201.33whp/191.27wtq MEVI/STOCK ECU
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
201.33whp/191.27wtq MEVI/STOCK ECU
Just got back from the dyno. My best run was 201whp/191.27wtq and this was with my stock ECU.
I will upload graph shortly. Basically I started off dynoing with JWT ECU. Kept getting inconsistant #'s so decided toswitch back to stock ECU and this was the result.
I will upload graph shortly. Basically I started off dynoing with JWT ECU. Kept getting inconsistant #'s so decided toswitch back to stock ECU and this was the result.
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
Run 32 is stock ECU/MEVI/I/Y/E
Run 34 is JWT ECU/MEVI/I/Y/E
two things to notice look at the JWT ECU dyno how LEAN it is and look at how the power dips once i rev past 6500 with JWT ECU
Run 34 is JWT ECU/MEVI/I/Y/E
two things to notice look at the JWT ECU dyno how LEAN it is and look at how the power dips once i rev past 6500 with JWT ECU
Originally Posted by zack342
Sent Kevlo notice how LEAN the A/F is with JWT ECU
Oh and there are ways we can fix the inconsistant JWT ECU.
MEVI Power ... hopefully the ECU gives some torque back ..Can you send them to me as well. bizzy1999@hotmail.com
I think you're VI actualtor is closing after 6.5k
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
I lost no torque with MEVI....The next file KEVLO is going to upload will show my last run from when i dynoed back in december which is RUN 16 compared to my best run from today RUN 32 which was with stock ECU/MEVI.
Esentially all i got from JWT ECU was extended rev limit. there was no power increase at all. Look at run 32 and run 34 which are the two best runs.
run 32 Stock ECU
run 34 JWT ECU
Kevlo can you host the pics of her starpped down
Esentially all i got from JWT ECU was extended rev limit. there was no power increase at all. Look at run 32 and run 34 which are the two best runs.
run 32 Stock ECU
run 34 JWT ECU
Kevlo can you host the pics of her starpped down
does any one see that comparison of run 16 and 32? The only loss is at 4.5k (well a couple of other dips). That is not a low end loss like everyone has been getting (which is now associated to the MEVI). is it possible the swirl valves are affecting this? Its like the USIM with a sweet high end increase.
Guest
Posts: n/a
So what does this mean? That a stock 99 ecu is just as good as a jwt ecu for other model yrs? Without the raised rev of course. From the dyno, I see no low end loss that was reported from others with the mevi installed. ANd it seems like the raised rev limit did not help you out at all.
How was the ride in that SRT-4 by the way? That thing kills vipers.
http://www.srtgurl.com/
How was the ride in that SRT-4 by the way? That thing kills vipers.
http://www.srtgurl.com/
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
Originally Posted by 99Automagic
So what does this mean? That a stock 99 ecu is just as good as a jwt ecu for other model yrs? Without the raised rev of course. From the dyno, I see no low end loss that was reported from others with the mevi installed. ANd it seems like the raised rev limit did not help you out at all.
How was the ride in that SRT-4 by the way? That thing kills vipers.
http://www.srtgurl.com/
How was the ride in that SRT-4 by the way? That thing kills vipers.
http://www.srtgurl.com/
No it does not it means 1999's are diffrent and JWT needs to work out the bugs on the Program. I am getting codes with the JWT which i think are hurting performance.
Guest
Posts: n/a
So if, and that's a big IF, jwt works out the bugs, you'll see more gains. Even if they don't, anyone with a 99 should consider this a viable upgrade on it's own. This corrects the problem of the power drop off at 5500 rpm. Adding another 1000 to the power band is huge. Granted this is the first actual proof, but the 99 ecu seems to adjust well to the mevi on it;s own. The gains are evident and the A/F is very good. Earlier model yrs have recorded losses in the low and mid range if it's not mated with a upgrade to the ecu. It does not seem so for the 99. You gained close to 20whp with just the mevi installed. Strange no tq gains were recorded though. If I remember correctly, tq is a by product of hp, and vise versa.
Wow. This is really great to look at. Just like jsutter said the only loss was a few couple of insignificant dips... Hardly anything at all.
And looking at this, the only thing that the JWT ecu gives you is an extended redline. Is it really worth the extra money?? Especially when the power declines dramatically after 6500.
Looking at the mevi w/ stock ecu vs. no mevi dyno, with gains past 4800 and really significant gains past 5700 with the stock ecu, I would think that the best route would be to save your money and just run the stock ecu with the mevi.
And looking at this, the only thing that the JWT ecu gives you is an extended redline. Is it really worth the extra money?? Especially when the power declines dramatically after 6500.
Looking at the mevi w/ stock ecu vs. no mevi dyno, with gains past 4800 and really significant gains past 5700 with the stock ecu, I would think that the best route would be to save your money and just run the stock ecu with the mevi.
Originally Posted by JSutter
does any one see that comparison of run 16 and 32? The only loss is at 4.5k (well a couple of other dips). That is not a low end loss like everyone has been getting (which is now associated to the MEVI). is it possible the swirl valves are affecting this? Its like the USIM with a sweet high end increase.
maybe you missed it but there is a loss from 2400k to 3400k about 10 tq
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
Originally Posted by chuckie311
maybe you missed it but there is a loss from 2400k to 3400k about 10 tq
Originally Posted by zack342
I think he was talking about peak numbers but to be honest i couldn't feel the difference when it was installed
could be.. i could tell the differnece in my mevi compared to my usim..thats why i think im just going to do the 3.5 swap..
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
Originally Posted by chuckie311
that jwt ecu looks like all the did was raise the rev limiter.. other than that there is no gain from it.glad i havent sent mine in yet. i think im going to hold off awhile now
I am Sending BEN my dynos he said they will come up with a new eprom for me
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
Originally Posted by deezo
Nice Zach. Sorry I couldn't make it. Work is out of control right now.
Originally Posted by chuckie311
maybe you missed it but there is a loss from 2400k to 3400k about 10 tq
Was the MEVI still open after 6.5k, bucause it looks like the valve may have closed. I've seen many dynos like this that show a drop like that when the valve closes accidentally/undesired (96sleeper).
What exaclty is Ben going to do with the new eprom?
What exaclty is Ben going to do with the new eprom?
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Was the MEVI still open after 6.5k, bucause it looks like the valve may have closed. I've seen many dynos like this that show a drop like that when the valve closes accidentally/undesired (96sleeper).
Thread Starter
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
I'm thinking the same thing. I know somebody else whose MEVI closes at 6300 rpm. I wonder if it is a Summit rpm switch quirk.
I think because of the AF on the JWT ECU the car was pulling timing in the high RPM because it WAS VERY LEAN. if you look at the dyno graph of the 199whp with the JWT ecu you will see this. The dyno operator explained to me if it gets too lean the car will pull timing to prevent detonation.









