who would win?
03-05-2003, 06:52 AM
#3
Originally posted by mdeal
Are you serious? You can fit a V8 in a 260 or 280, so you might want to check under the hood. Otherwise, you have much more power than a stock 260/280.
Are you serious? You can fit a V8 in a 260 or 280, so you might want to check under the hood. Otherwise, you have much more power than a stock 260/280.
Geez, let me pull out my crystal ball and see...... Just go and find out, why does this question come up 3 times a day?!?!?! What is the deal, you won't race someone unless Maxima.org says you have a fair chance of winning?
03-05-2003, 07:41 AM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
yeah it's kind of like not asking a girl to dance due to the whole rejection thing...not
No I am not into racing the guy on a federal installation I was just pretty annoyed by his riding in my backseat on the way to work today and wondered if he knew something I didn't. I am a previous 91 300ZX TT and know what those cars are capable of I just wasn't sure if their performance dated back that far. Jeez try to make conversation and get bombarded!!
No I am not into racing the guy on a federal installation I was just pretty annoyed by his riding in my backseat on the way to work today and wondered if he knew something I didn't. I am a previous 91 300ZX TT and know what those cars are capable of I just wasn't sure if their performance dated back that far. Jeez try to make conversation and get bombarded!!
03-05-2003, 12:11 PM
#5
Originally posted by 2K2_6spd
Geez, let me pull out my crystal ball and see......
Just go and find out, why does this question come up 3 times a day?!?!?! What is the deal, you won't race someone unless Maxima.org says you have a fair chance of winning?
Geez, let me pull out my crystal ball and see...... Just go and find out, why does this question come up 3 times a day?!?!?! What is the deal, you won't race someone unless Maxima.org says you have a fair chance of winning?
03-05-2003, 12:14 PM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,968
Originally posted by slickrick
some people perhaps dont know the capabilities of other cars and want a comparison. sometimes they just go about it the wrong way.
some people perhaps dont know the capabilities of other cars and want a comparison. sometimes they just go about it the wrong way.
03-05-2003, 12:35 PM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 534
Originally posted by jjs
That being the case, they should limit themsleves to magazine racing or car-stat comparisons and not worry about it and not bother us unless they plan on finding out themselves. Crap, EVEN if we had a comprehensive listing of cars, capabilities, and timeslips IN BOLDFACE AT THE TOP OF HTE FORUM....there would ALWAYS be this kind of thread around here. It just won't die.
That being the case, they should limit themsleves to magazine racing or car-stat comparisons and not worry about it and not bother us unless they plan on finding out themselves. Crap, EVEN if we had a comprehensive listing of cars, capabilities, and timeslips IN BOLDFACE AT THE TOP OF HTE FORUM....there would ALWAYS be this kind of thread around here. It just won't die.
03-05-2003, 12:36 PM
#8
Originally posted by jjs
That being the case, they should limit themsleves to magazine racing or car-stat comparisons and not worry about it and not bother us unless they plan on finding out themselves. Crap, EVEN if we had a comprehensive listing of cars, capabilities, and timeslips IN BOLDFACE AT THE TOP OF HTE FORUM....there would ALWAYS be this kind of thread around here. It just won't die.
That being the case, they should limit themsleves to magazine racing or car-stat comparisons and not worry about it and not bother us unless they plan on finding out themselves. Crap, EVEN if we had a comprehensive listing of cars, capabilities, and timeslips IN BOLDFACE AT THE TOP OF HTE FORUM....there would ALWAYS be this kind of thread around here. It just won't die.
03-05-2003, 01:58 PM
#11
Originally posted by jjs
That being the case, they should limit themsleves to magazine racing or car-stat comparisons and not worry about it and not bother us unless they plan on finding out themselves. Crap, EVEN if we had a comprehensive listing of cars, capabilities, and timeslips IN BOLDFACE AT THE TOP OF THE FORUM....there would ALWAYS be this kind of thread around here. It just won't die.
That being the case, they should limit themsleves to magazine racing or car-stat comparisons and not worry about it and not bother us unless they plan on finding out themselves. Crap, EVEN if we had a comprehensive listing of cars, capabilities, and timeslips IN BOLDFACE AT THE TOP OF THE FORUM....there would ALWAYS be this kind of thread around here. It just won't die.
03-05-2003, 04:27 PM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 549
Originally posted by jjs
That being the case, they should limit themsleves to magazine racing or car-stat comparisons and not worry about it and not bother us unless they plan on finding out themselves. Crap, EVEN if we had a comprehensive listing of cars, capabilities, and timeslips IN BOLDFACE AT THE TOP OF THE FORUM....there would ALWAYS be this kind of thread around here. It just won't die.
That being the case, they should limit themsleves to magazine racing or car-stat comparisons and not worry about it and not bother us unless they plan on finding out themselves. Crap, EVEN if we had a comprehensive listing of cars, capabilities, and timeslips IN BOLDFACE AT THE TOP OF THE FORUM....there would ALWAYS be this kind of thread around here. It just won't die.
03-05-2003, 09:11 PM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,968
Originally posted by max...to the ma
what the **** is ur problem..they can do what they want... and if they couldn't, you dont judge them what makes u any beter or more worthy of saying such things
what the **** is ur problem..they can do what they want... and if they couldn't, you dont judge them what makes u any beter or more worthy of saying such things
Well, let's see:
1. My point is logical.
2. My point makes common sense.
3. My point is supported by others.
4. My point is presented in a way which demonstrates control of capitalization and grammar.
5. It is my freaking opinion and at least as valuable as yours, just presented in a much better fashion.
03-06-2003, 06:40 AM
#16
Originally posted by jjs
Well, let's see:
1. My point is logical.
2. My point makes common sense.
3. My point is supported by others.
4. My point is presented in a way which demonstrates control of capitalization and grammar.
5. It is my freaking opinion and at least as valuable as yours, just presented in a much better fashion.
Well, let's see:
1. My point is logical.
2. My point makes common sense.
3. My point is supported by others.
4. My point is presented in a way which demonstrates control of capitalization and grammar.
5. It is my freaking opinion and at least as valuable as yours, just presented in a much better fashion.
03-06-2003, 07:23 AM
#17
Originally posted by jjs
Well, let's see:
1. My point is logical.
2. My point makes common sense.
3. My point is supported by others.
4. My point is presented in a way which demonstrates control of capitalization and grammar.
5. It is my freaking opinion and at least as valuable as yours, just presented in a much better fashion.
Well, let's see:
1. My point is logical.
2. My point makes common sense.
3. My point is supported by others.
4. My point is presented in a way which demonstrates control of capitalization and grammar.
5. It is my freaking opinion and at least as valuable as yours, just presented in a much better fashion.
03-06-2003, 07:47 AM
#18
i have some interest in this thread, not cause i want to see my max beat an old Z, but cause i'm gonna be cruisin in an 82 280Z this summer. nothin wrong with old cars - still can beat civics and such. cant beat a car thats runnin great after 20 years and 200,000+ miles
03-06-2003, 08:12 AM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yeah my point in the question was because I spent 5 years in Okinawa Japan and witnessed the 280s beat up on the fast sylvias and in some situations the Skyline GS-t (single turbo)I wasn't sure if the mods could be the same here as they were over there. And I wasn't looking for reassurance in if I raced him I was just thinking of the comparison (weight, torque, and HP) similar to the thread a while back regarding the Lincoln LS. Thanks for the responses though.
... crystal ball...
03-06-2003, 01:11 PM
#22
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 50
Originally posted by heems27
My buddy has a 82 280zx and that thing is a dog. The inline 6 in those bad boys only pushes about 150-160hp and even the turbo models don't even clear 200 hp. You'll have no problem with him.
My buddy has a 82 280zx and that thing is a dog. The inline 6 in those bad boys only pushes about 150-160hp and even the turbo models don't even clear 200 hp. You'll have no problem with him.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xUNIxPanther
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
6
08-27-2015 10:09 PM
speednsound007
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
1
02-27-2001 06:34 PM
2ndMAX
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
31
11-21-2000 11:19 PM