help guys, my belt shredded!
#1
help guys, my belt shredded!
i got a front end alignment today and right when i left the shop, both my belts just shredded to pieces!!!! so now that i have to replace them, i am gonna upgrade the pulley.... if i go 3.25 or 3.125, will i still have to upgrade the fmu to a 8:1 disc, even with the 3.25? i know i have to with the 3.125, but not sure with the 3.25..... and also what belt sizes do i need? thanks
#2
Re: help guys, my belt shredded!
Originally posted by hooktup98SE
i got a front end alignment today and right when i left the shop, both my belts just shredded to pieces!!!! so now that i have to replace them, i am gonna upgrade the pulley.... if i go 3.25 or 3.125, will i still have to upgrade the fmu to a 8:1 disc, even with the 3.25? i know i have to with the 3.125, but not sure with the 3.25..... and also what belt sizes do i need? thanks
i got a front end alignment today and right when i left the shop, both my belts just shredded to pieces!!!! so now that i have to replace them, i am gonna upgrade the pulley.... if i go 3.25 or 3.125, will i still have to upgrade the fmu to a 8:1 disc, even with the 3.25? i know i have to with the 3.125, but not sure with the 3.25..... and also what belt sizes do i need? thanks
#3
if you are running too rich with the 8:1....maybe you could test my theory few threads down there, "a cheap way to lower my fuel pressure"
but it is better to run rich than lean, stay with the 8:1 and get an S-AFC or just get the adjstable FMU.
belt size? have you checked the stickie in this forum, hooktup98SE?
but it is better to run rich than lean, stay with the 8:1 and get an S-AFC or just get the adjstable FMU.
belt size? have you checked the stickie in this forum, hooktup98SE?
#4
Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]
if you are running too rich with the 8:1....maybe you could test my theory few threads down there, "a cheap way to lower my fuel pressure"
but it is better to run rich than lean, stay with the 8:1 and get an S-AFC or just get the adjstable FMU.
if you are running too rich with the 8:1....maybe you could test my theory few threads down there, "a cheap way to lower my fuel pressure"
but it is better to run rich than lean, stay with the 8:1 and get an S-AFC or just get the adjstable FMU.
By the way, Mardigrasmax went with a boost bleeder valve along with a 3:1 fmu, adjustable fpr and fields afc when he went to the 370 cc/min injectors. How he managed to juggle all that in getting to 12's is beyond me.
#5
so if the 3.25" is running alittle rich, than is it safe to just go with the 3.125"? what do you all think is better? or should i say, safer.... thanks all... (this is hooktup98se by the way on someone else's account)
#6
Originally posted by maxxygrrl
so if the 3.25" is running alittle rich, than is it safe to just go with the 3.125"? what do you all think is better? or should i say, safer.... thanks all... (this is hooktup98se by the way on someone else's account)
so if the 3.25" is running alittle rich, than is it safe to just go with the 3.125"? what do you all think is better? or should i say, safer.... thanks all... (this is hooktup98se by the way on someone else's account)
#7
Originally posted by Stephen Max
I have a safc, but I don't want to lean it out more than about 10% at high rpm without it being on a dyno.
By the way, Mardigrasmax went with a boost bleeder valve along with a 3:1 fmu, adjustable fpr and fields afc when he went to the 370 cc/min injectors. How he managed to juggle all that in getting to 12's is beyond me.
I have a safc, but I don't want to lean it out more than about 10% at high rpm without it being on a dyno.
By the way, Mardigrasmax went with a boost bleeder valve along with a 3:1 fmu, adjustable fpr and fields afc when he went to the 370 cc/min injectors. How he managed to juggle all that in getting to 12's is beyond me.
thx Stephen...I just PM'ed him
#8
Originally posted by maxxygrrl
so if the 3.25" is running alittle rich, than is it safe to just go with the 3.125"? what do you all think is better? or should i say, safer.... thanks all... (this is hooktup98se by the way on someone else's account)
so if the 3.25" is running alittle rich, than is it safe to just go with the 3.125"? what do you all think is better? or should i say, safer.... thanks all... (this is hooktup98se by the way on someone else's account)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trungg86
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
7
09-04-2015 04:58 AM