5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

2003 GLE 1st month impressions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2010 | 11:12 AM
  #41  
Eirik's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 496
From: San Diego, CA
Yeah, mods must really affect fuel economy! I got 24.5 mpg, all highway, 70 MPH as my record, and that was with tires that were seriously under-inflated, a clogged/disgusting air filter, and spark plugs with 118K miles on them. 6MT.

Now, with tires aired up to 38 all 'round, cleaned MAF, new air filter, new Mobil1 0W-40, and new NGKs, I average just under 21 mpg. That's conservative driving and about 70% highway mileage.

The government says I'm getting normal fuel economy for the car, so I'm satisfied. I have terrible, terrible generic Goodyears at 245/45/R17, so that surely doesn't help. If you want to feel the road more, try swapping on a 245/35 or 245/45. Wheelspin is waaaaay reduced from the 215s you have on there now.

Yours is, too.

19 city, 26 highway for a 21 combined is much more realistic than the 24 mpg combined sticker that came on the car.

Last edited by Eirik; 09-30-2010 at 11:14 AM.
Old 09-30-2010 | 11:28 AM
  #42  
charlestek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 282
Eirik,

I'm curious to find out what condition your fuel filter is in when you change it.
I looked at the procedure in the FSM, and I would think it is a tough thing to do without getting some fuel splashed in the passenger compartment....

I'm thinking about cleaning my MAF, but haven't figured out if I need to do idle re-learning or whatever after cleaning it.
Old 09-30-2010 | 11:34 AM
  #43  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by charlestek
I'm curious to find out what condition your fuel filter is in when you change it. I looked at the procedure in the FSM, and I would think it is a tough thing to do without getting some fuel splashed in the passenger compartment...
It's actually a pretty simple task, and requires no special skills or tools. Just take your time. This here is pretty much the best write-up on it for our car:

http://www.shiftice.com/fuel_filter.html
Old 09-30-2010 | 11:36 AM
  #44  
RobertColianni's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 183
From: Upper Darby, Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by nelledge
It's already 18.5 gallons. Geesh! How large should it be?
Right?

Craig,
I've obviously done some work to my car and drive swift while avoiding downshift unless breaking. Rolling down a hill in neutral helps alot more than you could ever imagine, so does cruise control at anything consistent over 35MPH.
Old 09-30-2010 | 11:38 AM
  #45  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,588
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by Rochester
It's actually a pretty simple task, and requires no special skills or tools. Just take your time. This here is pretty much the best write-up on it for our car:

http://www.shiftice.com/fuel_filter.html
Anyone have the PN on the seal mentioned in there?

Originally Posted by RobertColianni
Rolling down a hill in neutral helps alot more than you could ever imagine,

Last edited by NmexMAX; 09-30-2010 at 11:51 AM.
Old 09-30-2010 | 09:28 PM
  #46  
Eirik's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 496
From: San Diego, CA
I've gotten a lot of mixed answers to that question, NMexxxxxx. Do our cars turn off the injectors when coasting in gear? I think that answer is yes? I would always coast in neutral and have switched to coasting in the tallest gear possible. We'll see if it makes a difference of any significance.
Old 10-01-2010 | 02:43 AM
  #47  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,588
From: Santa Fe, NM
Yes, the IPW is near 0 when coasting in 'gear'. And when the vehicle is in "N", it 'tries' or ' attempts' to maintain 14.7:1, as the ECU adds fuel in order to maintain 14.7:1. As is verified by my WB. This has been discussed prior, and has been proven.
Old 10-01-2010 | 05:24 PM
  #48  
charlestek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 282
Just filled my tank and got 18.7 mpg from all city driving and one fairly short highway trip. I'll see about cleaning the MAF tomorrow.
Old 10-01-2010 | 06:03 PM
  #49  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Anyone have the PN on the seal mentioned in there?
You mean the O-Ring? I spent $23 at the dealership in May 2009 on both the filter and o-ring together. Just ask them for the fuel strainer, not the fuel filter. Once they find it, the o-ring will be right there too.

Remember, the word is "strainer". Otherwise, the parts guy might not find it.
Old 10-01-2010 | 10:27 PM
  #50  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,014
From: Arlington, TX
Stop romping on it if you want better mileage.
Old 10-02-2010 | 05:34 AM
  #51  
charlestek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 282
Hey I just put a coat of Poli-Seal, two Opti-Seal Coats and one OCW so the car has less drag and better mileage.

Honestly, I drive like a little old lady around town, because you can't go fast in Boston if you wanted to. So the mileage s*cks, and I'd be hoping for at least 20mpg around town.
Old 10-02-2010 | 08:31 AM
  #52  
Eirik's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 496
From: San Diego, CA
@Scottwax: Again, if you are getting the same mileage the EPA says you'll most likely get, nothing is wrong with your car or your driving.
Old 10-02-2010 | 09:13 AM
  #53  
Z-Powered's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 339
From: Stone Mountain, Georgia
To the OP: I think there may be something wrong with your car... I have an '02 auto, and on the highway I average 35 MPG at 65 MPH. I've heard that the trip computer is about 3 MPG optimistic, so I probably average around 32 MPG. I don't do much city driving, so I'm not quite sure what my city average is. I have a short ram intake though, so that may skew my averages upwards slightly compared to yours.
Old 10-02-2010 | 10:32 AM
  #54  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,588
From: Santa Fe, NM
@ 35 MPG.
Old 10-03-2010 | 05:19 AM
  #55  
AMaxima2Envy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by charlestek
I bought a black 2003 GLE automatic about a month ago with 43,600 miles on the odo.

I put new tires (Continental DWS) and new rear calipers on the car (felt the rear wheel getting hot on my first highway trip). I also changed the oil to Mobil One, and changed the tranny fluid and the radiator coolant. I put a set of Hawk HPS pads on front and rear.

My previous car was a black '96 GLE automatic that I sold this week, so that is my reference point for comparison.

In the 2003 Max, compared to the '96, it feels like I'm driving a boat or Land Cruiser. Gone is the nimbleness and road feel of the '96. The road is pretty well insulated from the driver, except for a fair amount of wind noise at highway speeds. The steering wheel diameter feels like it belongs more in a yellow Thomas bus, than a car. I thought the turning radius on the '96 was bad, but it seems worse on the '03.

The car is indeed fast, but again insulated-feeling fast.
Right now I'm one tick mark away from a half tank and I've only got around 130 miles on the trip odo from city driving. Jeez, and I thought the '96 had low fuel economy, this is heartbreaking.

So while my initial impressions seem somewhat negative, as I get more adjusted to the car, I hope I feel better about it. Maybe I will put some stiffer shocks (but not too stiff like the AGX's I put in the '96) in it to firm up the handling.

The fuel mileage, however, I don't think I will get over. I had the car on a highway trip and it didn't do that much better.

everything you said is EXACTLY how I felt when i went from my 4th to 5th gen.
Old 10-03-2010 | 07:44 AM
  #56  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by AMaxima2Envy
everything you said is EXACTLY how I felt when i went from my 4th to 5th gen.
You guys have a few options.

  1. Accept the car the way it is.
  2. Modify the car to address your complaints.
  3. Sell the car and get something more to your liking.
  4. Attempt to commiserate with a community that doesn't share your POV.

Try to pick the less lazy choice.
Old 10-03-2010 | 11:14 AM
  #57  
charlestek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 282
Yeah, mods take time and money, and I've already spent money aquiring the car and changing some needed basics. I think a CAI is my next step, and I emailed Cattman about the installation, but haven't heard back yet. Other than that, I guess I will get a Racingline FSTB.

As far as another car, I did look at an Acura TL when I was also looking at the Max. It has better seat knee/leg accomodations for my 6'4" frame, and except for the 2003 year when there was a bad tranny problem, it should be more reliable. The only issue is that it is a lot more expensive. The fuel economy of the 2004 Acura is 18/26, whereas the Max is 17/24 per www.fueleconomy.gov, which is a little better.
Old 10-03-2010 | 11:56 AM
  #58  
AMaxima2Envy's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by Rochester
You guys have a few options.

  1. Accept the car the way it is.
  2. Modify the car to address your complaints.
  3. Sell the car and get something more to your liking.
  4. Attempt to commiserate with a community that doesn't share your POV.

Try to pick the less lazy choice.
1) i do accept it. trust me. i was simply agreeing with the op. it is ok to talk about something you have experienced with another member. right?

2) there is nothing you can do for a 5.5 to make it feel like a 4th gen. ask another who has gone from one to the other and modded both(me).

3) the 5.5 will be a DD when I get a fun project car.

4) everyone who has gone from a 4th gen to 5.5 basically have the same complaints the op made. where have you been? i'v driven 3rd 4th and 5th all of them back to back, yes i had all 3 generations at one time, and it's night and day between all of them. With them getting progressively worse as they go up in generations in terms of handling, feeling the road, weight(i think 3rd 4th might be close but 5.5 & 6th gen feel so damn heavy), turning radius, etc. of course this is just from MY experience.
Old 10-03-2010 | 12:39 PM
  #59  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by AMaxima2Envy
2) there is nothing you can do for a 5.5 to make it feel like a 4th gen. ask another who has gone from one to the other and modded both(me).
Post #7:

Originally Posted by Rochester
I also went from a 4th gen (1999 SE 5MT) to a 5th gen (2003 SE 6MT). Granted, that was 8 years ago, but your observations are pretty much spot-on. The 4th gen was nimble where the 5th gen is not. Start modifying the car to find your happy-place.
Old 10-03-2010 | 02:44 PM
  #60  
MONTE 01&97 SE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,751
From: Manhattan Beach, Ca / Dallas, Tx
Originally Posted by AMaxima2Envy
i think 3rd 4th might be close but 5.5 & 6th gen feel so damn heavy), turning radius, etc. of course this is just from MY experience.
I still think that the 4th Gen SE was the best handling Max. My 3rd gen IMO did not handle that well (lots of body roll etc), but it felt like a cadillac on the highway. It would hit a bump/dip and that front end would float up and down like the Caddy's of that era.
Old 10-03-2010 | 03:01 PM
  #61  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by MONTE 01&97 SE
I still think that the 4th Gen SE was the best handling Max. My 3rd gen IMO did not handle that well (lots of body roll etc), but it felt like a cadillac on the highway. It would hit a bump/dip and that front end would float up and down like the Caddy's of that era.
I agree about the 4th gen, but only when thrashing it around under highway speeds. The 7th gen has my vote for best highway handling. Coincidentally, I test-drove one yesterday.
Old 10-03-2010 | 11:22 PM
  #62  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,014
From: Arlington, TX
Originally Posted by charlestek
Hey I just put a coat of Poli-Seal, two Opti-Seal Coats and one OCW so the car has less drag and better mileage.

Honestly, I drive like a little old lady around town, because you can't go fast in Boston if you wanted to. So the mileage s*cks, and I'd be hoping for at least 20mpg around town.
If Boston is anything like here in Arlington, your mileage will suck no matter what because the traffic light timing is so horrible. You literally stop at every single light, day or night. My last tank was right at 19 mpg with an average speed of 31...and that included a 90 mile freeway round trip. When I was in Phoenix in February, I was getting 22.5 mpg city because they time the lights to the speed limit. Go the speed limit and you keep on driving.
Old 10-03-2010 | 11:27 PM
  #63  
Scottwax's Avatar
That's Mr. Detail to you
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,014
From: Arlington, TX
Originally Posted by Eirik
@Scottwax: Again, if you are getting the same mileage the EPA says you'll most likely get, nothing is wrong with your car or your driving.
On the freeway, I'd agree. Best I've ever had on a road trip was a touch over 27 mpg, but mostly I am right around 26 mpg. However, in town there are a lot of things you can do to improve on the EPA rating, like coasting towards red lights that you know are going to change so you don't slow down a lot and then have to accelerate. On hilly roads letting your speed drop a bit as you go up and picking it back up on the way down. Places like Phoenix when during off peak hours and excellent traffic light timing, you can drive miles at 45 mph and end up with pretty decent city mileage.

Lots of times here I am in the 17-18 mpg range because my average speed is 24-25 mph due to horrible traffic and light synchronization. Really nothing I can do here to improve my mileage without being one of those obnoxious hyper mileage Prius drivers.
Old 10-04-2010 | 07:30 AM
  #64  
charlestek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 282
Scottwax,

Yeah, there is a stop sign or light at about every block, and frequently lights that make you wait many minutes. The lower mileage is particularly noticeable coming from a 4th generation car, where the mpg was reasonably better. I'll have to get used to it, and hope gas prices don't skyrocket as the economy gets better; I mean IF the economy gets better....

BTW, what do you recommend for dashboard vinyl use? I have some Meguairs dash trim foam, but after using Lexol cleaner and conditioner for the leather, I was wondering if their Vinylex was better.

Last edited by charlestek; 10-04-2010 at 07:33 AM.
Old 10-05-2010 | 06:44 AM
  #65  
crystalline's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 127
From: MA
Originally Posted by charlestek
I bought a black 2003 GLE automatic about a month ago with 43,600 miles on the odo.

I put new tires (Continental DWS) and new rear calipers on the car (felt the rear wheel getting hot on my first highway trip). I also changed the oil to Mobil One, and changed the tranny fluid and the radiator coolant. I put a set of Hawk HPS pads on front and rear.

My previous car was a black '96 GLE automatic that I sold this week, so that is my reference point for comparison.

In the 2003 Max, compared to the '96, it feels like I'm driving a boat or Land Cruiser. Gone is the nimbleness and road feel of the '96. The road is pretty well insulated from the driver, except for a fair amount of wind noise at highway speeds. The steering wheel diameter feels like it belongs more in a yellow Thomas bus, than a car. I thought the turning radius on the '96 was bad, but it seems worse on the '03.

The car is indeed fast, but again insulated-feeling fast.
Right now I'm one tick mark away from a half tank and I've only got around 130 miles on the trip odo from city driving. Jeez, and I thought the '96 had low fuel economy, this is heartbreaking.

So while my initial impressions seem somewhat negative, as I get more adjusted to the car, I hope I feel better about it. Maybe I will put some stiffer shocks (but not too stiff like the AGX's I put in the '96) in it to firm up the handling.

The fuel mileage, however, I don't think I will get over. I had the car on a highway trip and it didn't do that much better.
One of the best things about the 5.5 gen is how well it responds to modding. My car has gone from horrible floating boat to a great confident drive over the course of the last year. My gas millage has also gone from 16 to 18 to 22 to 24. I know it takes $$$ and my mod list is starting to get respectably long but I really enjoy the way the car drives now. Its like a totally different machine than stock.

Previous cars for reference
96 maxima se auto 04 explorer 99 explorer 87 mustang gt 5 speed.
Current cars 02 maxima se 6 speed 02 rsx type s 6 speed
Old 10-06-2010 | 03:09 PM
  #66  
charlestek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 282
I hope I can do some mods. I'm at 114 miles or so and getting close to a half tank......
I filled the tank and calculated 14.7mpg

Last edited by charlestek; 10-07-2010 at 08:35 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Max139617
Members Rides
41
10-19-2016 12:34 PM
captchaos
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
17
03-15-2016 01:18 PM
Excalibur23
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
5
10-13-2015 05:33 PM
wingnut2006
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
4
09-19-2015 07:13 AM
jfl330
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
4
09-04-2015 02:44 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:31 PM.