Supercharged/Turbocharged The increase in air/fuel pressure above atmospheric pressure in the intake system caused by the action of a supercharger or turbocharger attached to an engine.

rough 3" or stock 2.5" charge pipe?

Old May 3, 2010 | 10:55 AM
  #1  
EsQueue's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 411
rough 3" or stock 2.5" charge pipe?

Hello, my current sc charge pipe has a 3" diameter but the rough edges are bound to cause alot of turbulence. I have a 2.5" stillen charge pipe that I wanted to install. It looks much cleaner, 1 piece so more laminar flow.

Would I see a performance loss? Wouldn't all that turbulance negate the gains or a larger diameter?

The setup is the black 90 with ridges, Bov section, coupling, long pipe piece, 45° rubber coupling, 45° pipe, coupling then maf adapter. That will be reduced to a silicone 90° connected to a stillen pipe.


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Old May 3, 2010 | 06:05 PM
  #2  
Quickywd01's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,078
From: NorthernNJ
How are you getting away with using a rubber coupler? Low boost?
Old May 3, 2010 | 06:07 PM
  #3  
JeEvE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,673
What do you mean by rough edges exactly?
Old May 3, 2010 | 07:36 PM
  #4  
The Wizard's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 16,718
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by JeEvE
What do you mean by rough edges exactly?
+1

Originally Posted by EsQueue
Hello, my current sc charge pipe has a 3" diameter but the rough edges are bound to cause alot of turbulence. I have a 2.5" stillen charge pipe that I wanted to install. It looks much cleaner, 1 piece so more laminar flow.

Would I see a performance loss? Wouldn't all that turbulance negate the gains or a larger diameter?

The setup is the black 90 with ridges, Bov section, coupling, long pipe piece, 45° rubber coupling, 45° pipe, coupling then maf adapter. That will be reduced to a silicone 90° connected to a stillen pipe.


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
If you're refering to the rubber coupler next to the BOV, and assuming it's "stepped" on the inside like it is on the outside, then yes, that is very bad and will cause turbulence.

FWIW, the inside of pipes should be as smooth as possible, rubber couplers should be kept to a minimum, avoid kinks and sharp angles, avoid tight radii, and transitions from big to small or visa versa should be kept to a minimum as well.

As for 3" vs 2.5", I'll address that a little bit later. Gotta run.
Old May 3, 2010 | 09:25 PM
  #5  
EsQueue's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 411
Originally Posted by JeEvE
What do you mean by rough edges exactly?
With the couplings in place, the inside where they all meet is far from smooth. Lots of areas that will cause lots of turbulence.
Old May 5, 2010 | 12:10 AM
  #6  
The Wizard's Avatar
Administrator
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 16,718
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by EsQueue
With the couplings in place, the inside where they all meet is far from smooth. Lots of areas that will cause lots of turbulence.
I suggest to do whatever you can to make it as smooth as possible. Got pics?
Old May 5, 2010 | 07:38 AM
  #7  
buttonhook's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 736
From: east tennessee
[quote=The Wizard;7543471
As for 3" vs 2.5", I'll address that a little bit later. Gotta run.[/quote]



And the answer is? Pros vs cons of each as you see it please.
Old May 5, 2010 | 04:29 PM
  #8  
EsQueue's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 411
Sorry, I don't have any pics yet. Thanks though.

Originally Posted by buttonhook
And the answer is? Pros vs cons of each as you see it please.
I'll order the parts needed to convert back to 2.5 (Blitz BOV and 2.5" to 2.75" silicone 90° ell) and tell you the results from the *** dyno. From the looks of the inside of my installed pipes, I will not loose a thing but gain space and a cleaner compartment.

Last edited by EsQueue; May 5, 2010 at 04:32 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DJLAX152
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
3
May 4, 2021 11:46 AM
BkGreen97
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
2
Apr 2, 2016 05:47 AM
ballerchris510
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
9
Sep 10, 2015 09:35 PM
Violator
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
1
Sep 9, 2015 10:14 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:50 AM.