the next generation maxima is going to share the same platform as the altima.
With all this said, the next generation maxima is going to share the same platform as the altima.
#68
Re: Re: Re: Re: I beleive what he means is this:
looks like you need to go take a course in engineering and unibody construction. The platform from the 4th to the 5th didn't change much at all. Look at the car from the side. Hmm..same roofline. The front and rear of the car are very similar to the 4th generation. You keep looking and the front end and rear end and go but it is different! I park my 4th gen next to 5th gens all the time.
I can't make the variable intake but it is child's play for Nissan and the R&D for it was peanuts compared to a complete redesign.
The rumors that I have heard put the maxima on a modified altima platform.
I can't make the variable intake but it is child's play for Nissan and the R&D for it was peanuts compared to a complete redesign.
The rumors that I have heard put the maxima on a modified altima platform.
#69
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I beleive what he means is this:
Originally posted by Rutnick
looks like you need to go take a course in engineering and unibody construction.
looks like you need to go take a course in engineering and unibody construction.
Originally posted by Rutnick
The platform from the 4th to the 5th didn't change much at all. Look at the car from the side. Hmm..same roofline. The front and rear of the car are very similar to the 4th generation..
The platform from the 4th to the 5th didn't change much at all. Look at the car from the side. Hmm..same roofline. The front and rear of the car are very similar to the 4th generation..
Originally posted by Rutnick
You keep looking and the front end and rear end and go but it is different! I park my 4th gen next to 5th gens all the time.
You keep looking and the front end and rear end and go but it is different! I park my 4th gen next to 5th gens all the time.
Originally posted by Rutnick
I can't make the variable intake but it is child's play for Nissan and the R&D for it was peanuts compared to a complete redesign.
I can't make the variable intake but it is child's play for Nissan and the R&D for it was peanuts compared to a complete redesign.
Originally posted by Rutnick
The rumors that I have heard put the maxima on a modified altima platform.
The rumors that I have heard put the maxima on a modified altima platform.
#71
I didn't like the 5th gen look at first but it grows on you. Especially after seeing some nicely fixed up Maxs on this forum. Either way I still like the 4th gen body the best. Personally, I think the new Altima's look better than the new Maxima's and that sucks.
#73
Originally posted by MaxSE98
alright lemme see if theres a correlation here , all the people here who like the 5th gen which skyline do your prefer r33 or r34 ?? 4th geners ?
alright lemme see if theres a correlation here , all the people here who like the 5th gen which skyline do your prefer r33 or r34 ?? 4th geners ?
#74
Originally posted by SLC I30t
What are you trying to see if someone is going to post that the maxima is a shortcut rip off of the r33? Rutnick, can you give us some insight?
What are you trying to see if someone is going to post that the maxima is a shortcut rip off of the r33? Rutnick, can you give us some insight?
#77
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I beleive what he means is this:
You totally keep missing the point and it keeps flying over your head.
You also keep pounding on a variable intake like it is some feat of magic. It isn't. It is a minor modification for a company that is of Nissan's size. You keep thinking in aspects of how you or I can or can't do something and not of what it costs a company to do something vs a total redesign of the entire engine. You keep looking at the intake and going, "but you can't do it" or "two people here said it was hard". You miss the bigger picture of "it is child's play for a company with the resources of Nissan". It cost them nearly nothing to test out a theory vs redoing the entire engine to get the additional 30+ hp. It was propably designed on a computer. They then made a working test mule and then put it into production. It is no different to them than changing the rear trunk area and front bumper in the 1997 maxima vs the 1995-1996. Can you do that one? They did and kept it the same generation. You act like it is totally differnt motor in the 2k. It isn't.
You can throw pictures at me and also keep saying that the 5th generation is "much different" than the 4th generation platform. It still won't change that it isn't. You keep missing the point that they share the same platform. Going blah blah blah and making references to 1970s trucks also isn't going to change it. Nissan using the 4th generation platform saved them a TON of money in development.
As far as the next generation maxima using the altima platform, use your search function on this board and use it on the internet. The info is there.
You also keep pounding on a variable intake like it is some feat of magic. It isn't. It is a minor modification for a company that is of Nissan's size. You keep thinking in aspects of how you or I can or can't do something and not of what it costs a company to do something vs a total redesign of the entire engine. You keep looking at the intake and going, "but you can't do it" or "two people here said it was hard". You miss the bigger picture of "it is child's play for a company with the resources of Nissan". It cost them nearly nothing to test out a theory vs redoing the entire engine to get the additional 30+ hp. It was propably designed on a computer. They then made a working test mule and then put it into production. It is no different to them than changing the rear trunk area and front bumper in the 1997 maxima vs the 1995-1996. Can you do that one? They did and kept it the same generation. You act like it is totally differnt motor in the 2k. It isn't.
You can throw pictures at me and also keep saying that the 5th generation is "much different" than the 4th generation platform. It still won't change that it isn't. You keep missing the point that they share the same platform. Going blah blah blah and making references to 1970s trucks also isn't going to change it. Nissan using the 4th generation platform saved them a TON of money in development.
As far as the next generation maxima using the altima platform, use your search function on this board and use it on the internet. The info is there.
#78
I remembered talking to a Japanese friend of mine. he saw me just got a 4th gen and wanna test drive my car. while driving, he was saying how he dislike the look of the 5th gen (at that time I think the styling of the 5th gen was pretty cool and I think it's pretty cool now but not as much) The reason was he think the 5th gen looks more American style rather than japanese. now, I think I understand what was he trying to say. Japanese car used to be more compact design but preseve a pretty good "useful" interior or trunk space. you can feel more effort was being put in the early japanese car, like the quality of the interior and exterior are better (quality not technology). I feel 3rd gen is better than 4th and 4th is better than 5th in term of quality (again, quality not technology)
I think all the japanese cars are changing now. look at the new Camry, the car just look ugly as hell. Even the Civic, which well known for it's compact design, are bigger than ever and look ugly as hell too. while the japanese car are getting bigger and bigger, the American car are getting smaller and smaller. what happen?
I think all the japanese cars are changing now. look at the new Camry, the car just look ugly as hell. Even the Civic, which well known for it's compact design, are bigger than ever and look ugly as hell too. while the japanese car are getting bigger and bigger, the American car are getting smaller and smaller. what happen?
#79
i think the rear end on the 4th gens look nice, and even tho it was designed over 8 years ago i think it is a real sexy car. but the 5th gens look more modern, and a lot less square than the previous 2 gens. same platform or not, the 4th gens look nothing like 5th gens, in any way, and the interior design is night and day.
now being a 2k2 is a 5th gen, i dont think theres any1 here who would turn down one for a 3rd or 4th gen. in my opinion, with the inevitable changes for the future max's, the 2k2's and 2k3's will be the most sought after max's for some time
now being a 2k2 is a 5th gen, i dont think theres any1 here who would turn down one for a 3rd or 4th gen. in my opinion, with the inevitable changes for the future max's, the 2k2's and 2k3's will be the most sought after max's for some time
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Shingles
General Maxima Discussion
2
03-22-2001 09:28 AM