4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Clutchless Gear-Shifting--Does it hurt anything? Why do it at all?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 08:50 AM
  #1  
Minimalmaxima's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 514
Clutchless Gear-Shifting--Does it hurt anything? Why do it at all?

So I'm riding with my friend who's a trucker and the guy says, "Why do you keep hitting the clutch when you don't have to?" I says, "In this car you have to." He says, "No you don't." I stops the car and says show me this. And he does it. I did a third to fourth and a fourth to fifth today with no clutch just to see if I could do it. I've been trying for three days. Not all the time, though. I know the synchros don't like it when you're not spot on. Anyway, does this tear anything up? What are the real advantages of doing this for a passenger car?
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 09:09 AM
  #2  
GoalieKeg's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,290
From: Stuart, FL
There are NO advantages other than the fact that you can do it where most people can't. There are points in the rev range in each gear where it is possible to do this. Does this mean you should do it on a daily basis? The clutch pedal is there for a reason, use it. We have a syncromesh transmission that likes to fail easily on us. You don't drive an 18 wheeler with a million gears to go through, you drive a maxima.


Every time you do this, and you hear grinding, the input shaft teeth are not lining up with the output shaft gears. This causes stress, and you could crack gears. Ever blown a 4th gen transmission before? Well you will soon if you keep doing this.
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 09:10 AM
  #3  
MDeezy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 33,701
From: Atlanta
I dont fully understand how you are actually doing a clutchless gear change, but we have the clutch peddle for a reason, so I think its pretty safe to say that you'll be damaging something by not using the clutch peddle, if that is indeed how its done.

Our trannies are fragil enough as is, no need to put extra un-needed stress on it.
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 09:17 AM
  #4  
GoalieKeg's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,290
From: Stuart, FL
Originally Posted by MDeezy
I dont fully understand how you are actually doing a clutchless gear change, but we have the clutch peddle for a reason, so I think its pretty safe to say that you'll be damaging something by not using the clutch peddle, if that is indeed how its done.

Our trannies are fragil enough as is, no need to put extra un-needed stress on it.

Try driving in first gear, slowly accelerating. Put some pressure on the shifter without your foot on the clutch, and it will pull out of gear. If you match it right, it will fall into second without grinding. Good luck getting it not to grind.
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 09:33 AM
  #5  
Minimalmaxima's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 514
Originally Posted by GoalieKeg
There are NO advantages other than the fact that you can do it where most people can't. There are points in the rev range in each gear where it is possible to do this. Does this mean you should do it on a daily basis? The clutch pedal is there for a reason, use it. We have a syncromesh transmission that likes to fail easily on us. You don't drive an 18 wheeler with a million gears to go through, you drive a maxima.


Every time you do this, and you hear grinding, the input shaft teeth are not lining up with the output shaft gears. This causes stress, and you could crack gears. Ever blown a 4th gen transmission before? Well you will soon if you keep doing this.
Sheesh, Mr. Magliozzi. I said that I hadn't been trying it all the time the whole three days. Just once or twice a day, really. And I was never forcing it. I just never believed it was even possible, and this guy did it smoothly as buttah, and if there were any good reasons to do this, I wanted to know. Personally, I'm all about efficiency, and when it takes more than a split second to change gears, I'm not happy. I wonder if there's anyone who can change without the clutch as fast as they can with it, though. I couldn't. And BTW, when I did it successfully a couple of times today, I heard no grinding. Fell right in.
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 09:49 AM
  #6  
MDeezy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 33,701
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by Minimalmaxima
Sheesh, Mr. Magliozzi. I said that I hadn't been trying it all the time the whole three days. Just once or twice a day, really. And I was never forcing it. I just never believed it was even possible, and this guy did it smoothly as buttah, and if there were any good reasons to do this, I wanted to know. Personally, I'm all about efficiency, and when it takes more than a split second to change gears, I'm not happy. I wonder if there's anyone who can change without the clutch as fast as they can with it, though. I couldn't. And BTW, when I did it successfully a couple of times today, I heard no grinding. Fell right in.
in that case you want an automatic with a valve body mod, if your looking for speedy shifting, or custom rig a sequential setup.

but in short, yes you'll be doing damage, it would be best not to do this period, let a lone on a daily basis or every now and then.

Originally Posted by GoalieKeg
Try driving in first gear, slowly accelerating. Put some pressure on the shifter without your foot on the clutch, and it will pull out of gear. If you match it right, it will fall into second without grinding. Good luck getting it not to grind.
I thought that might be the technique... no I like my tranny too much, a lot of us have trouble keeping our trannies lasting just under normal driving conditions.
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 11:19 AM
  #7  
99BlackMaxMS's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,508
From: Wrentham,MA/Smithfield,RI
Look at it this way...wouldn't you rather replace your clutch in 50K miles rather than blow your tranny within the next few thousand miles? IMO it just makes sense to use the clutch...it is there for a reason...to shift gears. I am not saying you do this every time you drive the car, but the reason why truckers use this method is because they have 12+ gears that they need to get through. This wears out the clutch easily and if they blow one or two gears, its not a huge deal.
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:04 PM
  #8  
GoalieKeg's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,290
From: Stuart, FL
Originally Posted by MDeezy
a lot of us have trouble keeping our trannies lasting just under normal driving conditions.

I've blown mine twice since the 3.5 swap.
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:11 PM
  #9  
MDeezy's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 33,701
From: Atlanta
Originally Posted by GoalieKeg
I've blown mine twice since the 3.5 swap.

my old girl is still holding up but as soon as I have enough funds I'm buying another one, and leaving it in the garage just in case, cause my tranny didnt feel that healthy before my swap, so I dont expect her to last forever.
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 12:20 PM
  #10  
MorpheusZero's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,064
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Clutchless shifting is ok to practice every once in awhile just in case you need to be able to do it (I did when my clutch went out on me) but not exactly good for the tranny. It's kind of a novelty though.
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #11  
GoalieKeg's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,290
From: Stuart, FL
Originally Posted by MDeezy
my old girl is still holding up but as soon as I have enough funds I'm buying another one, and leaving it in the garage just in case, cause my tranny didnt feel that healthy before my swap, so I dont expect her to last forever.

Yep...I've already got one I'm looking into to buy, I'd rebuild it though and shot peen the gears. It would be worth it. Mabye I'd get some billet stuff made...
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 04:11 PM
  #12  
f550maranello2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,496
omg guys.... truck drivers dont use the clutch.... simply because the syncros are so good on trucks that they only use the clutch to get out of first gear... my friend owns his own truck and has over a million miles on it.. He never uses the clutch other than to get out of first....
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #13  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Maintenance Monster
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,231
From: Harrisburg, PA
Originally Posted by Minimalmaxima
So I'm riding with my friend who's a trucker and the guy says, "Why do you keep hitting the clutch when you don't have to?" I says, "In this car you have to." He says, "No you don't." I stops the car and says show me this. And he does it. I did a third to fourth and a fourth to fifth today with no clutch just to see if I could do it. I've been trying for three days. Not all the time, though. I know the synchros don't like it when you're not spot on. Anyway, does this tear anything up? What are the real advantages of doing this for a passenger car?
Yes, you can shift without the clutch. But use the clutch. Clutchless shifting can at the very best speed shifts by a tiny fraction of a second, and at worst it will destroy the tranny internals much faster than if you had stuck with clutching. It's least harmful with upshifts at no throttle, if you rev match correctly. So if you try it, make sure to work with the timing and try to get the engine such that it's neither pushing nor engine braking, and push the shifter into gear without rushing it.

The bottom line is that the synchros and gear dog teeth are designed to work with the clutch, such that their loading is caused only by the rotating inertia of the input shaft and coupled gears. If you go clutchless, there is the inertia of the entire drivetrain and torque of the engine loading the shifter parts when you shift. That's a whole lot more load. If you don't rev match perfectly, you WILL wear the synchros and dog teeth very quickly. Your shifts will get clunkier and more likely to grind as they wear.

The kind of trannys that do withstand clutchless shifting are face-engagement (dog box) transmissions. And even then not using a clutch will wear it out more quickly.

So let your friend have fun doing that, but not on your car.

Dave
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 10:33 PM
  #14  
aznprid972's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,043
From: DFW, Texas
Originally Posted by Minimalmaxima
I wonder if there's anyone who can change without the clutch as fast as they can with it, though. I couldn't.
That would be impossible. You have to match the RPM right with each gear to allow it to fall in perfectly. Just a note... that specific rpm isn't anywhere close to redline.

Although it wouldn't be too bad to learn this method. My brother's clutch went out a few months ago and he drove on it just fine by doing this method. Seeing him start in first gear at every light was pretty to watch too. But once moving, he can get the gears to fall in place but it just took some time.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 09:06 AM
  #15  
padam07's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 112
From: Rochdale, MA
Originally Posted by f550maranello2
omg guys.... truck drivers dont use the clutch.... simply because the syncros are so good on trucks that they only use the clutch to get out of first gear... my friend owns his own truck and has over a million miles on it.. He never uses the clutch other than to get out of first....
Actually OTR trucks do not have a synchronized transmision so that is why they have to double clutch when shifting. If you are talented (usually with many miles under your belt) you can shift without using the clutch. Not all truck drivers shift without a clutch.
My father has been driving for close to 25 years with more than 2 million miles of safe driving and he still double clutches for both up and down shifting. He says that he is just used to it. When he took his Class A driving test they required you to double clutch while shifting.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 12:10 PM
  #16  
phenryiv1's Avatar
Mod her. Ate her.
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,824
From: Martinsburg, WV
He cannot read what you are telling him.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #17  
MorpheusZero's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,064
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Neither can you.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 12:59 PM
  #18  
EnervinE's Avatar
i has college
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,363
From: KCMO-ish
I can!
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 01:05 PM
  #19  
phenryiv1's Avatar
Mod her. Ate her.
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,824
From: Martinsburg, WV
Originally Posted by MorpheusZero
Neither can you.
Are you SURE about that?
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 01:11 PM
  #20  
Max_Out's Avatar
Under the radar
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6,178
From: Snowshoe, WV, Centreville, VA
Ive done this in my max by accident once. I was crusing down the road and had my had on the shifter with a slight preasure pulling towards forth, and when i hit (if i remember correctly) 4700 RPM's the shifter just slid into 4th gear.

On another note. when i race my dirt bike, on the take off through the first turn i do not use the clutch just to get faster shifts.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 01:14 PM
  #21  
ComradeJew's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 494
My dad taught me to drive clutchless, and I honestly can say that it is absolutely un-necessary. It causes stress on the components as other have mentioned, and it takes a extremely long time to perfect - else you will be blowing trannies to the left and right. Moreover, it is easier to do with a car that has longer plays - i.e. I can shift clutch less in my Scion xB without much effort or resistance... but since I have a short shifter on my Maxima, it does take more strength and concentration.

Bottom line - don't bother... clutch less is only good when you are racing - and even then, chances are you gonna mess something up.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 02:00 PM
  #22  
aznprid972's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,043
From: DFW, Texas
Originally Posted by ComradeJew
Bottom line - don't bother... clutch less is only good when you are racing
I don't think so...
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 02:02 PM
  #23  
MorpheusZero's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,064
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Originally Posted by phenryiv1
Are you SURE about that?
Hey I just read the avatar quotes buddy.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 02:03 PM
  #24  
MorpheusZero's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,064
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Originally Posted by ComradeJew
clutch less is only good when you are racing
Not unless you have a dogbox...
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 03:26 PM
  #25  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Maintenance Monster
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,231
From: Harrisburg, PA
Originally Posted by MorpheusZero
Not unless you have a dogbox...
And if the nickname 'crash box' doesn't give you an idea of what it's like, I'll tell you. Shifting clutchless in a race car is a little bit faster and a whole lot more abusive. Plus any race driver with half a brain will not do it with a synchromesh transmission.

Dave
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #26  
MorpheusZero's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,064
From: Santa Barbara, CA
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
And if the nickname 'crash box' doesn't give you an idea of what it's like, I'll tell you. Shifting clutchless in a race car is a little bit faster and a whole lot more abusive. Plus any race driver with half a brain will not do it with a synchromesh transmission.

Dave
Yep... with smaller engines it isn't as bad, but it's brutal, near-instant change in RPM means a big kick in the pants.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 04:29 PM
  #27  
ComradeJew's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 494
Originally Posted by dgeesaman
And if the nickname 'crash box' doesn't give you an idea of what it's like, I'll tell you. Shifting clutchless in a race car is a little bit faster and a whole lot more abusive. Plus any race driver with half a brain will not do it with a synchromesh transmission.

Dave
Well what I meant is that there is absolutely no benefit for everyday driving.
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 06:07 PM
  #28  
phenryiv1's Avatar
Mod her. Ate her.
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,824
From: Martinsburg, WV
Originally Posted by MorpheusZero
Hey I just read the avatar quotes buddy.
I GUESS that moderators could be banned, but I have never seen it happen...
Old Mar 14, 2007 | 06:37 PM
  #29  
dgeesaman's Avatar
Maintenance Monster
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,231
From: Harrisburg, PA
Originally Posted by ComradeJew
Well what I meant is that there is absolutely no benefit for everyday driving.
Yeah, my comment was directed to anyone who might confuse the operation of a racing gearbox with the thing in their car.

Entirely different beasts. Different gears, different shift engagement, different costs.

Dave
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 06:38 AM
  #30  
Keatz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 289
I used to drive a truck and i know why your friend said that, after you drive a truck for a while you begin to find the clutch useless (except for first gear) and when you drive a car you carry over the no clutch habit. I dont, but some truckers do, but like everyone said the clutch is there for a reason and should be used, a trucks tranny is different then our tranny.
Old Mar 15, 2007 | 06:56 AM
  #31  
phenryiv1's Avatar
Mod her. Ate her.
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 9,824
From: Martinsburg, WV
Okay, we have made our points here...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mad Jap
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
7
Mar 12, 2001 12:12 PM
Empz
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
12
Feb 12, 2001 02:10 PM
primeevil711
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
4
Jan 27, 2001 01:34 PM
MidnightSpeed53
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
3
Nov 20, 2000 12:33 PM
fcuco
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
19
Nov 15, 2000 09:58 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:02 PM.