all AUTO races

the 95 and 2k were about even, the 2k2(me) pretty much killed them

kind of strange, the 95 is good for 15.8-16.2 on avg
the 2k is about the same, but i heard its faster high end....
and the 2k2 are good for 14.7-14.9s on avg

95 190hp/205torq 3000lbs
2k 222hp/217torq 3250lbs
2k2 255hp(really 240hp) 246torq(really 265torq or so) 3250lbs or so

now, how could a 95 be on par with the 2k in the 1/4 if it lacks 32hp? even tho the torq ratio for the 95 might be slighty better

now, look at the 2k and 2k2 hp's, the hp difference is about the same between the 95 and 2k, even less for the 2k and 2k2, if comparing with the 240hp rating, yet the 2k2 is a lil more than a FULL second faster?

how are the dynos for the 2k?
perhaps they overrated it, and underrated the 95s?

i have seen the 98-02 v6 accord on par with that 2k max, and it lacks 22hp/22torq, same weight too...

IMO with that power/weight ratio for the 2k, they should hit 15.3-15.7....
right between the 2k2s and the 95s

???

 

Well the 2000 maxima's were about 300lbs heavier then the 95-96, so thats prob the biggiest reason why.

 

https://maxima.org/shoptalk/sub_read...ns/index.shtml