Engine 300hp
Engine 300hp
What do you guys think about this:
http://www.hekimianracing.com/nissan3lna.html
Check it out and tell me if it's an engine that would work on our Maxima. I e-mailed the website so I let you know what they tell me when they e-mail me back.
http://www.hekimianracing.com/nissan3lna.html
Check it out and tell me if it's an engine that would work on our Maxima. I e-mailed the website so I let you know what they tell me when they e-mail me back.
Dear Jesus, it would be nice to have a spare $8k lying around... I can only imagine the bulging eyes and dropped jaws were my GXE to leave a few confused people looking at tailights...
Originally posted by DA-MAX
VERY old news, but and yes it will work if you have a VG Maxima.
VERY old news, but and yes it will work if you have a VG Maxima.
IMO...that motor will never be worth the price to swap into a Max! a turbo setup would probably be cheaper and make more power. a decent turbo setup and low CR motor rebuild w/ a set of nice aggressive cams would probably cost less or almost the same and make gobs more power off the break!
Originally posted by Bouncer
Dear Jesus, it would be nice to have a spare $8k lying around... I can only imagine the bulging eyes and dropped jaws were my GXE to leave a few confused people looking at tailights...
Dear Jesus, it would be nice to have a spare $8k lying around... I can only imagine the bulging eyes and dropped jaws were my GXE to leave a few confused people looking at tailights...
Engine 300HP
How much do you guys think i'd be looking at to rebuild the VE with cams, lower compression, wider pistons and the general internals? Would it be worth it? Imagine putting $8000 into the VE? That would be awesome!
You guys gotta put this all into perspective. Sure it would be cool to have a 300+ hourse power maxima but dumping more money into a car then its actual worth is not a good idea unless you have money to throw around or perhaps have your own printing press. Just look at the classifieds and you will see a lot of people trying to get back out of their car the money they pored into it.
Think about it this way buy a maxima for 4000 grand and dump 2000 into it and you might be able to get your money back out if you baby your ride.
If you dump 4000 grand into the car then you probably plan on keeping it for years anyway. So you will recoup on your investment with time spent driving and the years of service the car provides. You most likely will not be able to sell your ride for 8000 unless it is show quality.
Dump 8000 into a 4000 dollar car and you will be wishing you had spent that money on a 300zx TT or something else. You will never be able to sell the car for 12 grand unless you find some little rich boy that doesn't want to work on his own ride. On top of that you will probably be trailering your ride everywhere because your so worried about it so you will never get your money back out by using it as a dailey driver.
Think about it this way buy a maxima for 4000 grand and dump 2000 into it and you might be able to get your money back out if you baby your ride.
If you dump 4000 grand into the car then you probably plan on keeping it for years anyway. So you will recoup on your investment with time spent driving and the years of service the car provides. You most likely will not be able to sell your ride for 8000 unless it is show quality.
Dump 8000 into a 4000 dollar car and you will be wishing you had spent that money on a 300zx TT or something else. You will never be able to sell the car for 12 grand unless you find some little rich boy that doesn't want to work on his own ride. On top of that you will probably be trailering your ride everywhere because your so worried about it so you will never get your money back out by using it as a dailey driver.
#1 who says you plan to sell the car later? if its paid off and you've dumped crazy cash into it, keep the SOB!!
#2 modding out a Maxima is far more unique than a Z or something to that nature
#3 the whole purpose of modification is to take something regular and make it better...of course its up to you on how far you go, but if we didn't do that this import culture would be dull and boring.
#2 modding out a Maxima is far more unique than a Z or something to that nature
#3 the whole purpose of modification is to take something regular and make it better...of course its up to you on how far you go, but if we didn't do that this import culture would be dull and boring.
Originally posted by adamis
You guys gotta put this all into perspective. Sure it would be cool to have a 300+ hourse power maxima but dumping more money into a car then its actual worth is not a good idea unless you have money to throw around or perhaps have your own printing press. Just look at the classifieds and you will see a lot of people trying to get back out of their car the money they pored into it.
Think about it this way buy a maxima for 4000 grand and dump 2000 into it and you might be able to get your money back out if you baby your ride.
If you dump 4000 grand into the car then you probably plan on keeping it for years anyway. So you will recoup on your investment with time spent driving and the years of service the car provides. You most likely will not be able to sell your ride for 8000 unless it is show quality.
Dump 8000 into a 4000 dollar car and you will be wishing you had spent that money on a 300zx TT or something else. You will never be able to sell the car for 12 grand unless you find some little rich boy that doesn't want to work on his own ride.
You guys gotta put this all into perspective. Sure it would be cool to have a 300+ hourse power maxima but dumping more money into a car then its actual worth is not a good idea unless you have money to throw around or perhaps have your own printing press. Just look at the classifieds and you will see a lot of people trying to get back out of their car the money they pored into it.
Think about it this way buy a maxima for 4000 grand and dump 2000 into it and you might be able to get your money back out if you baby your ride.
If you dump 4000 grand into the car then you probably plan on keeping it for years anyway. So you will recoup on your investment with time spent driving and the years of service the car provides. You most likely will not be able to sell your ride for 8000 unless it is show quality.
Dump 8000 into a 4000 dollar car and you will be wishing you had spent that money on a 300zx TT or something else. You will never be able to sell the car for 12 grand unless you find some little rich boy that doesn't want to work on his own ride.
exactly i plan on keeping my max for a very very long time i might buy other cars to but not get rid of the max till the goverment bans the use of gasoline which will be awile, so i dont mind dumping gobbes of cash into it but its piontless to spend 8k on 300hp when theres a 4th gen guy pushing 430hp with 12lb a turbo boost on stock motor and trany, although i dont believe it will last long and he proboly didnt dump over 5k in it
high compression engines are generally less reliable because of the high strain on the internal. a turbo engine is a little better because not only does it have low compression you can keep out of the boost or turn it down and make your engine last a little longer.
Re: Engine 300hp
Originally posted by hector9383
What do you guys think about this:
http://www.hekimianracing.com/nissan3lna.html
Check it out and tell me if it's an engine that would work on our Maxima. I e-mailed the website so I let you know what they tell me when they e-mail me back.
What do you guys think about this:
http://www.hekimianracing.com/nissan3lna.html
Check it out and tell me if it's an engine that would work on our Maxima. I e-mailed the website so I let you know what they tell me when they e-mail me back.
WTH are you talking about. You just went on the list in OT
Originally posted by mtcookson
high compression engines are generally less reliable because of the high strain on the internal. a turbo engine is a little better because not only does it have low compression you can keep out of the boost or turn it down and make your engine last a little longer.
high compression engines are generally less reliable because of the high strain on the internal. a turbo engine is a little better because not only does it have low compression you can keep out of the boost or turn it down and make your engine last a little longer.
what compression is it at? The damn this is BUILT for high compression idiot.
I guess all those Type Rs and M3 engines are all just about to fall apart right now
I guess all those Type Rs and M3 engines are all just about to fall apart right now

Originally posted by mtcookson
uh... yes it will. high compression puts more strain on the engine's internals. turbo does too but you aren't constantly running boost making it a little more reliable.
uh... yes it will. high compression puts more strain on the engine's internals. turbo does too but you aren't constantly running boost making it a little more reliable.
Originally posted by mtcookson
uh... yes it will. high compression puts more strain on the engine's internals. turbo does too but you aren't constantly running boost making it a little more reliable.
uh... yes it will. high compression puts more strain on the engine's internals. turbo does too but you aren't constantly running boost making it a little more reliable.
3 liter v6 at 300 hp normally aspirated is probably running at 12:1-14:1 and i'm sure it's at 14:1. lets put it this way... you build the engines the exact same way but on one you run high compression normally aspirated and on the other you run low compression with a turbo. the turbo engine will generally last longer because there is less constant strain on the internals.
Originally posted by adamis
Just look at the classifieds and you will see a lot of people trying to get back out of their car the money they pored into it.
Just look at the classifieds and you will see a lot of people trying to get back out of their car the money they pored into it.
Where are getting this info? 14:1 really? And what type of gas is this person going to run??
You really have no idea how an engine works do you?
What ever engine is driven easier/built better/or is maintained better is gonna last longer. Again idiotic thinking
You really have no idea how an engine works do you?
What ever engine is driven easier/built better/or is maintained better is gonna last longer. Again idiotic thinking
Originally posted by mtcookson
3 liter v6 at 300 hp normally aspirated is probably running at 12:1-14:1 and i'm sure it's at 14:1. lets put it this way... you build the engines the exact same way but on one you run high compression normally aspirated and on the other you run low compression with a turbo. the turbo engine will generally last longer because there is less constant strain on the internals.
3 liter v6 at 300 hp normally aspirated is probably running at 12:1-14:1 and i'm sure it's at 14:1. lets put it this way... you build the engines the exact same way but on one you run high compression normally aspirated and on the other you run low compression with a turbo. the turbo engine will generally last longer because there is less constant strain on the internals.
I am talking about the Hekimian Nissan engine, you know? Hekimian makes racing engines. The engine is built for racing so they are generally going to run high octane gas. If you have ever looked into muscle car performance and seen the guys that run high horse power normally aspirated engines you'll see that they run very high compression. Hekimian is getting 100 hp per liter out of this 3 liter normally aspirated vg30e engine... they are going to have to have really high compression to do that.
Oh so I see now. So since people with RACING engines usually RACE with their RACING ENGINES, who in the hell is gonna NOT FRIGGEN' boost a comparable RACING ENGINE w/ a turbo??
So please explain the logic in turning DOWN the boost in RACE engine when you want to WIN a RACE with my RACING ENGINE?
And since RACING engines are rebuilt after xxxx races, who gives a crap about which type of motor is THEORICALLY gonna last longer?? Hmmmm "well I was friggen' dead LAST in the race but I bet my engine is gonna outlast the winner's engine!!!!" LOL!!!
So please explain the logic in turning DOWN the boost in RACE engine when you want to WIN a RACE with my RACING ENGINE?

And since RACING engines are rebuilt after xxxx races, who gives a crap about which type of motor is THEORICALLY gonna last longer?? Hmmmm "well I was friggen' dead LAST in the race but I bet my engine is gonna outlast the winner's engine!!!!" LOL!!!
Originally posted by mtcookson
I am talking about the Hekimian Nissan engine, you know? Hekimian makes racing engines. The engine is built for racing so they are generally going to run high octane gas. If you have ever looked into muscle car performance and seen the guys that run high horse power normally aspirated engines you'll see that they run very high compression. Hekimian is getting 100 hp per liter out of this 3 liter normally aspirated vg30e engine... they are going to have to have really high compression to do that.
I am talking about the Hekimian Nissan engine, you know? Hekimian makes racing engines. The engine is built for racing so they are generally going to run high octane gas. If you have ever looked into muscle car performance and seen the guys that run high horse power normally aspirated engines you'll see that they run very high compression. Hekimian is getting 100 hp per liter out of this 3 liter normally aspirated vg30e engine... they are going to have to have really high compression to do that.
who said you turn down the boost? there's this thing called turbo lag. you don't have boost until you are higher in the rpm range meaning you don't have as much constant strain on the engine as you do with the high compression engine. the reason why i brought this up about it being less reliable is because it sounds like people want to use this engine on the street.
Ah, when you RACE, you are beating the engine all the TIME. Since they want to stay in the upper ranges of rev range THEY DON'T WANT TO BE IN THE LAG PORTION OF THE POWERBAND. KINDA HARD TO WIN RACES THAT WAY.
Again, IF this motor has 14:1 compression DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MUCH IT WOULD COST TO RUN THE ENGINE EVERY WEEK IF YOU HAD TO BUY THAT MUCH RACE GAS OR OCTANE BOOSTER TO KEEP IT FROM DETONATING?
Again, IF this motor has 14:1 compression DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MUCH IT WOULD COST TO RUN THE ENGINE EVERY WEEK IF YOU HAD TO BUY THAT MUCH RACE GAS OR OCTANE BOOSTER TO KEEP IT FROM DETONATING?
Originally posted by mtcookson
who said you turn down the boost? there's this thing called turbo lag. you don't have boost until you are higher in the rpm range meaning you don't have as much constant strain on the engine as you do with the high compression engine. the reason why i brought this up about it being less reliable is being it sounds like people want to use this engine on the street.
who said you turn down the boost? there's this thing called turbo lag. you don't have boost until you are higher in the rpm range meaning you don't have as much constant strain on the engine as you do with the high compression engine. the reason why i brought this up about it being less reliable is being it sounds like people want to use this engine on the street.
you get the turbo engine up into the racing rpms but on the way up you have the turbo lag, not much strain on the engine until you get into the boost. high compression engine when revving has constant strain in the whole rom range.
i know it would cost a lot to run from the high octane gas, that's why it wouldn't be smart to run on the street.
shouldn't this thread have gotten locked by now?
i know it would cost a lot to run from the high octane gas, that's why it wouldn't be smart to run on the street.
shouldn't this thread have gotten locked by now?
Oh yeah "on the way up" Ooooooookaayyyy. You do know that serious turbo race engines run ball bearing high effiency turbos right? What lag are you talking about. If there was enough lag, they would be losing races. If you drive easy, an high compression engine doesn't put any more strain than any other engine. Geez again, no sense, logic or knowledge.
Not to mention that Rally cars run anti-lag devices in their engines TO PREVENT LAG. Weerd
Not to mention that Rally cars run anti-lag devices in their engines TO PREVENT LAG. Weerd
Originally posted by mtcookson
you get the turbo engine up into the racing rpms but on the way up you have the turbo lag, not much strain on the engine until you get into the boost. high compression engine when revving has constant strain in the whole rom range.
i know it would cost a lot to run from the high octane gas, that's why it wouldn't be smart to run on the street.
you get the turbo engine up into the racing rpms but on the way up you have the turbo lag, not much strain on the engine until you get into the boost. high compression engine when revving has constant strain in the whole rom range.
i know it would cost a lot to run from the high octane gas, that's why it wouldn't be smart to run on the street.
Originally posted by Jeff92se
Again, IF this motor has 14:1 compression DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MUCH IT WOULD COST TO RUN THE ENGINE EVERY WEEK IF YOU HAD TO BUY THAT MUCH RACE GAS OR OCTANE BOOSTER TO KEEP IT FROM DETONATING?
Again, IF this motor has 14:1 compression DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MUCH IT WOULD COST TO RUN THE ENGINE EVERY WEEK IF YOU HAD TO BUY THAT MUCH RACE GAS OR OCTANE BOOSTER TO KEEP IT FROM DETONATING?
newbie
i would hope they run anti-lag devices on rally cars, most of them are tiny 4 cylinder engines. even with the ball bearing high efficiency turbos there is still lag. if someone wants boost but no lag, get a supercharger. turbos still do better than s/c's though.
And just what does this have ANYTHING to do with ANYTHING we are talking about?
Originally posted by mtcookson
i would hope they run anti-lag devices on rally cars, most of them are tiny 4 cylinder engines. even with the ball bearing high efficiency turbos there is still lag.
i would hope they run anti-lag devices on rally cars, most of them are tiny 4 cylinder engines. even with the ball bearing high efficiency turbos there is still lag.
BUT BUT BUT, if these rally cars have anti-lag devices how come they aren't blowing up after two miles????? 
Oh must be the lag 

Oh must be the lag 
Originally posted by mtcookson
you started it. you were talking about anti-lag devices on rally cars and high efficiency turbos
you started it. you were talking about anti-lag devices on rally cars and high efficiency turbos
how much do you really know about rally cars? did you know that the FIA requires them to put on turbo restrictors which increases lag? the point of the anti-lag device is only for after they have started to moving. oh and while we are talking about reliabilty yes, anti lag devices can do a lot of harm. if you were to setup one of these anti-lag devices on a street car you would destroy the exhaust system within 30 to 60 miles.
And that's to save the engines??
hardly.
Did you know that putting sugar on fries is really icky?
hardly. Did you know that putting sugar on fries is really icky?
Originally posted by mtcookson
how much do you really know about rally cars? did you know that the FIA requires them to put on turbo restrictors which increases lag? the point of the anti-lag device is only for after they have started to moving. oh and while we are talking about reliabilty yes, anti lag devices can do a lot of harm. if you were to setup one of these anti-lag devices on a street car you would destroy the exhaust system within 30 to 60 miles.
how much do you really know about rally cars? did you know that the FIA requires them to put on turbo restrictors which increases lag? the point of the anti-lag device is only for after they have started to moving. oh and while we are talking about reliabilty yes, anti lag devices can do a lot of harm. if you were to setup one of these anti-lag devices on a street car you would destroy the exhaust system within 30 to 60 miles.




on you 