4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Whats better? A Supercharger, or a Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #1  
mastercater7's Avatar
Thread Starter
VQ35 FTW
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 822
From: Seattle, WA
Whats better? A Supercharger, or a Turbo

Im thinking seriously about boosting my max, but im not sure whats better. I want the most power for the best price. Also what is the best turbocharger out there for my 98?
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 05:53 PM
  #2  
4x4Max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,577
http://forum.maxima.org/forumdisplay.php?f=53
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 05:54 PM
  #3  
95_Maxima_5spd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 237
Depends on many factors....first of all, you can't just throw either on there and call it a day....it takes a bit of time, money, and work.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 05:56 PM
  #4  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Holy as.s cracker.

Originally Posted by 4X4Max
http://forum.maxima.org/forumdisplay.php?f=53
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 06:29 PM
  #5  
MaximaSE96's Avatar
Maxima Owner
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,036
it all depends...ultimately a turbo will provide u the most power....supercharger will usually be more reliable less gizmos and issues....but also takes hp to make hp....it really all depends on ur goals..u want a highway star go turbo...u want almost instant boost and a lil more pep for the street go supercharger....turbo is alot more custom work...u need to research more
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 06:33 PM
  #6  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Turbo = more power, more lag

SC = less power, no lag

SC is linear and more like driving a ridiculously powerful NA car with a funny whine.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 07:18 PM
  #7  
95_Maxima_5spd's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 237
If i were to boost my Max, i would probly go supercharged. the Maxima seems to have plenty of torque for a SC...although a turbo would be fun, they take a LOT of tweaking and tuning to be reliable and efficient.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #8  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Interesting thread
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #9  
d00df00d's Avatar
Old enuf to pick his own gears
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,018
Originally Posted by JClaw
Turbo = more power, more lag

SC = less power, no lag

SC is linear and more like driving a ridiculously powerful NA car with a funny whine.
Exactly.

....Unless you get a super-small, super-quick-spooling turbo, like a GT28RS. That would make more power than a supercharger everywhere but the absolute bottom of the rev range (1500 and under).
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 07:40 PM
  #10  
MDeezy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 33,701
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by d00df00d
Exactly.

....Unless you get a super-small, super-quick-spooling turbo, like a GT28RS. That would make more power than a supercharger everywhere but the absolute bottom of the rev range (1500 and under).

or if someone twin turbo's their car, and has a functional sequential setup.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 07:53 PM
  #11  
illCaptain's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 21
Originally Posted by MDeezy
or if someone twin turbo's their car, and has a functional sequential setup.
Yeah, but those suck. They still lag and all your doing is paying for an extra turbo. A single ball bearing would be a better choice.

Normally a turbo will make more power, but this is peak power and none of it is available down low. Turbos are also a little more finikey.

A supercharger is more consistant and relyable throughout the power band, although they are known to lack the up-top power as a turbo (but a set of cams can fix that). And they are less prone to detonation (their power is directly tied to RPMs). And you can make a decent amout of power with a supercharger (why do you think all the top fuel guys use them?) by swaping out the pully.

That being said there is nothing sexier than a blow off valve.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 09:27 PM
  #12  
mastercater7's Avatar
Thread Starter
VQ35 FTW
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 822
From: Seattle, WA
well i know about the lag and everything, but wouldnt the boost at lower rpms from a supercharger only matter in first gear if im dragging? Im going to start my engine rebuild soon and im going to bore out my VQ, but after its all redone, i wanna boost it. I am just lost on whats best.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 09:43 PM
  #13  
matts95max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,663
do some research, read a lot in the all motor and s/c t/c sections, also do some google searches.

I wonder what percentage of noobies ask this question? and how many actually follow thru with their plans..in less than a year..
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 09:46 PM
  #14  
mastercater7's Avatar
Thread Starter
VQ35 FTW
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 822
From: Seattle, WA
Well i have the money and i am going to go through with the install. I was just wondering what was better. I have researched and still just bounce back and forth on what seems better. I definitely feel that my max should be supercharged over a turbo but from dynos ive looked at and from what others have said im stuck in the middle.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 09:53 PM
  #15  
matts95max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,663
go s/c, talk to matty and get his starter kit. then upgrade clutch and exhaust. but look at the stickies in the s/c t/c section. I may be wrong but I believe you can s/c for somewhere around $2200??? that is just price for s/c and the components(the cheap way), not clutch and exhaust easy. If you dont go the cheap route for all that you are talking about doing...rebuild engine, bore stuff out..which means u have to buy bigger pistons? s/c & kit, clutch, full exhaust..you are talking prolly like 5gs or something man..oh and labor for all that if you arent doing it..are you lowered? wheels? upgrade brakes? like bbk?? there is a lot to think about man. GL with your decission!
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 09:54 PM
  #16  
d00df00d's Avatar
Old enuf to pick his own gears
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,018
Originally Posted by illCaptain
Normally a turbo will make more power, but this is peak power and none of it is available down low.
PFI disagrees with you (unless by "down low" you mean below 1500 rpm). Their turbo kit made more power at 4 psi than the Stillen supercharger kit did at 8 psi -- across the entire rev range.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 09:59 PM
  #17  
mastercater7's Avatar
Thread Starter
VQ35 FTW
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 822
From: Seattle, WA
PFI disagrees with you (unless by "down low" you mean below 1500 rpm). Their turbo kit made more power at 4 psi than the Stillen supercharger kit did at 8 psi -- across the entire rev range.
When I saw that dyno on the JWT page, thats when I became lost. And Im not worried about the money cuz I have it. and I have a new clutch. I put an exedy stage 2 in not too long ago
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:04 PM
  #18  
MDeezy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 33,701
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by matts95max
go s/c, talk to matty and get his starter kit. then upgrade clutch and exhaust. but look at the stickies in the s/c t/c section. I may be wrong but I believe you can s/c for somewhere around $2200??? that is just price for s/c and the components(the cheap way), not clutch and exhaust easy. If you dont go the cheap route for all that you are talking about doing...rebuild engine, bore stuff out..which means u have to buy bigger pistons? s/c & kit, clutch, full exhaust..you are talking prolly like 5gs or something man..oh and labor for all that if you arent doing it..are you lowered? wheels? upgrade brakes? like bbk?? there is a lot to think about man. GL with your decission!

dont have to build the engine up, but if you want to put down a lot of power it could be a good idea. Hal was pushing about 500hp on stock internals, no upgrading at all.

saves a lot of money
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:06 PM
  #19  
matts95max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,663
I was going to say he didnt have to, or that he could just buy a low mileage..but for some reason, didnt wanna go there.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:09 PM
  #20  
MDeezy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 33,701
From: Atlanta
gotcha.

If I was going to boost, I would want to build up the engine so it can handle more boost and the extra wear on the engine.
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:10 PM
  #21  
mastercater7's Avatar
Thread Starter
VQ35 FTW
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 822
From: Seattle, WA
But then still what about the PFI turbo over the Stillen?
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:10 PM
  #22  
timmyp34's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 41
just to throw sumthing in!

why not do both? is it even poss?

or would it jst wear out the engine
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:12 PM
  #23  
matts95max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,663
mdeezy- After thinking all the possibilities thru, I always come up to..it is still FWD..
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:15 PM
  #24  
f550maranello2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,496
its fwd...

on a LS1 a turbo all the way bishes
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:20 PM
  #25  
matts95max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,663
on a LS1 a trubo all the way
I bet yall dont know nothin' bout that TRUBO!!!!
haha im just messin man!
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:22 PM
  #26  
f550maranello2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,496
hahaha its 1:20 am... im a bit tired lol
Old Oct 16, 2006 | 10:25 PM
  #27  
matts95max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,663
haha i know man im sitting here kinda studying for a test i have at 7:50am..in a couple hours..lol and for one the class right after that!
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 12:39 PM
  #28  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
yeeesh.....
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #29  
90stanza's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 536
I doubt you will be unhappy with getting a S/C
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 07:43 PM
  #30  
matty's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,163
From: Northern Jersey
I have 2 V1 Starter Kits Available. Contact me if your interested in one.

-matt
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 08:53 PM
  #31  
i30krab's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 995
From: Las Vegas, NV
Don't forget heat . A turbo causes a lot more heat soak under the hood. If you live in a hot climate it's even worse.
A SC is more user friendly, much more set it and forget it. A turbo requires too much adjustments etc.

Of course this presupposes one spends the $$ and time to set up everything the right way with no corners cut.
The whole idea of a daily driver is reliability not headaches.
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 09:00 PM
  #32  
mastercater7's Avatar
Thread Starter
VQ35 FTW
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 822
From: Seattle, WA
I live in seattle so i aint worried about heat. Anyone know how much boost and power is possible out of a supercharger?
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 09:05 PM
  #33  
Max_Out's Avatar
Under the radar
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,178
From: Snowshoe, WV, Centreville, VA
Originally Posted by timmyp34
just to throw sumthing in!

why not do both? is it even poss?

or would it jst wear out the engine


you could do that theoreticly. i believe it was done in the early 80's and done by one company i cant think of and i know nissan dabbled in it for alittle bit. it has recently been picked back up by VW being called the Twin Charger. The reason why i know all this is a friend and i thought of the idea, started reasearching on how to do it. but found out we were 26 years to late lol.
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 09:14 PM
  #34  
f550maranello2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,496
there was a car that had both

The March Superturbo R was commonly used in the All-Japan Rally Championship It was fitted with both a Supercharger and Turbo-charger system - Double Charge. It was equipped with a five-speed close-ratio syncromeshed gearbox. The interior has been stripped and equipped with a factory-fitted rollcage.

Production started in 1988 and ended in 1991.

Form and E‐EK‐10FR. Engine: Nissan MA MA09ERT

Displacement: 930cc OHC x rally classification

The engine size enabled this car to race in the 1.4 and 1.6 litre classes, depending on class rules.
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #35  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by Max_Out
i believe it was done in the early 80's and done by one company
Meguiars Integra...
Old Oct 17, 2006 | 10:03 PM
  #36  
Fr33way™'s Avatar
Wild for Width
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,471
From: Atlanta
Twin-Electric Superchargers and a can of NOS energy drink.
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 03:50 AM
  #37  
d00df00d's Avatar
Old enuf to pick his own gears
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,018
Mini guys twincharge all the time. Wouldn't be worth it for us, though.
Old Oct 18, 2006 | 07:33 AM
  #38  
smotz's Avatar
Brain phuck
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 271
Extremely good point.. If your serious about boosting your max, and money is not an issue, AND your even asking this question, unless you think you could go without your car for 2 weeks and be ok, get a second car (max maybe). Because once you start dumping money into pushing your car to its limits, it could take a crap on you right when you just put your last $800 into a brake kit or something. Then your F'ed Renting a car for 2 weeks at $50/day = $750 + tax and bullcrap. Would be worthing springing the extra grand and getting a high milage, stock, reliable 4th gen as a backup.

I remember when I wanted to boost my max back when I was kinda new to the forums. I was trying to decide on sc or turbo. Then I realized in my search for that answer, that everyone I read about that had either sc or turbo, also had reliability problems, which is totaly understandable and there is almost no way around it.
Just remember, a lot of the guys on these forums that are boosted and are pushing their maxi pads too their limits, also work at a auto repair shop, or their family owns one. So if their max takes a crap on them, they get it towed probably for free.. to the place they work! Then fix it and drive it home the same day. For us on the other hand.. our car takes a crap, we pay $125 to tow, then the shop we take it to says they need today to diagnose it, then 4 business days for the parts to get in, then 2 days to fix it blah blah. Or tow it to your house while you try to fix it, depending on your tools and knowledge and availability of your car guru buddies, who knows how long it could take.
Originally Posted by i30krab
Don't forget heat . A turbo causes a lot more heat soak under the hood. If you live in a hot climate it's even worse.
A SC is more user friendly, much more set it and forget it. A turbo requires too much adjustments etc.

Of course this presupposes one spends the $$ and time to set up everything the right way with no corners cut.
The whole idea of a daily driver is reliability not headaches.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
Jan 4, 2024 07:01 PM
aw11power
Supercharged/Turbocharged
161
Oct 10, 2021 04:57 AM
VQ'ed
Forced Induction
8
Feb 29, 2016 08:05 AM
KabirUTA13
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
19
Oct 17, 2015 02:15 AM
09maxshawn11
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
5
Sep 30, 2015 10:28 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:34 PM.