All Motor All Motor Advanced Performance. Talk about Engine Swaps, Internal Engine work. Not your basic Y pipe and Intake Information.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

chassis dyno vs dynojet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 01:42 PM
  #1  
steven88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Need A Light?
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,649
From: SoCal, CA
chassis dyno vs dynojet?

Hey guys, I think I read somewhere that a chassis dyno is better for tuning than a dynojet, mustang? Is this true and how so? I'm asking becuz I plan to hit the dyno for tuning....not necessarily looking to break any HP records...just want a straight, flat AFR line....will a chassis dyno be easier to get a flat AFR than a dynojet?

Thanks!
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 02:12 PM
  #2  
Kevlo911's Avatar
Kevlo for President
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 35,755
From: Lake Orion, MI
Dynojet = chassis dyno
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 02:30 PM
  #3  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Dynojet is a chassis dyno.


Chassis dyno = dyno that you put the whole car on

engine dyno = dyno that you just hook the engine to without the engine being in the car.

You are thinking of a load dyno which loads the car in a more "real world" way so that your tune is based on load your car would see on the street. Load dynos are Mustang, Dynapack, etc. Load dynos are considered "better" for tuning though I've started to think recently that the difference may not be all that significant if you have a tuner who knows what he's doing. AMS (worlds highest HP evo) uses a dynojet (not a load dyno), SVS uses a dynojet (1800hp vipers running 8s, 600hp 350Zs, 800hp MR2s, etc).
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 06:06 PM
  #4  
steven88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Need A Light?
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,649
From: SoCal, CA
OHhh my bad..SO Dynopack, Mustang are "supposedly" better tuning? I'm not looking to break HP records...just a nice flat line...

two local shops here in Cali offer dyno timing....one has a Dynapack (bolts onto the hubs) and the other has Dynojet.....which one would ya'll pick if you were in my shoes? I'm tuning with a V-afcii anyway
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 09:32 PM
  #5  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
all else being equal i'd go with the dynapack because it does load the car up more. im just saying that I don't believe the difference between the two types is as significant as some people might suggest if the tuner knows what he is doing.
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #6  
steven88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Need A Light?
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,649
From: SoCal, CA
nice....I'm tryin to call around a few places to see if they can let me rent the dyno....I will do the tuning myself and just pay them for roller times....I know R&D with the dynojet dyno charges $150/hr for tuning services....but I wonder how much it would be without tuning...hmm
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 10:09 PM
  #7  
Puppetmaster's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,551
From: Fairfax, VA
Originally Posted by steven88
nice....I'm tryin to call around a few places to see if they can let me rent the dyno....I will do the tuning myself and just pay them for roller times....I know R&D with the dynojet dyno charges $150/hr for tuning services....but I wonder how much it would be without tuning...hmm
How many runs do ya plan on doing (baseline + tuning)? Just curious....
Old Feb 16, 2006 | 10:20 PM
  #8  
steven88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Need A Light?
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,649
From: SoCal, CA
Originally Posted by Puppetmaster
How many runs do ya plan on doing (baseline + tuning)? Just curious....
Well I really don't know...If the price is right....I'll put in like 2-3hrs...thats good enough to make my **** flat as hell...

Tony said hes not sure if he can come through on certain dates....hes a pretty busy guy and I needa back up plan...so I'm gonna call around place to see how much they charge for roller time & I do the tuning myself....if it's in the $50-$75 per hour range...I might just buy 2hrs worth and definitely get my AFR to be flat!

Tony said tuning with the Vafcii is easy....i'll just get him to teach me over the internet so i'll be prepared when I roll up to the tuning shop...
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 01:04 AM
  #9  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Mike and I tuned his SAFC-II on his turbo car to get his AFR from untuned to flat in like 20 minutes on the road. They are really easy to use.

BTW $150 an hour sounds pretty high. Most places are usually $100 an hour in my experience. If you are going to be doing the tuning entirely yourself I'd just go with the place that has the cheapest dyno time. Also check to make sure they let you operate the car on the dyno yourself, some places won't let you operate it yourself and insist that they have an employee operate the car. Obviously you don't want a place like that if you plan on tuning things yourself unless you just want to sit in the passenger seat and mess with the VAFC.

Also the load vs non load thing is more of an issue for turbo cars, being as how quickly a turbo car spools is based on engine load. On an NA car like yours the difference will be much less, and so the use of a load bearing dyno vs a non-load dyno is even less of a concern for you in my personal opinion.
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 01:19 AM
  #10  
steven88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Need A Light?
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,649
From: SoCal, CA
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
Mike and I tuned his SAFC-II on his turbo car to get his AFR from untuned to flat in like 20 minutes on the road. They are really easy to use.

BTW $150 an hour sounds pretty high. Most places are usually $100 an hour in my experience. If you are going to be doing the tuning entirely yourself I'd just go with the place that has the cheapest dyno time. Also check to make sure they let you operate the car on the dyno yourself, some places won't let you operate it yourself and insist that they have an employee operate the car. Obviously you don't want a place like that if you plan on tuning things yourself unless you just want to sit in the passenger seat and mess with the VAFC.

Also the load vs non load thing is more of an issue for turbo cars, being as how quickly a turbo car spools is based on engine load. On an NA car like yours the difference will be much less, and so the use of a load bearing dyno vs a non-load dyno is even less of a concern for you in my personal opinion.
Yeah $150/hr is for tuning + roller time I guess....but I'm going to try calling around and asking if I can just pay for the roller times...then we'll see how much they charge me, and I'll go to the cheapest place I find....I'm hoping to find a nice shop that charges me like $50-$60/hr for roller time....so in the end, I'd pay $100 or so for two hrs on the dyno...more than enough to get me a nice flat AFR...or if I'm able to get a flat AFR before the 1hr is up, I'll just end up paying alot less!

Neal, since you say NA cars dont benefit as much on dynapacks....you do suggest I try looking for a shop that uses dynojet....so I can get a nice tune + get "accurate" whp? I know dynapacks read 12% or so higher....which makes is fairly inaccurate compared to the majority of dynojet users on this board...
Old Feb 17, 2006 | 09:18 AM
  #11  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Originally Posted by steven88

Neal, since you say NA cars dont benefit as much on dynapacks....you do suggest I try looking for a shop that uses dynojet....so I can get a nice tune + get "accurate" whp? I know dynapacks read 12% or so higher....which makes is fairly inaccurate compared to the majority of dynojet users on this board...
I don't believe that dynapacks read any higher necessarily, it all has to do with how they calibrate the dyno. I know guys who have dynod on both dynapack and dynojet and put down identical numbers.
Old Feb 18, 2006 | 05:46 AM
  #12  
I30tMikeD's Avatar
Moderator who thinks he is better than us with his I30
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,332
Unless you have a established relationship with a shop it may be difficult to find a place to let you be within 5 feet of the car while it's on the dyno. Alot of places are really stingy about that because of their insurance policies. I went to a place one time where they asked me to actually stand outside about 30ft away. But I have also been to places where I drove my own car and did my own tuning.

Not counting getting the car set up and strapped down, it shouldn't take more than 45 min to tune AFR with an VAFC. Maybe 4-5 pulls if you know what your doing.

Again, unless you have a relationship with a place I wouldn't count on them letting you get too involved. It's just how these places are.

Neal is right about a load dyno being more important with a turbo car. I see about full lb of boost more on the street than I do on a dynojet and that is an easy 20whp difference. An NA car won't have that variable.
Old Feb 18, 2006 | 01:42 PM
  #13  
Broaner's Avatar
2060lbs and falling...
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,155
From: Madison, WI
If you're only tunning with a VAFC then the difference is insignificant. Those are precise enough to really make night and day changes ever 50RPM. Its always been my belief that full standalone would benifit from being tuned on a loaded dyno.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BPuff57
Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking
33
Apr 16, 2020 05:15 AM
Ben2003GLE
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
31
Jul 17, 2016 08:13 AM
VQ'ed
Forced Induction
8
Feb 29, 2016 08:05 AM
schmellyfart
All Motor
7
Sep 25, 2015 04:47 PM
MaximaDrvr
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
16
Aug 19, 2015 08:20 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:41 PM.