Supercharged/Turbocharged The increase in air/fuel pressure above atmospheric pressure in the intake system caused by the action of a supercharger or turbocharger attached to an engine.

Overlay of my old S-trim 10.5psi dyno -vs- SR20DEN's newest dyno

Old Jun 7, 2006 | 06:40 AM
  #1  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
Thread Starter
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Overlay of my old S-trim 10.5psi dyno -vs- SR20DEN's newest dyno



So for all the people thinking just because you are boosted(SC) and make more peak HP you can't lose to an NA car, this is for you.

If you don't have a raised rev limiter and pretty much all the bolt ons you will get drug.

Enjoy....
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 06:43 AM
  #2  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
Thread Starter
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Mods for that dyno include MEVI, full 3" exhaust, etc etc.

When we ran I would pull maybe a car granny shifting because I didn't want to break **** again.
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 09:16 AM
  #3  
TJ_Max's Avatar
Paradox Systems Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,436
Nice post. I'm dying to see a 3.5L 6speed against a 7psi SC'd 5speed. If you mod and build a 3.5L it can probably take the SC'd car on 10-11psi. What started this whole 3.5L vs. SC is basically me not wording it right, either way, this really isn't really a surprise. SR20DEN is just a different story altogether. Not a good representative for the common 3.5L max at all. My statement still stands, a stock 3.5L motor is not taking an SC.

to SR20DEN though.
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 09:29 AM
  #4  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
What's going on here eh?
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 09:38 AM
  #5  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
Thread Starter
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by TJ_Max
Nice post. I'm dying to see a 3.5L 6speed against a 7psi SC'd 5speed.
It would be a close race if the 4th gen was stock besides the bolt on SC'er kit.
Originally Posted by TJ_Max
If you mod and build a 3.5L it can probably take the SC'd car on 10-11psi.
Probably?

Originally Posted by TJ_Max
What started this whole 3.5L vs. SC is basically me not wording it right, either way, this really isn't really a surprise. SR20DEN is just a different story altogether. Not a good representative for the common 3.5L max at all. My statement still stands, a stock 3.5L motor is not taking an SC.

to SR20DEN though.
SR20DEN's car is a stock motor car. Stock cams, rods, pistons etc etc. Anyone out there could duplicate his car if they paid enough attention to what he has done and posted. Nothing on his car is out of the ordinary headers, modified manifold, larger injectors, l-spec ECU, larger MAF housing, exhaust, UDP, pop charger, rod bolts, weight reduction.

Its not his fault no one else has done it, 99% are more worried about light bulbs and stereos which is why noone else has done it.

One more thing, his car ran a 14.3@97 with intake and UDP so the factory freak calling people to head elsewhere.
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #6  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
No offense Blu, but I don't think your setup was at its full potential. If you are going to compare the 3.5L ringer, you should compare the 3L ringer.

Put SR20DEN vs. StephenMax:
------SR---SM
3500 150--150
4000 180--180
4500 218--215
5000 240--250
5500 250--280
6000 260--330
6500 265--350
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #7  
CullenJ76's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,358
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
No offense Blu, but I don't think your setup was at its full potential. If you are going to compare the 3.5L ringer, you should compare the 3L ringer.

Put SR20DEN vs. StephenMax:
------SR---SM
3500 150--150
4000 180--180
4500 218--215
5000 240--250
5500 250--280
6000 260--330
6500 265--350
good point
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 10:51 AM
  #8  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
Thread Starter
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
No offense Blu, but I don't think your setup was at its full potential. If you are going to compare the 3.5L ringer, you should compare the 3L ringer.

Put SR20DEN vs. StephenMax:
------SR---SM
3500 150--150
4000 180--180
4500 218--215
5000 240--250
5500 250--280
6000 260--330
6500 265--350
No offense taken but this discussion is about a 10psi basic bolt on Maxima not a 14psi header equipped Maxima. Find me a 10psi SC’ed Max that makes 350whp with my mods and then we can compare. The initial discussion started with a 7psi SC’ed car but I threw mine at 10psi to compare since that number came up in a previous thread.

BTW my setup was 3.125 pulley, s-trim, JWT ECU, MEVI, 3" full exhaust and other minor stuff. Can't really go too much higher than that unless you add headers and 00VI.
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 07:34 PM
  #9  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Am i supposed to see a dyno sheet here? Because I don't...
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 11:35 PM
  #10  
h2kFrosty's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 920
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
Am i supposed to see a dyno sheet here? Because I don't...
Dyno pic works for me. Once again nice numbers Matt, really damn impressive, your car is sleeper as hell too, I love it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
05RLS2
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
5
Nov 7, 2016 05:52 PM
Ben2003GLE
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
31
Jul 17, 2016 08:13 AM
Redfox
New Member Introductions
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:41 AM
umnitza
Group Deals / Sponsors Forum
0
Sep 1, 2015 01:03 PM
MaximaDrvr
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
16
Aug 19, 2015 08:20 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:40 PM.