Race Against time....MAX VS. RSX TYPE S
#2
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (54)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Northern Jersey
Posts: 10,166
Well if your stock you will get ripped on even if your 5speed, I think...I know the regular RSX's arent fast...you might have a slight chance if you have 5spd with a few mods,(I/Y/E) but dont take my word for it
#3
Re: Race Against time....MAX VS. RSX TYPE S
Originally posted by 02tsmaxima
I have a 95 max and my friend has a 02 rsx type s were gonna race next weekend i wnat to know if i have a shot and what i will need to win if i dont please write back asap i have to know thanxs
I have a 95 max and my friend has a 02 rsx type s were gonna race next weekend i wnat to know if i have a shot and what i will need to win if i dont please write back asap i have to know thanxs
#5
I have beaten an RSX-S several times at the track. Those things are very hard to launch. Chances are he will either bog the engine or get huge wheelspin. Either way, you can take him off the line.
Go for it.
Go for it.
#6
the 02 rsx type s are fast my homie has one and beats me by 4 cars and i have 95 maxima auto with placeracing cai, intake, pulley and stillen y pipe but u can beat him if he dont know how to lounch it they are hard to lounch
#7
Originally posted by matty
No the regular RSX's are slow but the RSX-S will give a 5spd (I/Y/E) a good run for its money..
Just my $$.02
No the regular RSX's are slow but the RSX-S will give a 5spd (I/Y/E) a good run for its money..
Just my $$.02
#12
95 is the lightest by a small margin, and is the fastest according to a few magazines
High mileage can't nessasarily kill that advantage, more carbon makes for more power as it's smoother, so I've read, no real proof.
High mileage can't nessasarily kill that advantage, more carbon makes for more power as it's smoother, so I've read, no real proof.
#13
Originally posted by mzmtg
things are very hard to launch.
things are very hard to launch.
i lost to a MX-6 when i first bought my car just because my front wheels would not stop spinning.
but to experienced drivers.. it makes really no difference...
#14
Originally posted by NmexMAX
95 is the lightest by a small margin, and is the fastest according to a few magazines:rolley=es:
High mileage can't nessasarily kill that advantage, more carbon makes for more power as it's smoother, so I've read, no real pr=oof.)
95 is the lightest by a small margin, and is the fastest according to a few magazines:rolley=es:
High mileage can't nessasarily kill that advantage, more carbon makes for more power as it's smoother, so I've read, no real pr=oof.)
Lightest and least emmissions. High mileage can actually work to your advantage. New cars are always about .1-.3 slower than when their broken in (20,000 miles+)...don't you ever read C&D long range tests?
95 ownz: 96,97,98,99,00,01
2002 ownz: all
And we ALL own 1st-3rd gen. Max's
#15
Originally posted by ArcRSX-S
true RSXs are very hard to lauch due to the lack of LSD and the ****ty stock wheels acura gave to us.
i lost to a MX-6 when i first bought my car just because my front wheels would not stop spinning.
but to experienced drivers.. it makes really no difference...
true RSXs are very hard to lauch due to the lack of LSD and the ****ty stock wheels acura gave to us.
i lost to a MX-6 when i first bought my car just because my front wheels would not stop spinning.
but to experienced drivers.. it makes really no difference...
psssss. rsx guy, get workin on the performance stuff, enuff show show stuff
#16
Originally posted by NotNew!!NewSN!!
its nice to see a "rival" becoming a friend. no one has respect like maxima folks do, and we attract people into the family becuz of it
psssss. rsx guy, get workin on the performance stuff, enuff show show stuff
its nice to see a "rival" becoming a friend. no one has respect like maxima folks do, and we attract people into the family becuz of it
psssss. rsx guy, get workin on the performance stuff, enuff show show stuff
i would work on my car's performance if they actually sell the parts~~ most of the parts come out in the 2nd half of this year..
i am still trying to decide wether to go n/a+nos or super charger..
#17
Originally posted by ArcRSX-S
true RSXs are very hard to lauch due to the lack of LSD and the ****ty stock wheels acura gave to us.
i lost to a MX-6 when i first bought my car just because my front wheels would not stop spinning.
but to experienced drivers.. it makes really no difference...
true RSXs are very hard to lauch due to the lack of LSD and the ****ty stock wheels acura gave to us.
i lost to a MX-6 when i first bought my car just because my front wheels would not stop spinning.
but to experienced drivers.. it makes really no difference...
man.. why can't maximas have sporty designs like that huh?
why we gotta go the 4 door pimp car way?
WHY WHY WHY!@#%!#!@%!@$!@#!@$!@%!@%!@% I'm too young to get dirty girls in my car!!!!
#19
Originally posted by Sexima
damn... your car looks nice as hell!
man.. why can't maximas have sporty designs like that huh?
why we gotta go the 4 door pimp car way?
WHY WHY WHY!@#%!#!@%!@$!@#!@$!@%!@%!@% I'm too young to get dirty girls in my car!!!!
damn... your car looks nice as hell!
man.. why can't maximas have sporty designs like that huh?
why we gotta go the 4 door pimp car way?
WHY WHY WHY!@#%!#!@%!@$!@#!@$!@%!@%!@% I'm too young to get dirty girls in my car!!!!
I always thought the 96 gxe was the lightest of all the gen 4 cars
Jules
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trsandrew
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
17
04-08-2016 06:45 PM
trsandrew
Group Deals / Sponsors Forum
2
10-25-2015 02:47 PM