4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Does anyone with an intake wish they would have kept it stock and just added k&N...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2001, 06:40 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ivolley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 936
Does anyone with an intake wish they would have kept it stock and just added k&N...

I have a 97se 5sp with a Budget Y and K&N Filter and stock exhaust. After hearing many opinions about loosing lowend with all intakes I am concerned but I must admit the sound of the intake on the videos from the NE sound SWEET I also have heard that the loss is not as great on a 5sp as it is in an Automagic. Let's just assume that a CAI is not an option, I am going to add either an intake or some type of bolt on muffler. What are your opinions?


Thanks in advance,
Pat
ivolley is offline  
Old 11-23-2001, 08:24 AM
  #2  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
clee130's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,159
Intake.

With the stock airbox, you get low end back but lose top end. With the intake, you loose slightly with the low end, but make up for it with the top end. I'll take the top end because the loss isn't that bad.
clee130 is offline  
Old 11-23-2001, 09:11 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
nizmolee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,619
make you max sound crazy, go with a CAI...or bolt on intake.
nizmolee is offline  
Old 11-23-2001, 09:18 AM
  #4  
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
TurDz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,241
or even better, OSCAI.
TurDz is offline  
Old 11-23-2001, 10:13 AM
  #5  
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
AndyXXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,363
Earlier this year I went back from JWT intake back to stock airbox. I like to be quicker off the line, plus I don't really care for sound.
AndyXXL is offline  
Old 11-23-2001, 12:20 PM
  #6  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
dwapenyi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,016
I went from stock to K&N panel to CAI. No regrets. Didn't feel a low end loss, either.

DW
dwapenyi is offline  
Old 11-23-2001, 12:53 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
DARTHSWAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 648
Nope, happy with the purchase.

K
DARTHSWAN is offline  
Old 11-23-2001, 01:21 PM
  #8  
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Nealoc187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West burbs, Chicago
Posts: 14,631
Here's a question for ya? Do you do your racing in the low RPM ranges or high RPM ranges?

Exactly....... if you wanna make your car faster, get an intake.
Nealoc187 is offline  
Old 11-23-2001, 03:00 PM
  #9  
All YOUR grammer belong to me
 
Craig Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Either way a simple Pop-charger isn't gonna do much.
Craig Mack is offline  
Old 11-23-2001, 03:46 PM
  #10  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
matt calder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,382
would never go back to stock. Stock is boring
matt calder is offline  
Old 11-24-2001, 12:36 AM
  #11  
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Nealoc187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West burbs, Chicago
Posts: 14,631
Originally posted by Craig Mack
Either way a simple Pop-charger isn't gonna do much.
I disagree. I gain .75 mph in the traps by removing my stock air filter from the airbox. It's a very obvious gain, last time I was at the track i trapped about 95.75 every time I ran with my stock filter in the box. When I removed it, I consistently trapped at 96.25-96.5. I'd say a real intake will do even more than that, probably on the order of 1mph in the traps.
Nealoc187 is offline  
Old 11-24-2001, 03:46 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
KWheelzSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,872
Originally posted by Nealoc187


I disagree. I gain .75 mph in the traps by removing my stock air filter from the airbox. It's a very obvious gain, last time I was at the track i trapped about 95.75 every time I ran with my stock filter in the box. When I removed it, I consistently trapped at 96.25-96.5. I'd say a real intake will do even more than that, probably on the order of 1mph in the traps.
You mean you were running the strip w/ no filtration? Open intake? Yikes.
KWheelzSB is offline  
Old 11-24-2001, 03:51 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
KWheelzSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,872
Originally posted by dwapenyi
I went from stock to K&N panel to CAI. No regrets. Didn't feel a low end loss, either.

DW
You wouldn't be likely to feel a loss @ low end w/ CAI.

Most people here have reported a slight loss of low end w/ pop chargers and a slight loss of top end w/ CAI. They both involve some compromise - it just depends where you want it.
KWheelzSB is offline  
Old 11-24-2001, 11:05 AM
  #14  
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Nealoc187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: West burbs, Chicago
Posts: 14,631
Originally posted by KWheelzSB


You mean you were running the strip w/ no filtration? Open intake? Yikes.
Yes. I figured with 114K miles, a little piece of sand wasn't gonna do more damage than has probably been done in the last 6 years to this engine. And I was curious what kind of results I'd get. I couldn't feel any difference, but I could definately hear it, and the results were plain as day on paper.
Nealoc187 is offline  
Old 11-24-2001, 11:14 AM
  #15  
Not DAVEB the parts guy
 
Dave B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,555
I've dynoed with the HKS intake and with a modified stock airbox. My modified stock airbox had all the resonators removed and a K&N drop in filter panel. With the HKS intake I dynoed 176fwhp and 194fwtq. With Poorman's CAI I dynoed 174fwhp and 193fwtq. Peak hp and tq occured at the nearly the same rpms in both tests, but with the HKS intake, power held on much longer after peak which is better for drag racing simply because you typically shift ~500rpms after peak in gears 1 and 2.

From what I've seen on the dyno, there is absolutely no loss in lowend tq or hp with a POP style intake.


Dave
Dave B is offline  
Old 11-24-2001, 05:12 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
KWheelzSB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,872
Originally posted by Dave B
I've dynoed with the HKS intake and with a modified stock airbox. My modified stock airbox had all the resonators removed and a K&N drop in filter panel. With the HKS intake I dynoed 176fwhp and 194fwtq. With Poorman's CAI I dynoed 174fwhp and 193fwtq. Peak hp and tq occured at the nearly the same rpms in both tests, but with the HKS intake, power held on much longer after peak which is better for drag racing simply because you typically shift ~500rpms after peak in gears 1 and 2.

From what I've seen on the dyno, there is absolutely no loss in lowend tq or hp with a POP style intake.


Dave
Cool! Thanks for the numbers - always good when someone comes through with real data. Our butt-o-meters aren't usually quite as accurate!

This certainly reinforces the value of the pop-charger style intake: measured performance gain, low cost, low-hassle, non-invasive install, low water-induction likelihood, great sound, etc.

KWheelzSB is offline  
Old 11-24-2001, 10:21 PM
  #17  
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
spiff56747's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,371
The main reason I got the POP Charger vs the CAI is because I really didn't wanna drill a hole in my wheel well. I think the CAI provides slightly better performance, but when I go to sell the car and return it back to stock, who wants to see a 3 inch hole in their wheel well?

I mean I guess a person could just leave the CAI in there when they are selling the car, but I think the best way to maximize your profits from selling is take out all the mods, sell the stock car, and sell the mods separately....
spiff56747 is offline  
Old 11-25-2001, 09:38 AM
  #18  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (30)
 
ionicmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,540
I went from a Pop-charger back to the stock air box, and I did this because the pop-charger made too much noise, to the degree that I got pulled over three times by cops just because I floored it a little. The max is supposed to be a sleeper and with the Pop-charger it loses that.
ionicmax is offline  
Old 11-25-2001, 01:15 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
MAXIPADMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 425
i put my PlaceRacing CAI on about 6 months ago. I still have not noticed a loss in the lower end. I love the way it sounds, and it goes great with my cattman y, random tech cat, and greddy catback.
MAXIPADMAN is offline  
Old 11-25-2001, 03:24 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
FameMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,029
Re: Does anyone with an intake wish they would have kept it stock and just added k&N...

I love the noise. People look at me when i drive by
FameMax is offline  
Old 11-25-2001, 06:50 PM
  #21  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (29)
 
phatmax95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kernersville, NC
Posts: 1,766
what kind of gains do you get with just the k&n air filter?
phatmax95 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cruce91
Infiniti I30/I35
6
09-20-2015 10:23 AM
bumpypickle
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
09-20-2015 08:22 AM
220k+ A32
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
09-11-2015 02:18 AM
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
9
09-09-2015 10:37 AM
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
09-04-2015 06:04 PM



Quick Reply: Does anyone with an intake wish they would have kept it stock and just added k&N...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:07 AM.