5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Call me crazy, but....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2011 | 06:16 PM
  #81  
T_Behr904's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10,344
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally Posted by topSpeed
since I am biased I say go for the 03 haha.

the 03 is a very nice ride, and my alternator just died and costing me $400 to fix.

why is the alternator located all the way in the back? lol
Mine is in the front and the a/c compressor has to be dropped to get to it... transverse engines really **** me off
Old Oct 31, 2011 | 07:42 PM
  #82  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,545
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by T_Behr904
After reading this back and forth about transmissions, I'm going to put my two cents in and you all can interpret it any way you wish.

In general, car A, which is stock, with a conventional automatic, may be slower than if it had a manual. Why? Mostly due to more parasitic loss of an automatic compared to a manual, usually fewer forward gears with a wider ratio between gears, and some increased weight. Many cars built throughout the years that have been road tested by numerous sources (t.v. programs, magazines) have published the numbers showing this. As technology has progressed, the number of cars on the road that still run conventional automatics have had that gap in performance shortened between their manually equipped siblings. However, car A with modifications can be just as fast or faster than it's manual option. Aaron's car (NWP) is currently running the fastest N/A Maxima, but it is highly modified and has had major weight reduction done to it. He also runs shorter tires on the front to give him lower "gearing" to offset the automatic's less desirable gear ratios.

There are many variables between different makes and models of cars and how they drive and perform, and their transmissions are part of that equation. It all boils down to your taste in cars, what you can afford in your taste, and your driving style, climate, terrain, etc. You might like car A more with an auto vs. manual. You might go out and test drive car B and feel the opposite. So drive what you can afford, drive what you like, and let's move on...
Well said sir,
Old Oct 31, 2011 | 07:57 PM
  #83  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by 2000_MAXIMA_KING
CAD mod? you lost me Bob.
"CAD" is short for Cool Air Diverter, a gizmo that lowers inlet air temp roughly 7deg F. See this thread. http://forums.maxima.org/5th-generat...-maxima-4.html

Originally Posted by 2000_MAXIMA_KING
Yea the AT selector is not designed at all for manual shifting and if it is its terrible I've been looking at the supra stick since my first max, its an awesome mod basically a way of tuning our trans and according to JIME it can be used to get rid of the hard 1st to 2nd shift that the transgo hd2 kit creates under low throttle by changing the ratios. Its definetely a must do mod you can run it as a "piggyback" for tracking the car etc and want to change your ratios etc, or if you want to run it as a "tiptronic" to shift your car with a click of a button.

It was originally made for supras hence the name since lots of them are ATs and enthusiasts wanted to change gear ratios, shift manually, and basically do what the stock TCM can't do.

You can actually run the suprastick as a stand alone and completely control every aspect of your trans the way you want and make a monster out of it. Its perfect, especially if you have a TCM that's limiting the power of your trans, which can be said of our cars.
Which is why I found it intriguing! Especially when combined with these Paddle Shifters http://www.worksbell.co.jp/en/produc...mn_shifter.htm for 350Z/I35 (that would probably fit the Maxima as well). It would be such a cool setup.

Last edited by BobPezz; Oct 31, 2011 at 08:11 PM.
Old Oct 31, 2011 | 08:01 PM
  #84  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
Well said sir,
My sentiments exactly. T_Behr904, hit the bulls eye!
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 05:50 AM
  #85  
ranmas2004's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,626
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
Originally Posted by 2000_MAXIMA_KING
You basically tried to attack anyone with an AT saying they should be ashamed

Then you tried to say I can't be convinced since I think its made out of GOLD

Again
I already stated why I preferred the AT. And others stated why they preferred the MT and we agreed on the reasons since there are different cases where one performs better then the other. READ THE POSTS. Did you reply with any reasons other then you hated your old 4th gen? NO.

Please show me facts that more MT Maxes were sold then ATs. I'd like to see this, is this a FACT or another one of your opinions that you think is a fact?
Man you dont read correctly. You are so quick to be agressive you skimmed over everything. Perhaps that is why you misunderstood.

I did not say people that OWN AT Maximas should be ashamed. I meant NISSAN should be ashamed making them like that for the Maximas.

I never HATED my 4th Gen Maxima. Don't know where you got that.

I meant to say if everyone was like me Maxima would sell more MTs than ATs. That was my fault.

Basically not on here to get into fights and petty arguements with members......so carry on.
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 06:06 AM
  #86  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
The OP already moved on (See Post #65). You guys should too.

/unsubscribed
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 04:38 PM
  #87  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,545
From: Ontario, Canada
I'm with this guy ^
Old Nov 1, 2011 | 05:00 PM
  #88  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
I'm with this guy ^
Agreed! The quibbling over minutia in this thread has gotten ridiculous.
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 06:21 PM
  #89  
Gotta08MaxSE's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 49
From: Central MA
On the off chance that anyone jumps into this thread based on the original theme (rather than a master's course in transmissions) here's my experience:

I traded down from a '08 SE (base model with moonroof, 40-ish thousand miles) to a 2003 GLE with 59k miles, one owner per Carfax.

What I gave up: Large monthly payments; 18" wheels (with absolutely CRAPPY Goodyear RS-A tires that I don't miss); Aux input on radio (don't underestimate how handy this is); dual-zone A/C (helpful if - like me - your wife or daughter likes the temp to be 20 degrees higher than you do); Intelligent key and all the nice features it entails; larger, more usable trunk with better hinge design and larger pass-through with the seats down; what seemed like a bit more legroom for the driver (and room for bigger shoes as it turns out!); stable on the highway to 100 mph and beyond!

What I gained: No payments; lower insurance premium; HID headlights; Bose 6-disc in-dash stereo; dual power leather heated seats with memory (though I often miss the cloth); heated steering wheel; much better outward visibility in all directions; less obscenely bad turning radius; what feels like slightly quicker off-the-line acceleration (4 AT vs CVT); better armrest design (okay, now I'm reaching); Homelink buttons on the visor where they belong (not on the mirror that ends up not being just where you want it after you open the garage door)

One area where I'm looking for improvement is handling in snow. I'm using the same Pirelli snows I had on the '08 so I'll check back in a few months with an update...I'm sure there'll be a thread where it will be relevant!

I've had the '03 since March and have never regretted making the change. As always your mileage may vary!
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 07:28 PM
  #90  
TunerMaxima3000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,545
From: Ontario, Canada
^Wait, are you telling me the 2003 maxima has better turning radius than the '08???!?!!!!!?!????
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 07:31 PM
  #91  
T_Behr904's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10,344
From: Jacksonville, FL
Originally Posted by TunerMaxima3000
^Wait, are you telling me the 2003 maxima has better turning radius than the '08???!?!!!!!?!????
If that's the case, then 6th gens must have the turning radius of the Titanic... watch out for those icebergs!
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 07:55 PM
  #92  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by Gotta08MaxSE
On the off chance that anyone jumps into this thread based on the original theme (rather than a master's course in transmissions) here's my experience:

I traded down from a '08 SE (base model with moonroof, 40-ish thousand miles) to a 2003 GLE with 59k miles, one owner per Carfax.

What I gave up: Large monthly payments; 18" wheels (with absolutely CRAPPY Goodyear RS-A tires that I don't miss); Aux input on radio (don't underestimate how handy this is); dual-zone A/C (helpful if - like me - your wife or daughter likes the temp to be 20 degrees higher than you do); Intelligent key and all the nice features it entails; larger, more usable trunk with better hinge design and larger pass-through with the seats down; what seemed like a bit more legroom for the driver (and room for bigger shoes as it turns out!); stable on the highway to 100 mph and beyond!

What I gained: No payments; lower insurance premium; HID headlights; Bose 6-disc in-dash stereo; dual power leather heated seats with memory (though I often miss the cloth); heated steering wheel; much better outward visibility in all directions; less obscenely bad turning radius; what feels like slightly quicker off-the-line acceleration (4 AT vs CVT); better armrest design (okay, now I'm reaching); Homelink buttons on the visor where they belong (not on the mirror that ends up not being just where you want it after you open the garage door)

One area where I'm looking for improvement is handling in snow. I'm using the same Pirelli snows I had on the '08 so I'll check back in a few months with an update...I'm sure there'll be a thread where it will be relevant!

I've had the '03 since March and have never regretted making the change. As always your mileage may vary!
Glad to hear there's so much you enjoy about the 03 vs. 08. I love my 01 and I guess the turning radius isn't so bad after all!
Old Nov 3, 2011 | 08:24 PM
  #93  
2000_MAXIMA_KING's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,095
From: Chicago, IL
It might be just me but I bust U-turns in this thing all the time and I don't really see a problem with the turning radius.
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 12:30 AM
  #94  
sparks03max's Avatar
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by 2000_MAXIMA_KING
It might be just me but I bust U-turns in this thing all the time and I don't really see a problem with the turning radius.
It depends on where you do the U-turns. If you have no or little divider, concrete curbs and 2 lanes to turn around in like most 5-lane streets with center turning lane, it can be difficult.
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 04:44 AM
  #95  
BobPezz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 992
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by Gotta08MaxSE
On the off chance that anyone jumps into this thread based on the original theme (rather than a master's course in transmissions) here's my experience: less obscenely bad turning radius; what feels like slightly quicker off-the-line acceleration (4 AT vs CVT); I've had the '03 since March and have never regretted making the change. As always your mileage may vary!
I can honestly say I didn't really notice the poor turning radius until it was mentioned. My prior 91Camry (a smaller car than the Max) didn't turn on a dime either! And not to go off on a tranny tangent AGAIN! But Gotta08MaxSE brings up a good point re: the 4AT criticisms. The CVT in theory should be the perfect transmission, since it can match infinite ratios to driving conditions. But in real world application falls short of it's promise. So like Forrest Gump "That's all I'm going to say about that".
Old Nov 4, 2011 | 09:35 AM
  #96  
2000_MAXIMA_KING's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,095
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by sparks03max
It depends on where you do the U-turns. If you have no or little divider, concrete curbs and 2 lanes to turn around in like most 5-lane streets with center turning lane, it can be difficult.
I edited my post last night but I don't know what happened

Anyway, I was saying that I found that before I turn or U-turn that I veer to the opposite side in order to widen my turn (increase the turn radius) without even thinking about it. I've been doing it all along that I didn't even notice it especially since I used to drive a van, etc. And I noticed this morning that I don't have to do that with my Jetta!

I guess the turn radius does suck I've just found a way around it and gotten used to it and automatically do it without really thinking about it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HOKUSMAX
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
4
Nov 13, 2017 04:34 AM
D Mason
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
1
Jun 21, 2016 04:43 AM
bigfrank
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Oct 1, 2015 12:51 PM
ivorton23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
11
Sep 28, 2015 09:08 PM
Garrettz459
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
1
Sep 28, 2015 02:50 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:38 PM.