All Motor All Motor Advanced Performance. Talk about Engine Swaps, Internal Engine work. Not your basic Y pipe and Intake Information.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

201.33whp/191.27wtq MEVI/STOCK ECU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2005 | 12:14 PM
  #81  
chuckie311's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 777
From: Vegas
Originally Posted by zack342
no they also did something with the AF look how lean it gets with the JWT ECU compared to the Stock ECU and even when its is leaned out it still doesn't make more power than my stock ECU.
I am Sending BEN my dynos he said they will come up with a new eprom for me

i hope they give you some money off when they out in the new eprom program.i have had my doubts with the 96 ecu working in the 99 correctly thats why i have held off.maybe if they get it all figured out i might send in my 96 ecu for the upgrade.
Old Aug 21, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #82  
Nismo87SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,806
You should get yourself an adjustable fuel pressure regulator. That way you can just adjust your FP to get the AFR you want. When I installed my JWT ECU, my se-r ran super lean with the new header. After adjusting my FP I got it back to mid 12's up top (I have a wideband). It is alot easier to just mess with a FPR than to wait for the ecu to get new fuel maps.

I know for a fact that when my se-r ran as lean as yours did with the JWT ecu, its not going to be making the power it should. You'd be surprised how the same program would cause one car to run lean vs another to run just right. If I'm not mistaken you should get your car datalogged so we can see your STFT and LTFT (short/long term fuel trims).

Originally Posted by zack342
i got a call from Jim Wolf Some bs about my engine not making enough vacuum to hold the mevi open. He said they will write me a new emprom which they will richen up the fuel a bit. look like this is going to keep costing me $$$$. i hope all you 1999's are greatful
Old Aug 21, 2005 | 12:55 PM
  #83  
chuckie311's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 777
From: Vegas
sounds like a good idea. i know that my mevi would cause my maxima to run alot more rich at WOT thans the usim
Old Aug 21, 2005 | 02:34 PM
  #84  
Zack342's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
I am going to answer a couple things in this post concerning Chuckies and nismo87se post.
Jim Wolf himself called me on thursday to discuss what was going on with my cars and the dyno results.
Basically 2 things were discussed on some runs my MEVI would not open or stay open on some runs as a result of a bad check Valve which i have since replaced. The second thing is the very LEAN a/f condition i was experiencing in the upper RPMS. According to him i am the first guy to actually send in a dyno showing what is going when the MEVI comes on and although he did no admit it i believe they were never tuning with the MEVI in mind that is why once it opens the added a/f causes such a lean condition which would result in the car pulling timing. If my car were still using the stock intake manifold this would never have happened. I am not going to get a APR because they are writing me a new eprom specific to my car with MEVI so it should have correct a/f ratios.
All the JWT ECU/MEVI intake dynos i have examined have this same condition which is why people are still experiencing gains when they tune with an SAFC.
Chuckie the ECU works its just 1999's are diffrent animals and 1999 calispecs are even more diffrent.
I believe and this is pure speculation. That 1999 calispec cars may have a more agressive tune to compensate for additional pre-cats and swirl valves as well as other emissions related stuff. This way the car would retain the 190hp/205tq that it was rated at.
I am sending out for the new eprom which is specific to my car and i will re dyno once it is installed.
Old Aug 21, 2005 | 02:38 PM
  #85  
Zack342's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
Originally Posted by AsthmaMax11
First of all, AWESOME numbers!! This thread has inspired me to dyno next week to compare.
I have MEVI/JWT ECU and I have suspected what you said about the timing being pulled to prevent detonation for a while. It almost feels like I have a bad knock sensor or something.

Well I have three questions. Are you still considering a SAFC II?
Are you driving around with the stock ECU now?
How close were runs 32 and 34? the only reason I ask is that maybe your car was very hot when you ran with the JWT ECU. I remember they would always have me wait like 20 minutes in between runs at my local dyno.

I'll try to post my upcoming dyno along with my old dynos next week.
NO at this time i am no longer considering the SAFC since the new eprom should be written using the af on my dynos.
I have reinstalled the stock ecu since the dyno and have been driving around with that one installed because i am concerned about the really lean condition up in the higher rpms.
run 32 and 34 were done with 3 minutes of each other which was how long it took me to switch the ecus.
Old Aug 21, 2005 | 04:01 PM
  #86  
chuckie311's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 777
From: Vegas
sounds good. but im no longer using the mevi.just want the upgrade for more power. im doing a 3.5 swap next year.so im putting no more money in this engine besides the ecu upgrade
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 02:27 AM
  #87  
Nismo87SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,806
Here is another thing I noticed, sometimes the dyno's AFR (tail pipe version) would show a different reading than my wideband (2nd bung added near o2 sensor). Also this is why you should get some datalogs done too, if I'm not mistaken on JWT's website how to configure CONSULT for logging. If you didn't have consult but some other OBD-II reader, you could log MAF lb/min, rpm, ign timing, TPS %, coolant temp, o2 voltage and STFT/LTFT. I still say that bumping the fuel pressure about 3-6psi probably would've made the same difference as getting new fuel maps, however it would be quicker/easier.

Originally Posted by zack342
NO at this time i am no longer considering the SAFC since the new eprom should be written using the af on my dynos.
I have reinstalled the stock ecu since the dyno and have been driving around with that one installed because i am concerned about the really lean condition up in the higher rpms.
run 32 and 34 were done with 3 minutes of each other which was how long it took me to switch the ecus.
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 02:28 PM
  #88  
1chewabacha1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 781
From: Murderapolis
Keep us updated Zack. If the JWT ECU is giving out gains like what you posted, I'd rather get mine from somewhere else.

Hopefully it's just a bug that they need to work out.
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 04:49 PM
  #89  
Zack342's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
ECU will be here tomorrow with new program
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #90  
hacim105's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,063
From: Reno, NV
Originally Posted by zack342
ECU will be here tomorrow with new program
Well get back to that dyno soon so we can see if it has benefited you.
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 05:14 PM
  #91  
1chewabacha1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 781
From: Murderapolis
So.... what's up Zack? Have you had any time to dyno your Max yet? I'm pretty sure everyone's just as curious as I am to see if JWT turned out good or not....
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 08:10 PM
  #92  
Zack342's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
Originally Posted by 1chewabacha1
So.... what's up Zack? Have you had any time to dyno your Max yet? I'm pretty sure everyone's just as curious as I am to see if JWT turned out good or not....
money is tight rightnow just spent $650 on new clutch with install.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gigabyte
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
8
Jan 6, 2017 06:05 PM
Omar Abdurrahman Siddiqi
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
33
Aug 26, 2016 05:18 PM
BLACKKILA.GTR
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
1
Sep 29, 2015 11:23 AM
Dasmith
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
4
Sep 23, 2015 08:28 PM
QueensMAX
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
7
Sep 15, 2015 04:14 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:41 PM.