maximize maxima mpg at 97 mph?
maximize maxima mpg at 97 mph?
Nah, I don't think the logic would work. But interestingly, I was reading about a Sea Ray that was capable of 52 mph (knots). They actually tested and reviewed, and spit out the fuel consumption at various speeds. The sweet spot or maximum mpg occured at 37 mph--at that speed the mpg's were higher than any speed lower or higher. It was a whopping 2.8 mpg!!!
If those calculations were applied to a Maxima whose top speed is 137, then 97 would achieve maximum fuel economy. but of course that defies common sense, just like a 15W50 Mobil 1 making your motor make strange noises until you drain it. From experience my Max has delivered the highest mpg's at around 73 mph--it's done 30+ mpg on a good day at that speed with the cruise control.
If those calculations were applied to a Maxima whose top speed is 137, then 97 would achieve maximum fuel economy. but of course that defies common sense, just like a 15W50 Mobil 1 making your motor make strange noises until you drain it. From experience my Max has delivered the highest mpg's at around 73 mph--it's done 30+ mpg on a good day at that speed with the cruise control.
Originally posted by max1ma97se
always thought 50mph you get the bast gas mpg
always thought 50mph you get the bast gas mpg
atw
Originally posted by max1ma97se
always thought 50mph you get the bast gas mpg
always thought 50mph you get the bast gas mpg
When the car was new I used to have to make this 440 mile round trip with it, 1 or more times a month. It could knock-out 31-33 mpg consistently when I put the cruise at 72-73. I've never come close since but the car only gets a chance to go on the highway at a steady speed for about 55-60 miles tops these days, which isn't really long enough to get a good mpg calculation.
Originally posted by MaxedOut2g
i heard it was 55...thats why FDR [i think] put up speed limits of 55mph during the depression to cut back on ppl speeding and supposedly that worked...but hey, those were the the 30s [i think] and things change
atw
i heard it was 55...thats why FDR [i think] put up speed limits of 55mph during the depression to cut back on ppl speeding and supposedly that worked...but hey, those were the the 30s [i think] and things change
atw
Originally posted by maximadriven
72-73 does seem like the sweet spot. I drive 160 miles per day and my max get 32-33 mpg if I cruise around 72.
72-73 does seem like the sweet spot. I drive 160 miles per day and my max get 32-33 mpg if I cruise around 72.
That was always the shocker on the VQ--4 cyl. Camry mpg's possible, with 190 hp and 205 ft-lbs!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: maximize maxima mpg at 97 mph?
Optimal fuel mileage usually occurs near the torque peak rpm of the motor. Peak torque rpm is where the engine is most efficient. On the Maxima, that's around 4000-4500 rpm. One thing that also needs to be accounted for is drag resistance at high speeds, which increases exponentially as speeds increase. I can't account for that, but drag typically does not become significant until close to 100 mph.
However, the best mpg I've achieved was when cruising with the cruise set to 90 mph. I was able to get 32 mpg in Colorado, and 29 in Texas. That 90 mph corresponds to ~4500 rpm, which matches the peak torque rpm guestimate reasonably well.
The old "50 mph is optimal for fuel efficiency" rule-of-thumb came about in the 70's during the oil crisis. Back then, huge displacement engines that were realllllly detuned were used. We're talking 400+ cu in motors that only made 150 HP. This meant those motors had peak torque right off idle, like 1000-1500 rpm. With the reallly conservative gearing used back in those days, this meant 1000-1500 rpm occured in top gear at 50 mph, and the cars therefore achieved peak efficiency/mileage at around 50 mph. These brick-like land barges also were not at all aerodynamic, so drag resistance became a significant factor at lower speeds like 60 mph.
However, the best mpg I've achieved was when cruising with the cruise set to 90 mph. I was able to get 32 mpg in Colorado, and 29 in Texas. That 90 mph corresponds to ~4500 rpm, which matches the peak torque rpm guestimate reasonably well.
The old "50 mph is optimal for fuel efficiency" rule-of-thumb came about in the 70's during the oil crisis. Back then, huge displacement engines that were realllllly detuned were used. We're talking 400+ cu in motors that only made 150 HP. This meant those motors had peak torque right off idle, like 1000-1500 rpm. With the reallly conservative gearing used back in those days, this meant 1000-1500 rpm occured in top gear at 50 mph, and the cars therefore achieved peak efficiency/mileage at around 50 mph. These brick-like land barges also were not at all aerodynamic, so drag resistance became a significant factor at lower speeds like 60 mph.
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
Nah, I don't think the logic would work. But interestingly, I was reading about a Sea Ray that was capable of 52 mph (knots). They actually tested and reviewed, and spit out the fuel consumption at various speeds. The sweet spot or maximum mpg occured at 37 mph--at that speed the mpg's were higher than any speed lower or higher. It was a whopping 2.8 mpg!!!
If those calculations were applied to a Maxima whose top speed is 137, then 97 would achieve maximum fuel economy. but of course that defies common sense, just like a 15W50 Mobil 1 making your motor make strange noises until you drain it. From experience my Max has delivered the highest mpg's at around 73 mph--it's done 30+ mpg on a good day at that speed with the cruise control.
Nah, I don't think the logic would work. But interestingly, I was reading about a Sea Ray that was capable of 52 mph (knots). They actually tested and reviewed, and spit out the fuel consumption at various speeds. The sweet spot or maximum mpg occured at 37 mph--at that speed the mpg's were higher than any speed lower or higher. It was a whopping 2.8 mpg!!!
If those calculations were applied to a Maxima whose top speed is 137, then 97 would achieve maximum fuel economy. but of course that defies common sense, just like a 15W50 Mobil 1 making your motor make strange noises until you drain it. From experience my Max has delivered the highest mpg's at around 73 mph--it's done 30+ mpg on a good day at that speed with the cruise control.
Re: Re: maximize maxima mpg at 97 mph?
Why do people always say that in order to get good fuel economy, keep the tach below 3K?
Originally posted by Keven97SE
Optimal fuel mileage usually occurs near the torque peak rpm of the motor. Peak torque rpm is where the engine is most efficient. On the Maxima, that's around 4000-4500 rpm. One thing that also needs to be accounted for is drag resistance at high speeds, which increases exponentially as speeds increase. I can't account for that, but drag typically does not become significant until close to 100 mph.
However, the best mpg I've achieved was when cruising with the cruise set to 90 mph. I was able to get 32 mpg in Colorado, and 29 in Texas. That 90 mph corresponds to ~4500 rpm, which matches the peak torque rpm guestimate reasonably well.
The old "50 mph is optimal for fuel efficiency" rule-of-thumb came about in the 70's during the oil crisis. Back then, huge displacement engines that were realllllly detuned were used. We're talking 400+ cu in motors that only made 150 HP. This meant those motors had peak torque right off idle, like 1000-1500 rpm. With the reallly conservative gearing used back in those days, this meant 1000-1500 rpm occured in top gear at 50 mph, and the cars therefore achieved peak efficiency/mileage at around 50 mph. These brick-like land barges also were not at all aerodynamic, so drag resistance became a significant factor at lower speeds like 60 mph.
Optimal fuel mileage usually occurs near the torque peak rpm of the motor. Peak torque rpm is where the engine is most efficient. On the Maxima, that's around 4000-4500 rpm. One thing that also needs to be accounted for is drag resistance at high speeds, which increases exponentially as speeds increase. I can't account for that, but drag typically does not become significant until close to 100 mph.
However, the best mpg I've achieved was when cruising with the cruise set to 90 mph. I was able to get 32 mpg in Colorado, and 29 in Texas. That 90 mph corresponds to ~4500 rpm, which matches the peak torque rpm guestimate reasonably well.
The old "50 mph is optimal for fuel efficiency" rule-of-thumb came about in the 70's during the oil crisis. Back then, huge displacement engines that were realllllly detuned were used. We're talking 400+ cu in motors that only made 150 HP. This meant those motors had peak torque right off idle, like 1000-1500 rpm. With the reallly conservative gearing used back in those days, this meant 1000-1500 rpm occured in top gear at 50 mph, and the cars therefore achieved peak efficiency/mileage at around 50 mph. These brick-like land barges also were not at all aerodynamic, so drag resistance became a significant factor at lower speeds like 60 mph.
Re: Re: maximize maxima mpg at 97 mph?
If that's true, and it sounds very plausible, then that's VERY interesting, Keven. Like many, I assumed that 45-55mph was the sweet spot where the sum of friction and drag was lowest. It would make sense with newer, smaller, more powerful engines and aerodynamic cars that optimal fuel mileage would occur at a higher speed.
So is cruising at peak torque rpm ,e.g. 4500 rpm, for long periods of time on the highway ok for the engine? At first, it would seem that running at higher rpms puts more wear on the engine, but obviously the engine doesn't have to pull as hard when it's doing 4500 rpm at a given speed versus when it's doing 2000rpm at the same speed.
So is cruising at peak torque rpm ,e.g. 4500 rpm, for long periods of time on the highway ok for the engine? At first, it would seem that running at higher rpms puts more wear on the engine, but obviously the engine doesn't have to pull as hard when it's doing 4500 rpm at a given speed versus when it's doing 2000rpm at the same speed.
Originally posted by Keven97SE
Optimal fuel mileage usually occurs near the torque peak rpm of the motor. Peak torque rpm is where the engine is most efficient. On the Maxima, that's around 4000-4500 rpm. One thing that also needs to be accounted for is drag resistance at high speeds, which increases exponentially as speeds increase. I can't account for that, but drag typically does not become significant until close to 100 mph.
However, the best mpg I've achieved was when cruising with the cruise set to 90 mph. I was able to get 32 mpg in Colorado, and 29 in Texas. That 90 mph corresponds to ~4500 rpm, which matches the peak torque rpm guestimate reasonably well.
The old "50 mph is optimal for fuel efficiency" rule-of-thumb came about in the 70's during the oil crisis. Back then, huge displacement engines that were realllllly detuned were used. We're talking 400+ cu in motors that only made 150 HP. This meant those motors had peak torque right off idle, like 1000-1500 rpm. With the reallly conservative gearing used back in those days, this meant 1000-1500 rpm occured in top gear at 50 mph, and the cars therefore achieved peak efficiency/mileage at around 50 mph. These brick-like land barges also were not at all aerodynamic, so drag resistance became a significant factor at lower speeds like 60 mph.
Optimal fuel mileage usually occurs near the torque peak rpm of the motor. Peak torque rpm is where the engine is most efficient. On the Maxima, that's around 4000-4500 rpm. One thing that also needs to be accounted for is drag resistance at high speeds, which increases exponentially as speeds increase. I can't account for that, but drag typically does not become significant until close to 100 mph.
However, the best mpg I've achieved was when cruising with the cruise set to 90 mph. I was able to get 32 mpg in Colorado, and 29 in Texas. That 90 mph corresponds to ~4500 rpm, which matches the peak torque rpm guestimate reasonably well.
The old "50 mph is optimal for fuel efficiency" rule-of-thumb came about in the 70's during the oil crisis. Back then, huge displacement engines that were realllllly detuned were used. We're talking 400+ cu in motors that only made 150 HP. This meant those motors had peak torque right off idle, like 1000-1500 rpm. With the reallly conservative gearing used back in those days, this meant 1000-1500 rpm occured in top gear at 50 mph, and the cars therefore achieved peak efficiency/mileage at around 50 mph. These brick-like land barges also were not at all aerodynamic, so drag resistance became a significant factor at lower speeds like 60 mph.
Re: Re: Re: maximize maxima mpg at 97 mph?
Originally posted by 95emeraldgxe
Why do people always say that in order to get good fuel economy, keep the tach below 3K?
Why do people always say that in order to get good fuel economy, keep the tach below 3K?
Originally posted by Jaws
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but i don't think the 55 mph speed limit came in until the early 70's...
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but i don't think the 55 mph speed limit came in until the early 70's...
atw
Doesn't mpg depend on the gear ratios...That is why the vette gets great mpg because it has an extra overdrive gear (the sixth). I think a combination of drag and gearing will depend on what mpg is optimal for a certain car.
Re: maximize maxima mpg at 97 mph?
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
Nah, I don't think the logic would work. But interestingly, I was reading about a Sea Ray that was capable of 52 mph (knots).
Nah, I don't think the logic would work. But interestingly, I was reading about a Sea Ray that was capable of 52 mph (knots).
FWIW, 52knots = 59.8mph
1 nautical mile (knot) = 1.15 statute mile (roads)
Originally posted by Jaws
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but i don't think the 55 mph speed limit came in until the early 70's...
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but i don't think the 55 mph speed limit came in until the early 70's...
Re: Re: Re: maximize maxima mpg at 97 mph?
Originally posted by 95emeraldgxe
Why do people always say that in order to get good fuel economy, keep the tach below 3K?
Why do people always say that in order to get good fuel economy, keep the tach below 3K?
I have been driving extremely conservatively for the last couple of weeks. I never get above 2k RPM except on the highway where I cruise at 65mpn...approx 2300 RPM.
My average MPG has jumped from 19 to 25.
ok 30 mpg seems really high. I have never been able to get over 25/26. I need to know what you guys are doing to get that type of mileage. I drive 70-75 most of the time when on the freeway. Do you guys have mods? Do you guys drive a 4th gen? My car has about 40k miles so my plugs and throttle body and all that good stuff should still be good. Air filter is clean. Give me some advice guys. Have any of you guys tried that warpspeed b-pipe fix? THey say an extra 2-3mpg.
Re: Re: Re: maximize maxima mpg at 97 mph?
Originally posted by 95emeraldgxe
Why do people always say that in order to get good fuel economy, keep the tach below 3K?
Why do people always say that in order to get good fuel economy, keep the tach below 3K?
Originally posted by SamMan23
ok 30 mpg seems really high. I have never been able to get over 25/26. I need to know what you guys are doing to get that type of mileage. I drive 70-75 most of the time when on the freeway. Do you guys have mods? Do you guys drive a 4th gen? My car has about 40k miles so my plugs and throttle body and all that good stuff should still be good. Air filter is clean. Give me some advice guys. Have any of you guys tried that warpspeed b-pipe fix? THey say an extra 2-3mpg.
ok 30 mpg seems really high. I have never been able to get over 25/26. I need to know what you guys are doing to get that type of mileage. I drive 70-75 most of the time when on the freeway. Do you guys have mods? Do you guys drive a 4th gen? My car has about 40k miles so my plugs and throttle body and all that good stuff should still be good. Air filter is clean. Give me some advice guys. Have any of you guys tried that warpspeed b-pipe fix? THey say an extra 2-3mpg.
Re: maximize maxima mpg at 97 mph?
I agree with you. I always travel about 300 miles every weekend and I always cruise at 73-74mph at I-94 between Milwaukee-Madison, WI.
Mpg is dead on at 30+, assuming you never stop. Once you stop/reaccelerate though....it would be around 29...and if you keep on decelerating/accelerating along the way (due to traffic), it would be around 27-28.
City? This one is usually around 22-25 for me...
Mpg is dead on at 30+, assuming you never stop. Once you stop/reaccelerate though....it would be around 29...and if you keep on decelerating/accelerating along the way (due to traffic), it would be around 27-28.
City? This one is usually around 22-25 for me...
Originally posted by Frank Fontaine
From experience my Max has delivered the highest mpg's at around 73 mph--it's done 30+ mpg on a good day at that speed with the cruise control.
From experience my Max has delivered the highest mpg's at around 73 mph--it's done 30+ mpg on a good day at that speed with the cruise control.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hondarydr
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
5
Dec 30, 2024 06:15 PM
Finkle
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
13
Sep 27, 2015 09:53 PM




