Mallfinder TB + jwt or techno ecu
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mallfinder TB + jwt or techno ecu
Will getting the pathfinder throttle body wit a jim wolf ecu be enuf to feel a oticeable difference. If I am getting a pathfinder throttle body should I order my jim wolf ecu wit timing very advanced to get the most out if it.
You'll feel a difference in throttle response with a larger TB, but overall power gain from a Pathfinder TB on a NA 3.0 is going to be marginal at best, unless you do other things to significantly increase the airflow (i.e. cams, high rev limit, or VQ35 swap).
I just trapped 101 basically with the 00VI and only 4th gen TB and that's with 7000 rpm limiter. Plus the recent dyno from Joe showing a mid-range loss and I'm not convinced PF TB is the way to go on a 3.0.
I have one but been debating whether to put it on or not...
I have one but been debating whether to put it on or not...
Originally Posted by Playboycutie69
Will getting the pathfinder throttle body wit a jim wolf ecu be enuf to feel a oticeable difference. If I am getting a pathfinder throttle body should I order my jim wolf ecu wit timing very advanced to get the most out if it.
I wouldn't worry much about the ECU and TB. There was someone that had a MEVI, stock ECU, and stock TB that got 205whp.
Originally Posted by foobeca
I wouldn't worry much about the ECU and TB. There was someone that had a MEVI, stock ECU, and stock TB that got 205whp.
Originally Posted by nismology
Those dyno results are VERY questionable. His numbers are higher than any other maxima, ever, with those mods. I'd take those numbers with a grain of salt. By NO means is that typical.
Originally Posted by Playboycutie69
Thanks alot foo. Once again u save the day wit ur knowledge. One more thing, how will the 3.5 conv and pathfinder tb reactmwit jwt or ts?
An ECU upgrade will net you much better gains on a 3.5 swap than with a 3.0L. ECU upgrade on a 3.0L without a VI would net you 5whp or less. On the 3.5, you're prolly looking at around 10whp, maybe 15. If you do that, have them advance the hell out of the timing and do a 7200rpm rev limit. Alternatively, you could get a E-manage Ultimate and do the same thing, plus a few more things.
Originally Posted by nismology
Those dyno results are VERY questionable. His numbers are higher than any other maxima, ever, with those mods. I'd take those numbers with a grain of salt. By NO means is that typical.
Originally Posted by foobeca
An ECU upgrade will net you much better gains on a 3.5 swap than with a 3.0L. ECU upgrade on a 3.0L without a VI would net you 5whp or less. On the 3.5, you're prolly looking at around 10whp, maybe 15. If you do that, have them advance the hell out of the timing and do a 7200rpm rev limit. Alternatively, you could get a E-manage Ultimate and do the same thing, plus a few more things.
The gains from an ECU on a 3.0 have been compared to the gains from an aftermarket y-pipe. Like +12 HP/+12 TQ. That's with stock intake manifold. Where do you get this stuff from? Just wondering...
Originally Posted by foobeca
I agree that those numbers may be a little high. I can't remember the exact details of it, but my larger point is that a ECU and TB upgrade won't net you much power on the 3.0L. Especially if you don't have a MEVI or 00VI.
Originally Posted by nismology
Improper assumption again.
The gains from an ECU on a 3.0 have been compared to the gains from an aftermarket y-pipe. Like +12 HP/+12 TQ. That's with stock intake manifold. Where do you get this stuff from? Just wondering...
The gains from an ECU on a 3.0 have been compared to the gains from an aftermarket y-pipe. Like +12 HP/+12 TQ. That's with stock intake manifold. Where do you get this stuff from? Just wondering...Another thing you have to take into consideration is the mods are less than the sum of their parts. Using ricer math, you could say
12hp ECU upgrade
20hp Y-pipe
10hp intake
25hp 00VI
10hp catback
10hp UDP
____
77hp + 190hp = 277hp. No need to get a 3.5!!! But that simply isn't the case. Your dyno numbers for the above mods would be around 200whp/200wtq which would equal about 240hp. I think the only mods that are really worth a d*mn are the 00VI and a y-pipe. Those two mods alone should net you 190whp-195whp.
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Ricer math ...
..
I've seen dynos add 8hp/12tq JWT on a 3.0L.
BTW There's also no dyno with 10-15whp from advanced timing w/ 3.5L either
.. I've seen dynos add 8hp/12tq JWT on a 3.0L.
BTW There's also no dyno with 10-15whp from advanced timing w/ 3.5L either

Originally Posted by foobeca
I seriously doubt that you would get 12hp/12tq throughout the powerband with a stock 3.0L. Please show a dyno where this is the case. I could believe 12hp with a 7200rpm limiter with a 00vi.
Another thing you have to take into consideration is the mods are less than the sum of their parts. Using ricer math, you could say
12hp ECU upgrade
20hp Y-pipe
10hp intake
25hp 00VI
10hp catback
10hp UDP
____
77hp + 190hp = 277hp. No need to get a 3.5!!! But that simply isn't the case.
12hp ECU upgrade
20hp Y-pipe
10hp intake
25hp 00VI
10hp catback
10hp UDP
____
77hp + 190hp = 277hp. No need to get a 3.5!!! But that simply isn't the case.
Your dyno numbers for the above mods would be around 200whp/200wtq which would equal about 240hp. I think the only mods that are really worth a d*mn are the 00VI and a y-pipe. Those two mods alone should net you 190whp-195whp.
It's worth it much more than a PF TB.
And besides better throttle response, the TB isn't really worth it, and the relation between TB and timing is minimal at best.
of all my mods, I/Y/E/MEVI, my ECU was the most noticeable, and it adds no loud wail such as an intake, or drone such as an exhaust, so instead of placebo, it was ACTUALLY noticed.
And besides better throttle response, the TB isn't really worth it, and the relation between TB and timing is minimal at best.
of all my mods, I/Y/E/MEVI, my ECU was the most noticeable, and it adds no loud wail such as an intake, or drone such as an exhaust, so instead of placebo, it was ACTUALLY noticed.
Here is about 8 whp peak increase just by changing the ecu. The increase in the midrange is more like 20 whp. Obviously no MEVI or 00VI.
However, this is with a dramatic increase in timing.
However, this is with a dramatic increase in timing.
Guest
Posts: n/a
So what I am gettin from this is you can still use the jwt or tecnosquare with the 7200 rev limiter for the 3.5 to 4th gen conv but just ask them to advance the hell out of ur timing. And if you do decide to take this route, add the 00vi and pF tb you should be seeing at least 240-250 whp? Or a little less?
So what I am gettin from this is you can still use the jwt or tecnosquare with the 7200 rev limiter for the 3.5 to 4th gen conv but just ask them to advance the hell out of ur timing
It's hard to throw a guess at whp when no variables are known (i.e added whp w/ timing advance w/ JWT/TS advance tuning etc)
Originally Posted by Playboycutie69
And if you do decide to take this route, add the 00vi and pF tb you should be seeing at least 240-250 whp? Or a little less?
Housemoms.
If 5.5 gens and 3.5 Altimas can get like 10whp from an ECU, surely us 4.5 gens can get quite a bit more, since we start lower for the timing chart, especially with all the crap I've done to my car.
If 5.5 gens and 3.5 Altimas can get like 10whp from an ECU, surely us 4.5 gens can get quite a bit more, since we start lower for the timing chart, especially with all the crap I've done to my car.
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
Why do you keep calling it a Mallfinder TB?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
Jan 4, 2024 07:01 PM
t6378tp
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
11
Sep 29, 2018 04:27 PM
BLACKKILA.GTR
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
1
Sep 29, 2015 11:23 AM





