5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Input on frame damage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2007, 06:01 PM
  #1  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
 
Maximax2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,042
Input on frame damage

Sad but true: In January I sold my 2k3 Max to my sis-in-law, after buying a new car (and staying in the Nissan family ) (and BTW, it's sorta sad to see the car that's been cared for all its life to suddenly be treated normally...)

Anyway, a few weeks ago some **** in a Mustang is going to fast on a slick road, and t-bones the Max on the driver's side. No major damage (doors replaced, some paint), but the frame member at the bottom of the doors was bent in.

So here's my question: Is that metal bar, under the side sills of the of the door, considered to be part of the unibody, or not? Have heard two different opinions, one that it's the "rocker" and not part of the frame, another that it (and the roof etc.) are all parts of the "unibody." I'm concerned because I believe in Texas, when you have unibody damage you have to declare it to a buyer - this is a big hit on value, and I've advised her to go after diminished value. Anyone know if this part is "frame"? Thanks!!!

For extra points , any advice on how to pursue a diminished value claim?
Maximax2 is offline  
Old 06-18-2007, 06:31 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
young1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 781
As for diminished valve, it's very hard to do... But I think if there's frame damage, the body shop needs to fix it so there is no more damage or as good as new. If there's still frame damage after fixing it, wouldn't it be still damaged and therefore not fixed?
young1976 is offline  
Old 06-18-2007, 06:36 PM
  #3  
Very sound, Mike
iTrader: (24)
 
soundmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: H-Town
Posts: 6,011
Aww... sorry to hear that. You seriously should have kept the Max instead of going for the G. Sorry, couldn't help it.

I believe the roof is indeed part of the unibody structure. When i was rear-ended several years ago i had damage to the frame all the way to the front and suffered approximately 10k in damages (roughly, i forgot the exact amount). My carfax report shows it was in an accident but has nothing stating it was a frame/unibody issue.
soundmike is offline  
Old 06-18-2007, 08:24 PM
  #4  
retired moderator
iTrader: (38)
 
irish44j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Burke, VA
Posts: 27,289
if it is the frame rail underneath the car (a couple inches inboard of the rocker panels), those would be considered part of the unibody, since they are the lower structural support member.

I'm referring to the square-profile rails that run from just behind the front subframe all the way back to a little rounded "ball" piece forward of the rear axle assembly.
irish44j is offline  
Old 06-18-2007, 08:44 PM
  #5  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
 
Maximax2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,042
Originally Posted by irish44j
if it is the frame rail underneath the car (a couple inches inboard of the rocker panels), those would be considered part of the unibody, since they are the lower structural support member.

I'm referring to the square-profile rails that run from just behind the front subframe all the way back to a little rounded "ball" piece forward of the rear axle assembly.
Yep, that's it thx. Crap - well, at least it'll be good ammo for the diminished value claim.
Maximax2 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gigabyte
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
8
01-06-2017 06:05 PM
REDinLV
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
4
10-18-2015 05:31 AM
Marc2theMax
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
4
09-28-2015 08:13 AM



Quick Reply: Input on frame damage



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:18 AM.