4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

3.5 Pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #121  
vsamoylov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
By no means is it fun.. But the aftermath will be
not fun? maybe you are just tired of it already and wish it was done so you can
Old Apr 27, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #122  
Armani
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by JClaw
...When my car was stock last year, I could hang with stock WRX's on the highway, so I assume STI's won't be far off with the 3.5 and all those mods.
I know this is kind of off topic, but your assumptions are way off. People should not compare STIs and regular WRXs. There's a reason why one is STI and the other is not. By all means, the difference is night and day. You would know if you test drove both. I can also guarantee you that with an STi you would NOT hang, at all. In fact, it would completely destroy you.

I also know from personal experience. I have test drove both. Also, as you have mentioned, the STI runs 13.2 1/4 mile, which is VERY fast for a stock AWD.

Regular WRX is a slow POS, often running mid to high 14's in its stock form. I raced a stock black WRX recently at the drag strip. 20+ other people from here were there. Actually, it was my very first run. I ran a 15.2 and finished some 2 carlengths ahead.

Yes, I realize the driver of the WRX must have sucked a little. But unless you know how to launch it well (it's very tricky with these AWD turbo), your time will suck too. Now....I have yet to see even the worst driver hit anything over 14 in an STI.

My point? - saying STi > WRX is similar to 10 > 5
Old Apr 27, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #123  
risk's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 18
wish i had a garage like that
Old Apr 27, 2005 | 09:54 PM
  #124  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
Originally Posted by Armani
I know this is kind of off topic, but your assumptions are way off. People should not compare STIs and regular WRXs. There's a reason why one is STI and the other is not. By all means, the difference is night and day. You would know if you test drove both. I can also guarantee you that with an STi you would NOT hang, at all. In fact, it would completely destroy you.

I also know from personal experience. I have test drove both. Also, as you have mentioned, the STI runs 13.2 1/4 mile, which is VERY fast for a stock AWD.

Regular WRX is a slow POS, often running mid to high 14's in its stock form. I raced a stock black WRX recently at the drag strip. 20+ other people from here were there. Actually, it was my very first run. I ran a 15.2 and finished some 2 carlengths ahead.

Yes, I realize the driver of the WRX must have sucked a little. But unless you know how to launch it well (it's very tricky with these AWD turbo), your time will suck too. Now....I have yet to see even the worst driver hit anything over 14 in an STI.

My point? - saying STi > WRX is similar to 10 > 5
Were you at the GLD meet? The STI there nailed a perfect 14.7
Old Apr 27, 2005 | 10:36 PM
  #125  
vsamoylov
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
Were you at the GLD meet? The STI there nailed a perfect 14.7
that is slow for that car. driver must really haved sucked big time.
Old Apr 27, 2005 | 11:19 PM
  #126  
TurboMax67
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Very nice job, was fun reading this whole thread. I was considering doing this all last fall, but never broke down to do it because of the room I DONT have. Very nice once again, can't wait to hear about it in the future!
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 12:42 AM
  #127  
Armani
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
Were you at the GLD meet? The STI there nailed a perfect 14.7
I was there, but I left at 2pm and did not see a single STI, just a couple WRXs. I did however see a stock Evo running low 13s consistantly. And we all know that the two are nearly identical performers.
Old May 6, 2005 | 08:13 PM
  #128  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
With tranny bolted on, IM, TB and intake: Hopefully it will be fired up next week.




Old May 6, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #129  
DR-Max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,737
Damn........that's a pretty massive looking IM! Never seen a 3.5 in a 4th gen engine bay before. Is it just me or is that engine almost right up against the radiator cooling fan? Overall.........I envy you.
Old May 6, 2005 | 09:05 PM
  #130  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
Nah, its the same amount of space between the engine and rad fans as the 3.0.
Old May 7, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #131  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
WOO HOOO!!!!!!!!!!!! ITS RUNNING!!!!


I started the car today, it took a few cranks, but it fired right up without a problem.

I started it without the y-pipe on, and although it sounds insanely sweet, it was smoking a little. The engine probly hasnt been turned on for quite a while, but I hope it goes away.

Now I have to put everything back together, and start it up for a 2nd time.. Wish me luck!!!!!!
Old May 7, 2005 | 10:37 AM
  #132  
monty95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 266
wow..that looks like a beast....
Old May 7, 2005 | 11:06 AM
  #133  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Originally Posted by Armani
I know this is kind of off topic, but your assumptions are way off. People should not compare STIs and regular WRXs. There's a reason why one is STI and the other is not. By all means, the difference is night and day. You would know if you test drove both. I can also guarantee you that with an STi you would NOT hang, at all. In fact, it would completely destroy you.

I also know from personal experience. I have test drove both. Also, as you have mentioned, the STI runs 13.2 1/4 mile, which is VERY fast for a stock AWD.

Regular WRX is a slow POS, often running mid to high 14's in its stock form. I raced a stock black WRX recently at the drag strip. 20+ other people from here were there. Actually, it was my very first run. I ran a 15.2 and finished some 2 carlengths ahead.

Yes, I realize the driver of the WRX must have sucked a little. But unless you know how to launch it well (it's very tricky with these AWD turbo), your time will suck too. Now....I have yet to see even the worst driver hit anything over 14 in an STI.

My point? - saying STi > WRX is similar to 10 > 5
I KNOW the difference between a WRX and a STI is night an day, but so is the difference between my car last year and now.

Last year: Stock 1995 SE 5-speed, with a limping Knock Sensor.

Now: 1995 5-speed with a VQ35DE, new Knock Sensor, O2 sensors, Cattman headers, cat, catback, PR motor mounds and CAI, Underdrive Pulley, A/C bypassed, Power Steering bypassed (will be electric) and 100 lbs weight reduction. I call that "night and day" too but whatever...

Originally Posted by Armani
I know this is kind of off topic, but your assumptions are way off. People should not compare STIs and regular WRXs. There's a reason why one is STI and the other is not. By all means, the difference is night and day. You would know if you test drove both. I can also guarantee you that with an STi you would NOT hang, at all. In fact, it would completely destroy you.
With all those mods? On the highway? I doubt an STI would "destroy" me.

PS: Congrats on getting it working, Nismo...
Old May 7, 2005 | 11:31 AM
  #134  
Pervis Anathema's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,761
Originally Posted by JClaw
I KNOW the difference between a WRX and a STI is night an day, but so is the difference between my car last year and now.

Last year: Stock 1995 SE 5-speed, with a limping Knock Sensor.

Now: 1995 5-speed with a VQ35DE, new Knock Sensor, O2 sensors, Cattman headers, cat, catback, PR motor mounds and CAI, Underdrive Pulley, A/C bypassed, Power Steering bypassed (will be electric) and 100 lbs weight reduction. I call that "night and day" too but whatever...

PS: Congrats on getting it working, Nismo...

So we are talking at least 255hp on a ~2900 pound car?! That sounds wonderful. And yes, congrats to Nismo!
Old May 7, 2005 | 11:43 AM
  #135  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Dunno... but I'm considering getting an OBDI conversion done soon... (300zx ecu) very very tunable so we'll see what that yields. EGR is history, too.

Nismo, did you use a vacum pipe like Tilley? From the section between the TB and the MAF to the valve input on the other side of the intake manifold? Like this:

http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=364779&page=1 (scroll towards the bottom of the page)

Then again, I think that part bolted is from the 1995 manifold. I kept the 2002 manifold plate that goes there, because I'm not using EGR (because of the upcoming OBDI converison).
Old May 7, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #136  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
Originally Posted by JClaw
Nismo, did you use a vacum pipe like Tilley? From the section between the TB and the MAF to the valve input on the other side of the intake manifold? Like this:

http://forums.maxima.org/showthread.php?t=364779&page=1 (scroll towards the bottom of the page)
Yeah I have Tilley's setup. The TB is a little different though.
Old May 7, 2005 | 01:23 PM
  #137  
RA030726's Avatar
I'm nutty for Nissans
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,311
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
I would move the throttle braket to the IM. IF you dont just think that could happen when you floor it and the engine moves a bit. The slack will either be too tight or too loose. This could cause some problems and possibly a broken throttle cable.

Great work none the less
Old May 7, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #138  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
Yeah, I had thought of that after I put the bracket on. This is just temporary. I will make a bracket so it moves w/ the engine.
Old May 7, 2005 | 02:56 PM
  #139  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Looking at the 2k2 intake manifold, I don't know where we could possibly attach the throttle cable bracket.

Also one thing:



Is that for the EGR? I did not reuse that. Do you know what kind of issue it could cause? Since I am getting the OBDI conversion done in a few weeks, I guess the lack of EGR won't affect gas mileage, right?
Old May 7, 2005 | 03:43 PM
  #140  
Spaniard's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 972
From: Santa Clara, CA 95054
This is so friggin sweet-
Please please get it dyno'd and post the curves...
Old May 7, 2005 | 06:55 PM
  #141  
nismos14's Avatar
§è~® f®ÈÄk
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 17,505
From: NJ
congrats man VIDEO's PLEASE
Old May 7, 2005 | 07:42 PM
  #142  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
Originally Posted by JClaw
Looking at the 2k2 intake manifold, I don't know where we could possibly attach the throttle cable bracket.

Also one thing:



Is that for the EGR? I did not reuse that. Do you know what kind of issue it could cause? Since I am getting the OBDI conversion done in a few weeks, I guess the lack of EGR won't affect gas mileage, right?
That is the IACV valve, it controls the idle, adds idle for extra load such as PS, A/C... I removed my EGR back when I had the 3.0, no driving probs.

I am going to make a bracket so the throttle cable is secured to the engine.
Old May 7, 2005 | 09:28 PM
  #143  
THT's Avatar
THT
Throbbing member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,390
From: Joliet, IL
You SOB...you said you'd call! j/p We'll have to arrange a track day; I wanna run you now that I have a working KS.
Old May 7, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #144  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
That is the IACV valve, it controls the idle, adds idle for extra load such as PS, A/C... I removed my EGR back when I had the 3.0, no driving probs.
Ok. I have no PS or A/C. I only have an UDP with a short alternator belt, that's it. So I could do without it, right?
Old May 7, 2005 | 11:56 PM
  #145  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
Originally Posted by JClaw
Ok. I have no PS or A/C. I only have an UDP with a short alternator belt, that's it. So I could do without it, right?
I believe it also opens when the throttle kicks down or something, so the engien doesn't choke. BTW, What size is the belt you're using? I can't seem to find it anywhere!
Old May 8, 2005 | 12:29 AM
  #146  
evil_spork's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 329
how much does a swap cost.. in the end. assuming i have ZERO car skills so it would have to be done by a shop.
Old May 8, 2005 | 12:34 AM
  #147  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
Originally Posted by evil_spork
how much does a swap cost.. in the end. assuming i have ZERO car skills so it would have to be done by a shop.
Tilleys99 is doing this swap at his shop. Contact him.
Old May 8, 2005 | 12:38 AM
  #148  
evil_spork's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 329
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
Tilleys99 is doing this swap at his shop. Contact him.
thanks will do.
Old May 8, 2005 | 12:42 AM
  #149  
tonelocnyc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 188
*drooool* i want!!
Old May 8, 2005 | 07:48 AM
  #150  
silvermax2k2's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,935
wow... thats crazy man... good job with everything, I cant wait to see some final pics! congrats man!
Old May 8, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #151  
DR-Max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,737
How did that affect your emissions? Are you still passing the smog test? What did you do with the CEL light as this should stay on in your case? I know I fail the visual test when the CEL light on my car was lit because of the EGR solenoid control valve being out.


Originally Posted by Nismo3112
... I removed my EGR back when I had the 3.0, no driving probs.
Old May 8, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #152  
THT's Avatar
THT
Throbbing member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,390
From: Joliet, IL
IA doesn't have emissions tests.

Nismo and I removed my EGR when we put the 00VI on my 96 and I don't have a CEL or any ghost codes.
Old May 8, 2005 | 09:41 AM
  #153  
DR-Max's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,737
Wow....that's really cool! As for the CEL due to removed EGR, is that a FED spec thing? Mine is a Cali spec which probably explains why I get the CEL.


Originally Posted by THT
IA doesn't have emissions tests.

Nismo and I removed my EGR when we put the 00VI on my 96 and I don't have a CEL or any ghost codes.
Old May 8, 2005 | 10:15 AM
  #154  
THT's Avatar
THT
Throbbing member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,390
From: Joliet, IL
Did you leave the sensors plugged in? Mine are dangling in the engine bay so they're still functioning and communicating with the ECU.
Old May 8, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #155  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Originally Posted by Nismo3112
I believe it also opens when the throttle kicks down or something, so the engien doesn't choke. BTW, What size is the belt you're using? I can't seem to find it anywhere!
The belt is a 335 5rib
Old May 9, 2005 | 09:03 AM
  #156  
emmas97's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 485
congratulations!!!! i am glad everything worked out so well for you! now, get to the track and get some times, and then come up here and run mine!
Old May 9, 2005 | 09:59 AM
  #157  
ptatohed's Avatar
Licensed to Spell
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,519
From: Murrieta (southern California)
Nismo, Nice, very nice. Parts list and explicit write up pleeeeease??

So since you re-used the timing cover, do you think a Stillen/Vortech Supercharger would work?

Someone said that a 5 speed is required to do this swap, why is that?

Congrats.
Old May 9, 2005 | 10:57 AM
  #158  
THT's Avatar
THT
Throbbing member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,390
From: Joliet, IL
Auto can't hold the power. JapMaxSE's auto lasted less than a week.
Old May 9, 2005 | 11:24 AM
  #159  
Nismo3112's Avatar
Thread Starter
Custom User Title
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,685
I would try and do a writeup, but there would be many things I would forget.

Yeah it would be wise to change to a 5spd.. Extrememly easy if you have the engine out.. I think why Japmax's tranny went so soon is because it had 140k on it I believe.

A Stillen SC would definantly work.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BPuff57
Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking
33
Apr 16, 2020 05:15 AM
NmexMAX
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
4
May 23, 2016 07:38 PM
BobTX10
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
14
Oct 7, 2015 08:43 AM
bigfrank
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:51 PM
09maxshawn11
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
5
Sep 30, 2015 10:28 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:06 AM.