3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994) Learn more about the 3rd Generation Maxima here.

Oil filter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 04:17 PM
  #1  
america8371's Avatar
Thread Starter
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 98
Oil filter

Ok, i dont now if anyone else has heard this. But i had a Fram (oil filter company) representative tell me that if an oil filter is changed every other oil change that its accually better for the car, although the company will never publicly admit it (for obvious reasons). I think its complete bull****, although it did come from a representative. What do you all think?
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 04:37 PM
  #2  
Matt93SE's Avatar
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 18,087
From: Houston
I think you need to go read the fluids and lubricants forum......

and shoot that idiot in the head.
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 04:40 PM
  #3  
america8371's Avatar
Thread Starter
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 98
i agree..........but i dont need to read that forum cus i didnt believe him, besides, im in school for automotive
Old Dec 6, 2004 | 05:19 PM
  #4  
Matt93SE's Avatar
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 18,087
From: Houston
Just because you're in school for "automotive" doesn't mean you can't learn.
I have Nissan master techs call me weekly asking about 3rd gen problems... and you'd think I would be learning from them!
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 06:46 PM
  #5  
america8371's Avatar
Thread Starter
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 98
i can always learn something even though im in school, im just trying say that i know very well that a filter has to be changed every time. its that i was told something else and wondered if anyone has heard that before
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 07:07 PM
  #6  
internetautomar's Avatar
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,760
From: Skokie (look it up)
actually I've heard the opposite.
change your filter twice as often as the oil itself
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 08:18 PM
  #7  
longjuanfeng's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 88
From: San Jose, CA
Schedule 2 in the FSM for our cars has you replacing the filter every OTHER oil change. I think you'd have to be an idiot to not replace the filter while you're down there changing the oil.
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 08:35 PM
  #8  
pete944/max's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 62
Fram is crap anyway.
Old Dec 7, 2004 | 09:05 PM
  #9  
PulsarDriver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 224
Word. Fram and Autolite can eat my taint.

My Max gets Nippon filters.
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 08:16 AM
  #10  
Loe max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,269
From: sarasota FL
Originally Posted by internetautomar
actually I've heard the opposite.
change your filter twice as often as the oil itself
From what I read in the Fluid section, certain oils can last a good deal if the filter is changed at a certain time, you'll just have to fill up the oil that you lost when changing the filter.

I don't follow that rule though, as I change mine every 5,000miles oil/filter
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 09:42 AM
  #11  
white90se's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 391
alot of companies are sayin you dont need to change your oil at 3,000 miles...they want you to do it every 5,000-7,000 miles
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 09:49 AM
  #12  
Greeny's Avatar
¯\(°_o)/¯
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 64,424
From: Tunasea
Originally Posted by white90se
alot of companies are sayin you dont need to change your oil at 3,000 miles...they want you to do it every 5,000-7,000 miles

Of coures they do. That way your cars engine will wear out faster= You buying cars more often...
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 11:10 AM
  #13  
internetautomar's Avatar
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,760
From: Skokie (look it up)
Originally Posted by pennzoil
It's cheaper to change your oil than your engine
10char friggin rule
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 03:05 PM
  #14  
Creedence85's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 189
Having hte car wear out faster has nothing to do with it at all. Since most of our cars were built, the refining process of crude oil has increased dramatically and the resulting engine oils are much better. It's the better oils which are why manufacturers are recommending the 3000mi oil change can be pushed to 5000-7000mi, not the fact they want the cars to wear out faster. If they wanted cars to wear out, they just make crappier cars. Since when has a crappier product helped a manufacturer? All of the top selling cars out there generally have good reliability and build quality.
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 03:21 PM
  #15  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
I disagree 100%. Quality of oils has not gone up greatly. It's the quality of the ENGINES that have gone up greatly. Greatly improved engine design, greatly reduced blowby, more efficent head design all leads to greatly reduced oil contamination. thus longer change intervals.

Originally Posted by Creedence85
Having hte car wear out faster has nothing to do with it at all. Since most of our cars were built, the refining process of crude oil has increased dramatically and the resulting engine oils are much better. It's the better oils which are why manufacturers are recommending the 3000mi oil change can be pushed to 5000-7000mi, not the fact they want the cars to wear out faster. If they wanted cars to wear out, they just make crappier cars. Since when has a crappier product helped a manufacturer? All of the top selling cars out there generally have good reliability and build quality.
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 05:56 PM
  #16  
internetautomar's Avatar
mod or sell?
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 19,760
From: Skokie (look it up)
just to add fuel to a fire.
there has been released an updated spec for the oil, so oil prices will be going up some more as the new spec is more widely implemented.
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 06:00 PM
  #17  
blacks92seAuto
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I use WIX oil filter # 51394, its what cross refrenced with the yota filter. and I think it works great, puny little fukcer tho
Old Dec 8, 2004 | 09:47 PM
  #18  
Bman's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,940
Originally Posted by Creedence85
Having hte car wear out faster has nothing to do with it at all. Since most of our cars were built, the refining process of crude oil has increased dramatically and the resulting engine oils are much better. It's the better oils which are why manufacturers are recommending the 3000mi oil change can be pushed to 5000-7000mi, not the fact they want the cars to wear out faster. If they wanted cars to wear out, they just make crappier cars. Since when has a crappier product helped a manufacturer? All of the top selling cars out there generally have good reliability and build quality.
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
I disagree 100%. Quality of oils has not gone up greatly. It's the quality of the ENGINES that have gone up greatly. Greatly improved engine design, greatly reduced blowby, more efficent head design all leads to greatly reduced oil contamination. thus longer change intervals.
IMO it's BOTH factors. Oil specifications are getting tighter and more is being demanded of oils, particularly synthetics. Conventional oils are being made out of better base stocks and have better additive packages to meet these specs. Some are being made out of base stocks that are getting closer to the level of synthetic base stocks.

At the same time, engines are getting cleaner and made to tighter tolerances, which is easier on oil. Many newer cars like my parents' new Mazda don't even specify a break-in period or tell you to change the oil within a few hundred miles anymore. Combine a carefully constructed engine with durable synthetic oil, and you get those crazy sounding 10,000 mile oil change intervals some cars specify now.... mind you some of those particular cars have fairly high oil capacities.
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 04:03 PM
  #19  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
Think about this. Compare oil quality from 1985 to 1995. Now compare Nissan's 3.0 V6 from 1985 to 1995. Which do you think has advanced more?

Originally Posted by Bman
IMO it's BOTH factors. Oil specifications are getting tighter and more is being demanded of oils, particularly synthetics. Conventional oils are being made out of better base stocks and have better additive packages to meet these specs. Some are being made out of base stocks that are getting closer to the level of synthetic base stocks.

At the same time, engines are getting cleaner and made to tighter tolerances, which is easier on oil. Many newer cars like my parents' new Mazda don't even specify a break-in period or tell you to change the oil within a few hundred miles anymore. Combine a carefully constructed engine with durable synthetic oil, and you get those crazy sounding 10,000 mile oil change intervals some cars specify now.... mind you some of those particular cars have fairly high oil capacities.
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 04:06 PM
  #20  
95turbo gxe's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,385
From: oburg S.C.
Just some new cat on the job with his 2 cents
Old Dec 9, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #21  
Minty91GXE's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 597
'representative' is just a fancy title for bull****ter, certainly not a indication of technical knowledge/experience.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
my03maxima
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
9
Jul 28, 2024 07:40 AM
mclasser
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
22
Nov 12, 2020 01:58 PM
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
Jun 6, 2017 02:01 PM
05RLS2
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
4
Apr 14, 2016 11:49 AM
Justin Kroll
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
3
Oct 1, 2015 07:03 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 AM.