96' Max SE Vs. 2000 Mustang
96' Max SE Vs. 2000 Mustang
I was just woundering, Who would win in 1/2 mile RUN, a 2000 mustang (base model) or 96 max (SE). Both are stock and autos, except for the max, has a K&N cone air filter on it. My sister who has a mustang is always ragging on my max, saying that her mustang would burn me, i dont think its true.....or is it?
Originally Posted by NISMOMAXMAN
SleeperMax66666 beat a V6 mustang, I got the same situation (the same guy sleeprmax66666 raced), this guy calls our cars maxipads, and says he'll smoke us, I cant wait to see him on the road.....
"Maxipads"I have to admit...Thats funny!!
Originally Posted by DoGGy
ud leave her in the dust if she got a v6. even if she was stick, ud steal beat her. them v6 stangs r slow *** pos's. 4700 rpm redline says it all
Originally Posted by DoGGy
ud leave her in the dust if she got a v6. even if she was stick, ud steal beat her. them v6 stangs r slow *** pos's. 4700 rpm redline says it all
Your sadly mistaken believing all V6 mustangs have a 4700rpm redline. Take a leap back in time to 1999 when they introduced the 3.8L OHV V-6 with 190hp @ 5250 rpm/220lbft @ 2750 rpm. Pit that up against a 190hp @5600rpm and 205lbft @ 4000rpm 3.0L maxima with similar weights and you have a drivers race pal...
And just because a car has a low redline doesnt mean anything. That 3.8L was designed to only peak out at around 5200rpm, just like a honda 2.2L s2000 is designed to peak out at 8300+rpm....
Eric
Originally Posted by DoGGy
them v6 stangs r slow *** pos's. 4700 rpm redline says it all
Mustang performance specs
Originally Posted by my99maxisnice
Are you serious? Wow, that's bad. I think my bike get's over 4700 RPM at it's redline.
Originally Posted by 99Maxima5sp
Your sadly mistaken believing all V6 mustangs have a 4700rpm redline. Take a leap back in time to 1999 when they introduced the 3.8L OHV V-6 with 190hp @ 5250 rpm/220lbft @ 2750 rpm. Pit that up against a 190hp @5600rpm and 205lbft @ 4000rpm 3.0L maxima with similar weights and you have a drivers race pal...
And just because a car has a low redline doesnt mean anything. That 3.8L was designed to only peak out at around 5200rpm, just like a honda 2.2L s2000 is designed to peak out at 8300+rpm....
Eric
And just because a car has a low redline doesnt mean anything. That 3.8L was designed to only peak out at around 5200rpm, just like a honda 2.2L s2000 is designed to peak out at 8300+rpm....
Eric
Originally Posted by IwANnAMaX96
A low redline means alot. Think about it, with a 5800 RPM redline, the gears have to be made longer so you don't have to shift all the time. Higher revving engines can get away with shorter gearing which in turn multiplies the torque even more. Let's say a car with a 8000 RPM redline reaches 60 at the top of 2nd gear. A car with a 4000 RPM redline and the same gears would have to shift 2 times as often to get to the same speed. In order to shift the same amount of times as the other car, the lower gears have to be made twice as long. And longer gears equals slower car.
Thats not what he meant by redline not meaning anything. He meant that just because a car has a low redline, it doesn't mean its slow. At least thats what I got from his statement.
Originally Posted by Bmr4life
Thats not what he meant by redline not meaning anything. He meant that just because a car has a low redline, it doesn't mean its slow. At least thats what I got from his statement.
Originally Posted by Bmr4life
Thats not what he meant by redline not meaning anything. He meant that just because a car has a low redline, it doesn't mean its slow. At least thats what I got from his statement.
That is what i was getting at.
But i do see your point about longer gears. It still doesnt necessarily translate to a slower car...
Eric
i just wanted to know something, (sorta off topic). why is it that american engines are so much larger than japanese/euro engines but do not put out as much power.(mustang 3.8L engine at 193 or so HP compared to 350z 3.5L engine at 280 or so HP) Is there something im missing, im just guessing they have poor engine designs or something, i jus find it unbelievable. My friends grand am gt has a 3.5L v6 engine and it cant even hang wit my stock 2.5L SE-R 4 banger, or the max for that matter.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by mm347
That's incorrect! The Mustang Coupe (V6) is rated at 193 @ 5500 HP and 225 @ 2800 torque. I'm not positive about the redline but I think it's 6250 RPM.
Mustang performance specs
Mustang performance specs
um i remember steppin into a 5 spd 98 v6 stang and the redline was 4700?
Originally Posted by 99Maxima5sp
That is what i was getting at.
But i do see your point about longer gears. It still doesnt necessarily translate to a slower car...
Eric
But i do see your point about longer gears. It still doesnt necessarily translate to a slower car...
Eric
Originally Posted by Magikone69
i just wanted to know something, (sorta off topic). why is it that american engines are so much larger than japanese/euro engines but do not put out as much power.(mustang 3.8L engine at 193 or so HP compared to 350z 3.5L engine at 280 or so HP) Is there something im missing, im just guessing they have poor engine designs or something, i jus find it unbelievable. My friends grand am gt has a 3.5L v6 engine and it cant even hang wit my stock 2.5L SE-R 4 banger, or the max for that matter.
Originally Posted by IwANnAMaX96
If you understand how horsepower is derived from torque it is quite simple. They are designed with low-end torque in mind and do not breath as well as revs rise as most of them have a 2 valve/cylinder configuration. If torque drops off at higher revs, the HP value will be lower since HP=RPM*torque/5252. Simple mathematics, the lower the numerator is, the smaller the end result.
, im sorta new to the whole thing about engine designs and the scientific way they are supposed to opperate
Originally Posted by DoGGy
um i remember steppin into a 5 spd 98 v6 stang and the redline was 4700?
You obviously missed my post stating the 99s were enhanced, and are not the same slow V6 stangs pre-99...
99-up V6 stangs run in the 15s people, 5speeds that is....
Eric
Off topic, but I downloaded a Video clip of a Mustang GT vs. SC Maxima, what a beautiful race, that maxima left him behind............... Also I've downloaded a clip of a GTP vs 350z vs Maxima 00 and the GTP whooped on all of them..(WTF??? I thought atleast the 350 would be giving it a good run)...... Check it out and tell me what you think, these clips are on KAZA, just type maxima in the search for videos
I've beaten a stock 00ish mustang auto couple months ago in my auto 96 max with custom catback and exhaust. It was really REALLY close. We had to race three times to be sure. (inconsistent with torque braking). I beet him twice.
If you're completely stock, I'm not sure man.
NEVERTHELESS, what a rush. I love close races.
If you're completely stock, I'm not sure man.
NEVERTHELESS, what a rush. I love close races.
Originally Posted by NISMOMAXMAN
Off topic, but I downloaded a Video clip of a Mustang GT vs. SC Maxima, what a beautiful race, that maxima left him behind............... Also I've downloaded a clip of a GTP vs 350z vs Maxima 00 and the GTP whooped on all of them..(WTF??? I thought atleast the 350 would be giving it a good run)...... Check it out and tell me what you think, these clips are on KAZA, just type maxima in the search for videos
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Omar Abdurrahman Siddiqi
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
33
Aug 26, 2016 05:18 PM
homewrecker
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
4
Sep 23, 2015 03:41 AM
QueensMAX
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
7
Sep 15, 2015 04:14 AM
ballerchris510
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Sep 11, 2015 05:29 PM




