3.5 Pics
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by JClaw
...When my car was stock last year, I could hang with stock WRX's on the highway, so I assume STI's won't be far off with the 3.5 and all those mods.
I also know from personal experience. I have test drove both. Also, as you have mentioned, the STI runs 13.2 1/4 mile, which is VERY fast for a stock AWD.
Regular WRX is a slow POS, often running mid to high 14's in its stock form. I raced a stock black WRX recently at the drag strip. 20+ other people from here were there. Actually, it was my very first run. I ran a 15.2 and finished some 2 carlengths ahead.
Yes, I realize the driver of the WRX must have sucked a little. But unless you know how to launch it well (it's very tricky with these AWD turbo), your time will suck too. Now....I have yet to see even the worst driver hit anything over 14 in an STI.
My point? - saying STi > WRX is similar to 10 > 5
Originally Posted by Armani
I know this is kind of off topic, but your assumptions are way off. People should not compare STIs and regular WRXs. There's a reason why one is STI and the other is not. By all means, the difference is night and day. You would know if you test drove both. I can also guarantee you that with an STi you would NOT hang, at all. In fact, it would completely destroy you.
I also know from personal experience. I have test drove both. Also, as you have mentioned, the STI runs 13.2 1/4 mile, which is VERY fast for a stock AWD.
Regular WRX is a slow POS, often running mid to high 14's in its stock form. I raced a stock black WRX recently at the drag strip. 20+ other people from here were there. Actually, it was my very first run. I ran a 15.2 and finished some 2 carlengths ahead.
Yes, I realize the driver of the WRX must have sucked a little. But unless you know how to launch it well (it's very tricky with these AWD turbo), your time will suck too. Now....I have yet to see even the worst driver hit anything over 14 in an STI.
My point? - saying STi > WRX is similar to 10 > 5
I also know from personal experience. I have test drove both. Also, as you have mentioned, the STI runs 13.2 1/4 mile, which is VERY fast for a stock AWD.
Regular WRX is a slow POS, often running mid to high 14's in its stock form. I raced a stock black WRX recently at the drag strip. 20+ other people from here were there. Actually, it was my very first run. I ran a 15.2 and finished some 2 carlengths ahead.
Yes, I realize the driver of the WRX must have sucked a little. But unless you know how to launch it well (it's very tricky with these AWD turbo), your time will suck too. Now....I have yet to see even the worst driver hit anything over 14 in an STI.
My point? - saying STi > WRX is similar to 10 > 5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
Were you at the GLD meet? The STI there nailed a perfect 14.7

Damn........that's a pretty massive looking IM! Never seen a 3.5 in a 4th gen engine bay before. Is it just me or is that engine almost right up against the radiator cooling fan? Overall.........I envy you.
WOO HOOO!!!!!!!!!!!! ITS RUNNING!!!!
I started the car today, it took a few cranks, but it fired right up without a problem.
I started it without the y-pipe on, and although it sounds insanely sweet, it was smoking a little. The engine probly hasnt been turned on for quite a while, but I hope it goes away.
Now I have to put everything back together, and start it up for a 2nd time.. Wish me luck!!!!!!
I started the car today, it took a few cranks, but it fired right up without a problem.
I started it without the y-pipe on, and although it sounds insanely sweet, it was smoking a little. The engine probly hasnt been turned on for quite a while, but I hope it goes away.
Now I have to put everything back together, and start it up for a 2nd time.. Wish me luck!!!!!!
Originally Posted by Armani
I know this is kind of off topic, but your assumptions are way off. People should not compare STIs and regular WRXs. There's a reason why one is STI and the other is not. By all means, the difference is night and day. You would know if you test drove both. I can also guarantee you that with an STi you would NOT hang, at all. In fact, it would completely destroy you.
I also know from personal experience. I have test drove both. Also, as you have mentioned, the STI runs 13.2 1/4 mile, which is VERY fast for a stock AWD.
Regular WRX is a slow POS, often running mid to high 14's in its stock form. I raced a stock black WRX recently at the drag strip. 20+ other people from here were there. Actually, it was my very first run. I ran a 15.2 and finished some 2 carlengths ahead.
Yes, I realize the driver of the WRX must have sucked a little. But unless you know how to launch it well (it's very tricky with these AWD turbo), your time will suck too. Now....I have yet to see even the worst driver hit anything over 14 in an STI.
My point? - saying STi > WRX is similar to 10 > 5
I also know from personal experience. I have test drove both. Also, as you have mentioned, the STI runs 13.2 1/4 mile, which is VERY fast for a stock AWD.
Regular WRX is a slow POS, often running mid to high 14's in its stock form. I raced a stock black WRX recently at the drag strip. 20+ other people from here were there. Actually, it was my very first run. I ran a 15.2 and finished some 2 carlengths ahead.
Yes, I realize the driver of the WRX must have sucked a little. But unless you know how to launch it well (it's very tricky with these AWD turbo), your time will suck too. Now....I have yet to see even the worst driver hit anything over 14 in an STI.
My point? - saying STi > WRX is similar to 10 > 5
Last year: Stock 1995 SE 5-speed, with a limping Knock Sensor.
Now: 1995 5-speed with a VQ35DE, new Knock Sensor, O2 sensors, Cattman headers, cat, catback, PR motor mounds and CAI, Underdrive Pulley, A/C bypassed, Power Steering bypassed (will be electric) and 100 lbs weight reduction. I call that "night and day" too but whatever...
Originally Posted by Armani
I know this is kind of off topic, but your assumptions are way off. People should not compare STIs and regular WRXs. There's a reason why one is STI and the other is not. By all means, the difference is night and day. You would know if you test drove both. I can also guarantee you that with an STi you would NOT hang, at all. In fact, it would completely destroy you.
PS: Congrats on getting it working, Nismo...
Originally Posted by JClaw
I KNOW the difference between a WRX and a STI is night an day, but so is the difference between my car last year and now.
Last year: Stock 1995 SE 5-speed, with a limping Knock Sensor.
Now: 1995 5-speed with a VQ35DE, new Knock Sensor, O2 sensors, Cattman headers, cat, catback, PR motor mounds and CAI, Underdrive Pulley, A/C bypassed, Power Steering bypassed (will be electric) and 100 lbs weight reduction. I call that "night and day" too but whatever...
PS: Congrats on getting it working, Nismo...
Last year: Stock 1995 SE 5-speed, with a limping Knock Sensor.
Now: 1995 5-speed with a VQ35DE, new Knock Sensor, O2 sensors, Cattman headers, cat, catback, PR motor mounds and CAI, Underdrive Pulley, A/C bypassed, Power Steering bypassed (will be electric) and 100 lbs weight reduction. I call that "night and day" too but whatever...
PS: Congrats on getting it working, Nismo...
So we are talking at least 255hp on a ~2900 pound car?! That sounds wonderful. And yes, congrats to Nismo!
Dunno... but I'm considering getting an OBDI conversion done soon... (300zx ecu) very very tunable so we'll see what that yields. EGR is history, too.
Nismo, did you use a vacum pipe like Tilley? From the section between the TB and the MAF to the valve input on the other side of the intake manifold? Like this:
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=364779&page=1 (scroll towards the bottom of the page)
Then again, I think that part bolted is from the 1995 manifold. I kept the 2002 manifold plate that goes there, because I'm not using EGR (because of the upcoming OBDI converison).
Nismo, did you use a vacum pipe like Tilley? From the section between the TB and the MAF to the valve input on the other side of the intake manifold? Like this:
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=364779&page=1 (scroll towards the bottom of the page)
Then again, I think that part bolted is from the 1995 manifold. I kept the 2002 manifold plate that goes there, because I'm not using EGR (because of the upcoming OBDI converison).
Originally Posted by JClaw
Nismo, did you use a vacum pipe like Tilley? From the section between the TB and the MAF to the valve input on the other side of the intake manifold? Like this:
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=364779&page=1 (scroll towards the bottom of the page)
http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=364779&page=1 (scroll towards the bottom of the page)
Originally Posted by Nismo3112

Great work none the less
Looking at the 2k2 intake manifold, I don't know where we could possibly attach the throttle cable bracket. 
Also one thing:

Is that for the EGR? I did not reuse that. Do you know what kind of issue it could cause? Since I am getting the OBDI conversion done in a few weeks, I guess the lack of EGR won't affect gas mileage, right?

Also one thing:

Is that for the EGR? I did not reuse that. Do you know what kind of issue it could cause? Since I am getting the OBDI conversion done in a few weeks, I guess the lack of EGR won't affect gas mileage, right?
Originally Posted by JClaw
Looking at the 2k2 intake manifold, I don't know where we could possibly attach the throttle cable bracket. 
Also one thing:

Is that for the EGR? I did not reuse that. Do you know what kind of issue it could cause? Since I am getting the OBDI conversion done in a few weeks, I guess the lack of EGR won't affect gas mileage, right?

Also one thing:

Is that for the EGR? I did not reuse that. Do you know what kind of issue it could cause? Since I am getting the OBDI conversion done in a few weeks, I guess the lack of EGR won't affect gas mileage, right?
I am going to make a bracket so the throttle cable is secured to the engine.
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
That is the IACV valve, it controls the idle, adds idle for extra load such as PS, A/C... I removed my EGR back when I had the 3.0, no driving probs.
Originally Posted by JClaw
Ok. I have no PS or A/C. I only have an UDP with a short alternator belt, that's it. So I could do without it, right?
Originally Posted by evil_spork
how much does a swap cost.. in the end. assuming i have ZERO car skills so it would have to be done by a shop.
How did that affect your emissions? Are you still passing the smog test? What did you do with the CEL light as this should stay on in your case? I know I fail the visual test when the CEL light on my car was lit because of the EGR solenoid control valve being out.
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
... I removed my EGR back when I had the 3.0, no driving probs.
Wow....that's really cool! As for the CEL due to removed EGR, is that a FED spec thing? Mine is a Cali spec which probably explains why I get the CEL.
Originally Posted by THT
IA doesn't have emissions tests.
Nismo and I removed my EGR when we put the 00VI on my 96 and I don't have a CEL or any ghost codes.
Nismo and I removed my EGR when we put the 00VI on my 96 and I don't have a CEL or any ghost codes.
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
I believe it also opens when the throttle kicks down or something, so the engien doesn't choke. BTW, What size is the belt you're using? I can't seem to find it anywhere!
Nismo, Nice, very nice. Parts list and explicit write up pleeeeease??
So since you re-used the timing cover, do you think a Stillen/Vortech Supercharger would work?
Someone said that a 5 speed is required to do this swap, why is that?
Congrats.
So since you re-used the timing cover, do you think a Stillen/Vortech Supercharger would work?
Someone said that a 5 speed is required to do this swap, why is that?
Congrats.
I would try and do a writeup, but there would be many things I would forget.
Yeah it would be wise to change to a 5spd.. Extrememly easy if you have the engine out.. I think why Japmax's tranny went so soon is because it had 140k on it I believe.
A Stillen SC would definantly work.
Yeah it would be wise to change to a 5spd.. Extrememly easy if you have the engine out.. I think why Japmax's tranny went so soon is because it had 140k on it I believe.
A Stillen SC would definantly work.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BPuff57
Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking
33
Apr 16, 2020 05:15 AM
bigfrank
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:51 PM






i want!!

