would a 245/45/17 tires fit on stock 02 17" se rims?
#1
would a 245/45/17 tires fit on stock 02 17" se rims?
does anyone have this? how is the ride? hard to put on? the original size is 225/50/17 i think so its not that much of a reach
anyone?
thanks in advance
anyone?
thanks in advance
#2
#6
its good this thread came up b/c I wanted to replace my craptenzas for some toyo proxes 4. Im running the stock 225/50/17 size right now...guess Im going to get 235/45/17s since I want a little more of a low profile look. I just dont want it to be at the expense of comfort
#12
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Clifton Park, NY
Posts: 4,035
The concern is that the bead will slip off the rim and blow out the tire, usually in turns.
This has been discussed to death on the org and 235 is as wide as you should go on stock 17x7 rims.
#14
Like upstatemax said, safety is the number one concern with using 245s. I'd also suggest that 235/45/17s are as wide as you should go, and even then, just ensure that they are properly inflated and maintained (I know, common sense).
#15
I'm using falken 245/45/17 on stock rims and I've had no problem. I've also tested cornering at high speeds and they seem fine, they also look sweet with the stock rims.
I'm sure there's much of a noticable difference in width from 245 to 235 so I might just switch it up soon anyways since its safer.
I'm sure there's much of a noticable difference in width from 245 to 235 so I might just switch it up soon anyways since its safer.
#16
oh...........wow. 2 year thread bump FTW.
While im here, i have 245/45 17's on stockers that are drag radials and I drive around with them at 25PSI (put them on to drive to the track and take them off when im home) with very little handling change, but at that PSI I dont purposely take hard corners
While im here, i have 245/45 17's on stockers that are drag radials and I drive around with them at 25PSI (put them on to drive to the track and take them off when im home) with very little handling change, but at that PSI I dont purposely take hard corners
#18
Apparently Continental is onto something with the over size tire footprint, highly compliant sidewalls and special tread design, not to mention the silica based compound and the best manufacturers warranty offered: Ultra High Performance with a 6 year 50,000 mile wear warranty. The new 2009 Conti Extreme Contact DWS (dry-wet-snow) is improved on the previous year's tires and according to actual track performance done by Tire Rack, exceed 2008's best track UHP Michelin Pilot's and fall just 1/10th of a point behind Pirelli Net Zeros, the 2009 best track tire.
Conventional wisdom is to get narrower tires in the snow but if you go back several decades to when people were allowed to wear their tires down pretty low, it was a widely accepted practice to drop the air pressure making for a more compliant sidewall and a larger tire footprint on a tire that would never pass inspection today. It was good enough traction to get around and better than the majority of bad all-seasons at that time.
Compliant sidewalls, big footprint and aggressive tread design has made the Continental Extreme Contacts an amazing tire. They have two steel belts and two polymide (aramid/kevlar?) belts on the tread, and a polyester sidewall that runs bead to bead with no bias...a true radial tire with 5-ply under the tread. Standard equipment on several Porsche, Mercedes, Audi.
Anyone in the snow belts considering winter tires or new tires will do themselves a big favor by checking out Tire Rack on the Continentals. In my view, the few Maxima owners who saw their way clear to the 245/45/17 ($108/ea at Tire Rack) mounted on 17 inch rims made a wise move and got great looking slower wearing shoes for their ride. By inflating close to the maximum 51 psi they had excellent handling and gas mileage with a shock absorbing ride in spite of the air pressure because of the way the sidewall interacts with the rim with a true bead-to-bead radial.
The 245 is two sizes higher than the 225 stock tire, but the 45 profile is one profile size lower than the stock 50 profile. Therefore the 245/45/17 is really only one tire size larger than stock and actually has a very slightly smaller diameter. (25.858 dia. @225/50/17 vs 25.681 dia. at 245/45/17).
The 245's are over an inch wider, with no interference. At $108 they are a steal.
Last edited by FloydMax; 11-15-2009 at 10:09 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post