5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

cattman vs megan? Oh shoot...

Old Jan 31, 2010 | 12:18 PM
  #41  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by 02max245
The megan catback sound amazing at around 2000 to 3000 rpms, after that i cant hear anything cuz my intake kicks in. Also my megan rattles alittle because one of the pegs for the rubber holders hits on the sidwalls where the exhaust goes. A catback exhaust is only going to give u a few hp. Go cheap, and spead the good money on hi flow cat, heades, and y pipe u will get the most out of that.
Your exhaust is sliding thru the hangar bushing(it's worn)...you can add another small piece of hose or a shock bushing to keep that bushing peg from sliding thru the worn out hangar banging against your under carriage.
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 12:26 PM
  #42  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Catback for me wouldn't be only a few hp considering I have no back pressure at all right now. On top of that I already have full bolt ons haha, and the 3" catback by cattman is going to give me some good hp Time to saveee
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 12:31 PM
  #43  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Originally Posted by 02max245
The megan catback sound amazing at around 2000 to 3000 rpms, after that i cant hear anything cuz my intake kicks in. Also my megan rattles alittle because one of the pegs for the rubber holders hits on the sidwalls where the exhaust goes. A catback exhaust is only going to give u a few hp. Go cheap, and spead the good money on hi flow cat, heades, and y pipe u will get the most out of that.
It's not just about going cheap though, It's about sound and drone quality to me as well. Megan is awesome but no ones selling otherwise I woulda gone with that. I was considering getting cattmans 2.5" off a member but I figure that's going to give minimal gain, might as well save a little more and get the 3" which really gives some numbers.
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 01:40 PM
  #44  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
i never understood that back pressure thing giving more power........ if so was the case wouldnt a 2.5 exhaust offer more power due to more back pressure??? i wouldnt mind buying a cattman 2.5 but the people who sells em is selling em for dang near the price of a new one
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 01:51 PM
  #45  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
I understand it and feel it as straight pipes on a non built motor=not enough back pressure. It's mainly throttle response for me I guess. My car just runs tons better with a good amount of back pressure that fits the motor. It's like blowing through a straw, too much air vs too little air. You blowing through a 1" in diameter straw will go further than you blowing througha 3" in diameter straw unless you can allow stronger air flow for the 3"... If that made any sense..
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 01:52 PM
  #46  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Long story short if the 3" allows 15+-whp gains (which i'm trying to understand considering a n/a) i'm on board. Especially like you said grand about the pricing, i'd rather get the 3". Or fabricate my own which looks like it's going to be the way it's gonna go unless cattmans next line is in over a month.
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 02:09 PM
  #47  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
i can understand the straw theory but the reason why i would disagree is because the main objective isnt to shoot something out the exhaust to a furthur distance moreso having a free flow from the motor without too much of an exhaust width to mess up the flow of exhaust gas... so with that said i can see how the 3" exhaust would produce more gains than the 2.5" as far as throttle response i guess is cant speak on that seeing as though i dont own a car with a 3" exhaust but our cars were already so responsive, i cant see how the exhaust would ruin that so much but provide gains... doesnt seem to bug Jaypee99's 5.5 at all (guy with the prototype 3")
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 02:38 PM
  #48  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
Backpressure is a myth and what you're saying makes no sense.

http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/html_pr...torquemyth.htm
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 02:43 PM
  #49  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 02:43 PM
  #50  
sparks03max's Avatar
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by MoncefA33
Backpressure is a myth and what you're saying makes no sense.

http://www.uucmotorwerks.com/html_pr...torquemyth.htm
I've tried to post that... lol Most just disregard it and get back to their backpressure talk.
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #51  
02max245's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 480
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by CMax03
Your exhaust is sliding thru the hangar bushing(it's worn)...you can add another small piece of hose or a shock bushing to keep that bushing peg from sliding thru the worn out hangar banging against your under carriage.
Alright thats its not too bad, but also the megan catback moves a little. Midas said it was normal
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 02:54 PM
  #52  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17
What subliminal is saying does not make any sense.
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 02:56 PM
  #53  
02max245's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 480
From: New Jersey
Yea the way u get more hp off exhaust is by eliminating the pressure, letting the gases flow much easier, if their was backpressure it would make the engine work harder decreasing hp.
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 03:05 PM
  #54  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
If you buy a 3" cat-back you'll be expelling exhaust gases as quickly as possible (for what's available)

If you buy a 2.5" cat-back you'll be expelling exhaust gases somewhat quickly.

Backpressure is like sticking a tennis ball in your exhaust.

So actually what you wanna do is just jam a tennis ball in your pipe and then you will have maximum low-end torque available to you.
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 08:24 AM
  #55  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
It's not all about WOT. None of us are on our cars all the time, at normal cruising the drone of a 3" on top of the what i assume will be delayed throttle response and bit of lag will get very annoying+ the low end loss, quickly. Anyways back on track, this wasn't about the 3", it's about megan vs cattmans catback. And yes, MY CAR is not running like it should be without a proper catback. Throttle response is delayed, and I feel like I've lost power.
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 08:31 AM
  #56  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
I see both sides of it, I just personally don't think I will be going towards the 3" unless I decide to go f.i or built n/a.. All i'm saying. Moncef let me re-address my statement. You do not NEED back pressure but for low end and mid range throttle response and power, it would be very helpful.

Last edited by e-subliminal-2; Feb 1, 2010 at 08:38 AM.
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 09:16 AM
  #57  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
Originally Posted by e-subliminal-2
It's not all about WOT. None of us are on our cars all the time, at normal cruising the drone of a 3" on top of the what i assume will be delayed throttle response and bit of lag will get very annoying+ the low end loss, quickly. Anyways back on track, this wasn't about the 3", it's about megan vs cattmans catback. And yes, MY CAR is not running like it should be without a proper catback. Throttle response is delayed, and I feel like I've lost power.
If it's about Megan vs. Cattman well Megan is gonna be a lot louder. The resonator isn't designed like Cattman's. And you said you "might as well" go with the 3" if you were gonna gain some horsepower.

I'm not on my car all the time but I have zero torque issues with headers + exhaust and I'm even running a short ram intake (easily heat soaked) on a DEK

Originally Posted by e-subliminal-2
I see both sides of it, I just personally don't think I will be going towards the 3" unless I decide to go f.i or built n/a.. All i'm saying. Moncef let me re-address my statement. You do not NEED back pressure but for low end and mid range throttle response and power, it would be very helpful.
Readdress my statement. Backpressure is a myth. If you're sick of loud cars just put a stock cat-back on and you can have all the "backpressure" you want. If you really think you're having some power loss, check your codes if your SES is on.
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 09:22 AM
  #58  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Originally Posted by MoncefA33
If it's about Megan vs. Cattman well Megan is gonna be a lot louder. The resonator isn't designed like Cattman's. And you said you "might as well" go with the 3" if you were gonna gain some horsepower.

I'm not on my car all the time but I have zero torque issues with headers + exhaust and I'm even running a short ram intake (easily heat soaked) on a DEK

YOU have exhaust, There's a difference, I DON'T.



Readdress my statement. Backpressure is a myth. If you're sick of loud cars just put a stock cat-back on and you can have all the "backpressure" you want. If you really think you're having some power loss, check your codes if your SES is on.
A good example would be for you to switch back to your stock intake, you'll see how much smoother you car pulls, that's the difference in the larger diameter exhaust than the 2.5 which imo is perfect for a non built n/a maxima.


It's no myth that with a 3" you will more than likely lose the mid range/low end tq. It'd be awesome if you'd also open up your mind of thought and quit thinking your word is the final word and the correctt one. I'm done debating with a wall.
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 09:26 AM
  #59  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
There is no such thing as backpressure, no change in low end or mid range tq or power loss or throttle response time in switching exhaust sizes. Happy?
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 10:25 AM
  #60  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
There is no mid range lose on a MAXIMA with the 3"... can't speak for cars in general...
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 10:54 AM
  #61  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17
There is no mid range lose on a MAXIMA with the 3"... can't speak for cars in general...
Well every car is different, every motor and compression is. For the case of a maxima I'm in no case bias, If you show me proof i will accept it. Not gonna fight a war where I know i'm wrong. I'm saying for the majority of cars such an upgrade would only resolve in things like loss in throttle response and until I actually get some feedback from someone with the actual exhaust, I'm going to be skeptical. but that's just ME. If someone else feels different by all means go ahead and buy one, the threads right above us. I also want one however i'm still skeptical on it.
That's just me. MY opinion and feeling. thanks for the info guys.
I Might end up going with megan and just upgrading to a larger res.
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 11:00 AM
  #62  
bigpopaj369's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,643
From: western mass
this should be stickied, great info here
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 01:18 PM
  #63  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
At first I was kinda skeptical but the gains is there... merlyn was the first to post the gains seeing he was the first with the cattman 3" should be on youtube... he got rid of his maxima and sold the exhaust to jaypee99 who had similar gains so there is more than one people who proved such gains (both guys from MD, I don't know merlyn but I do know Jaypee99 and was there for the dyno)
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 02:05 PM
  #64  
maxboy325's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,129
From: Maryland
This may be off topic for the current convo but, this is one of the best sounding exhaust I have ever heard on a car and one of the reasons for my purchase.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3uuwBKw6Os
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 02:59 PM
  #65  
02max245's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 480
From: New Jersey
If you have backpressure u lose hp, and tq. Its a simple concept, thats why performance exhaust is so much better because it creates little backpressure.Show me some evidence that backpressure helps ur car.
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 06:46 PM
  #66  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Originally Posted by maxboy325
This may be off topic for the current convo but, this is one of the best sounding exhaust I have ever heard on a car and one of the reasons for my purchase.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3uuwBKw6Os
Actually that is on topic... and sounds pretty good..
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 06:49 PM
  #67  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
LMAO was the last part taken in the trunk???
Old Feb 1, 2010 | 06:51 PM
  #68  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Originally Posted by 02max245
If you have backpressure u lose hp, and tq. Its a simple concept, thats why performance exhaust is so much better because it creates little backpressure.Show me some evidence that backpressure helps ur car.
There is talk about having your valves burn and rot away but that's not my concern, ffs people my concerns just god damn low end throttle respone and tq"?!?! WTF seriously. Get off my nuts unless you own a damn 3" exhaust SERIOUSLY STFU.

Sorry to seem like a douche but god dang.
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 09:14 AM
  #69  
*2003MaxipadSE*'s Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15
From: Sheboygan Wisconsin
I bought a Megan Racing Turbo N1 muffler and had a shop fabricate me a 2.5" exhaust for $220 out the door. So with the cost of the muffler I was looking at $350 for everything, installed. Heres a sound clip.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzToN5mlFpM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzToN5mlFpM

LOVE IT

Last edited by *2003MaxipadSE*; Mar 16, 2010 at 09:18 AM.
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 09:55 AM
  #70  
mist max2000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,071
Originally Posted by *2003MaxipadSE*
I bought a Megan Racing Turbo N1 muffler and had a shop fabricate me a 2.5" exhaust for $220 out the door. So with the cost of the muffler I was looking at $350 for everything, installed. Heres a sound clip.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzToN5mlFpM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzToN5mlFpM

LOVE IT
thanks for the vids,..

OT: 2003maxipadse- but you should look into the gains of a SRI over a CAI on this car,.. injen= in terms of performance on a maxima..
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 10:39 AM
  #71  
*2003MaxipadSE*'s Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15
From: Sheboygan Wisconsin
Idk....i think i love the sound too much :/ plus I got the intake for $85 brand spankin new shipped to my house...so i had to. What is the hp difference between the two..roughly
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 10:44 AM
  #72  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Once you get headers your sound goes right out the door lol. Takes a hfc or a good res to get a nice sounding setup again.
imo..
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 11:51 AM
  #73  
mist max2000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,071
Originally Posted by *2003MaxipadSE*
Idk....i think i love the sound too much :/ plus I got the intake for $85 brand spankin new shipped to my house...so i had to. What is the hp difference between the two..roughly
the way the injen sits is directly behind the radiator,..so in the summer when that puppy is a couple hundread degrees.. it really gets heat soaked..its also said that the injen loses top end compared to the gains top end on the SR...search around on here.. theres alot of stuff.. ther is also a way to make the injen relocate into the fender by drilling a hole..and 90* turning the battery which a few membners have done..with picture by picture write ups.. from what i remember.,. you can find the how to on NYCMAXIMAS.org.. g/l..
EDIT: here.. found it 4 u.. u need to sign up to c it though.. http://forums.nycmaximas.org/showthread.php?t=25714

Last edited by mist max2000; Mar 16, 2010 at 11:55 AM.
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 03:16 PM
  #74  
*2003MaxipadSE*'s Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15
From: Sheboygan Wisconsin
I literally JUST picked up my car from the shop bc I got the Cattman Y pipe installed....................MY TONE IS GONE!!! ugh....idk bout this one. Not gonna lie its a great power increase but eek..it sounds alot deeper and a little raspy. :/
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 03:20 PM
  #75  
Mynameismcgyver's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 203
From: Long Island, NY
Good luck trying to find a MEGAN. I searched for a full day a few weeks ago. I was told anywhere from 1.5 months to 4 months backorder. YIKES!
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 06:32 PM
  #76  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
Originally Posted by *2003MaxipadSE*
I literally JUST picked up my car from the shop bc I got the Cattman Y pipe installed....................MY TONE IS GONE!!! ugh....idk bout this one. Not gonna lie its a great power increase but eek..it sounds alot deeper and a little raspy. :/
man, you have quite the choice in performance mods
Homemade intake > Injen
Headers > Ypipe... you probebly just added 20whp with I/Y/E when you couldve yeild 20whp with just headers... i guess if thats what you like though... i believe you sr. have spent the most for minimal gains
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 07:39 PM
  #77  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Originally Posted by *2003MaxipadSE*
I literally JUST picked up my car from the shop bc I got the Cattman Y pipe installed....................MY TONE IS GONE!!! ugh....idk bout this one. Not gonna lie its a great power increase but eek..it sounds alot deeper and a little raspy. :/
Well... Yeah that's what happens. After my headers+y I lost the deap throaty sound I loved to a annoying rasp. Had two resonators put on and it's TONS better. However only thing missing now to get me to that awesome sound is a fast cat....... Yeah, People say "I'll get over the sound for the performance" till they actually hear an non resonated headers+y combo.........
Old Mar 16, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #78  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Originally Posted by Grand_hustle17
man, you have quite the choice in performance mods
Homemade intake > Injen
Headers > Ypipe... you probebly just added 20whp with I/Y/E when you couldve yeild 20whp with just headers... i guess if thats what you like though... i believe you sr. have spent the most for minimal gains
I doubt 20..... That means if he gets headers 1+1=2.. Which would mean he'd yeild 40whp with i/h/y/e? I get what you mean though.

I'd assume maybe 10. Intake won't do much w.o a good tune. And 2.5" exhaust is a good step up but definitely arguable. However to fully put that i/h/y/e to it's full potential you need a tune.

Have you got one g-hustle? If so what are you running to tune it with?
I'm starting to pull towards the vafc-2/
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 09:09 AM
  #79  
*2003MaxipadSE*'s Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 15
From: Sheboygan Wisconsin
I agree with the sound vs performance comment.. I gotta say I dont care for the raspy sound I got but WOW do I love the performance gains. Real question is...was it worth it? Next step for me is going to be tuning...and im not sure what to go with either..Apexi Neo with a few hrs of dyno tuning?..
Old Mar 17, 2010 | 09:48 AM
  #80  
e-subliminal-2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,224
From: Charlotte Nc
Originally Posted by *2003MaxipadSE*
I agree with the sound vs performance comment.. I gotta say I dont care for the raspy sound I got but WOW do I love the performance gains. Real question is...was it worth it? Next step for me is going to be tuning...and im not sure what to go with either..Apexi Neo with a few hrs of dyno tuning?..
With obx, intake and 2.5" catback I'm going with the vafc-2.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:49 PM.